Bug#946987: r-cran-dqrng: Relationship to libpcg-cpp-dev and r-cran-sitmo

Hi Andreas, On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 7:57 AM Andreas Tille wrote: > Both, build-time as well as run-time dependencies are autogenerated. > While the field Build-Depends is created by dh-update-R before the > actual package build, the dependencies are resolved by dh-r in the > ${R:Depends}

Bug#946987: r-cran-dqrng: Relationship to libpcg-cpp-dev and r-cran-sitmo

Package: r-cran-dqrng Version: 0.2.1+dfsg-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, it is nice to see my dqrng packaged for Debian. However, I find the relationship to libpcg-cpp-dev and r-cran-sitmo surprising. Currently libpcg-cpp-dev is a build and run-time dependency while r-cran-sitmo is only a

Bug#642596: Time for version upgrade

Package: fonts-oflb-asana-math Version: 000.907-6 Followup-For: Bug #642596 Dear Maintainer, any news on updating the Asana Math fonts from CTAN? Is there any way I could help? cheerio ralf -- Package-specific info: Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold |

Bug#642596: Time for version upgrade

Package: fonts-oflb-asana-math Version: 000.907-6 Followup-For: Bug #642596 Meanwhile CTAN has version 000.955 . One can query CTAN via a JSON (or XML) API: https://ctan.org/json/2.0/pkg/asana-math BTW, TeX Live on Debian does not contain this

Bug#903819: Am I missing something with symlink_to_dir? Re: Bug#903819: r-cran-rmarkdown: Broken link /usr/lib/R/site-library/rmarkdown/rmd/h/bootstrap-3.3.5/shim

Hi Andreas, On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > No further info is needed. I actually realised the issue before and > fixed it in r-cran-rmarkdown_1.10+dfsg-2. So if you remove > r-cran-rmarkdown_1.10+dfsg-1 and install r-cran-rmarkdown_1.10+dfsg-2 > you will succeed with

Bug#903819: r-cran-rmarkdown: Broken link /usr/lib/R/site-library/rmarkdown/rmd/h/bootstrap-3.3.5/shim

Package: r-cran-rmarkdown Version: 1.10+dfsg-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I called the reprex package to render a minimal example based on an .R file: > reprex::reprex(input="parallelMap-rng.R") Rendering reprex... pandoc:

Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

On 20.11.2017 15:24, Ralf Stubner wrote: > I have given this some more thought and I am now quite sure that this is > indeed an issue in clBLAS, hence the reassign. I have also reported this upstream [1], but got no response from the maintainers. However, I was told by @tmag

Bug#838908: ArrayFire v3.6.0 released

Dear Maintainer, ArrayFire v3.6.0 has been released [1]. Do you plan to package this version? Do you need assistance? Greetings Ralf [1] https://arrayfire.com/arrayfire-v3-6-release/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

reassign 881054 libclblas2 thanks On 08.11.2017 17:31, Ralf Stubner wrote: > I have found another similar bug report: > https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS/issues/20 > > Following the suggestions there I have now build a custom version of > libclblas2

Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

On 08.11.2017 15:38, Ralf Stubner wrote: > However, I have just found a very similar issue > where clBLAS is named as the source of the error: > https://github.com/Theano/libgpuarray/issues/216#issuecomment-232225071 I have found another similar bug report: https://github.com/clMath

Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

ually use clBlast instead (cf https://arrayfire.com/arrayfire-v3-5-official-release/). In the end latest upstream version might solve this issue, but I am not sure. cheerio ralf -- Ralf Stubner Senior Software Engineer / Trainer R Institute GmbH Dortustraße 48 14467 Potsdam T: +49 331 23 70 81 66 F: +

Bug#881054: libarrayfire-opencl3: "INTERNAL KERNEL BUILD ERROR" from af::matmulTN

Package: libarrayfire-opencl3 Version: 3.3.2+dfsg1-4 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? As a trivial example, I am trying to implement an OLS solver based on arrayfire. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?

