Uploaded shellutils 2.0.11-7 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 20:47:37 -0400 Source: shellutils Binary: shellutils Architecture: m68k Version: 2.0.11-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Stone [EMAIL

Uploaded uqwk 2.17-1 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 09:25:15 +0200 Source: uqwk Binary: uqwk uqwk-spool Architecture: m68k Version: 2.17-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: peter karlsson [EMAIL

Uploaded netsaint-nrpe 1.2.4-1 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 11:11:56 +0100 Source: netsaint-nrpe Binary: netsaint-nrpe-plugin netsaint-nrpe-server Architecture: m68k Version: 1.2.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Uploaded etherwake 1.05-3 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 21:14:41 +0200 Source: etherwake Binary: etherwake Architecture: m68k Version: 1.05-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Alain Schroeder [EMAIL

Uploaded libpng 1.0.11-1 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 20:43:51 -0700 Source: libpng Binary: libpng2-dev libpng2 Architecture: m68k Version: 1.0.11-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Philippe Troin

Uploaded zsh-beta 4.0.0+4.0.1.pre3+0sf20010502-1 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 08:50:48 -0400 Source: zsh-beta Binary: zsh-beta-doc zsh-beta zsh-beta-static Architecture: m68k Version: 4.0.0+4.0.1.pre3+0sf20010502-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon

Uploaded mserv 0.33-3 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 18:31:04 -0700 Source: mserv Binary: mserv-dev mserv Architecture: m68k Version: 0.33-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: David Whedon [EMAIL

Uploaded tcpspy 1.6-1 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 23:42:42 + Source: tcpspy Binary: tcpspy Architecture: m68k Version: 1.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pablo Lorenzzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Uploaded fileutils 4.1-1 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 19:56:55 -0400 Source: fileutils Binary: fileutils Architecture: m68k Version: 4.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Stone [EMAIL

Uploaded ftnchek 3.0.4-2 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 09:32:38 +0100 Source: ftnchek Binary: ftnchek Architecture: m68k Version: 3.0.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Uploaded fcheck 2.7.59-1 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:37:45 + Source: fcheck Binary: fcheck Architecture: m68k Version: 2.7.59-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Graham Simpson [EMAIL

Uploaded netkit-rwho 0.17-3 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 19:27:57 +1000 Source: netkit-rwho Binary: rwhod rwho Architecture: m68k Version: 0.17-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Herbert Xu [EMAIL

Uploaded libterm-readkey-perl 2.14-2.1 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 13:05:23 +0200 Source: libterm-readkey-perl Binary: libterm-readkey-perl Architecture: m68k Version: 2.14-2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Uploaded libgmp3 3.1.1-7 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 10:15:58 -0400 Source: libgmp3 Binary: libgmp3-dev libgmp3 Architecture: m68k Version: 3.1.1-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Dale Scheetz

Uploaded openssl 0.9.6a-2 (all m68k) to non-us

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 12:28:39 +0200 Source: openssl Binary: libssl0.9.6 ssleay libssl-dev openssl Architecture: all m68k Version: 0.9.6a-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Uploaded gnomermind 0.99+1.0pre1-1 (m68k) to erlangen

2001-05-07 Thread buildd m68k user account
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:25:02 +0200 Source: gnomermind Binary: gnomermind Architecture: m68k Version: 0.99+1.0pre1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: buildd m68k user account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Tom Cato Amundsen [EMAIL

Uploaded main-menu 0.009 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 18:43:55 -0400 Source: main-menu Binary: main-menu Architecture: sparc Version: 0.009 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL

Uploaded tex-guy 1.1.9-5 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 09:15:50 +0900 Source: tex-guy Binary: spawg dvilib2-dev dvilib2 tex-guy spawx11 xgdvi Architecture: sparc Version: 1.1.9-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Uploaded linneighborhood 0.6.3-1 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 10:52:19 -0700 Source: linneighborhood Binary: linneighborhood Architecture: sparc Version: 0.6.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Will Lowe

