Just for background information, Leptonica has a big hulking
API, something on the order of a thousand calls. Upstream
is constantly making tweaks around the periphery, often just
adding more stuff.
In retrospect, it was possibly a mistake for upstream to bump
the soname up to 3 in one of the
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
I've been dragging my feet on this bug because I didn't see
any harm for users in the current situation.
If you decide not to fix the package name, then libleptonica needs to
at least have a Breaks against leptonica-progs and tesseract-ocr from
squeeze. And likewise
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
In retrospect, it was possibly a mistake for upstream to bump
the soname up to 3 in one of the releases. It is also very
hard for me to imagine any scenario where having multiple
versions of Leptonica installed at the same time makes sense.
Here's a patch on top of
Package: strongswan-ikev1
Version: 4.6.4-2
Severity: serious
In 4.6.4-2 the package was changed to make the daemons run as a
non-privileged user instead of root. This breaks my virtual IP setup
(leftsourceip=) because after establishing tunnels pluto runs iproute2
commands which now fail because
tags 679827 + experimental
quit
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
Kernel: Linux 3.5.0-rc3-sonne+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
holisme upstream noticed that this is the relevant variable. Ah.
One less release-critical bug for wheezy. ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 679827 + experimental
Bug #679827 [chromium] chromium always hangs on https://github.com
Added tag(s) experimental.
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
679827:
Hi Pino,
On 2012-07-07 21:58, Pino Toscano wrote:
(As side request: would be possible to have the full compiling/linking
commands being run while doing a Debian build? Otherwise it is
difficult to see how fbreader is compiled.)
It was an upstream choice, but I guess it's possible. Separate
tags 680657 + pending
quit
Hi Salvatore,
On 2012-07-08 02:31, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Attached is a really miniamal patch, but it can be done better ;-)
Works fine, applied, thanks. Upload will follow shortly.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 680657 + pending
Bug #680657 [src:fbreader] fbreader: FTBFS on binary-only builds
Added tag(s) pending.
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
680657:
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 09:33:02 +
with message-id e1snnrs-0006rk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#680657: fixed in fbreader 0.12.10dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #680657,
regarding fbreader: FTBFS on binary-only builds
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:54:55PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Please try the following (on amd64 if possible) in a clean sid chroot:
apt-get install dynare locales(it should install octave-java via the
recommends)
dpkg-reconfigure locales
Package: salome-gui
Version: 6.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hello Debian Science Maintainers,
thanks for your effort to reintroduce SALOME into Debian.
However, it seems to me that one of the licensing issues that
affected the previous package [1] is still present in the
On 18/06/2012 00:20, shawn wrote:
the skia patch here is tested and critical for armel.
I am unable to test the rest cause I am having issues in the linking
stage with chromium 20 with symbols that should be provided by the vpx
library. I was using chromium-browser-20.0.1132.21~r139451-1
Hello ia64 buildd admins,
could you please upgrade the version of dpkg in your buildd
environment to something = 1.16.4 (e.g. the version in testing
(1.16.4.3) or in sid (1.16.7)) and reschedule goobox 3.0.1-5.
Thanks
Helge
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 07:19:52PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann
Hi,
1)
I do not understand what the problem is. the build log I can find, on
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rdfindarch=s390ver=1.3.1-1stamp=1336438441
shows a cryptic error.
2)
is this related to gcc 4.7? the link in 1) says something about illegal
seek and perl.
3)
what does
On dim., 2012-07-08 at 10:38 +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
Package: strongswan-ikev1
Version: 4.6.4-2
Severity: serious
In 4.6.4-2 the package was changed to make the daemons run as a
non-privileged user instead of root. This breaks my virtual IP setup
(leftsourceip=) because after
tags 613842 + patch
thanks
Hi,
attached is a patch that solves the issue for me.
The reordering would have been enough in most cases,
but I wanted to safeguard it a bit :)
No idea how that could have worked in the first place, or did dpkg
accept non-extisting users in statoverrides before?
No
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 613842 + patch
Bug #613842 [spread] Uninstall of spread breaks dpkg
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
613842: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613842
Debian
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:32:25 +
with message-id e1snqf3-wj...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#680428: fixed in lapack 3.4.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #680428,
regarding liblapacke-dev: Can not link against liblapacke
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
upstream released version 0.7.5b on July 2, unfortunatelly just after
the wheezy freeze.