Bug#838908: ArrayFire v3.5.1 is available

Followup-For: Bug #838908 Dear Maintainer, Meanwhile version 3.5.1 has been released. Any updates concerning packaging newer versions of ArrayFire? Greetings Ralf

Bug#861748: r-cran-rmpi: Loading library fails

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > I think I found it. Do an 'apt-get install libopenmpi-dev' and it will work. I was about to write that 'pkg-config --libs ompi' produces an error and that there is no libmpi.so on my system. After installing

Bug#861748: r-cran-rmpi: Loading library fails

Package: r-cran-rmpi Version: 0.6-6-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, When I try to load the Rmpi library, it fails with an error about a missing shared object file: $ LANG=C Rscript -e "library(Rmpi)" libmpi.so: cannot open shared object file: No such

Bug#742767: TeX Gyre OpenType and wrongly(?) named glyphs

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: The pdf file has then this mapping with fi being named f_i and not fi (why should it) and also carries a tounicode which maps the 1 to unicode e and 2 to unicodes f followed by i. The reference to ff never ends up in the subsetted

Bug#694323: Bug#694324: Bug#694323: [gsfonts] Fonts include copyrighted adobe fragment all right reserved

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Ralf Stubner ralf.stub...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: Wait ... I am not sure either. Maybe fontfoge *also

Bug#694323: Bug#694324: Bug#694323: [gsfonts] Fonts include copyrighted adobe fragment all right reserved

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: Wait ... I am not sure either. Maybe fontfoge *also* contains and adds this code ... I just found the text in the sources of lmodern. For the record: Yes, fontforge does contain the code from Adobe. However, it is

Bug#678079: Minimal example available

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Juhapekka Tolvanen juht...@iki.fi wrote: I hope this is minimal enough: http://iki.fi/juhtolv/tmp/bugreports/LaTeX/02/minimal/ Definitely not. Here is an example that shows that KOMA-Script font commands and fontspec do work together nicely:

Bug#672491: texpower has an unreasonable expansion on its demand for space

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: On Mo, 14 Mai 2012, Ralf Stubner wrote: the actual texpower code now resides in tl-latex-extra. However, I think tl-fonts-recommend is still sufficient for texpower. tlpslifonts is in extra. I stand corrected

Bug#672491: texpower has an unreasonable expansion on its demand for space

On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:47 PM, David Starner prosfil...@gmail.com wrote: texlive-fonts-extra-doc is 68 MB, which is nothing to sneeze at, but the ultimate problem here is that texpower depends (not recommends) on texlive-fonts-extra, which is almost 400 MB. That does look unnecessary,

Bug#648086: texlive-plain-extra: resumemac uses undefined control sequence \nopagenumbers

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Jonathon Anderson anderbubble+deb...@gmail.com wrote: $ pdflatex /usr/share/doc/texlive-plain-extra/plain/resumemac/sample_resume.tex Have you tried using pdftex instead of pdflatex? cheerio ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#647225: texlive-lang-cyrillic: missing font declaration for T2A/aer

Am 04.11.2011 um 13:56 schrieb develop...@doudoulinux.org develop...@doudoulinux.org: Further I'm not 100% sure if ae is really still needed in times of latin modern and cm super. Ralf, are you still on the list? Can you help here? Catching up ... Given Latin Modern, ae is obsolete from my

Bug#647225: texlive-lang-cyrillic: missing font declaration for T2A/aer

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Hilmar Preusse hill...@web.de wrote: On 31.10.11 Jean-Michel Philippe (develop...@doudoulinux.org) wrote: - (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/cyrillic/t2acmr.fd) *geometry auto-detecting driver* *geometry detected driver: dvips* LaTeX Font

Bug#645841: Please include fontconfig config file to enable autohinting

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: What do the font experts here on the list say? - is that safe in all circumstances? - is there a simpler way to specify that (with foundry matching or so?) In case you are hoping for an answer from me: Unfortunately

Bug#610167: kpathsea: I can't find file `zpeurs'.