Uploaded analog 5.0-2 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 21:09:58 -0400 Source: analog Binary: analog Architecture: sparc Version: 1:5.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Uploaded eboard 0.1.6-1 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 18:20:23 -0400 Source: eboard Binary: eboard Architecture: sparc Version: 0.1.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Burrows [EMAIL

Uploaded gramofile 1.6-1 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 16:33:11 +0200 Source: gramofile Binary: gramofile Architecture: sparc Version: 1.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Kobras [EMAIL

Uploaded mpich 1.2.1-7 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 22:42:28 +0900 Source: mpich Binary: mpich mpi-doc Architecture: sparc Version: 1.2.1-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL

Uploaded kdict 0.5-2 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 11:58:39 +0200 Source: kdict Binary: kdict Architecture: sparc Version: 0.5-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Radovan Garabik [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Uploaded fetchmail 5.8.1-5 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 23:58:05 -0300 Source: fetchmail Binary: fetchmailconf fetchmail Architecture: sparc Version: 5.8.1-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Henrique

Uploaded mopd 2.5.4-5 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 22:05:05 -0700 Source: mopd Binary: mopd Architecture: sparc Version: 2.5.4-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Uploaded modutils 2.4.6-1 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 11:37:25 +0200 Source: modutils Binary: modutils-basic modutils-full modutils Architecture: sparc Version: 2.4.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Uploaded yiyantang 0.3.3-2 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 18:31:11 +0800 Source: yiyantang Binary: yiyantang Architecture: sparc Version: 0.3.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Yu Guanghui [EMAIL

Uploaded fileutils 4.1-2 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 09:52:55 -0400 Source: fileutils Binary: fileutils Architecture: sparc Version: 4.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Stone [EMAIL

Uploaded xpm2wico 0.2.2-3 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 00:20:20 -0400 Source: xpm2wico Binary: xpm2wico Architecture: sparc Version: 0.2.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Wolfgang Sourdeau [EMAIL

Uploaded file 3.33-5 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 02:13:10 -0300 Source: file Binary: file Architecture: sparc Version: 3.33-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Nicolas Lichtmaier [EMAIL

Uploaded wmaker 0.64.0-6 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 15:33:01 +0200 Source: wmaker Binary: libwraster2-dev libwmaker0-dev wmaker libwings-dev libwraster2 Architecture: sparc Version: 0.64.0-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon

Uploaded cd-circleprint 0.3.1-1 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 21:04:09 +0100 Source: cd-circleprint Binary: cd-circleprint Architecture: sparc Version: 0.3.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Matthias Kabel

Uploaded kdelibs 2.1.2-2 (sparc all) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 13:40:00 -0700 Source: kdelibs Binary: libarts-alsa libkmid kdelibs-dev kdelibs3-doc libkmid-dev kdelibs3 libarts-dev libkmid-alsa libarts Architecture: sparc all Version: 4:2.1.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency:

Uploaded proftpd 1.2.1-7 (sparc all) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 14:06:32 +0200 Source: proftpd Binary: proftpd-doc proftpd-ldap proftpd-pgsql proftpd proftpd-mysql proftpd-common Architecture: sparc all Version: 1.2.1-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:

Uploaded wmifs 1.3b1-6 (sparc) to ftp-master

2001-05-07 Thread Debian/SPARC Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 13:50:04 +0200 Source: wmifs Binary: wmifs Architecture: sparc Version: 1.3b1-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gcc error - xfsprogs, ppc

2001-05-07 Thread Keith Owens
gcc -O1 -g -DNDEBUG -funsigned-char -Wall -I../include '-DVERSION=1.2.4' -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXFS_BIG_FILES=1 -DXFS_BIG_FILESYSTEMS=1 -o xfs_db -L../libxfs addr.o agf.o agfl.o agi.o attr.o attrshort.o bit.o block.o bmap.o bmapbt.o bmroot.o bnobt.o check.o cntbt.o

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-07 Thread Brendan O'Dea
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:03:59AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: Can you compare Perl speed to Python? Just curious, have no prior knowledge on this. Can you? Of course you can. Has someone? Very probably, although I can't recall seeing an instance off-hand. Compare Perl speed to Python is pretty

