-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 20:47:37 -0400
Source: shellutils
Binary: shellutils
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.0.11-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Stone [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 09:25:15 +0200
Source: uqwk
Binary: uqwk uqwk-spool
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: peter karlsson [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 11:11:56 +0100
Source: netsaint-nrpe
Binary: netsaint-nrpe-plugin netsaint-nrpe-server
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.2.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 21:14:41 +0200
Source: etherwake
Binary: etherwake
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.05-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alain Schroeder [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 20:43:51 -0700
Source: libpng
Binary: libpng2-dev libpng2
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Philippe Troin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 08:50:48 -0400
Source: zsh-beta
Binary: zsh-beta-doc zsh-beta zsh-beta-static
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.0.0+4.0.1.pre3+0sf20010502-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 18:31:04 -0700
Source: mserv
Binary: mserv-dev mserv
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.33-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Whedon [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 23:42:42 +
Source: tcpspy
Binary: tcpspy
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pablo Lorenzzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 19:56:55 -0400
Source: fileutils
Binary: fileutils
Architecture: m68k
Version: 4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Stone [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 09:32:38 +0100
Source: ftnchek
Binary: ftnchek
Architecture: m68k
Version: 3.0.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:37:45 +
Source: fcheck
Binary: fcheck
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.7.59-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Graham Simpson [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 19:27:57 +1000
Source: netkit-rwho
Binary: rwhod rwho
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.17-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Herbert Xu [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 13:05:23 +0200
Source: libterm-readkey-perl
Binary: libterm-readkey-perl
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.14-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 10:15:58 -0400
Source: libgmp3
Binary: libgmp3-dev libgmp3
Architecture: m68k
Version: 3.1.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dale Scheetz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 12:28:39 +0200
Source: openssl
Binary: libssl0.9.6 ssleay libssl-dev openssl
Architecture: all m68k
Version: 0.9.6a-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:25:02 +0200
Source: gnomermind
Binary: gnomermind
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.99+1.0pre1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Tom Cato Amundsen [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 18:43:55 -0400
Source: main-menu
Binary: main-menu
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.009
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 09:15:50 +0900
Source: tex-guy
Binary: spawg dvilib2-dev dvilib2 tex-guy spawx11 xgdvi
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.1.9-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 10:52:19 -0700
Source: linneighborhood
Binary: linneighborhood
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.6.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Lowe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 21:09:58 -0400
Source: analog
Binary: analog
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:5.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 18:20:23 -0400
Source: eboard
Binary: eboard
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Burrows [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 16:33:11 +0200
Source: gramofile
Binary: gramofile
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 22:42:28 +0900
Source: mpich
Binary: mpich mpi-doc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.2.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 11:58:39 +0200
Source: kdict
Binary: kdict
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Radovan Garabik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 23:58:05 -0300
Source: fetchmail
Binary: fetchmailconf fetchmail
Architecture: sparc
Version: 5.8.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Henrique
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 22:05:05 -0700
Source: mopd
Binary: mopd
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.5.4-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 11:37:25 +0200
Source: modutils
Binary: modutils-basic modutils-full modutils
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.4.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 18:31:11 +0800
Source: yiyantang
Binary: yiyantang
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.3.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Yu Guanghui [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 09:52:55 -0400
Source: fileutils
Binary: fileutils
Architecture: sparc
Version: 4.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Stone [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 00:20:20 -0400
Source: xpm2wico
Binary: xpm2wico
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.2.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Wolfgang Sourdeau [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 02:13:10 -0300
Source: file
Binary: file
Architecture: sparc
Version: 3.33-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nicolas Lichtmaier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 15:33:01 +0200
Source: wmaker
Binary: libwraster2-dev libwmaker0-dev wmaker libwings-dev libwraster2
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.64.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 21:04:09 +0100
Source: cd-circleprint
Binary: cd-circleprint
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Kabel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 13:40:00 -0700
Source: kdelibs
Binary: libarts-alsa libkmid kdelibs-dev kdelibs3-doc libkmid-dev kdelibs3
libarts-dev libkmid-alsa libarts
Architecture: sparc all
Version: 4:2.1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 14:06:32 +0200
Source: proftpd
Binary: proftpd-doc proftpd-ldap proftpd-pgsql proftpd proftpd-mysql
proftpd-common
Architecture: sparc all
Version: 1.2.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 13:50:04 +0200
Source: wmifs
Binary: wmifs
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.3b1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc -O1 -g -DNDEBUG -funsigned-char -Wall -I../include '-DVERSION=1.2.4'
-D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXFS_BIG_FILES=1
-DXFS_BIG_FILESYSTEMS=1 -o xfs_db -L../libxfs addr.o agf.o agfl.o agi.o
attr.o attrshort.o bit.o block.o bmap.o bmapbt.o bmroot.o bnobt.o check.o
cntbt.o
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:03:59AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
Can you compare Perl speed to Python?
