Bug#500656: topgit patches from tags

2008-09-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
martin f krafft wrote: I wish people would change subject lines more often... Yes, it was time :-) See #500656. Interesting... With Manoj's arguments and this bugreport, I now paradoxically understand the point in having two separate build/master branches. IIUC, the problem is being able to

Bug#500656: topgit patches from tags

2008-09-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Stéphane Glondu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.09.30.1019 +0200]: refs/top-tags/debian/1.0-1/base and refs/top-tags/debian/1.0-1/tip Doing it that way would pollute the tag namespace, IMO. Yes and no. Normal tags are in refs/tags. I am proposing the refs/top-tags namespace, which

Bug#500656: topgit patches from tags

2008-09-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
martin f krafft wrote: Yes and no. Normal tags are in refs/tags. I am proposing the refs/top-tags namespace, which is reserved for topgit anyway (topgit reserved refs/top-*). Sorry, I didn't pay attention to this. I guess this needs a special cloning/pushing/pulling procedure, then? BTW, you

Bug#500656: topgit patches from tags

2008-09-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Stéphane Glondu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.09.30.1159 +0200]: Sorry, I didn't pay attention to this. I guess this needs a special cloning/pushing/pulling procedure, then? Yes, and that would be setup by tg-remote, which already sets this up for refs/top-bases/*. BTW, you don't talk