Bug#1067096: ITP: galvani -- reads data from a device with graphical plots and evaluation

2024-04-08 Thread Dr. Burkard Lutz
Am Samstag, dem 30.03.2024 um 11:43 -0700 schrieb Dima Kogan: > "Dr. Burkard Lutz" writes: > > > The actual version ("0.34") is the first which contains all desired > > functions, and after extensive testing I hope that there are only > > minor bugs left. > > Thanks for explaining. > > > >

Bug#960729: More issues trying to create an Ubuntu focal image

2024-04-08 Thread Paride Legovini
Control: tags -1 pending Fixed in master by: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/merge_requests/315

Bug#1068360: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#1068360: samba-gpupdate should be in samba-common-bin

2024-04-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
04.04.2024 10:42, Patrick Hibbs: Package: samba Version: 2:4.17.12+dfsg-0+deb12u1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: hibbsncc1...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, I noticed that the group policy tool (/usr/sbin/samba-gpupdate) in Debian is stored in the samba package. This seems to be a poor choice of

Bug#1068647: python-pot: autopkgtest regression on i386 with NumPy 1.26.4

2024-04-08 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: python-pot Version: 0.9.3+dfsg-1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, your package has a autopkgtest regression on i386 with NumPy 1.26.4. Hopefully relevant excerpt from test log at

Bug#1068646: pyorbital: autopkgtest regression on i386 with NumPy 1.26.4

2024-04-08 Thread Timo Röhling
Source: pyorbital Version: 1.8.2-1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, the pyorbital package has an autopkgtest regression on i386 only with NumPy 1.26.4. Hopefully relevant excerpt from test log at

Bug#1063077: syslog-ng: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs

2024-04-08 Thread Attila Szalay
Ok. I re-checked the patch and realized that I checked the only wrong module (the only one which is arch all and not any). So my apologies for the fuzz and will apply the patch with the appropriate changes. But here my original reply too: I admit that I joined late to this conversation. But my

Bug#1051024: bookworm-pu: package igtf-policy-bundle/1.22-1~deb12u1

2024-04-08 Thread Dennis van Dok
I've uploaded a new version since unstable is already at 1.128-1.

Bug#1068645: RM: rust-lazy-regex-proc-macros -- ROM; content already present in rust-lazy-regex package

2024-04-08 Thread James McCoy
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-lazy-regex-proc-mac...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:rust-lazy-regex-proc-macros User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove rust-lazy-regex-proc-macros should not have been packaged, since it was already

Bug#1068479: cynically closed by Rene Engelhard (Re: Bug#1068479: libreoffice-writer: space between paragraphs missing in spacing and indentation)

2024-04-08 Thread Marvin Renich
* José Luis González [240407 15:00]: > reopen 1068479 > thanks > > Hi all, > > Rene Engelhard seems to be a worse case even than Ricardo Mones. Take a > look at my recent bug reports to libreoffice-writer and his replies. > > In this one: > > > Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > >

Bug#1068644: gnutls-bin: "Fatal error: The encryption algorithm is not supported" appeared with 3.8.5 upgrade

2024-04-08 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
Package: gnutls-bin Version: 3.8.5-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Sanjoy Mahajan File: /usr/bin/gnutls-cli After dist-upgrading today, exim4 could no longer talk to my usual outgoing mail server. I reproduced the problem using just gnutls-cli. The problem started after today's upgrade

Bug#1068643: meep needs an update for Python 3.12

2024-04-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:meep Version: 1.25.0-2 Severity: important Tags: sid trixie patch User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.12 meep (and probably dependent packages) need an update for Python 3.12, e.g. no distutils anymore in 3.12.

Bug#987943: www.debian.org: Developers Reference: Sphinx search non-functional: searchindex.js missing

2024-04-08 Thread Thomas Lange
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 00:35:46 +0200, Holger Wansing > said: >> Can be viewed at >> >> (also with a different html theme, BTW) >> The search works for me. Thanks a lot. --

Bug#1068411: bookworm-pu: package schleuder/4.0.3-7+deb12u1

2024-04-08 Thread Georg Faerber
On 24-04-06 22:31:03, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Please go ahead. Uploaded, thank you.

