[ Moving this to debian-devel, discussion doesn't belong in the bug report. ]
James Troup wrote:
There is no i386 port in as much as i386 maintainers 99.5% of the time
_don't_ compile packages from scratch, which is when over 50% of the
problems (at least on m68k, and judging by the diff's
d) Try using NFS. This slows down the i/o bound resource hog enough to
leave the machine usable for interactive tasks. Yes it's ugly, but
scheduling in 2.0 is suboptimal, and nice doesn't have much effect on i/o,
only CPU. An extra disk dedicated to the i/o hog would probably be better
than an
'got a mail about this mountd bug today. you see the list of vendors -
but as you can see: debian is missing. why? how can we get on this
list next time?
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Appendix A - Vendor Information
Below is a list of the vendors who have provided
Evidently CPAN has a Term-ReadLine package that makes the standard
Term::ReadLine module in perl actually have readline features. I wonder if
someone familiar with CPAN packages would be interested in packaging this up
for debian?
I'd do it myself but I don't know much about CPAN, and I maintain
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, Avery Pennarun wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 06:47:14PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
What I have been doing of late is generating the .d file when the .o file
is built. Nothing depends on the .d file but if it exists it is included.
This makes the .o file depend
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joey Evidently CPAN has a Term-ReadLine package that makes the
Joey standard Term::ReadLine module in perl actually have
Joey readline features. I wonder if someone familiar with CPAN
Joey packages would be interested in packaging this
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
I'm pretty familiar with CPAN packages. I can package up either
Term::ReadLine::Gnu or Term::ReadLine::Perl, or both. They're
currently the only modules available that make Term::ReadLine
effective.
Yes, please :-)
What's the difference between the ::Gnu and ::Perl
my pine cannot display attachments like this but it's only pgp-signed
text:
Details about Attachment #1 :
Type: Application
Subtype : PGP
Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Parameters : FORMAT = mime
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben I'm pretty familiar with CPAN packages. I can package up
Ben either Term::ReadLine::Gnu or Term::ReadLine::Perl, or
Ben both. They're currently the only modules available that make
Ben Term::ReadLine effective.
Joey Yes, please
Heh, oddly enough the Term::ReadLine::Perl module's source name
will have to be:
libterm-readline-perl-perl
*grin*
--
Brought to you by the letters N and C and the number 11.
You forgot Uranus. Goodnight everybody! -- Yakko and Wakko
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Heh, oddly enough the Term::ReadLine::Perl module's source name
will have to be:
libterm-readline-perl-perl
Why not just call it libterm-readline-perl -- it's not going to conflict
with something else..
--
see shy jo
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben Heh, oddly enough the Term::ReadLine::Perl module's source
Ben name will have to be:
Ben
Ben libterm-readline-perl-perl
Joey Why not just call it libterm-readline-perl -- it's not going
Joey to conflict with something
Joerg Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my pine cannot display attachments like this but it's only pgp-signed
text:
[...]
Kann anyone tell me how to add this mime-type?
Try adding the following lines to ~/.mime.types
type=application/pgp \
desc=PGP signature
and the
Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and the following to ~/.mailcap
application/pgp; pgp $1 21 | grep 'Good signature'
^^
Sorry, that should be: %s
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are
/ \ / \ / \ /
Maybe the subject is a bit harsh, but currently users trying to
install Debian on a Notebook face more problems than users installing
it on a desktop computer. Compared with other Linux distributions
Debian fails to install on some Notebooks (for example IBM Thinkpad
770) or requires handcrafted
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
I'm the nethack maintainer. If you wish to package up and maintain
gnomehack, I'd be perfectly happy, so long as you use the same sort
of debian/* files that I use in the nethack package, and if you find
bugs in them you let me know :)
Ok, then, pending 1) some
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
I'm working on it. But even if I get it to compile with Debian
sources, we still would need another soname for this.
I was going to respond to your earlier message(s), but I see you're
ahead of me. Ok, for now, I'm just going to assume that you will work
this all out
Chris Waters wrote:
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
I'm the nethack maintainer. If you wish to package up and maintain
gnomehack, I'd be perfectly happy, so long as you use the same sort
of debian/* files that I use in the nethack package, and if you find
bugs in them you let me know :)
Ok,
Well, now that I'm back from my wonderful little break, has anything been
decided on libjpegg6b (libjpegg62?) It's gettin' kinda close to freeze, and I
was wondering if anything happenedno updates on them in slink
Any word from the maintainer? If not, maybe Steve could upload his fixed
Helmut Metzdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so, what to do now?