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Adam Heath
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Waters wrote: This is supposed to happen once enough packages make the transition. Now, if we're really down to 253 packages that use /usr/doc (with no symlink), then maybe it's time. But, unfortunately, that number, 253, measures *claimed* compliance, not actual

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Adam Heath
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Joey Hess wrote: Chris Waters wrote: - A change in the policy to remove the obsolete /usr/doc symlinks. This is supposed to happen once enough packages make the transition. No, it is supposed to happen one release _after_ a release in which all the packages have

Question on UNIX sockets

2001-05-07 Thread nadeem_mistry
Hi, My question is : Suppose a server is listening to 5 clients, and it has to send a message to all the clients, how does the server achieve this task? Regards, Nadeem

Re: Bug#96224: libgmp3: Move documentation in the -dev package

2001-05-07 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Christian Marillat | DS == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | DS While the principle of least surprise is important, it should not be | DS used to stifle progress. Moving the docs and demos out of the runtime | DS package is a significant bloat reduction. Moving them into -dev is not.

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Adam Heath | Um, when was it decided that woody+1=sarge? When was this flamewar? It wasn't yet. aj needed a name for woody+1 and picked sarge as an interim name. -- Tollef Fog Heen Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Chris Waters wrote: Didn't we already have this discussion? The Standards-Version field is not a reliable indication of much of anything. I strongly object Policy says: Policy says doesn't make the packages comply. And you can file all the bugs reports you want,

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Adam! You wrote: Actually, I already did a mass bug filing, on the usr/doc issue(did a grep on Contents-i386, which wasn't fully accurate(other archs, stale data(up to a week or so))). I have seen several of the bugs closed, probably more than half now. I need to do another scan, to see

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:57:37AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Standards-Version 3 : a not FHS compliant package is at most a normal bug Standards-Version = 3: a not FHS compliant package is at most a serious bug This is not correct. You can't change the severity of a bug by twiddling a field

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:31:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: List of packages with Standards-Version 3.0 -- snip -- [...] Torsten Landschoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) gsfonts-other Torsten Landschoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) gsfonts Guess I should really upload my local

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: ... Standards-Versions aren't release critical. You can put it as Standards-Version: 526.7.8.9.13-Foo.6 if you want. And no matter what I will practice your suggestion and upload my packages with Standards-Version: 526.7.8.9.13-Foo.6.

Re: Bug#96224: libgmp3: Move documentation in the -dev package

2001-05-07 Thread Christian Marillat
SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SMR Hi Christian Dale, Hi, [...] SMR If Dale has agreed to do move the docs (either to -dev or to -doc), SMR that seems to me to answer the bug report. I don't understand what SMR question Christian's posting to -devel is supposed to raise.

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Package: gsfonts Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 91489 Package gsfonts still has at least one file in /usr/doc Package is ready so far and installed locally. But I can't build a new package since

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Standards-Version you have, you still have to follow the FHS, you have to use /usr/share/doc, and if you specify build-dependencies they have to be correct. That means you can file RC bugs on all packages that don't follow the

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

2001-05-07 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:58:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: You mean XFS from Linus kernel tree? there are some patches on penguinppc.org This is not in Linus's kernel tree. Are you using SGI's 1.0 release?

Bug#96638: ITP: libkudzu

2001-05-07 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist I have made a package of the library part of kudzu, Redhat's hardware detection program. I need it to package a new upstream version of sndconfig. The upstream source was taken from RedHat 7.1 (ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/redhat-7.1-en/os/i386/SRPMS/). Copyright

Re: Two debconf issues

2001-05-07 Thread Paolo Molaro
On 05/07/01 Brendan O'Dea wrote: On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:03:59AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: Can you compare Perl speed to Python? Just curious, have no prior knowledge on this. Can you? Of course you can. Has someone? Very probably, although I can't recall seeing an instance off-hand.

