Bug#1010771: suricata: recieve erros after adding rule list

2022-05-10 Thread Sascha Steinbiss
severity 1010771 normal thanks Hi Tim, I just noticed you also included your suricata.yaml configuration file in your bug report. I think I found the cause of your problem. Let's take a look at a problematic rule: 9/5/2022 -- 14:20:21 - -- [ERRCODE: SC_ERR_INVALID_SIGNATURE(39)] - error

Processed: Re: Bug#1010771: suricata: recieve erros after adding rule list

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1010771 normal Bug #1010771 [suricata] suricata: recieve erros after adding rule list Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1010771:

Bug#965799: marked as done (rasqal: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2022 02:34:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965799: fixed in rasqal 0.9.33-0.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #965799, regarding rasqal: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1006060: rainloop: FTBFS: Error: File not found with singular glob: /usr/share/nodejs/knockout-sortable/build/knockout-sortable.js (if this was purposeful, use `allowEmpty` option)

2022-05-10 Thread Athos Ribeiro
A fix is available as a salsa MR at https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/rainloop/-/merge_requests/2 -- Athos Ribeiro

Processed: Re: Bug#1010824: aiowsgi: Remove aiowsgi from Debian?

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 RM: aiowsgi -- ROM; unmaintained upstream, unused in Debian Bug #1010824 [src:aiowsgi] aiowsgi: Remove aiowsgi from Debian? Changed Bug title to 'RM: aiowsgi -- ROM; unmaintained upstream, unused in Debian' from 'aiowsgi: Remove aiowsgi from Debian?'. >

Bug#1010824: aiowsgi: Remove aiowsgi from Debian?

2022-05-10 Thread Stefano Rivera
Control: retitle -1 RM: aiowsgi -- ROM; unmaintained upstream, unused in Debian Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: severity -1 normal > Shall we just RM it? Got a +1 from Jelmer Vernooij, doing it. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272

Bug#1010578: severity of bug

2022-05-10 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Gianfrance, can you please explain which part of [1] makes you think that this bug warrants a severity of serious? Thorsten [1] https://release.debian.org/testing/rc_policy.txt

Processed: cifs-utils: diff for NMU version 2:6.14-1.1

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 1010818 + patch Bug #1010818 [src:cifs-utils] cifs-utils: CVE-2022-27239 CVE-2022-29869 Added tag(s) patch. > tags 1010818 + pending Bug #1010818 [src:cifs-utils] cifs-utils: CVE-2022-27239 CVE-2022-29869 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1010818:

Bug#1010818: cifs-utils: diff for NMU version 2:6.14-1.1

2022-05-10 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags 1010818 + patch Control: tags 1010818 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for cifs-utils (versioned as 2:6.14-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards, Salvatore diff -Nru cifs-utils-6.14/debian/changelog

Bug#1010824: aiowsgi: Remove aiowsgi from Debian?

2022-05-10 Thread Stefano Rivera
Source: aiowsgi Version: 0.7-2 Severity: serious Filing as RC, to trigger autoremoval. I just spent an hour getting aiowsgi in shape. It hasn't been touched for 4 years upstream, and didn't support Python 3.7. The changes weren't complex, but it seems nobody cares.

Bug#1010822: jupyter-client: autopkgtest regression: Unknown config option: asyncio_mode

2022-05-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: jupyter-client Version: 7.3.0-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of jupyter-client the autopkgtest of jupyter-client fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of jupyter-client

Bug#1010821: pypdf2 breaks xml2rfc autopkgtest: lxml.etree.XMLSyntaxError: PCDATA invalid Char value 1

2022-05-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: pypdf2, xml2rfc Control: found -1 pypdf2/1.27.12-1 Control: found -1 xml2rfc/3.12.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of pypdf2 the autopkgtest of xml2rfc fails in testing when

Processed: pypdf2 breaks xml2rfc autopkgtest: lxml.etree.XMLSyntaxError: PCDATA invalid Char value 1