Hi Sebastian, On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 21:16 +0100, Sebastian Niehaus wrote: Package: texlive-fonts-recommended Version: 2009-11 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I tried to use the \euro sign in tge packages eurosans. However, I get this error message

Bug#604054: log files

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 18:25 +0300, jaakov jaakov wrote: The log files are attached along with the original files. In my case, the text is italics without hyperref and normal with hyperref. I've posted to usenet with a reference to here, Odd indeed. Have you tried loading hyperref after

Bug#598351: texlive-latex-base: Error when using lmodern fonts together with T1 fontenc

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 13:02 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 28.09.10 Eugen Dedu (eugen.d...@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr) wrote: [...] Oh, I see, it's ec package in texlive-latex-recommended. But why does that .tex example file need ec?! Because you're using the lmodern fonts, which use (IIRC)

Bug#598399: texlive-latex-base: Page break after section title

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 20:25 +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote: Note that removing either \paragraph, or \label fixes the problem. [...] \section{Pathologies dementielles} \paragraph{d} \label{boz} prennent en compte 12 patients ages entre 53 What are you trying to label here in the first place? As

Bug#178717: Fix for bug #178717?

Hi Hilmar, On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 21:30 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: I going actually through some old bugs to find out if they are fixed or if they're still present in TL. I tried to check http://bugs.debian.org/178717 but failed. I'm not even able to *compile* the minimal examples

Bug#574676: pdflatex font metrics generation problem when run as a web-server user

On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 07:20 +0200, Wolfgang wrote: The tfm file is located in /home/myuser/.texmf-var/fonts/tfm/Linotype/helveticaneuelt/LY1-HelveticaNeueLTPro-Md-kern-liga.tfm where myuser is the user which runs the PHP scripts. One further question: Can you please post the output produced

Bug#574676: pdflatex font metrics generation problem when run as a web-server user

On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 10:28 +0200, Wolfgang wrote: Ok. Here is the output when starting pdflatex from the shell: [...] [1{/home/myuser/.texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}] [...] And here is the output when I start pdflatex form the browser: [...]

Bug#574676: pdflatex font metrics generation problem when run as a web-server user

Please keep the Bug in CC. Thanks. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:05 -0700, Wolfgang Siebert wrote: I've got exactly the same problem. When I run pdflatex (or latex) from the shell as www-data (or www-user or root) everything works fine. When I run the script from the browser I got pdfTeX

Bug#574676: pdflatex font metrics generation problem when run as a web-server user

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 09:47 +0800, Bal K Paudyal wrote: *(see the transcript file for additional information) !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file ecsx1000): Font ecsx1000 at 600 not found == Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced! Hilmar's comments should help solving the issue of

Bug#574676: pdflatex font metrics generation problem when run as a web-server user

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 22:59 +0800, Bal K Paudyal wrote: I will try Hilmar's idea soon. Ralf's suggestion did not work. May be because I am using using CJKutf8 package, does this have anything to do ? That might be the case, but it is difficult to tell without a minimal example

Bug#573548: texlive-latex-base: [ and ] symbols does not work properly in the environment aligned of amsmath

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:28 +0100, Sergio Llorente wrote: $$ \begin{aligned} [z]=[y] \end{aligned} $$ $[z]$ is missing! The aligned environment accepts an optional argument. Here it thinks your [z] is the argument. One solution would be to use \begin{equation*}

Bug#547978: lmodern doesn't fix

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 17:19 -0400, Dennis Boone wrote: This is also not fixed with TL2009, so it might be useful to forward that to the author of the envlabl package. Since the package was last touched around 1997 I would not expect too much, and better suggest using a different

Bug#518800: texlive-pictures: Font lams1 not found by package lamsarrows

retitle 518800 lamsarrow.sty is non-free severity 518800 serious thanks On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 14:11 -0400, Dylan Thurston wrote: The package 'lamsarrow', included in texlive-pictures, does not work, as it attempts to use a font lams1, which does not seem to be currently included in Debian.