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Torsten Landschoff wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Package: gsfonts Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] 91489 Package gsfonts still has at least one file in /usr/doc Package is ready so far and installed

Re: gcc error - xfsprogs, ppc

2001-05-07 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:21:11PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: /opt/src/robert/XFS/xfsprogs-1.2.4/libxfs/xfs_inode.c:563: undefined reference to `__fswab64' /opt/src/robert/XFS/xfsprogs-1.2.4/libxfs/xfs_inode.c:563: relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 __fswab64 Ignore relocation

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Torsten Landschoff | On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: | | Package: gsfonts | Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] |91489 Package gsfonts still has at least one file in /usr/doc | | Package is ready so far and installed locally. But I can't

Re: build depends on kernel-headers

2001-05-07 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 01:50:45AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: (I tried my best but I can't garuantee this is 100% complete...) I won't look at all of them as this is really the upstream maintainer's job. fdisk: linux/unistd.h This one is always OK for obvious reasons. linux/hdreg.h A

Re: gcc error - xfsprogs, ppc

2001-05-07 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:13:30PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: As for why __fswab64 is undefined, try using -O2 instead of -O1. AFAIK functions are not inlined at -O1. I;ll try that but hmm shouldn't compile also fail on f.ex. i386 ? -O2 doesn't fix this... any other ideas?

Re: Many ports open by default

2001-05-07 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
Steve == Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *beep, wrong* :) update-rc.d -f exim remove Steve *beep*, *wrong* :) Steve The problem with update-rc.d -f exim remove is that it Steve removes *all* the links, not just the S*exim links. Yes. That's a bug in

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 03:52:57PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: Uhh, when did that become a must? In 3.5.2 the first paragraph says Probably during the policy/packaging merger. I intend at some point to go through policy and fix all of these confusions. Furthermore, it makes no sense

Re: Woody Freeze Plans - Progress Report II

2001-05-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:56:45PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: Being optimistic, this means: * Policy goes into debugging mode on 1st June, and no further changes may be made after about 20th June. * Base packages must have all release-critical bugs fixed by

Re: Woody Freeze Plans - Progress Report II

2001-05-07 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:32:31AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: What do you intend doing with distros, BTW? Will there be three or four distros? (Freezing == testing?) Will the migration into testing scripts be (partially) switched off? What happens when someone uploads to unstable? Will

PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-07 Thread Michael Meskes
What's up with that package? The files in /var/lib/apt/lists/ say: Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/postgresql_6.5.3-23.deb I do not have stable listed in my apt-sources file btw. Looking into /var/lib/dpkg/available I do not find postgresql at all and dselect says: *** Opt misc

Re: Bug#96224: libgmp3: Move documentation in the -dev package

2001-05-07 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 6 May 2001, Christian Marillat wrote: DS == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] DS I can be convinced on either count. How would you feel about my presenting DS this issue to the developers at large, with you and I agreeing to follow DS the concensus of the group? Go

Re: Bug#96224: libgmp3: Move documentation in the -dev package

2001-05-07 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 7 May 2001, Christian Marillat wrote: SMR == Steve M Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SMR Hi Christian Dale, Hi, [...] SMR If Dale has agreed to do move the docs (either to -dev or to -doc), SMR that seems to me to answer the bug report. I don't understand what SMR question

Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-07 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:22:46AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: But more important I wonder why postgresl 6.5.3 is still in testing and not 7.0.*. After all 7.1 has been released some weeks ago. Looking into the bug tracking system I found that there is one bug against postgresql tagged

support for older distributions

2001-05-07 Thread Russell Coker
Currently there are two usable repositories of Potato packages. There's a repository of kernel-related packages to run 2.4.x kernels on Potato, and there's a repository of LDAP related packages and other things that Wichert is maintaining. Both of these are good work, but even combined they

Questions to testing/unstable

2001-05-07 Thread Michael Meskes
Let's say it takes one week for a package to make it from unstable to testing. So what happens if package foo_1.0-1.deb is in testing and foo_1.0-2.deb is uploaded and then after five days foo_1.0-3.deb is uploaded to unstable. What happens if no grave bug exists againts foo? Is 1.0-2 moved to

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

2001-05-07 Thread Rahul Jain
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:00:34PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:58:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: ... you should stick to gcc 2.95 for compiling the kernel, and probably the

Re: Installing debs in ~user/ or /usr/local?

