> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 19:50:16 -0500, Laszlo said:
> Can you please make sure that overlay-root is not included in initramfs.
Yes, it's included.
> Do you have rd.live.overlay.overlayfs=1 set on the command line ?
Yes.
I will do the rest soon.
> Can you please list the output of
Package: snmptrapd
Version: 5.9+dfsg-4+deb11u1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The file /lib/systemd/system/snmptrapd.service ends up with line
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/snmptrapd -LOw -f -p /run/snmptrapd.pid
whereas I guess that should instead be
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/snmptrapd -Lsd -f
Package: texlive-fonts-extra
Version: 2022.20221123-2
Severity: normal
This is a question, which came up, when working on #1026460.
Things are worse: file(1) /does/ have magic for "TeX virtual font data"
but is *that* weak (only 16 bit, 0xf7 0xca at the start of file) it gets
beaten by the
Package: spamprobe
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hello,
You can find enclosed the Spanish translation template to be uploaded with the
latest package build.
Cheers,
--
Camaleón# spamprobe po-debconf translation to Spanish
# Copyright (C) 2010 Software in the Public Interest
# This file
Package: nodm
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hello,
You can find enclosed the Spanish translation template to be uploaded with the
latest package build.
Cheers,
--
Camaleón# nodm po-debconf translation to Spanish.
# Copyright (C) 2009 - 2011 Software in the Public Interest.
# This file is
Package: glibc
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hello,
You can find enclosed the Spanish translation template to be uploaded with the
latest package build.
Cheers,
--
Camaleón# eglibc debconf translation to spanish
# Copyright (C) 2003, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2012 Software in the Public
Package: gitolite3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hello,
You can find enclosed the Spanish translation template to be uploaded with the
latest package build.
Cheers,
--
Camaleón# gitolite po-debconf translation to Spanish
# Copyright (C) 2010 Software in the Public Interest
# This file is
Package: fontconfig
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hello,
You can find enclosed the Spanish translation template to be uploaded with the
latest package build.
Cheers,
--
Camaleón# fontconfig debconf translation to spanish
# Copyright (C) 2004 2012 Software in the Public Interest
# This
Package: clamsmtp
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hello,
You can find enclosed the Spanish translation template to be uploaded with the
latest package build.
Cheers,
--
Camaleón# clamsmtp po-debconf translation to Spanish
# Copyright (C) 2010 Software in the Public Interest
# This file is
Package: apt-src
Version: 0.25.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find the initial German man page translation for apt-src
attached.
If you update your template, please use
'msgfmt --statistics '
to check the po-files for fuzzy or untranslated strings.
If there are such strings,
Package: blhc
Version: 0.13-2
Followup-For: Bug #1019521
X-Debbugs-Cc: rvandegr...@debian.org
Hello,
I also ran into this- moc is now at /usr/lib/qt6/libexec/moc. I think the
attached patch should address this.
Thanks,
Ross
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers
Package: pkgconf
Severity: serious
When a pkg doesn't have its dependencies satisfied, pkgconf --cflags
etc all print an error message and return a failure exit code.
With pkg-config, --exists does this check too, exits with an error and
with --print-errors present, prints the same error as
Hello,
dkg, could you take a look? Thank you.
On Tue 20 Dec 2022 at 06:22PM +01, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: mailscripts
> Version: 27-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221220
control: severity -1 minor
Hello,
On Tue 20 Dec 2022 at 01:21PM GMT, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> This is presumably related to the emacs upgrade from 27.1 to 28.2.
Sort of. The warnings are not new, just that Emacs is showing them to
you, which was an intentional change upstream.
Try (setq
[Emmanuel Bourg]
> android-framework-23 fails to build with OpenJDK 17, Doclava no longer
> works due to the removal of the com.sun.javadoc API:
Is there any hope to have this fixed for bookworm? This bug block the
Android SDK to entering testing.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: reassign -1 libmpv-dev
Control: affects -1 src:mpv-mpris
Control: retitle -1 libmpv-dev: missing dependency on wayland-protocols
On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 18:16 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> [mpv-mpris] failed to build on amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
...