Bug#515635: (fwd) Re: Bug#515635: lmodern: No old-style figures in LMTypewriter10.

Hi T. I'm not sure. Does the changelog entry mean that the glyphs moved to different unicode addresses? In 1.00-3, they are at U+F730 - U+F739, as in other fonts like Caslon, Iwona, Kurier. In 1.010x-5, gucharmap shows me substitute characters from some other font at these unicode addresses;

Bug#507652: texlive: does not print math symbols

On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 17:22 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: Now I have the problem that Umlaute (ÜÖÄüöä) are not displayed. Minimal example (also attached). \documentclass{scrartcl} \usepackage[cm-default]{fontspec} \usepackage{ngerman} \usepackage{amsmath}

Bug#506689: texlive-lang-cyrillic: gost71u BibTeX style is not fully compatible with UTF-8

On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 18:07 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: I'm only working closely with LaTeX for a year. I used to think that BibTeX is the one and only solution for the bibliographies in LaTeX, but as it doesn't support Unicode yet, I'm beginning to doubt. Actually, BibTeX + iconv *is*

Bug#512903: tex-common - Fails on purge: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 20

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 22:26 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: tex-common Version: 1.11.3 Severity: serious Automatic build of tuxguitar_1.0.dak-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98 [...] Selecting previously deselected package tex-common. Unpacking tex-common (from

Bug#512903: tex-common - Fails on purge: subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 20

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:16 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: The warnings during install did go away, but during remove, I now get this instead: Removing tex-common ... Purging configuration files for tex-common ... *** ERROR: Need exactly two arguments, got 1 Debian GNU/Linux ucf $Revision:

Bug#508528: texlive-base-bin: dvips without -j0 causes missing characters in output

retitle 508528 dvips should parse referenced PS images to determin used fonts severity 508528 wishlist tags 508528 wontfix thanks On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:35 -0500, Mark T.B. Carroll wrote: Ralf Stubner ralf.stub...@web.de writes: The problem is simply that dvips cannot interpret

Bug#508528: texlive-base-bin: dvips without -j0 causes missing characters in output

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 16:08 -0500, Mark T.B. Carroll wrote: You are correct. I did this a long time ago and completely forgot; apologies for forgetting a way in which I had poked things away from defaults. No problem. I have a habit of having to submit documents to people who require me

Bug#508528: texlive-base-bin: dvips without -j0 causes missing characters in output

Hi Mark, thnaks for your report. On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 21:31 -0500, Mark T.B. Carroll wrote: Package: texlive-base-bin Version: 2007.dfsg.2-4 Severity: normal Note minimal input file and other files below. My texlive-latex-base version is 2007.dfsg.1-4 My ghostscript version is

Bug#507210: poligraf: does not mirror

Hi Michal, On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 03:13 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: AFAICT \mirror does not mirror anything. I tried to include it into my document, and tried the included sample with pdftex and tex. In either case I did not observe anything mirrored. For me it dous work, but only

Bug#448100: texlive-base: Added ams fonts to be used by grace.

On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 17:28 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Here is my attempt to defoma hints for all /usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/type1/bluesky/ fonts. This looks good? Well, I can't say. I don't understand so much about fonts and their properties. Ralf, can you evaluate the work?