Just curious, have no prior knowledge on this.
Can you? Of course you can. Has someone? Very probably, although I
can't recall seeing an instance off-hand.
Compare Perl speed to Python is pretty
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Waters wrote:
This is supposed to happen once enough packages make the transition.
Now, if we're really down to 253 packages that use /usr/doc (with no
symlink), then maybe it's time. But, unfortunately, that number, 253,
measures *claimed* compliance, not actual
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
Chris Waters wrote:
- A change in the policy to remove the obsolete /usr/doc symlinks.
This is supposed to happen once enough packages make the transition.
No, it is supposed to happen one release _after_ a release in which all
the packages have
Hi,
My question is :
Suppose a server is listening to 5 clients, and it has to send a
message to all the clients, how does the server achieve this task?
Regards,
Nadeem
* Christian Marillat
| DS == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| DS While the principle of least surprise is important, it should not be
| DS used to stifle progress. Moving the docs and demos out of the runtime
| DS package is a significant bloat reduction. Moving them into -dev is not.
* Adam Heath
| Um, when was it decided that woody+1=sarge? When was this flamewar?
It wasn't yet. aj needed a name for woody+1 and picked sarge as an
interim name.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Waters wrote:
Didn't we already have this discussion? The Standards-Version field
is not a reliable indication of much of anything. I strongly object
Policy says:
Policy says doesn't make the packages comply. And you can file all
the bugs reports you want,
Hi Adam!
You wrote:
Actually, I already did a mass bug filing, on the usr/doc issue(did a grep on
Contents-i386, which wasn't fully accurate(other archs, stale data(up to a
week or so))). I have seen several of the bugs closed, probably more than
half now. I need to do another scan, to see
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:57:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Standards-Version 3 :
a not FHS compliant package is at most a normal bug
Standards-Version = 3:
a not FHS compliant package is at most a serious bug
This is not correct. You can't change the severity of a bug by twiddling
a field
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:31:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
List of packages with Standards-Version 3.0
-- snip --
[...]
Torsten Landschoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) gsfonts-other
Torsten Landschoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) gsfonts
Guess I should really upload my local
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
...
Standards-Versions aren't release critical. You can put it as
Standards-Version: 526.7.8.9.13-Foo.6 if you want. And no matter what
I will practice your suggestion and upload my packages with
Standards-Version: 526.7.8.9.13-Foo.6.
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SMR Hi Christian Dale,
Hi,
[...]
SMR If Dale has agreed to do move the docs (either to -dev or to -doc),
SMR that seems to me to answer the bug report. I don't understand what
SMR question Christian's posting to -devel is supposed to raise.
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Package: gsfonts
Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
91489 Package gsfonts still has at least one file in /usr/doc
Package is ready so far and installed locally. But I can't build a
new package since
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Standards-Version you have, you still have to follow the FHS, you have
to use /usr/share/doc, and if you specify build-dependencies they have
to be correct.
That means you can file RC bugs on all packages that don't follow the
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:58:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote:
You mean XFS from Linus kernel tree? there are some patches on
penguinppc.org
This is not in Linus's kernel tree. Are you using SGI's 1.0 release?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I have made a package of the library part of kudzu, Redhat's hardware
detection program. I need it to package a new upstream version of
sndconfig.
The upstream source was taken from RedHat 7.1
(ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/redhat-7.1-en/os/i386/SRPMS/).
Copyright
On 05/07/01 Brendan O'Dea wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:03:59AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
Can you compare Perl speed to Python?
Just curious, have no prior knowledge on this.
Can you? Of course you can. Has someone? Very probably, although I
can't recall seeing an instance off-hand.
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Package: gsfonts
Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
91489 Package gsfonts still has at least one file in /usr/doc
Package is ready so far and installed
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:21:11PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
/opt/src/robert/XFS/xfsprogs-1.2.4/libxfs/xfs_inode.c:563: undefined
reference to `__fswab64'
/opt/src/robert/XFS/xfsprogs-1.2.4/libxfs/xfs_inode.c:563: relocation
truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 __fswab64
Ignore relocation
* Torsten Landschoff
| On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
|
| Package: gsfonts
| Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|91489 Package gsfonts still has at least one file in /usr/doc
|
| Package is ready so far and installed locally. But I can't
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 01:50:45AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
(I tried my best but I can't garuantee this is 100% complete...)