2001-05-07 Thread Gerd Flaig
Alexander Hvostov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The S/390 port is hardware specific. For obvious reasons (how many Debian machines are S/390s?), this is inadequate. And anyway, I was referring to a Linux kernel in a process (ie, it behaves just like any other program, albeit rather large), not

Re: Bug#96224: libgmp3: Move documentation in the -dev package

2001-05-07 Thread Christian Marillat
DS == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] DS More to the point, what did you find wrong with my solution? This is Monday syndrome, I've misread you post :-( I agree with your solution. Christian

Re: Installing debs in ~user/ or /usr/local?

2001-05-07 Thread Gerd Flaig
Alexander Hvostov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The S/390 port is hardware specific. For obvious reasons (how many Debian machines are S/390s?), this is inadequate. And anyway, I was referring to a Linux kernel in a process (ie, it behaves just like any other program, albeit rather large), not

Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-07 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:22:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: A serious bug is enough to keep a package out of testing; it's even enough to get it pulled from testing if it's already there, especially one that's almost a year old... Sure. I meant to say that I was surprised that this bug is

Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-07 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:50:28PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: The real problem will've been that postgresql probably needs to be updated at the same time as php3 and apache and python and a handful of IMO it shouldn't depend on any of these and it probably does not. :-) Nah, it's the other

xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-07 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 08:03:57AM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:00:34PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:58:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: ... you

Re: Woody Freeze Plans - Progress Report II

2001-05-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: ... There are four ports, any of which may want to try for a woody release: hurd-i386, mips, hppa and ia64. If they do, they need to ensure that ... I did perhaps only miss it: You did post some weeks ago a list how much each architecture is keeping up

Re: build depends on kernel-headers

2001-05-07 Thread Sam Hartman
Herbert == Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Herbert I won't look at all of them as this is really the Herbert upstream maintainer's job. This brings up an interesting point. While we should work with upstream maintainers to fix these problems, we should also try to avoid making

¬ü°ê¥Jµo°]¹Ú

2001-05-07 Thread ¥¬§Æ
!? ...! ADSL ! ! A=

Re: Woody Freeze Plans - Progress Report II

2001-05-07 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Anthony Towns wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:32:31AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: What do you intend doing with distros, BTW? Will there be three or four distros? (Freezing == testing?) Will the migration into testing scripts be (partially) switched off? What happens when someone

Re: Bug#96224: libgmp3: Move documentation in the -dev package

2001-05-07 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 7 May 2001, Christian Marillat wrote: DS == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] DS More to the point, what did you find wrong with my solution? This is Monday syndrome, I've misread you post :-( Well, I hope things have gotten better ;-) I agree with your solution.

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-07 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: Nathan Scott from SGI send me patch but it didn't work. I now figured some other way to fix that and it seems it partially worked (now it quits with: It looks like my fix made the trick (i mailed my solution to

Re: rfc1149

2001-05-07 Thread Hilko Bengen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: No, no. Pigeons are ugly horrid things that infest cities and leave droppings on my car. You mean packet loss? -Hilko

Re: build depends on kernel-headers

2001-05-07 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Sam == Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Manoj == Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Aaron == Aaron Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Aaron So you're saying it's better to hardcode syscall numbers Aaron and stuff than using the kernel headers? Sre... Manoj We already have a

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-07 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Adrian == Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Adrian In the source package's `Standards-Version' control Adrian field, you must specify the most recent version number Adrian of this policy document with which your package Adrian complies. The current version number is

Giram: Request for removal

2001-05-07 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, I'm requesting giram (giram, giram-gnome, giram-mesa, giram-gnome-mesa) to be removed from Debian for the following reasons: - the upstream author is not responsive (possibly because he's working at MadrakeSoft) - it's development is very slow (8 months between 0.1.7 and 0.1.8)