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 pypdf2/1.27.12-1 Bug #1010821 [src:pypdf2, src:xml2rfc] pypdf2 breaks xml2rfc autopkgtest: lxml.etree.XMLSyntaxError: PCDATA invalid Char value 1 Marked as found in versions pypdf2/1.27.12-1. > found -1 xml2rfc/3.12.4-1 Bug #1010821 [src:pypdf2,

Processed: pypdf2 breaks bookletimposer autopkgtest: Can't get Fields array

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 pypdf2/1.27.12-1 Bug #1010820 [src:pypdf2, src:bookletimposer] pypdf2 breaks bookletimposer autopkgtest: Can't get Fields array Marked as found in versions pypdf2/1.27.12-1. > found -1 bookletimposer/0.3.1-1 Bug #1010820 [src:pypdf2, src:bookletimposer]

Bug#1010820: pypdf2 breaks bookletimposer autopkgtest: Can't get Fields array

2022-05-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: pypdf2, bookletimposer Control: found -1 pypdf2/1.27.12-1 Control: found -1 bookletimposer/0.3.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of pypdf2 the autopkgtest of bookletimposer

Bug#1010818: cifs-utils: CVE-2022-27239 CVE-2022-29869

2022-05-10 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:29:52PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: cifs-utils > Version: 2:6.8-2 > Severity: grave > Tags: security upstream > X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team > > Control: found -1 2:6.11-3.1 > Control: found -1 2:6.14-1 > > Hi, > > The

Bug#1010819: python-svg.path: autopkgtest regression

2022-05-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: python-svg.path Version: 6.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: by...@debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of python-svg.path the autopkgtest of python-svg.path fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the

Processed: cifs-utils: CVE-2022-27239 CVE-2022-29869

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 2:6.11-3.1 Bug #1010818 [src:cifs-utils] cifs-utils: CVE-2022-27239 CVE-2022-29869 Marked as found in versions cifs-utils/2:6.11-3.1. > found -1 2:6.14-1 Bug #1010818 [src:cifs-utils] cifs-utils: CVE-2022-27239 CVE-2022-29869 Marked as found in versions

Bug#1010818: cifs-utils: CVE-2022-27239 CVE-2022-29869

2022-05-10 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: cifs-utils Version: 2:6.8-2 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Control: found -1 2:6.11-3.1 Control: found -1 2:6.14-1 Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for cifs-utils. CVE-2022-27239[0]: | In cifs-utils through

Bug#1010815: src:rust-pretty-assertions: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression

2022-05-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: rust-pretty-assertions Version: 0.6.1-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.1.0-1 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more

Processed: src:rust-pretty-assertions: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.1.0-1 Bug #1010815 [src:rust-pretty-assertions] src:rust-pretty-assertions: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regression Marked as fixed in versions rust-pretty-assertions/1.1.0-1. Bug #1010815 [src:rust-pretty-assertions]

Bug#1010814: src:faketime: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on 32 bit architectures

2022-05-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: faketime Version: 0.9.8-9 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.9.10-2 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days

Processed: src:faketime: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on 32 bit architectures

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 0.9.10-2 Bug #1010814 [src:faketime] src:faketime: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on 32 bit architectures Marked as fixed in versions faketime/0.9.10-2. Bug #1010814 [src:faketime] src:faketime: fails to migrate to testing for too long:

Bug#1010813: mutter: Let gtk4 4.6.3+ds1-2 migrate to testing first

2022-05-10 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Source: mutter Version: 42.1-1 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 src:gtk4 mutter 42.1-1 has a Breaks: libgtk-4-1 << 4.6.3+ds1-2 Therefore, mutter shouldn't be allowed to migrate to Testing until that version of gtk4 is available in Testing. Thank you, Jeremy Bicha

Processed: mutter: Let gtk4 4.6.3+ds1-2 migrate to testing first

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:gtk4 Bug #1010813 [src:mutter] mutter: Let gtk4 4.6.3+ds1-2 migrate to testing first Added indication that 1010813 affects src:gtk4 -- 1010813: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010813 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1010231: marked as done (android-platform-tools dropped symbols (at least causes autopkgtest regression inandroid-platform-art))

