Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-07-29 Thread Ari Pollak
Ah, that makes perfect sense, sorry I missed that entirely. Feel free to do an NMU/git update.

Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-07-28 Thread Ari Pollak
On Jul 28, 2015 11:49 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi m...@debian.org wrote: Leaving the code as it is now, it'd fail almost soon. How so?

Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-07-28 Thread Ari Pollak
Ah, I see now. I missed the upstream patch in the original message. Isn't that also something that would be taken care of by the GEGL dependency though? If built with libgegl-dev 0.3.0, wouldn't gimp then depend on libgegl-0.3-0 anyway, making the source patch redundant? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-07-28 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Ari Pollak a...@debian.org wrote: Ah, I see now. I missed the upstream patch in the original message. Isn't that also something that would be taken care of by the GEGL dependency though? If built with libgegl-dev 0.3.0, wouldn't gimp then depend on

Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-07-28 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Ari Pollak a...@debian.org wrote: Thanks! Should this ticket just be closed then, since gimp could be updated with a binNMU? Well, there's a patch I provided with the initial message for this bug that modifies the upstream source code and this means that

Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-07-27 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Ari Pollak a...@debian.org wrote: If every package depending on libgegl-dev fails to build without libjson-glib-dev, doesn't that mean there should be a regular dependency on it? Yep, you're right. It was something I didn't notice. Thanks for the heads

Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-07-27 Thread Ari Pollak
Thanks! Should this ticket just be closed then, since gimp could be updated with a binNMU?

Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-07-22 Thread Ari Pollak
If every package depending on libgegl-dev fails to build without libjson-glib-dev, doesn't that mean there should be a regular dependency on it?

Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-07-21 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Ari Pollak a...@debian.org wrote: Is libjson-glib-dev supposed to be a GEGL dependency? Yes, it is [1]. Otherwise, the build would fail due to missing dependencies. Cheers. [1]

Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-07-20 Thread Ari Pollak
Is libjson-glib-dev supposed to be a GEGL dependency? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#790421: gimp: please bump GEGL build-dependency to 0.3.0

2015-06-29 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Package: gimp Version: 2.8.14-1+b1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, on June 6th upstream GEGL team released the new 0.3.0 version and I've prepared a new package for it, landed in experimental suite on June 27th. GEGL has only a couple of reverse dependencies: Gimp and GNOME