Re: Questions to testing/unstable

2001-05-07 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 07 May 2001, Michael Meskes wrote: to unstable. What happens if no grave bug exists againts foo? Is 1.0-2 moved to testing after 7 days, or is 1.0-3 moved or do the seven days start anew The quarantine time is restarted every upload. If it is also true with no grave bug, we should

Re: support for older distributions

2001-05-07 Thread Ian Eure
i have libssl openssh 2.5.2p2 for potato at http://people.debian.org/~ieure/potato_ssh On Mon, 7 May 2001, Russell Coker wrote: Currently there are two usable repositories of Potato packages. There's a repository of kernel-related packages to run 2.4.x kernels on Potato, and there's a

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-07 Thread Jason E. Stewart
Just a friendly Jedi Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyway if there is somone outthere willing to try powerpc xfsprogs please point your apt-get at deb ftp://ftp.plukwa.net/debian-local sid main I would like to but your server is not responding to ftp requests... jas.

Re: PostgreSQL in testing

2001-05-07 Thread Oliver Elphick
Anthony Towns wrote: Nah, it's the other way around: one of the php3 binaries in testing doesn't work with the postgresql in unstable, and the php3 in unstable doesn't work with the postgresql in testing; ditto some other php3 binary and apache, and a few other similar things. It gets

Re: Woody Freeze Plans - Progress Report II

2001-05-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:52:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:32:31AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: What do you intend doing with distros, BTW? Will there be three or four distros? (Freezing == testing?) Will the migration into testing scripts be (partially)

Re: rfc1149

2001-05-07 Thread Andreas Fuchs
Today, Hilko Bengen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, no. Pigeons are ugly horrid things that infest cities and leave droppings on my car. You mean packet loss? ITYM log entries as defined in RFC2549. -- Andreas Fuchs, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], antifuchs Hail RMS! Hail Cthulhu! Hail

Re: Giram: Request for removal

2001-05-07 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 07 May 2001, Jérôme Marant wrote: I'm requesting giram (giram, giram-gnome, giram-mesa, giram-gnome-mesa) to be removed from Debian for the following reasons: Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a O: (orphaned) bug against wnpp for giram* ? The

Re: Question on UNIX sockets

2001-05-07 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:11:13AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, My question is : Suppose a server is listening to 5 clients, and it has to send a message to all the clients, how does the server achieve this task? A server typically consists of 2 programs: one that listens for

Re: Questions to testing/unstable

2001-05-07 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:49:36PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: Let's say it takes one week for a package to make it from unstable to testing. So what happens if package foo_1.0-1.deb is in testing and foo_1.0-2.deb is uploaded and then after five days foo_1.0-3.deb is uploaded to unstable.

Re: Woody Freeze Plans - Progress Report II

2001-05-07 Thread Peter S Galbraith
I'll make my question clear. debian-changelog-mode.el currently allows you to set the distribution field for an upload to multiple distributions, e.g. xwatch (2.11-8) frozen unstable; urgency=low The list of possibilities is currently set to: unstable frozen stable frozen unstable

Re: Giram: Request for removal

2001-05-07 Thread Jérôme Marant
Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a O: (orphaned) bug against wnpp for giram* ? The instructions on bug severity and how to do it are in http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp. If you've already done that, I apologise for the nitpick. I did not orphan it

Dist-upgrading from potato 2.2r3 to testing

2001-05-07 Thread Eduardo Trapani
I really don't know where I should be posting this, or to which package I should file a bug report. I just hope this will be of use to somebody. I got this messages dist-upgrading a sparc *and* a i386 from potato to testing (more or less the same messages):

Re: rfc1149

2001-05-07 Thread Oliver Elphick
Hilko Bengen wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: No, no. Pigeons are ugly horrid things that infest cities and leave droppings on my car. You mean packet loss? I think it's network overhead. -- Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Giram: Request for removal

2001-05-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: ... Jérôme, could you please file a ITO (intent to orphan) or maybe even a O: ... s/ITO/RFA/ (Request for adoption) cu Adrian -- Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie

  1   2   >