In the upstream changelog
URL:http://fritzing.org/download/history-changes/
the compiler error is mentioned as fixed:
bug fixes:
[...]
armel/linux compiler errors fixed
[...]
Perhaps
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 12:47:15 +
with message-id e1snqtp-0002co...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#669486: fixed in django-auth-ldap 1.0.19-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #669486,
regarding django-auth-ldap: FTBFS: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured:
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 13:02:33 +
with message-id e1snr8d-0003pw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#676800: fixed in octave-java 1.2.8-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #676800,
regarding octave-java: completely breaks octave
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Le 2012-07-07 23:42, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
On 07/02/2012 08:10 PM, Sebastien NOEL wrote:
if you don't have time to test a package after a new build, maybe
it's
time to orphan it and let someone who care about vsftpd to maintain
it.
A syntax error like this one means you don't even bother to
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 12:28:52PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov
un...@debian.org wrote:
Of course I (as the most people) read documentation fully if I stumble
over problem. :)
Unfortunately, you are unable to even answer the most basic questions I asked
you, such as which OS, arch and which perl
On 07/08/2012 03:49 PM, Sebastien NOEL wrote:
yeah right... because uploading lots of untested crap in unstable the
day of the freeze is perfecly acceptable...
you're apparently a DM since 3 months now, and you're being 'already'
very hostile to other people. i don't think this is an acceptable
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 12:11:12PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov
un...@debian.org wrote:
1000 +- 100 hashes with 3-4 fields in 100 asyncs...
test computer has more than 4G RAM.
Good luck having those 4G of ram allocated to your stack - memory
management doesn't work like you think it does.
You
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:47:49 +
with message-id e1snsm5-cv...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#676105: fixed in rbbr 0.6.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #676105,
regarding rbbr: FTBFS: missing build-dependency on ruby-gettext
to be marked as done.
This means that
tags 676126 patch
thanks
Hi Mats,
I'm about to upload an NMU for #676126 (FTBFS due to
some changes in Ruby 1.9).
Changelog is the following:
netsed (1.00b-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Add 05-ftbfs_ruby1.9_testsuite_require_syntax.diff to adjust to
changes
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 676126 patch
Bug #676126 [src:netsed] netsed: FTBFS:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require': cannot load
such file -- test_helper (LoadError)
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 12:40 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 18/06/2012 00:20, shawn wrote:
CXXFLAGS += -mno-thumb-interwork
under the armel section
If i remember well, I was using a similar 0001 patch for libv8 and
using that flag was a better solution. I think it poses problems
with
Hi Paul
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 12:47:41PM +0200, Paul Dreik wrote:
1)
I do not understand what the problem is. the build log I can find, on
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rdfindarch=s390ver=1.3.1-1stamp=1336438441
shows a cryptic error.
2)
is this related to gcc 4.7? the
Package: libblas3gf
Version: 1.2.20110419-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
gimp is segfaulting if 'libblas3gf' is installed. If 'libblas3gf' is not
installed, 'libgegl-0.2-0' complains about it being missing if I execute gimp
(but gimp runs fine
Package: vsftpd
Version: 3.0.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #679710
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
When trying to upgrade to 3.0.4 I got the above error. When I then try to
remove the current version I get
the
Le 2012-07-08 16:19, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
On 07/08/2012 03:49 PM, Sebastien NOEL wrote:
yeah right... because uploading lots of untested crap in unstable
the
day of the freeze is perfecly acceptable...
you're apparently a DM since 3 months now,
(2 years 3 mounts)
i bet you misread
Package: vsftpd
Followup-For: Bug #679710
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
The extra '}' character in line 36 needs to be removed manually by the admin.
Then the package manager can complete the upgrade.
*
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 649384
Bug #649384 {Done: Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com} [gnash] gnash creates
world-readable cookies under /tmp with predictable filenames
Unarchived Bug 649384
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 673987
Bug #673987 {Done: Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com} [python-tornado]
CVE-2012-2374
Unarchived Bug 673987
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
673987:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 679447 normal
Bug #679447 [libcoro-perl] libcoro-perl often segfaults
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
679447:
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:47:11 +
with message-id e1snthx-0003jb...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#676126: fixed in netsed 1.00b-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #676126,
regarding netsed: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in
`require': cannot
Hi!
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
When I applied the mentioned patches, the package did not build. Can
you have a look at them?