> > Package
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:21:03AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> I've fixed the segfault by applying the patch from [1], but there's one
> issue remaining -- PrusaSlicer fails to initialize GLEW due to [2],
> resulting in the plater screen not showing up, same as this SuperSlicer
> issue[3].
>
>
[Boyuan Yang]
> My current plan is to package the latest upstream release, clean up packaging,
> fix RC bugs, and orphan the package to allow possible external contribution.
I just wanted to let you know that I am using this package, and am very
glad you are willing to help keep it in Debian.
--
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
I make the following observations about this package.
* It relies on perma-unstable rustc features and this is the third time it
has broken in the last two years due to changes in rustc.
* It has no long-term
After a fair amount of head scratching, I tracked this down to a change
in behaviour of the protobuf compiler. Version 3.14.0+ generates
slightly different pb.go files with respect to the timestamp type (and
possibly others):
--- metrics.pb.go.old 2022-11-08 23:31:00.0 +1300
+++
block 1023365 by 1024147
retitle 1023365 Compatibility problems with wxwidgets3.2
thanks
I've fixed the segfault by applying the patch from [1], but there's one
issue remaining -- PrusaSlicer fails to initialize GLEW due to [2],
resulting in the plater screen not showing up, same as this
Hello,
Do you still get this behavior with the LO version provided by bullseye
or bookworm?
Regards,
--
Stéphane Aulery
Hello,
This version oF LO is not supported anymore.
Could you reproduce on with last LO version?
Regards,
--
Stéphane Aulery
Hello,
Does this still happen with a newer version?
Couldn't the Windows manager reduce the window too much, unlike LO?
Regards,
--
Stéphane Aulery
Hello Thomas,
Happy Holidays !
Thank you so much for the follow-up and giving it a try. Since the
test seems to pass in the upstream dracut repo and fail in the debian
package version, I would be inclined to focus on the differences
upstream vs downstream.
> I can't see that the overlayfs
Package: apt
Severity: wishlist
Some packages act as plugins for some other package (the "loader"). To
get consistent results, if the plugin is Multi-Arch: same, then it is
often desirable for it to be installed for every architecture on which
the loader package is installed. I don't think apt
Source: binutils
Version: 2.39.50.20221208-5
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
Up to src:binutils 2.39-8, binutils-${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH} and
libbinutils:${DEB_HOST_ARCH} were coinstallable. Upgrading a system
where both are installed (e.g. binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu and
libbinutils:arm64) fails
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: Samuel Henrique
X-Debbugs-Cc: samuel...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: check-jsonschema
Version : 0.19.2
Upstream Contact: Stephen Rosen
* URL :
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Lucas Nussbaum (2022-12-20):
> Source: debian-installer
> Version: 20220917
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During
Initial packaging work:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/buskill
Discussion with upstream:
https://github.com/BusKill/buskill-app/issues/31
Francois
--
https://fmarier.org/
> I have CC'ed Guillem Jover because *if* this is a change to be supported,
> then it would need dpkg and debhelper to support it.
Great! I look forward to hearing his response as well.
> For this to be possible, it would require two "independent" features in the
> Debian build stack:
>
> C1)
Control: retitle -1 Please make liblog4j2-java depend on junit5
Hello,
In version 2.19.0-1 of liblog4j2-java, the file
/usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/logging/log4j/log4j/debian/log4j-debian.pom
declares the junit-bom artifact as a dependency. It is shipped in junit5.
If this
For the record, the following test also just timed out on i386:
=== RUN TestRulesUnitTest/Long_evaluation_interval
Unit Testing: ./testdata/long-period.yml
panic: test timed out after 20m0s
So perhaps we need to increase the baseline test timeout for _all_ archs
to at least e.g. 30 mins.
