Bug#896464: Passing -V as default

2018-04-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 07:46:51 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > El mar., 24 de abr. de 2018 02:47, Niels Thykier > > escribió: > > Scott Kitterman: > > > On April 23, 2018 10:03:45 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" > > > >

Bug#896464: Passing -V as default

2018-04-24 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El mar., 24 de abr. de 2018 02:47, Niels Thykier escribió: > Scott Kitterman: > > > > > > On April 23, 2018 10:03:45 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" > wrote: > >> If I understand correctly and, let's suppose, libQtFoo 5.10.2 is built > >>

Bug#896464: Passing -V as default

2018-04-23 Thread Niels Thykier
Scott Kitterman: > > > On April 23, 2018 10:03:45 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" > wrote: >> If I understand correctly and, let's suppose, libQtFoo 5.10.2 is built >> with a patched compat 12, then all applications rebuilt against 5.10.2 >> would require at

Bug#896464: Passing -V as default

2018-04-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On April 23, 2018 10:03:45 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer" wrote: >If I understand correctly and, let's suppose, libQtFoo 5.10.2 is built >with a patched compat 12, then all applications rebuilt against 5.10.2 >would require at very least 5.10.2 even if

Bug#896464: Passing -V as default

2018-04-23 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
If I understand correctly and, let's suppose, libQtFoo 5.10.2 is built with a patched compat 12, then all applications rebuilt against 5.10.2 would require at very least 5.10.2 even if symbols files allowed it to depend on a minor version. If this is true is more or less what we are currently