On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 07:46:51 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> El mar., 24 de abr. de 2018 02:47, Niels Thykier
>
> escribió:
> > Scott Kitterman:
> > > On April 23, 2018 10:03:45 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
> >
> >
El mar., 24 de abr. de 2018 02:47, Niels Thykier
escribió:
> Scott Kitterman:
> >
> >
> > On April 23, 2018 10:03:45 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
> wrote:
> >> If I understand correctly and, let's suppose, libQtFoo 5.10.2 is built
> >>
Scott Kitterman:
>
>
> On April 23, 2018 10:03:45 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
> wrote:
>> If I understand correctly and, let's suppose, libQtFoo 5.10.2 is built
>> with a patched compat 12, then all applications rebuilt against 5.10.2
>> would require at
On April 23, 2018 10:03:45 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
wrote:
>If I understand correctly and, let's suppose, libQtFoo 5.10.2 is built
>with a patched compat 12, then all applications rebuilt against 5.10.2
>would require at very least 5.10.2 even if
If I understand correctly and, let's suppose, libQtFoo 5.10.2 is built
with a patched compat 12, then all applications rebuilt against 5.10.2
would require at very least 5.10.2 even if symbols files allowed it to
depend on a minor version.
If this is true is more or less what we are currently
5 matches
Mail list logo