I won't look at all of them as this is really the upstream maintainer's job.
fdisk:
linux/unistd.h
This one is always OK for obvious reasons.
linux/hdreg.h
A
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:13:30PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote:
As for why __fswab64 is undefined, try using -O2 instead of -O1. AFAIK
functions are not inlined at -O1.
I;ll try that but hmm shouldn't compile also fail on f.ex. i386 ?
-O2 doesn't fix this... any other ideas?
Steve == Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
*beep, wrong* :)
update-rc.d -f exim remove
Steve *beep*, *wrong* :)
Steve The problem with update-rc.d -f exim remove is that it
Steve removes *all* the links, not just the S*exim links.
Yes. That's a bug in
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 03:52:57PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
Uhh, when did that become a must? In 3.5.2 the first paragraph
says
Probably during the policy/packaging merger. I intend at some point
to go through policy and fix all of these confusions. Furthermore, it
makes no sense
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:56:45PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Being optimistic, this means:
* Policy goes into debugging mode on 1st June, and no further
changes may be made after about 20th June.
* Base packages must have all release-critical bugs fixed by
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:32:31AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
What do you intend doing with distros, BTW? Will there be three or
four distros? (Freezing == testing?) Will the migration into
testing scripts be (partially) switched off? What happens when
someone uploads to unstable? Will
What's up with that package? The files in /var/lib/apt/lists/ say:
Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/postgresql_6.5.3-23.deb
I do not have stable listed in my apt-sources file btw.
Looking into /var/lib/dpkg/available I do not find postgresql at all and
dselect says:
*** Opt misc
On 6 May 2001, Christian Marillat wrote:
DS == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
DS I can be convinced on either count. How would you feel about my presenting
DS this issue to the developers at large, with you and I agreeing to follow
DS the concensus of the group?
Go
On 7 May 2001, Christian Marillat wrote:
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SMR Hi Christian Dale,
Hi,
[...]
SMR If Dale has agreed to do move the docs (either to -dev or to -doc),
SMR that seems to me to answer the bug report. I don't understand what
SMR question
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:22:46AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
But more important I wonder why postgresl 6.5.3 is still in testing and not
7.0.*. After all 7.1 has been released some weeks ago.
Looking into the bug tracking system I found that there is one bug against
postgresql tagged
Currently there are two usable repositories of Potato packages. There's a
repository of kernel-related packages to run 2.4.x kernels on Potato, and
there's a repository of LDAP related packages and other things that Wichert
is maintaining.
Both of these are good work, but even combined they
Let's say it takes one week for a package to make it from unstable to
testing. So what happens if package foo_1.0-1.deb is in testing and
foo_1.0-2.deb is uploaded and then after five days foo_1.0-3.deb is uploaded
to unstable. What happens if no grave bug exists againts foo? Is 1.0-2 moved
to
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:00:34PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote:
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:58:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote:
...
you should stick to gcc 2.95 for compiling the kernel, and probably the
Alexander Hvostov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The S/390 port is hardware specific. For obvious reasons (how many
Debian machines are S/390s?), this is inadequate. And anyway, I was
referring to a Linux kernel in a process (ie, it behaves just like any
other program, albeit rather large), not
DS == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
DS More to the point, what did you find wrong with my solution?
This is Monday syndrome, I've misread you post :-(
I agree with your solution.
Christian
Alexander Hvostov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The S/390 port is hardware specific. For obvious reasons (how many
Debian machines are S/390s?), this is inadequate. And anyway, I was
referring to a Linux kernel in a process (ie, it behaves just like any
other program, albeit rather large), not
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:22:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
A serious bug is enough to keep a package out of testing; it's even enough
to get it pulled from testing if it's already there, especially one that's
almost a year old...
Sure. I meant to say that I was surprised that this bug is
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:50:28PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
The real problem will've been that postgresql probably needs to be
updated at the same time as php3 and apache and python and a handful of
IMO it shouldn't depend on any of these and it probably does not. :-)
Nah, it's the other
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 08:03:57AM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:00:34PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote:
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:58:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight
wrote:
...
you
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
...
There are four ports, any of which may want to try for a woody release:
hurd-i386, mips, hppa and ia64. If they do, they need to ensure that
...
I did perhaps only miss it: You did post some weeks ago a list how much
each architecture is keeping up
Herbert == Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Herbert I won't look at all of them as this is really the
Herbert upstream maintainer's job.