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:33:18 -0500, Laszlo said:
>
https://github.com/dracutdevs/dracut/blob/master/test/TEST-20-NFS/test.sh#L178
I cannot reproduce that this works.
It always mounts the nfsroot read-only, but no writeable overlayfs in
tmpfs is available. I didn't found the problem
I am uploading a NMU to fix this. debdiff is attached.diff -Nru lifelines-3.0.61/build/autotools/config.guess
lifelines-3.0.61/build/autotools/config.guess
--- lifelines-3.0.61/build/autotools/config.guess 2022-12-20
23:13:58.0 +0100
+++
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: o...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:otf2
Hello,
The newer version of otf2 uses more atomic operations that previously.
It is able to use the gcc atomic operations, but
Am Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 03:27:53PM +0100 schrieb Jan Altenberg:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 22:45:57 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote:
> > As a new maintainer has stepped up, this cannot be the reason anymore
> > to dump the package. Actually, with the next version of swupdate (one
> > of those handful) I
On 12/2/22 11:23, Eric Mackay wrote:
Greetings Heinrich and Lee,
Reaching out to both of you directly because I'm not sure that replies on the
Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982842 were
actually propagated
I made a merge request to the Debian open-iscsi package
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 22:44:57 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > tags 1026503 + confirmed
> > Bug #1026503 [src:libembperl-perl] ibembperl-perl: FTBFS: Expected 6 more
> > error(s) in logfile
(Thanks for fixing this copypaste mistake!)
> Can confirm as well.
Hi gregor,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > tags 1026503 + confirmed
> Bug #1026503 [src:libembperl-perl] ibembperl-perl: FTBFS: Expected 6 more
> error(s) in logfile
Can confirm as well. Are you already working on it? I've put it on my
TODO list at least, too. :-)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Perl Group ,
Alexander Zangerl
* Package name: libio-termios-perl
Version : 0.09
Upstream Author : Paul Evans
* URL or Web page : https://metacpan.org/release/IO-Termios
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Description
On Tue, 6 May 2014 12:37:31 +0200 Florian Ernst wrote:
Hello there,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:18:19PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Please update old 1.1.3 (2001-09-23) to 1.1.4 (2007-01-01):
>
>http://code.google.com/p/xdelta/downloads/list
This is not available anymore but should have
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Perl Group
* Package name: libdevice-i2c-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Slava Volkov
* URL or Web page : https://metacpan.org/release/Device-I2C
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Description : Control and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Java maintainers
* Package name: hid4java
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Gary Rowe
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/gary-rowe/hid4java
* License : MIT
Description : A cross-platform Java Native Access
Control: severity -1 important
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 11:47:10 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Recent uploads of mutter have had a FTBFS on armhf and sometimes armel,
> with this test failure in "mutter:core+mutter/wayland / xwayland"
In 43.2-4 I've downgraded failures in this test to be
Source: libcap2
Version: 1:2.66-2
Severity: serious
Jutsification: stops other packages from migrating to testing
Hi,
The autopkgtest run for the latest version of libcap2 in unstable
fails on all architectures:
autopkgtest [18:14:20]: test upstream-nonroot: - - - - - - - - - -
results - - - -
Hi Mathieu
On 2022-12-17 14:55:41 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> Hi Mathieu
>
> On 2022-12-12 08:21:40 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags:
Version: 1:2.39.0-1
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 21:22:09 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
The excuses pages tells us that
piuparts is reporting an issue with bin:git-daemon-run during removal:
rmdir: failed to remove '/var/log/git-daemon': No such file or directory
Unknown option: f
deluser USER
Package: libsane
Version: 1.0.31-4.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: 15151...@mail.ru
Dear Maintainer,
The size of the libsane_1.0.31-4.1_amd64.deb package is only about 46 kB
whereas the libsane_1.0.27-3.2_amd64.deb package has a size of 2,1 MB. It looks
Source: misspell-fixer
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package. I noticed
that it regularly fails on nearly all architectures.