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2022 01:56:21 +0900 with message-id and subject line Re: android-platform-tools dropped symbols (at least causes autopkgtest regression inandroid-platform-art) has caused the Debian Bug report #1010231, regarding android-platform-tools dropped symbols (at least

Bug#1006245: marked as done (libwebsockets: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0)

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2022 16:49:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1006245: fixed in libwebsockets 4.0.20-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1006245, regarding libwebsockets: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1006245: libwebsockets: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0

2022-05-10 Thread GCS
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 2:00 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > Upstream's changelog says in v4.2.0: > "prepared for openssl v3 compatibility, for main function and GENCRYPTO" > > So please import that or a later version. While that may provide OpenSSL 3.0+ support, 'prepared' doesn't mean (for me at

Bug#1010657: marked as done (google-oauth-client-java: CVE-2021-22573 - IdTokenVerifier does not verify the signature of ID Token)

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2022 14:34:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010657: fixed in google-oauth-client-java 1.33.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010657, regarding google-oauth-client-java: CVE-2021-22573 - IdTokenVerifier does not verify the signature of ID Token to

Bug#997293: marked as done (pinfo: FTBFS: video.c:112:26: error: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Werror=format=])

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2022 13:19:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#997293: fixed in pinfo 0.6.13-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #997293, regarding pinfo: FTBFS: video.c:112:26: error: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long unsigned

Bug#1006023: marked as done (lombok: FTBFS: [ivy:compile] /<>/src/stubs/com/sun/tools/javadoc/DocCommentScanner.java:4: error: package exists in another module: jdk.javadoc)

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2022 12:48:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1006023: fixed in lombok 1.18.12-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1006023, regarding lombok: FTBFS: [ivy:compile] /<>/src/stubs/com/sun/tools/javadoc/DocCommentScanner.java:4: error: package exists in

Bug#1010804: frogatto: Missing Build-Depends on libopengl-dev

2022-05-10 Thread Robie Basak
Package: frogatto Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic ubuntu-patch *** /tmp/tmpULOMPK/bug_body In Ubuntu, the build was failing with

Bug#1005677: marked as done (apertium-fr-es: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes)

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2022 11:34:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005677: fixed in apertium-fr-es 0.9.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005677, regarding apertium-fr-es: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: 1006341

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1006341 important Bug #1006341 [src:dpdk] dpdk: FTBFS on a bigger box Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1006341:

Bug#1010698: Salsa MR to fix this

2022-05-10 Thread Simon Chopin
I just posted a Salsa MR to fix this issue: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/stunnel/-/merge_requests/1 -- Simon Chopin Foundations Team Ubuntu MOTU simon.cho...@canonical.comscho...@ubuntu.com

Processed: Re: Bug#995242: isc-dhcp-server: omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/-/issues/167 Bug #995242 [isc-dhcp-server] isc-dhcp-server: omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#995242 to the same value -- 995242:

Bug#995242: isc-dhcp-server: omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

2022-05-10 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/-/issues/167 On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:41:23 -0800 Harris Enniss wrote: > We encountered this as well. It seems to be an issue with the way debian's > fork is linked against system bind libraries (i.e. libiscexport-1105); > segfaults

Processed: Re: Bug#995242: isc-dhcp-server: omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/-/issues/167 Bug #995242 [isc-dhcp-server] isc-dhcp-server: omshell returns inconsistent results or segfaults Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/dhcp/-/issues/167'. --

Bug#1005679: marked as done (apertium-eo-en: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes)

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2022 06:34:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005679: fixed in apertium-eo-en 1.0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005679, regarding apertium-eo-en: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1005683: marked as done (apertium-eu-en: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes)

2022-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2022 06:18:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1005683: fixed in apertium-eu-en 0.3.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005683, regarding apertium-eu-en: FTBFS: wrong parameters to apertium-gen-modes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that