Bug#1068642: No intuitive way to debug/edit/fix defaults for file types

2024-04-08 Thread Eduard Bloch
Package: xdg-utils Version: 1.1.3-4.1 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/xdg-open Hi, sorry for making this lengthy, but this is first-hand user experience. If TL;DR is wanted, please scroll down to the summary section. This issue has bothered me for a while and I had to report it eventually. I

Bug#1068637: apt does not always install Recommends

2024-04-08 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2024-04-08 12:29:17 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 11:50:04AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > The lvm2 package is installed, but not thin-provisioning-tools, > > though lvm2 recommends it. This can yield a broken system: > > > >

Bug#1068634: libdialog-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdialog.a

2024-04-08 Thread Santiago Vila
Just for the record: I finally used this, in line with the original proposal: Replaces: dialog (<< 1.3-20240307-1~) Breaks: dialog (<< 1.3-20240307-1~) Thanks.

Bug#1068637: apt does not always install Recommends

2024-04-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Control: severity -1 wishlist On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 11:50:04AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: apt > Version: 2.7.14 > Severity: serious > > The lvm2 package is installed, but not thin-provisioning-tools, > though lvm2 recommends it. This can yield a broken system: > >

Bug#1068634: libdialog-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdialog.a

2024-04-08 Thread Santiago Vila
Ok. This is a little bit subtle. I naively tried to simplify the fields by using this: Replaces: dialog (<< 1.3-20240307) Breaks: dialog (<< 1.3-20240307) But this actually means upstream version 1.3, debian revision 20240307, not upstream 1.3-20240307. I guess I should use 1.3-20240307-0 at

Bug#1050588: bookworm-pu: package nsis/3.08-3+deb12u1

2024-04-08 Thread Christian Franke
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: ... Thanks. The bug #1050288 isn't fixed in unstable according to the BTS, which is a requirement. What's the status? The problem described in #1050288 does not longer occur since NSIS 3.09. The problem appeared in Debian 12 because the Mingw-w64 toolchain now

Bug#1068641: plasma-mobile: Record Screen doesn't work, creates 0 byte files

2024-04-08 Thread Russell Coker
Package: plasma-mobile Version: 5.27.10-1 Severity: normal When the end of recording is selected if there isn't a ~/Videos directory then nothing is created. If the directory exists then it creates a 0 byte file. This is on a Librem5. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid

Bug#1068640: clevis-initramfs: clevis early boot DNS fail, no resolv.conf created by ipconfig

2024-04-08 Thread anon2529
Package: clevis-initramfs Version: 19-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: spamthath...@gmail.com The early boot fails to unlock a volume automatically. We get a prompt to unlock a volume (it's a swap volume) but clevis is unable to unlock it automatically because it cannot resolve the Tang server's

Bug#1068639: RFS: redict/7.3.0-1 [ITP] -- Persistent key-value database with network interface (metapackage)

2024-04-08 Thread Maytham Alsudany
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Control: block 1068129 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "redict":  * Package name : redict    Version  : 7.3.0-1    Upstream contact : Drew DeVault  * URL  : https://redict.io/  * License  

Bug#1068638: RFP: mount-zip -- FUSE file system for ZIP archives (read-only)

2024-04-08 Thread Fab Stz
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: mount-zip Version : 1.0.12 Upstream Contact: François Degros * URL : https://github.com/google/mount-zip * License : GPL3 Programming Lang: C++ Description : FUSE file system for ZIP archives (read-only)

Bug#1068634: libdialog-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdialog.a

2024-04-08 Thread Santiago Vila
El 8/4/24 a las 9:18, Helmut Grohne escribió: Package: libdialog-dev Version: 1.3-20240307-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fileconflict Control: affects -1 + dialog libdialog-dev has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack error from dpkg. The