Because the unstable-to-testing migration
kworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> &
Source: conman
I have uploaded a NMU to DELAYED/3 to link to the right git repository.
Available as attached debdiff and also in the git repo.diff -Nru conman-0.2.7/debian/changelog conman-0.2.7/debian/changelog
--- conman-0.2.7/debian/changelog 2015-10-29 11:56:06.0 +0100
+++
> Firstly, an installation of Debian without a root password will
> install sudo. Therefore, it does not need to be a dependancy of
> HPLIP.
>
> Secondly, HPLIP will only interact with Debian via a root pasword.
> A user's password with sudo is not acceptable. See
>
>
Package: rust-trust-dns-proto
Version: 0.22.0-1
Severity: serious
01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
rust-trust-dns-proto has an "optional" (in the cargo sense) dependency on
rustls, since collapse_features is used*, this results in it depending but
Dear maintainer,
The NMU that fixed that bug was not acknowledged in the next upload to
unstable, so this bug still affects unstable (but not testing).
Lucas
On 15/05/22 at 20:39 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - confirmed
> Control: tag -1 + unreproducible
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:22:27 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > tags 1009406 + confirmed
> > thanks
>
> Looking again a month later, I can't
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 19:05:37 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Hi Wolfgang,
> > Did you still have the same bug with 7.0.4 (bullseye) or 7.4.3 (bookworm) ?
>
> cc'ing the submitter explitly :)
Wolfgang just confirmed to me in a private conversation that both
bullseye and bookworm are still
Source: vulkan-loader
Version: 1.3.231.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi, could you please consider upgrading to version 1.3.238 when it is fully
released? It is currently needed by the latest release of yuzu[1], a package
I'm maintaining.
By looking at
Control: tags 1026460 confirmed upstream
Hilmar Preusse wrote...
> Not sure if this is solvable, at the fist glance I found no magic byte
> for vf files.
Things are worse: file(1) /does/ have magic for "TeX virtual font data"
but is *that* weak (only 16 bit, 0xf7 0xca at the start of file) it
Trying again, I got this verbose error log:
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x7f689ee7e480, pid=30847, tid=30891
#
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (18.0.2+9) (build
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: sa...@packages.debian.org, pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:satpy
Please remove satpy from s390x where it FTBFS due to test failures and
autopkgtest
Package: sweethome3d
Version: 7.0.2+dfsg-3
Severity: important
Dear maintainers,
The latest version of sweethome3d on my system consistently crashes when
I try to modify an existing file.
This is the error message I get when it crashes:
COntrol: tag -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:28:54 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libio-compress-perl
> Version: 2.201-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Package: mmdebstrap
Version: 1.2.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: wontfix
mmdebstrap fails to bootstrap Debian jessie. When running
systemd.postinst (before libpam-runtime.postinst), it faces:
| chfn: PAM: Critical error - immediate abort
| adduser: `/usr/bin/chfn -f systemd Time Synchronization
Hi,
On 07/12/22 at 08:19 +0100, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> @Lucas: if the rebuild goes fine, will this bug report be automatically
> closed? Otherwise, is there a web page where the results can be tracked?
Not automatically no. Rebuilds are mostly a manual process, with a bunch
of helpers
Control: close -1
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 2:17 PM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> OK then, as you wish, I'll close this ITS, even though they seem to be
> releasing a new version soon.
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 2:14 PM Bastian Germann wrote:
> >
> > Yes, upstream has developed since your ITS.
> > I am
OK then, as you wish, I'll close this ITS, even though they seem to be
releasing a new version soon.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 2:14 PM Bastian Germann wrote:
>
> Yes, upstream has developed since your ITS.
> I am not addressing upstream with this.
> What's keeping you from handing in a new package
Yes, upstream has developed since your ITS.
I am not addressing upstream with this.
What's keeping you from handing in a new package version?
The idea of an ITS is that you send one after three weeks.
This is now open for more than three years.