I took the patches from upstream and backported them to our 7.1. Current
state is in the packaging git. Feel free to give it a try. Do you want
me to upload the
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:32:16 +
with message-id e1snupa-0006u9...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#680637: fixed in udj-desktop-client 0.5.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #680637,
regarding QSqlQuery::exec: database not open
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On 07/08/2012 05:30 PM, Sebastien NOEL wrote:
you're apparently a DM since 3 months now,
(2 years 3 mounts)
https://nm.debian.org/public/person/m...@twolife.org
says: Debian Maintainer since 2012-03-13
i was hostil with you because you broke at least 2 packages
(i'm affected with bugs
Dear maintainer,
Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed
this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security
Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites
through point releases:
squeeze (6.0.6) - use target stable
tags 679649 + patch
tags 679649 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ruby-image-science (versioned as 1.2.2-1.1) and
will have it uploaded soon.
Cheers
Luk
diff -Nru ruby-image-science-1.2.2/debian/changelog ruby-image-science-1.2.2/debian/changelog
---
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 679848 grave
Bug #679848 [chromium] chromium: everything related to chrome:// is broken
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
forcemerge 679827 679848
Bug #679827 [chromium] chromium always hangs on https://github.com
Bug #679848
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 679649 + patch
Bug #679649 [src:ruby-image-science] FTBFS: cannot find -lstdc++
Added tag(s) patch.
tags 679649 + pending
Bug #679649 [src:ruby-image-science] FTBFS: cannot find -lstdc++
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing
Dear maintainer,
Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed
this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security
Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites
through point releases:
squeeze (6.0.6) - use target stable
Source: libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian
Source: clamfs
Version: 1.0.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: bzr-svn
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: zope2.12
Version: 2.12.23-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: lua-penlight
Version: 1.0.2+htmldoc-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: scim-skk
Version: 0.5.2-7
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
x86_64-linux-gnu-g
Source: libcam-pdf-perl
Version: 1.58-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: libmojomojo-perl
Version: 1.05+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: sitplus
Version: 1.0.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: circuits
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: subvertpy
Version: 0.8.10-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: ed
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: piwigo
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: odin
Version: 1.8.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
cc1: warning: command line
Source: librdf-crypt-perl
Version: 0.002-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: libio-async-loop-glib-perl
Version: 0.20-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: poco
Version: 1.3.6p1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -Iinclude -I
Source: gnome-boxes
Version: 3.4.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules
Source: libio-socket-ip-perl
Version: 0.16-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ruby-rack-test
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian
Source: tunnelx
Version: 20110801-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: qcake
Version: 0.7.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -c -m64 -pipe -I/usr
Source: ffgtk
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I
Source: conduit
Version: 0.3.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Package: python-osmgpsmap
Version: 0.7.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
In a minimal chroot:
$ python -c 'import osmgpsmap'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File string, line 1, in module
ImportError: No module named osmgpsmap
Installing python-gtk2 fixes this problem.
--
Source: libcatalyst-plugin-unicode-encoding-perl
Version: 1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant
Source: tryton-proteus
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: yate
Version: 4.1.0-1~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: osmosis
Version: 0.40.1+ds1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: libconfig-model-backend-augeas-perl
Version: 0.111-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: pyside
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gpsshogi
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: xdotool
Version: 1:2.20110530.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[6]: Entering
Source: gromacs
Version: 4.5.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering directory
Source: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl
Version: 0.57-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: mecab-cannadic
Version: 0.94h-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: pycode-browser
Version: 20120614+git+b041dd2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: scim
Version: 1.4.14-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: libtext-recordparser-perl
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2
Source: libio-async-perl
Version: 0.51-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: glunarclock
Version: 1:0.34.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ipadic
Version: 2.7.0+main-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
dh
Source: ruby-uglifier
Version: 1.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: ruby-execjs
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: weboob
Version: 0.c-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: libfprint
Version: 1:0.4.0-4-gdfff16f-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash
Source: commons-vfs
Version: 2.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
test
Source: plplot
Version: 5.9.9-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles
Source: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant
Source: tomcat7
Version: 7.0.28-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: derivations
Version: 0.53.20120414-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120708 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2
On 08/07/2012 17:12, shawn wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 12:40 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
On 18/06/2012 00:20, shawn wrote:
CXXFLAGS += -mno-thumb-interwork
under the armel section
If i remember well, I was using a similar 0001 patch for libv8 and
using that flag was a better solution. I
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