Assuming I understand you correctly, and this is a program of your
own, add a call to nanosleep(2) at an appropriate point. You can tune
the positioning and duration of the sleep to balance your needs.
Note that what would be
Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin == Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Fixed by moving #include stdio.h five lines up. I
Martin fixed it but forget about it, since it was *that* easy.
Martin Not even worth mentioning.
Er, in which file? The file
Hi,
I just noticed that when my machine gets shut down cleanly, and there was
an open X session (which gets terminated), the words crash get inserted
into the wtmp, utmp or lastlog (whichever last uses) instead of the normal
log out time.
Does anyone else experience this? Is it a bug or a
Martin Schulze wrote:
Just in case we misunderstand each other, you're not listed in my
list of new maintainers. Thus the new-maintainer have not yet
received your application.
No -- maybe I'm missing something, but the Developer's Reference seems
to say that I should subscribe and lurk in
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 12:54:27PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Ray == Ray J.H.M. writes:
Ray Personally, I'd rather see the packages that still depend on
Ray libstdc++2.8 recompiled for libstdc++2.9 .
Of course, of course, nobody's arguing that. APT will be recompiled
for
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 12:47:46PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Enrique == Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrique About the approved method, I guess it is through the
Enrique bug tracking system, but I don't mind downloading a
Enrique patch, and it means less
On 13 Oct 1998, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Joerg Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my pine cannot display attachments like this but it's only pgp-signed
text:
[...]
Kann anyone tell me how to add this mime-type?
Try adding the following lines to ~/.mime.types
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 12:12:26PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
I have an IBM ThinkPad 380XD. I have found that 2.0.x kernels just don't
work properly, my machine will crash or shutdown during boot. I believe that
the best thing that can be done to support laptops is to create boot disks
with
Hi,
'got a mail about this mountd bug today. you see the list of vendors -
but as you can see: debian is missing. why? how can we get on this
list next time?
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Appendix A - Vendor Information
Below is a list of the vendors who have
I've been struggling with this for a couple of days, so I wanted to
share my solution...
* The story:
If one mounts a NFS directory on a Solaris box, then Solaris just
_assumes_ that there's an rpc.lockd sitting on the other side.
Linux 2.0 NFS implementation doesn't come with the NLM
Chris Waters wrote:
Martin Schulze wrote:
Just in case we misunderstand each other, you're not listed in my
list of new maintainers. Thus the new-maintainer have not yet
received your application.
No -- maybe I'm missing something, but the Developer's Reference seems
to say that I
Joerg Friedrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That might work...
There is a 'pinepgp' package (or was anyway), you could try that one...
Which does NOT provide this feature! Maybe this is a bug :-)
You are of course right... I haven't used pine in years, so... :)
pinepgp only checks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, do we have a consensus?
2.8 should go back in slink, but marked as a oldlib.
All packages which we have source to should be recompiled with 2.8 if
possable?^
On Mon 12 Oct 1998, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
to increase communication betweenm the ports and between porters and
non-porters, I'd propose a new list:
debian-porting
or sim.
I fully support this proposal (The name debian-porting seems fine to me)
No, we haven't enough topics
Can you explain to me what parts of the kernel can or cannot allow
closed source modules? Even the way the system is setup now, any
developer can create a module, and distribute it in compiled form without
source code. I'm not sure how Linus could or couldn't prevent it, unless
I'm
On Wed 14 Oct 1998, Drake Diedrich wrote:
d) Try using NFS. This slows down the i/o bound resource hog enough to
leave the machine usable for interactive tasks. Yes it's ugly, but
scheduling in 2.0 is suboptimal, and nice doesn't have much effect on i/o,
only CPU. An extra disk dedicated to
On Sun 11 Oct 1998, Anthony Fok wrote:
it spitted out the following error messages:
out/template2.o: In function `global constructors keyed to Cursorvoid
*::operator-(Cursorvoid *) const':
[...]
I am using the following on my Cyrix P166+ (133 MHz) computer:
ii libc6
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 01:45:04PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
These commercial sound drivers are a real hassle, since the user must
[valid complaints and security issues elided]
good hardware support is to Linux's success, I don't consider binary-only
support good support at
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 03:36:54AM -0700, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, do we have a consensus?
2.8 should go back in slink, but marked as a oldlib.
All packages which we have source to should be recompiled with 2.8 if
possable?
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 08:53:54PM +1000, Matthew Parry wrote:
As Linux becomes more popular the hardware manufacturers will start
giving away drivers with the hardware, as they do for WIN95/NT/Mac.