Hi Simon (2022.12.20_18:59:12_+)
> This appears to be a behaviour change in the build system, and I think it's
> triggered by the new setuptools.
It is. The Debian detection in meson doesn't support the newer distutils
that dynamically sources available schema from the sysconfig module.
I'm
Control: tag -1 + confirmed upstream
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:28:48 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libhttp-daemon-ssl-perl
> Version: 1.05-01-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftb
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: block 1026526 by -1
Control: block 1026751 by -1
Control: block 1026732 by -1
Control: affects -1 + meson python3-distutils src:dbus-python src:libgit2-glib
src:gi-docgen
On Sun, 18 Dec 2022 at 11:11:46 +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> After the 65.5.0-1.1
Control: tag -1 + confirmed upstream
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:28:10 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: clusterssh
> Version: 4.16-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Source: capsule-maven-nextflow
Version: 1.0.3.1+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Control: reassign -1 lazarus
Control: affects -1 + vmg
Hello,
Lucas Nussbaum, le mar. 20 déc. 2022 18:31:46 +0100, a ecrit:
> > Linking ./vmg
> > /usr/bin/ld.bfd: cannot find -lgdk-x11-2.0: No such file or directory
> > /usr/bin/ld.bfd: cannot find -lgtk-x11-2.0: No such file or directory
> >
It's only missing two crates afaik: mpris-player and gstreamer-player.
mpris-player is horribly broken and would require a major rewrite to compile
against the "newer" dbus and glib in debian. my gstreamer-player-sys upload was
rejected by ftpmasters, see #1017905 for background.
cheers
Source: tuxcmd
Version: 0.6.70+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
reassign 1026537 python-cryptography 38.0.4-1
retitle 1026537 python-cryptography fails to depend on python3-cffi
affects 1026537 python-certbot
thanks
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 12:12 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I: pybuild base:240: cd
> /<>/.pybuild/cpython3_3.10_certbot/build; python3.10 -m
Source: wreport
Version: 3.35-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libhttp-daemon-ssl-perl
Version: 1.05-01-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: spyder-kernels
Version: 2.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Ferraris
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, aferra...@debian.org
* Package name: rust-droid-juicer
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Contact: Arnaud Ferraris
* URL : https://gitlab.com/mobian1/droid-juicer
* License
Source: gatk-native-bindings
Version: 1.0.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Package: aws-crt-python
Version: 0.15.3+dfsg-1
Tags: hppa, patch, ftbfs
Package fails to build like this:
cd /<>/build/temp.linux-hppa-cpython-311/deps/s2n && /usr/bin/cc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200809L
-I/<>/crt/s2n -I/<>/crt/s2n/api -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -Wformat
-Werror=format-security
Source: mtree-netbsd
Version: 20180822-6.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 02:22:06 +0100, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Did you still have the same bug with 7.0.4 (bullseye) or 7.4.3 (bookworm) ?
>
> Regards,
cc'ing the submitter explitly :)
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer
Source: php-twig
Version: 3.4.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: gi-docgen
Version: 2022.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: glean-parser
Version: 5.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: clj-digest-clojure
Version: 1.4.9+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: dacite
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: python-pook
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Package: systemd-zram-generator
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: antde...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
At the start of the system this error returns:
× systemd-zram-setup@zram0.service - Create swap on /dev/zram0
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-zram-setup@.service;
Dear Maintainer,
This bug seem still to be there in Debian bookworm.
The nonempty option in allowed_options_exfat seems to make problems. Removing
this options makes it works..
Since the Debian bookworm kernel (6.0, 6.1) will come with an exfat fs driver
and does not support nonempty option:
Source: libcgi-application-plugin-captcha-perl
Version: 0.04-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: python-xsdata
Version: 22.11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: kineticstools
Version: 0.6.1+git20220223.1326a4d+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: pytest-bdd
Version: 5.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pyct
Version: 0.4.7a3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: lmfit-py
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: clusterssh
Version: 4.16-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20221220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
1 - 100 of 388 matches
Mail list logo