Bug#488038: texlive-base-bin: kpsewhere weirdness

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 21:59 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: This code #!/bin/sh IFS=':' kpsepath=$(kpsewhich --expand-path='$TEXMF') for path in $kpsepath do eval FOO=\$path echo $FOO done Just echo's nothing, and therefore, if we replace echo $FOO by a kpsewhich call and the

Bug#488038: texlive-base-bin: kpsewhere weirdness

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 21:38 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: $ for path in $kpsepath; do eval TEXMF=\$path kpsewhich texmf.cnf; done /usr/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf /usr/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf /usr/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf /usr/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf

Bug#487267: texlive-latex-base: no hyphenation patterns loaded for spanish

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 18:53 +0200, Roberto A. Lumbreras wrote: Package: texlive-latex-base Version: 2007-14 Severity: important Hyphenation patterns for spanish are not loaded. The package texlive-lang-spanish is installed and configured. -- Package-specific info: If you report an

Bug#486162: texlive-base-bin: tcfmgr.map and fmtutil.cnf missing

On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 16:17 +0200, Alexander Heinlein wrote: Frank Küster wrote: Alexander Heinlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /tmp/fmtutil.QIq31264 contains: warning: kpathsea: No usable entries in /var/lib/texmf/ls-R. Hm, what is the output of ls -l /var/lib/texmf/ls-R

Bug#486162: texlive-base-bin: tcfmgr.map and fmtutil.cnf missing

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 00:32 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: Do you have $HOME/.texlive/ and if yes, what is therein? I thought the Debian packages use $HOME/.texmf-var and $HOME/.texmf-config instead of $HOME/.texlive that is used upstream. Besides this, I have no idea what's

Bug#470118: tetex-base: Transitional package that should depend and/or recommend tex-foo.

Hi Andrew, On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 19:45 +1100, Andrew Vaughan wrote: Package: tetex-base Version: 2007-13 Severity: serious Hi From the description teTeX is no longer developed upstream, and has been replaced by the TeX Live collection. This is a transitional package to bring

Bug#469450: texlive-latex-recommended: ucshyper forces pdf output

On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:56 +0100, Gábor Braun wrote: Package: texlive-latex-recommended Version: 2007-13 Severity: normal Tags: patch Running latex on the minimal input file produces pdf output instead of the expected dvi. The problem is with ucshyper.sty, which incorrectly passes

Bug#469305: texlive-latex-base: Incompatibility between babel and hyperref results in catcode error in color.sty

On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 16:18 +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: Package: texlive-latex-base Version: 2007-13 Severity: normal Hi, ccreating a PDF file for the document dselect-beginner from DDP fails for language sk with the following error:

Bug#469437: lmodern: New upstream version: 1.106

On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:48 +0100, Gábor Braun wrote: Package: lmodern Version: 1.010x-4 Severity: wishlist I would appreciate if you would package version 1.106 of Latin Modern fonts. Do you have any particular reason for this? Note that that the .otf files have been renamed, as well

Bug#469447: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#469447: texlive-xetex: Wierd error for \textsuperscript with package xltxtra]

Hi Will, down here in the Debian bug tracking system a user reported an error when using \textsuperscript{1} from xltxtra together the LM fonts as loaded by default in fontspec. I can reproduce this with XeTeX, xltxtra and fontspec from TeX Live 2007. Can you comment on this issue? Thanks.

Bug#468493: Wish: Installing texlive without documentation?

On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 18:46 +, Florian Schanda wrote: On Saturday 01 March 2008 13:32:47 Norbert Preining wrote: On Fr, 29 Feb 2008, Florian Schanda wrote: When installing texlive or anything that depends on it (such as prosper), a huge amount of documentation and language specific

Bug#468493: Wish: Installing texlive without documentation?

Hi Florian On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:28 +, Florian Schanda wrote: Package: texlive Version: 2007-13 When installing texlive or anything that depends on it (such as prosper), a huge amount of documentation and language specific things are installed. It would be nice to not have to

Bug#465107: texlive-metapost: missing supp-pdf.tex and supp-mis.tex

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 20:21 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: Does that mean that the *only* file needed is supp-pdf.tex and supp-mis.tex? If they two are enough we could (in 2007 2005 is finished) put them into texlive-metapost which will put them into /usr/share/texmf-texlive/...

