Hi all,
>> No. Without a package as an argument it won't.
Thanks! You're right. Let me write it down here again:
- "apt upgrade" (no argument) will never remove a package, only upgrade
or install
- "apt upgrade pkg_name" will remove, upgrade or install the required
package to
Hi all,
>> (modifiers btw is not a good word. I guess it was never documented so
far partly as this is a rather advanced feature and mainly because naming
things is hard)
yes, we brought it up in our conversation but I agree it was not directly
related to the subject as it was an apt advanced
Hi there,
> If "apt upgrade" is saying that it removes packages, that is a bug, yes.
@david: it is not a bug, apparently.
To put everything in a nutshell:
- "apt upgrade" can remove packages
- "apt upgrade" accepts specific packages to be upgraded
Therefore, this behaviour is expected
Control: retitle -1 apt upgrade : it removes packages when it shouldn't.
which I don't really recommend for the reasons stated above).
Anyway, I think some clarification is needed from the developers to shed
some light on this.
Regards
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 3:12 AM Wesley Schwengle
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:32:24PM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
> > > I
> I see. It looks like `apt upgrade ' behaves as `apt install
> '. Which (to me) is unexpected behaviour, as the man page is
quite
>clear on its behaviour (man 8 apt-get):
Well, clearly it shouldn’t. To begin with, “apt install” should mark a
package as manual installed while “apt upgrade”
u requested.
Regards
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 5:44 PM Wesley Schwengle
wrote:
>
> Hi Miguel,
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 05:09:47PM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
> > > I do not know, at times I'm also wondering why it doesn't do it, but I
> > didn't
> > >
settled
down. I have a feeling that it is the same bug but there is no way to probe
it with this transition going on.
Regards
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:04 PM Wesley Schwengle
wrote:
>
> Hello Miguel,
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:50:12AM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
>
> &
Hi Wesley,
>This problem isn't because of apt, the problem is that gdb-minimal/gdb
> dependencies cannot be satified. A full-upgrade is the equivalent of a
> dist-upgrade which will remove packages to resolve the dependencies. The
> problem you are facing is the t64 transition[1][2] where not
Hi Diederik,
> While 'annoying', this is expected behavior. It tries to load the newest
(-83)
Yes, this is the expected behavior from our Linux kernel. However, I agree
with you and these messages are very annoying and should be removed.
> It could be it wouldn't be shown if it had already found
Hi Diederik,
My bad. Let me explain again. Taking into account the firmware errors:
- Realtek messages are fixed now. There are no actions to be done here.
- iwlwifi: If you are still working on a new version containing the -83
file, that should fix some warning messages but not all of
Hi there,
Downgrading the following packages:
- sddm-themes-breeze
- sddm-theme-debian-breeze
to version 4:5.27.7-2 makes sddm fully usable again with no issues.
It seems some changes have been made on version 4:5.27.8-1 that have broken
sddm.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Hi there,
I can confirm the bug is there. Libraries are not found and NVIDIA driver
fails to build.
Regards
Hi all,
It seems the problem is fixed with the new release (418.88)
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 12:42 AM Debian Bug Tracking System <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>
> You can follow progress on this Bug here: 934648:
>
>
>
> I must first say that I am absolutely not familiar with KDE, the QT
> environment and how it works. But the thread that raises the abort
> doesn't look like it's in the GL libraries code:
>
> Maybe there's some context I'm missing. Forgive me for asking, but are
> you sure this is due to the
Hi Luca,
Here you have the report you asked about the plasmashell. I do not know if
it could be related to a configuration issue, but again very easy to
reproduce. Here you have 2 reports (same error in 2 consecutive log on
sessions).
These crashes are related to the plasmashell (I manually
Hi Luca,
Thanks for the quick answer!
Here you have both report you asked for. Hopefully it will help us to know
where the issue is.
Regards
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Luca Boccassi <luca.bocca...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 20:16 +0200, Miguel Angel Rojas wrot
Hi all,
Vladimir is right, same issue here. Indeed, It is weird to me not so many
people is currently reporting on it, but it is affecting a lot of programs.
Something happens when upgrading to version 0.6.x (I agree at this point)
plasma-desktop is also unable to start and panic (black
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the troubleshooting. I think we have several options here
(as far as I see). We can also combined some of them:
- Modify ifupdown to be aware of networkmanager installation (as you
suggested)
- Modify networkmanager to remove/modify/backup /e/n/i interfaces managed
Hi Anton,
I see you point. I am not an expert on this but here are my thoughts:
- If ckbcomp could not be called at boot time... why this is inside in
/bin/setupcon (which is called at boot time)? Same idea for the other
binaries you mentioned
- How is the preliminary keymap
Package: libopenipmi0
Version: 2.0.16-1.1
Severity: grave
# aptitude install libopenipmi0
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information... Done
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done
The
Hi Michael,
Here is the version I use (I think is the lastest one):
# dpkg -l | grep dbconfig
ii dbconfig-common 1.8.40
common framework for packaging database applications
Thanks for your quick reply.
Today, I've upgrade the rest of the packages you
Hi,
It is confirmed that variable parameters we are using are not the one
zabbix are using right now. The reason why DB_* vars are still working is
for compatibility reason for older versions. Here you have the link:
http://www.zabbix.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11593
Michael, do
23 matches
Mail list logo