If we give them the option to release the drivers as closed source
then most of them will. But
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 01:45:04PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
These commercial sound drivers are a real hassle, since the user must
[valid complaints and security issues elided]
good hardware support is to Linux's success, I don't consider binary-only
support good support at
anyone know what it is in slink which is enforcing idle-timeout and daily
time limits on serial lines?
i've hunted all over (even to the point of grepping every file in /etc,
/bin, /usr/bin, /sbin, /usr/sbin) for it and can't find it anywhere.
how do i turn it off? i don't want time limits.
The problem is that I wrote the program in the first place... And it isn't
tcl,
its perl.. (with perl-tk as the gui-lib).
Oops I messed up the language. Should have checked more carefully. But
still would you mind someone else making the program fit the Debian
guidelines? I
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ Moving this to debian-devel, discussion doesn't belong in the bug report. ]
[ Killed the Cc: line. ]
James Troup wrote:
There is no i386 port in as much as i386 maintainers 99.5% of the time
_don't_ compile packages from scratch, which is when over
hmmm, just rebooted for the first time in 20 days and my sendmail daemon
isn't doing any logging. no problems in /etc/syslog.conf, and sendmail
invoked by pine drops logs in the right places. daemon logs its
invocation and then goes about its business (correctly), but doesn't log
anything as far
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
---
Removed and reinstalled sendmail binary, working again. Mysterious.
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Thomas Lakofski wrote:
From: Thomas Lakofski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 14:05:43 + (UTC)
Subject: sendmail logging disappeared
hmmm, just rebooted
Hi,
I was told recently that people might be interested in some screenshots
of the program. The following page contains three images.
http://www.infodrom.north.de/~joey/Linux/Debian/gdselect.html
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is user friendly ... It's just picky about it's friends.
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:15:51AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
PowerPC has
Pending approval of my application for maintainer-ship, I intent to package
the following for contrib (none will make it into slink):
Package: xwatch
Depends: libc6, libforms0.86, xlib6g (= 3.3-5)
Suggests: syslogd
Description: Xwatch monitors logfiles and displays in an X window.
The
Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's say I write a Qt program (and confirm that it works by
linking it against Qt in the privacy of my own home) and then I
include it (the source code) in a book as a programming example,
and I GPL the whole book.
Philip Hands [EMAIL
Is somebody going to work on this one?
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is user friendly ... It's just picky about it's friends.
---BeginMessage---
Well, just a few letters to announce that gcad 0.0.2 can be
downloaded from:
http://gaztelan.bi.ehu.es/~inigo/gcad
Has anyone looked at panorama and gcad?
panorama:
www.gnu.org/software/panorama/panorama.html
I'll try it soon, but from the web-page it looks like it might be
stable enough to put in what's the name of that forever-unstable¹
distribution?.
gCAD:
gaztelan.bi.ehu.es/~inigo/gcad/
From what I can
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 12:39:34PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I would think that using make-kpkg to create the modules
packages is not a bad idea anyway.
I think it's a great idea, and works really well with pcmcia on my
notebook.
/usr/src/modules/mod-name/, and runs
Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
Has anyone looked at panorama and gcad?
panorama:
www.gnu.org/software/panorama/panorama.html
I'll try it soon, but from the web-page it looks like it might be
stable enough to put in what's the name of that forever-unstable¹
distribution?.
Good luck.
gCAD:
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
So far, Alpha is looking near ready and we are shooting to release with
slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some big
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
So far, Alpha is looking near ready and we are shooting to release with
slink/i386. A caveat, however, is that we need to resolve some big egcs
issues SOON or else we can't
Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
*-Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| gCAD:
| gaztelan.bi.ehu.es/~inigo/gcad/
|
| From what I can tell, this isn't really useful, so I don't know
| whether there is any point in packaging it yet.
|
| I just took a look at gcad. It compiles and runs. During
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
Probably 4-6 weeks. I'd like to ship it before the end of November.
Fantastic!
Guy, is there any problem with freezing the alpha architecture some time
after the main freeze?
About the only thing I'm really concerned with is egcs. As much as I hate
I'm surprised that previews of harmony haven't been packaged yet.
Is it really that unuseable?
Are an Debian developers working on harmony?
PS: I don't know why I have this sudden rush of We should package-
emotions. Perhaps it's a reaction to the freeze.
--
The only way tcsh rocks is when
Okay, everybody... It's that time again. I've gone through the bug logs
and made my list of packages to keep/remove should they still have
release-critical (i.e. critical, grave, or important) bugs at ship time.
The following bugs are for packages I don't think we can ship 2.1 without:
Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
ARM is nowhere near being release ready (we just started).