Bug#465107: texlive-metapost: missing supp-pdf.tex and supp-mis.tex

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 16:08 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: On Mi, 20 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you mean mptopdf (also in package context)? After all, it seems that even in the modular world of texlive, ConTeXt has to be installed anyway... No, I mean: mpost foo.mp

Bug#466156: Package graphics Error: No driver specified.

On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 21:15 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: is loaded after graphics.sty. If this file is missing on your system, you have likely been bitten by http://bugs.debian.org/425803 I think, after some further fixing it should be sufficient to reinstall texlive-latex-base, and the

Bug#459539: texlive-lang-cyrillic: Really large cyrillic fonts unavailable

retitle 459539 texlive-lang-cyrillic should suggest/recommend scalable-cyrfonts-tex thanks Hi Andrey, On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 16:51 +0300, =?UTF-8?Q? =D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2 ?= wrote: I've tried

Bug#459539: texlive-lang-cyrillic: Really large cyrillic fonts unavailable

On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 18:33 +0300, =?UTF-8?Q? =D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2 ?= wrote: Actually, it just loads times.sty package, which changes the default fonts to Times, Helvetica, Courier. According to $

Bug#461613: texlive-base-bin: xdvi truncates documents on the right

On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 22:55 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Package: texlive-base-bin Version: 2007.dfsg.1-2 Severity: normal xdvi truncates some wide documents on the right, e.g. /usr/share/pari/doc/refcard.dvi from the pari-doc package and /usr/share/doc/gdb/refcard.dvi.gz from the gdb

Bug#459539: texlive-lang-cyrillic: Really large cyrillic fonts unavailable

Hi Andrey, On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:02 +0300, Andrey wrote: Package: texlive-lang-cyrillic Version: 2007.dfsg.3-1 Severity: normal To reproduce: 1) Download and unzip the file http://www-i6.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~dreuw/download/beamerposter-example.zip 2) Run

Bug#367774: Does this one apply to TeXlive?

reassign 367774 texlive-lang-vietnamese thanks On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 16:26 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 17.01.07 Ralf Stubner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 14:28 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: last May you answered in this bug. Can you check whether you think

Bug#456221: texlive-latex-base: does not accept some useful UTF-8 characters

On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 16:26 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 13.12.07 Laurent Bonnaud ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Other characters are concerned (do you need a list ?). Yes please. We'll care then what to do with the problem in question. I'm not sure if this is a missing feature or a bug.

Bug#455364: texlive: Definition caption is not localized for Russian

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 00:01 +0300, Andrey wrote: Package: texlive Version: 2007-12 Severity: minor Most of the environment captions (\tableofcontents, \thebibliography, \theorem etc) are correctly localized for Russian by means of babel package. Definition caption is not localized

Bug#453020: marked as done (texlive: pdflatex fails on long lines when using \sffamily in a custom environment while package microtype is in use)

On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 21:51 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: ! pdfTeX error (font expansion): auto expansion is only possible with scalable fonts. If you load microtype it will try to do font expansion. But you are using OT1 encoded sffamily which is cmss (AFAIR) which is a

Bug#449229: tex-common: texdoc finds html pages from catalogue first

On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 23:03 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: for ETCH: deb(-src) http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ luatex/ Thanks a lot, Norbert! Ralf: Could you please test ... I have no etch but my cow/pbuilder. Thanks! Installation works. texdoclua also works. However,

Bug#449229: tex-common: texdoc finds html pages from catalogue first

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 23:37 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: On Mo, 12 Nov 2007, Ralf Stubner wrote: Installation works. texdoclua also works. However, texdoclua does still find the html page from the catalogue first: Of course, you need tex-common 1.10 (AFAIR) which is still in svn

Bug#450941: texlive-fonts-extra: cannot use mathtime/belleek

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 15:20 +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote: Package: texlive-fonts-extra Version: 2007.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Hello all, I want to use some poster templates and beamer themes that employ the mathtime font (\usepackage{mathtime}). As I understood it, this

Bug#449229: tex-common: texdoc finds html pages from catalogue first

On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 22:19 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * fix texdoc so that it does not matter if a file is compressed or not You could give texdoclua a test, which I sent to the texlive list already, and attach again to this mail. Although I've

Bug#450771: mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for ec-lmr10.