This brings up an interesting point. While we should work with
upstream maintainers to fix these problems, we should also try to
avoid making
!?
...!
ADSL
! !
A=
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:32:31AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
What do you intend doing with distros, BTW? Will there be three or
four distros? (Freezing == testing?) Will the migration into
testing scripts be (partially) switched off? What happens when
someone
On 7 May 2001, Christian Marillat wrote:
DS == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
DS More to the point, what did you find wrong with my solution?
This is Monday syndrome, I've misread you post :-(
Well, I hope things have gotten better ;-)
I agree with your solution.
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote:
Nathan Scott from SGI send me patch but it didn't work. I now figured some
other way to fix that and it seems it partially worked (now it quits with:
It looks like my fix made the trick (i mailed my solution to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
No, no. Pigeons are ugly horrid things that infest cities and leave
droppings on my car.
You mean packet loss?
-Hilko
Sam == Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Manoj == Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aaron == Aaron Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aaron So you're saying it's better to hardcode syscall numbers
Aaron and stuff than using the kernel headers? Sre...
Manoj We already have a
Adrian == Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adrian In the source package's `Standards-Version' control
Adrian field, you must specify the most recent version number
Adrian of this policy document with which your package
Adrian complies. The current version number is
Hi,
I'm requesting giram (giram, giram-gnome, giram-mesa, giram-gnome-mesa)
to be removed from Debian for the following reasons:
- the upstream author is not responsive (possibly because he's working at
MadrakeSoft)
- it's development is very slow (8 months between 0.1.7 and 0.1.8)
On Mon, 07 May 2001, Michael Meskes wrote:
to unstable. What happens if no grave bug exists againts foo? Is 1.0-2 moved
to testing after 7 days, or is 1.0-3 moved or do the seven days start anew
The quarantine time is restarted every upload.
If it is also true with no grave bug, we should
i have libssl openssh 2.5.2p2 for potato at
http://people.debian.org/~ieure/potato_ssh
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
Currently there are two usable repositories of Potato packages. There's a
repository of kernel-related packages to run 2.4.x kernels on Potato, and
there's a
Just a friendly Jedi Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway if there is somone outthere willing to try powerpc xfsprogs please
point your apt-get at
deb ftp://ftp.plukwa.net/debian-local sid main
I would like to but your server is not responding to ftp requests...
jas.
Anthony Towns wrote:
Nah, it's the other way around: one of the php3 binaries in testing
doesn't work with the postgresql in unstable, and the php3 in unstable
doesn't work with the postgresql in testing; ditto some other php3 binary
and apache, and a few other similar things. It gets
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:52:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:32:31AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
What do you intend doing with distros, BTW? Will there be three or
four distros? (Freezing == testing?) Will the migration into
testing scripts be (partially)
Today, Hilko Bengen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, no. Pigeons are ugly horrid things that infest cities and leave
droppings on my car.
You mean packet loss?
ITYM log entries as defined in RFC2549.
--
Andreas Fuchs, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], antifuchs
Hail RMS! Hail Cthulhu! Hail
On Mon, 07 May 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote:
I'm requesting giram (giram, giram-gnome, giram-mesa, giram-gnome-mesa)
to be removed from Debian for the following reasons:
Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a O:
(orphaned) bug against wnpp for giram* ? The
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:11:13AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My question is :
Suppose a server is listening to 5 clients, and it has to send a
message to all the clients, how does the server achieve this task?
A server typically consists of 2 programs: one that listens for
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:49:36PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
Let's say it takes one week for a package to make it from unstable to
testing. So what happens if package foo_1.0-1.deb is in testing and
foo_1.0-2.deb is uploaded and then after five days foo_1.0-3.deb is uploaded
to unstable.
I'll make my question clear.
debian-changelog-mode.el currently allows you to set the
distribution field for an upload to multiple distributions, e.g.
xwatch (2.11-8) frozen unstable; urgency=low
The list of possibilities is currently set to:
unstable
frozen
stable
frozen unstable
Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a
O:
(orphaned) bug against wnpp for giram* ? The instructions on bug
severity
and how to do it are in http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp. If you've
already
done that, I apologise for the nitpick.
I did not orphan it
I really don't know where I should be posting this, or to which package
I should file a bug report. I just hope this will be of use to
somebody.
I got this messages dist-upgrading a sparc *and* a i386 from potato to
testing (more or less the same messages):
Hilko Bengen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
No, no. Pigeons are ugly horrid things that infest cities and leave
droppings on my car.
You mean packet loss?
I think it's network overhead.
--
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
...
Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a O:
...
s/ITO/RFA/
(Request for adoption)
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo