I mean a complete patch, including conversion tools and such.
If the team isn't working on a bug for 2 years, that's just
cluttering the BTS for the actual maintainer.
I'm having a hard time assessing how much time you made me waste on
something apparently only you cares about.
- Sylvain
On
Am 28.07.2015 um 10:11 schrieb b...@debian.org:
I mean a complete patch, including conversion tools and such.
The patch was complete back then and the fix includes adding a single
line to your already existing menu file. You can either convert the png
icon to a xpm icon during build time with
Am 28.07.2015 um 13:46 schrieb b...@debian.org:
Hi,
I salvaged upstream from google code, converted svn to git, refreshed
the autotools, integrated appstream contribution from Fedora,
coordinated with usptream, made a new release, extensively tested, and
packaged.
You only complained,
Hi,
I salvaged upstream from google code, converted svn to git, refreshed
the autotools, integrated appstream contribution from Fedora,
coordinated with usptream, made a new release, extensively tested, and
packaged.
You only complained, and now you're trying to provoke me by
questioning my
Control: reopen -1
Hello,
Thank you for adding appstream support to your package.
However the bug which I reported has not been fixed yet. I consider this
wishlist bug fixed when you either a menu icon entry was added to your
menu file or when the menu package has been removed from Debian or
Control: reopen -1
I have provided a patch two years ago.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726209#27
Please stop closing valid bug reports of team maintained packages. If
you are unwilling to apply this trivial patch, I will do it within the
next couple of weeks.
Regards,
6 matches
Mail list logo