Cheers,
- Jim
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 02:32:31PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Hi,
I brought it up already but nobody jumped on.
Slink currently cannot be installed on a single-cd system using cd images.
[...]
So, slink is more than 760 Megabytes big for i386 machines. This
does not fit on one single
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Brian ada-rm 27918 ada-rm: This large package should be architecture:
Brian all [0] ()
This is fixed and the bug has been closed.
Sam
- --
Samuel Tardieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset:
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 09:03:25PM +0200, Helmut Metzdorf wrote:
Hi,
[...]
The situation:
a self written programm (i'd like to run 24 hours a day) renders my
computer unusable for any other task. my observation says that the
cause is that my program relies heavy on file-io and my current
perl 27604 Perl @INC needs /usr/lib/perl5 [7] (Darren
Stalder [EMAIL PROTECTED])
perl 27738 perl: @INC does not contain /usr/lib/perl5 [0]
(Darren Stalder [EMAIL PROTECTED])
This doesn't affect the current perl version but the version to be
used in 2.2.
Enrique Zanardi wrote:
Are we going to include apt in the base system? Its package
ordering feature (and a few others) obsoletes the other methods, but
currently apt doesn't work with mountable media. A multi-cdrom-apt
method should be added quick.
NO! It does not _obsolete_ other methods.
Hi,
Going to contradict myself after some more investigation that I've done:
Seems that the latest sysklogd package breaks sendmail's (and cron's, just
checked) logging to syslog -- it works for a few minutes, and then no more
logs. I don't know if this is universal (only checked 2 daemons),
Thomas Lakofski wrote:
Hi,
Going to contradict myself after some more investigation that I've done:
Seems that the latest sysklogd package breaks sendmail's (and cron's, just
checked) logging to syslog -- it works for a few minutes, and then no more
logs. I don't know if this is
Brian == Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Could I get some official word on which architectures wish
Brian to be included in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
I don't think sparc is ready to go, though Johnnie or Eric may see it
differently.
Ultrasparc definately isn't.
Matthew Parry writes:
Why give them the option to release closed source when we can force them
to release free versions?
I don't believe we can.
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill
On 14 Oct 1998, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
Has anyone looked at panorama and gcad?
panorama:
www.gnu.org/software/panorama/panorama.html
I'll try it soon, but from the web-page it looks like it might be
stable enough to put in what's the name of that forever-unstable¹
distribution?.
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ole J. Tetlie)
|
| panorama:
| www.gnu.org/software/panorama/panorama.html
|
| I'll try it soon, but from the web-page it looks like it might be
| stable enough to put in what's the name of that forever-unstable¹
| distribution?.
It compiled OK and it actually seems useful. It
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
hurd-i386 is certainly not ready.
BTW: Considering the great amount of Cc:s in the original post, I have
decided to trim a little bit the
Le Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 05:03:22PM +0200, Martin Schulze écrivait:
http://www.infodrom.north.de/~joey/Linux/Debian/gdselect.html
The startup image isn't available.
But I have a problem with gdselect. The first time I ran it, i
was logged in a non-root account. It worked and was able to browse
*-Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| yagirc24747 yagirc: Binary and Libs for yagirc stored in /bin
and /lib [87] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (David N. Welton))
|
| Davide isn't maintaining this package anymore. Ole, are you taking
| care of this one, too?
Already uploaded. Closing bugs
Quick question: When two bugs are merged, do I need to close both
or will one closing close both, and send a message to both the
submittors?
--
The only way tcsh rocks is when the rocks are attached to it's feet
in the deepest part of a very deep lake. (Linus Torvalds)
[EMAIL
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 05:03:22PM +0200, Martin Schulze écrivait:
http://www.infodrom.north.de/~joey/Linux/Debian/gdselect.html
The startup image isn't available.
It is now. I'm too lame to type.
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is user friendly ... It's just
This is a useful utility...
qiv - Quick Image Viewer
Quick Image Viewer (qiv) is a very small and pretty fast
GDK/Imlib image viewer. Features include
zoom, maxpect, scale down, fullscreen,
brightness/contrast/gamma correction, slideshow, flip
horizontal/vertical, rotate left/right,
*-Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| yagirc24747 yagirc: Binary and Libs for yagirc stored in /bin
and /lib [87] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (David N. Welton))
|
| Davide isn't maintaining this package anymore. Ole, are you taking
| care of this one, too?