Bug#1068637: apt does not always install Recommends

2024-04-08 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: apt Version: 2.7.14 Severity: serious The lvm2 package is installed, but not thin-provisioning-tools, though lvm2 recommends it. This can yield a broken system: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857142 the fix of this bug being * Make lvm2 recommend

Bug#1068569: RM: nfs-ganesha-ceph [armel armhf i386] -- NBS; ceph dropped 32 bit support

2024-04-08 Thread Christoph Martin
Hi Sebastian, the packages are already removed from testing and unstable. Where do you see a problem? Regards Christoph Am 07.04.24 um 13:21 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: nfs-gane...@packages.debian.org, sramac...@debian.org User:

Bug#1068636: lincity-ng: conflict with older lincity-ng-data

2024-04-08 Thread Marc Glisse
Package: lincity-ng Version: 2.10.1-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, `apt upgrade` failed with Unpacking lincity-ng (2.10.1-1) over (2.9.0-1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-msgcqU/39-lincity-ng_2.10.1-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite

Bug#1068635: screen FTCBFS: pty.c:338:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘openpty’; did you mean ‘OpenPTY’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

2024-04-08 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: screen Version: 4.9.1-1 Tags: patch upstream User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftcbfs Hi, screen fails to cross build from source: | mips64el-linux-gnuabi64-gcc -c -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DETCSCREENRC='"/etc/screenrc"'

Bug#1068610: dico: binary-all FTBFS

2024-04-08 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: tags -1 + patch Hi Adrian, On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 02:03:01AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: dico > Version: 2.11-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > X-Debbugs-Cc: Helmut Grohne Thank you for notifying me. Mea culpa. Patch attached. >

Bug#1068634: libdialog-dev has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdialog.a

2024-04-08 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: libdialog-dev Version: 1.3-20240307-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fileconflict Control: affects -1 + dialog libdialog-dev has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an unpack error from dpkg. The file /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdialog.a is

Bug#1068628: screenshots from Bookworm and Unstable

2024-04-08 Thread Russell Coker
I've attached screenshots showing the problem on Stable 0.11.3-2 and Unstable 0.11.3+~0.9.2+~1.0.0+~0.3.0-2 . -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Bloghttp://doc.coker.com.au/

Bug#1068633: bookworm-pu: package cjson/1.7.15-1+deb12u1

2024-04-08 Thread Maytham Alsudany
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: cj...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:cjson [ Reason ] CVE-2023-50472, CVE-2023-50471 [ Impact ] Segmentation violation via the function

Bug#1068632: dh-exec-install - dh_missing fails when using arch or indep

2024-04-08 Thread Craig Small
Package: dh-exec Version: 0.29 Severity: normal In a multi-binary package, if there is a dh-exec-install .install or .manpages file for one of the packages, then these files are not carried across and logged for dh_install so dh_missing fails if you use the other type of build. For example, on

Bug#1068045: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#1068045: Bug#1068045: libssl3: breaks YAPET

2024-04-08 Thread Kurt Roeckx
There might be a related change that doesn't allow restarting the operation with the same context without setting things up again.

Bug#1068017: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#1068017: util-linux: please ship liblastlog2 packages

2024-04-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 09:19:09AM +0200, Iker Pedrosa wrote: > On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 11:48 PM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > util-linux upstream provides three binary objects to be built: > > - liblastlog2.so > > - pam_lastlog2.so > > - lastlog2 (program) > > > > Debian's PAM policy says to put

Bug#1068631: linux-image-6.6.15-amd64: Using monitor refreshrate above 120Hz i get random black screen for a few seconds at certain actions

2024-04-08 Thread dada007
Package: src:linux Version: 6.6.15-2 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: peter_malmb...@proton.me Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? has been the same problem since kernel 6.5 came out, just opening a

Bug#1068630: rsync: update to version 3.3.0

2024-04-08 Thread antonio
Package: rsync Version: 3.2.7-1+b2 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: antde...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, can you update to the latest version? https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync Thanks, Antonio -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700,