Hi Florian, On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 11:57 +0100, Florian Attenberger wrote: Package: lmodern Version: 1.010x-4 Severity: important following the instructions in the README.Debian.gz ( adding \usepackagee[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{lmodern} ), i get:

Bug#450771: mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for ec-lmr10.

Hi Florian, please keep the bug in the CC list. Thanks. On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 19:26 +0100, Florian Attenberger wrote: On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 03:59:48PM +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote: in order to debug this, we will need some additional information. Please send us the output of the following

Bug#449221: texlive-fonts-extra: bbold broken at some sizes

On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 23:49 -0700, David Dumas wrote: Package: texlive-fonts-extra Version: 2007.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal The bbold font (sans serif blackboard bold) included with texlive-fonts-extra cannot be used at point sizes other than 5,6,7,8,9,10,12,17. Metafont fails with

Bug#449229: tex-common: texdoc finds html pages from catalogue first

Package: tex-common Version: 1.9 Severity: normal ,[ 90TeXDoc.cnf ] | % the default extensions for documentation | TEXDOCSSUFFIX = .pdf:.dvi:.ps:.txt | % we allow some compression methods | TEXDOCSCOMPRESS = :.gz:.bz2 | % put html at the very end, to avoid showing the Catalogue: | TEXDOCHTML

Bug#449069: texlive-fonts-extra: cannot be installed because dayroman.map is missing

On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 20:20 +0100, - wrote: Package: texlive-fonts-extra Version: 2005.dfsg.3-1 Severity: important The package can't be installed because updmap fails while installing the package. Here is the output of aptitude: $ aptitude install texlive-fonts-extra [...] Setting up

Bug#448700: pdflatex format is not enabled

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:57 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: ... because you only have texlive-lang-italian installed. Many other language patterns will break. I could add a conflict, but this is even worth, then you are obliged to either use normal latex with some missing

Bug#447780: texlive-doc-base: Debian's documentation does not mention picins

On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 20:04 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: Back in the days picins was shipped with tetex[-extra] but AFAICS it is non-free due to lack of license information and therefore can't be distributed with Debian. But package texlive-doc-en for example ships the file

Bug#446476: [texhax] Bug#446476: Bug#446476: natbib cannot handle utf8

On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 18:27 -0500, Karl Berry wrote: it is not clear where they get their advice from. Sebastian decided as best he could, many years ago. Very little has changed in the set of recommended TL packages for a long time now. At that time ucs.sty was probably the only way

Bug#446476: natbib cannot handle utf8

On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 14:30 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.10.13.1312 +0100]: So I tried *again* to remove the utf8 characters from the bibtex entries, and this time I guess I got them all (and previously must have forgotten one

Bug#446476: natbib cannot handle utf8

On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:24 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: So I tried *again* to remove the utf8 characters from the bibtex entries, and this time I guess I got them all (and previously must have forgotten one), and suddenly it works. recode --diacritics UTF-8..LaTeX But this can't be, for

Bug#444034: Subject: /usr/bin/pdftex: index formatting broken

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 21:53 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: In any case I really want to see input and output of tetex and output of texlive if possible. If it is really only the index then a simple 10liner should suffice. ACK, especially since the following 7-liner does work correctly when

Bug#442531: tetex-extra: Why do we need all the lang packages?