Yelp! This bug is now closed,
Matthew Parry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Linux becomes more popular the hardware manufacturers will start
giving away drivers with the hardware, as they do for WIN95/NT/Mac. If
we give them the option to release the drivers as closed source then
most of them will. But if we force them to
smb2www 27641 perl 5.005-02 breaks smb2www [0] (Craig Small
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
This one also refers to the version of perl which has been
removed. (It broke every module, so there are several such bug reports)
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson,AZ
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
PowerPC has more or less given up on making 2.1. We're moving well,
but I'm of the inclination we shouldn't release until we have a truly
stabilized libc - or at least until
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 02:46:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Maybe the subject is a bit harsh, but currently users trying to
install Debian on a Notebook face more problems than users installing
it on a desktop computer. Compared with other Linux distributions
It worked very well for my
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 08:02:57PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
You're back on it. Michael isn't since he uses a pile of different
email addresses. Please always contact the listmaster in case of
Oh boy you bet. This is getting ugly. I have a private account I can only
read from home, a
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 08:52:01PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Tom Lees wrote:
I released alpha 3 to http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/gdselect/ today.
This looks quite impressive. Good work!
One comment: On my system the gauge which is displayed first uses
strange size. The y-stretch was
Is it my imagination or was someone working on ttyquake? It's just too cool
to miss Debian 2.1.
Adrian
Same things happens to me. Today I upgraded two things sendmail and syslogd
(what a coincidence! :). After few minutes I found that `ps ax' shows a lot
of sendmail processes. Everything looks like that after restarting *syslogd*
information goes into appropriate files for few minutes. Then it
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 08:23:04PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
I'm working on it. But even if I get it to compile with Debian
sources, we still would need another soname for this.
I was going to respond to your earlier message(s), but I see you're
ahead of me.
Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
*-Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| yagirc24747 yagirc: Binary and Libs for yagirc stored in /bin
and /lib [87] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (David N. Welton))
|
| Davide isn't maintaining this package anymore. Ole, are you taking
| care of this one, too?
Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
Quick question: When two bugs are merged, do I need to close both
or will one closing close both, and send a message to both the
submittors?
You need to close both, imho.
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is user friendly ... It's just picky about it's friends.
Adrian Bridgett wrote:
Is it my imagination or was someone working on ttyquake? It's just too cool
to miss Debian 2.1.
I was; but it was too difficult to get the keyboard handling just right
so I forgot about it. I can send you what I have, if you like.
Richard Braakman
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
htdig 25412 htdig: htdig ignores config file stuff/absolute
pathnames compiled in [70] (Gergely Madarasz [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Fixed last week, remembered to close it today :)
--
Madarasz Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
All packages destined for Slink must have been uploaded to master.debian.org's
incoming directory no later than October 16th, 18:30 GMT.
The process of freezing Hamm will take place over the weekend. No new
uploads will be processed after 18:30 GMT that day.
Could I get some official word on which architectures wish to be included
in the 2.1 release of Debian? Thanks!
PowerPC has more or less given up on making 2.1. We're moving well,
but I'm of the inclination we shouldn't release until we have a truly
stabilized libc - or at least
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Brian White wrote:
All packages destined for Slink must have been uploaded to master.debian.org's
incoming directory no later than October 16th, 18:30 GMT.
The process of freezing Hamm will take place over the weekend. No new
uploads will be processed after 18:30 GMT
All packages destined for Slink must have been uploaded to
master.debian.org's
incoming directory no later than October 16th, 18:30 GMT.
The process of freezing Hamm will take place over the weekend. No new
uploads will be processed after 18:30 GMT that day.
Due to work load
So, slink is more than 760 Megabytes big for i386 machines. This
does not fit on one single CD. This means that even without contrib,
non-free, non-US etc. we already need two cds.
This needs to be addressed quick!
Heiko Schlittermann has written a new dselect installation method
that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
This package contain manpages in hungarian language
bye
Sasa
- --
PGP ID 0x8D143771, /C5 95 43 F8 6F 19 E8 29 53 5E 96 61 05 63 42 D0
For my pgp key finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
We need a 2.1.x kernel source package, which isn't available for debian.
I don't see why you couldn't create one just for the powerpc arch. Either
way, v2.2 of the kernel should be available before v2.2 of Debian.
Yes, last rumors say that linux-2.2 came out short before christmas.
Oh, i
Hi!
Has ANYONE got a faint IDEA where to get
( for our pile of RS/6000 220 MCA ...)
an IBM RS/6000 Microchannel - RISC linux ??
It is mentioned in the introduction to
MCA linux in www.linux.org -
There should be a DEBIAN PS/2 - MCA distribution ...
Is it feasable that it could be simply
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