Bug#1068629: jtreg7: please vendor jtreg7 dependencies to avoid the backporting overhead

2024-04-08 Thread Vladimir Petko
Source: jtreg7 Version: 7.3.1+1-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, jtreg7 depends on newer versions of the Java packages such as junit4, junit5, hamcrest, etc. Updating them in the stable releases will require significant effort. Vendoring the dependencies introduces a pattern of packaging

Bug#1068628: nheko: missing some emoji for verification

2024-04-08 Thread Russell Coker
Package: nheko Version: 0.11.3-2 Severity: normal This affects version 0.11.3+~0.9.2+~1.0.0+~0.3.0-2 in Unstable too. About half the emoji are missing in verification, it's a cosmetic issue as the names of the items are there, but it's annoying. I'll attach the screenshots in the next message.

Bug#1068377: python-oslo.messaging: please make the build reproducible

2024-04-08 Thread Chris Lamb
affects 1068377 + magnum thanks Chris Lamb wrote: > Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed that > python-oslo.messaging could not be built reproducibly. The underlying bit of code is actually also causing src:magnum to be unreproducible as well. Regards, --

Bug#1042262: cumin: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 3.11 returned exit code 13

2024-04-08 Thread Riccardo Coccioli
Pyparsing upstream finally made the v3.1.2 release the other day with the fix. So I guess once that lands in unstable it should be ok. On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 12:30 AM Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2023-07-27 13:04:22, Riccardo Coccioli wrote: > > I've checked the issue and opened a bug upstream

Bug#1068560: "Recommends: thin-provisioning-tools" is insufficient or unnecessary

2024-04-08 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: reopen -1 On 2024-04-08 09:35:35 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 11:39:12AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Due to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857142 > > lvm2 currently has "Recommends: thin-provisioning-tools". > > But in new Debian

Bug#1068543: [Pkg-swan-devel] Bug#1068543: strongswan: isolation-machine autopkgtest fails: starter IS NOT RUNNING

2024-04-08 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 10:39 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Your package has an autopkgtest, great. I recently added support for > isolation-machine tests on ci.debian.net for amd64 and added your > package to the list to use that. However, it fails.

Bug#1068626: libdwarf-dev: please provide CMake files

2024-04-08 Thread Andrius Merkys
Package: libdwarf-dev Version: 20210528-1 Hello, dwarfutils seem to contain CMake files needed to find libdwarf using CMake's find_library(). However, these files do not seem to be installed into the libdwarf-dev binary package. It might be because the package is currently built using

Bug#1068627: teem: please add support for loong64

2024-04-08 Thread wuruilong
Source: teem Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org Usertags: loong64 X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn Dear Maintainer, The teem package compiles incorrectly on the loong64 architecture, the attached patch solves this problem and has been verified to compile

Bug#1068625: python3-sphinxcontrib.httpdomain: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\s'

2024-04-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
Package: python3-sphinxcontrib.httpdomain Version: 1.8.0-3 Severity: normal Tags: patch When installing this package in unstable (so it is byte-compiled by python3.12), the following warning appears: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinxcontrib/autohttp/flask_base.py:82: SyntaxWarning: invalid

Bug#1068624: RFS: cjson/1.7.15-1+deb12u1 -- Ultralightweight JSON parser in ANSI C

2024-04-08 Thread Maytham Alsudany
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cjson":  * Package name : cjson    Version  : 1.7.15-1+deb12u1    Upstream contact : https://github.com/DaveGamble/cJSON/issues  * URL  :

Bug#1068623: Right patch

2024-04-08 Thread Christian Marillat
On 08 avril 2024 07:15, "Debian Bug Tracking System" wrote: Here is the right patch (missing !m68k) diff -Nru mpg123-1.32.6/debian/libmpg123-0t64.symbols mpg123-1.32.6/debian/libmpg123-0t64.symbols --- mpg123-1.32.6/debian/libmpg123-0t64.symbols 2024-04-05 23:18:03.0 +0200 +++