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:29 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 16.09.07 Elimar Riesebieter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: # apt-get install tk-brief Need to get 249MB/294MB of archives. After unpacking 580MB of additional disk space will be used. In this case post the list of installed

Bug#442849: texlive-latex-extra: Missing documentation cd a CD Cover Class

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 13:42 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: Subject: texlive-latex-extra: Missing documentation cd a CD Cover Class Package: texlive-latex-extra Version: 2007-3 Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** Hello, trying to design CD covers I looked

Bug#442531: tetex-extra: Why do we need all the lang packages?

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:57 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 the mental interface of Ralf Stubner told: On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:29 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 16.09.07 Elimar Riesebieter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: # apt-get install tk-brief Need to get

Bug#441526: lmodern: updmap-sys failed.

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 17:18 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: But in your case !!! ERROR! The map file `dvips35.map' has not been found at all. this is strange, because dvips35.map IS present, because texlive-base-bin is unpacked. It seems that the problem is that it cannot be FOUND by

Bug#440039: hyperref package requires pzdr font

On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 20:38 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: Victor Stinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: texlive-latex-base Version: 2005.dfsg.3-1 I began to write a book but I get an error from hyperref package. Simply LaTeX example:

Bug#433137: texlive-fonts-recommended: No license information for utopia and fpl

On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:10 -0500, Karl Berry wrote: Regarding the license info for utopia, I added the {README,LICENSE}*.txt files to TL, in texmf-dist/doc/fonts/utopia. Thanks, Karl. One thing I'm wondering about is where the tfm/vf's on CTAN came from. Does anyone know if there are

Bug#438015: problems installing package

On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 12:46 -0400, Claudio Saavedra wrote: [...] english hyphen.tex % do not change! =usenglish =USenglish =american spanish Where does that line 'spanish' come from? It is not in the original 09texlive-base.cnf, and the syntax is wrong. If you want to have

Bug#437365: tipa-doc: include symlinks in /usr/share/tetex/doc

On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 17:42 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: [Cc:ing to debian-tex-maint] * Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-12 01:27]: Package: tipa-doc Version: 2:1.3-8 There should be symlinks to the tipa documentation from somewhere in /usr/share/texmf/doc so that

Bug#439000: dvips command fails in latex2html

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 13:03 -0400, Neil Watson wrote: I have attached a sample file that will produce the same error. I'm not sure how to run the dvips command manually. The errors referenced a file or directory called ./images.dvi but I can find no indications that this was created.

Bug#439000: dvips command fails in latex2html

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 15:19 -0400, Neil Watson wrote: On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 08:56:26PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote: \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx} Removing the option pdftex here solves the problem for me. Actually this option is not necessary here, so it is save to remove it. I agree

Bug#438015: texlive-latex-base: Setup fails when running fmtutil-sys

Raphael Manfredi wrote: Package: texlive-latex-base Version: 2007-11 Severity: important [...] (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/generic/babel/hyphen.cfg ! I can't find file `ushyph1.tex'. Hmm, this bug looks identical to #435812, which should have been solved by 2007-11. Can you please send us

Bug#433138: closed by Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#433138: fixed in texlive-bin 2007-13)

On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 20:54 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: * Move Philokalia-Regular.otf from the documentation to a fonts directory, thanks to Ralf Stubner (closes: #433138) Is this bug really solved? At least in texlive-xetex version 2007-13.np.etch.1 Philokalia

Bug#435428: texlive-latex-base: cp1257.def is wrong

[Please keep the bug report in the CC list.] On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 00:21 +0300, Martins Krikis wrote: 2007/7/31, Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 19:49 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please take a look at the attached file, which is part of sid's TeX Live 2007

Bug#435428: texlive-latex-base: cp1257.def is wrong

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 19:49 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: texlive-latex-base Version: 2005.dfsg.3-1 Severity: normal The same applies to tetex-base as well. Disregarding the fact that file cp1257.def, as provided by the package, causes the following LaTeX error:

  1   2   3   4   5   >