Bug#1068594: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#1068594: gpg: 100% CPU endless loop after mkdir /etc/gnupg/gpg.conf

2024-04-08 Thread Sune Stolborg Vuorela
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream Control: reassign -1 libgpg-error0 https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libgpg-error.git;a=commitdiff;h=2dc93cfecc7a7b22fd08365a789b8c6c4b8cc36c;hp=92f874e7d1150c44d8c5d4d5e2c2ddf5299e1064 Fixed upstream. /Sune On Sunday, April 7, 2024 7:48:07 PM CEST

Bug#1067916: FTBFS: tests failed

2024-04-08 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 12:58:13AM +, tony mancill wrote: > This may be a naive question, but since we're dealing with a syscall > that passes a timespec, is there a minimum kernel version required for > the time_t 64 userspace? I've never heard anything about this. > In any event, I'm not

Bug#1068591: systemd-container: doesn't list a default package for default-dbus-system-bus dependency

2024-04-08 Thread Raphaël Halimi
Le 07/04/2024 à 19:34, Michael Biebl a écrit : As you correctly noticed, this is a bug/fault in debootstrap. I don't think individual packages should work around that, so I'm included to close this as wontfix (or reassign/merge to debootstrap). Fair enough, I understand. Do you want me to

Bug#1068017: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#1068017: util-linux: please ship liblastlog2 packages

2024-04-08 Thread Iker Pedrosa
Hi, On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 11:48 PM Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Hi, > > * Iker Pedrosa [240403 09:43]: > > Hi Chris, > > > > I have some questions regarding your proposal: > > > >- What is the difference between liblastlog2 and libpam-lastlog2 > >binaries? Upstream util-linux only

Bug#1068623: mpg123: FTBFS Wrong architectures in symbols file

2024-04-08 Thread Christian Marillat
Source: mpg123 Version: 1.32.6-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, These symbols files : debian/libmpg123-0t64.symbols debian/libsyn123-0t64.symbol Contains the wrong architecture name for ppc instead of powerpc and missing m68k The patch below fix this issue. Build tested for powerpc

Bug#1068622: colobot: please add support for loong64

2024-04-08 Thread wuruilong
Source: colobot Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org Usertags: loong64 X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn Dear Maintainer, The colobot package compiles incorrectly on the loong64 architecture, the attached patch solves this problem and has been verified to

Bug#1066055: re: rust-symphonia-core: FTBFS on i386 units::tests::verify_timebase panic

2024-04-08 Thread Fab Stz
FWIW: - I created an issue upstream at [1] - rust-symphonia is required by czkawka #1032030 (+ MR at [2]) [1] https://github.com/pdeljanov/Symphonia/issues/254 [2] https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf/-/merge_requests/583

Bug#1068621: ITP: bisect-ppx -- Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript

2024-04-08 Thread Bo YU
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bo YU X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org * Package name: bisect-ppx Version : 2.8.3 Upstream Contact: Anton Bachin Leonid Rozenberg * URL :

Bug#1068620: rust-nix: please add support for loong64

2024-04-08 Thread wuruilong
Source: rust-nix Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org Usertags: loong64 X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn Dear Maintainer, The rust-nix package compiles incorrectly on the loong64 architecture, the attached patch solves this problem and has been verified to

Bug#1063982: setuptools-scm: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8

2024-04-08 Thread Timo Röhling
* Andrey Rakhmatullin [2024-04-07 17:13]: This works in a current sid chroot, both build-time tests and autopkgests. Timo, do you think we can close this or does something else need to be checked? pytest 8.1 fixed a few regressions, so it is likely that either that or another fix in a

Bug#1068578: RFH: singularity-container -- container platform focused on supporting "Mobility of Compute"

2024-04-08 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Nilesh, On 2024-04-07 15:28, Nilesh Patra wrote: Assistance required with maintaining the singularity-container package. I am not offering help with singularity-container, but do you by any chance know why apptainer is not packaged for Debian? I cannot find a wnpp bug. Thanks for

<    1   2