-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 17:47:07 -0500
Source: xemacs21
Binary: xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn xemacs21 xemacs21-nomule xemacs21-bin
xemacs21-supportel xemacs21-support xemacs21-gnome-mule xemacs21-mule
xemacs21-htmldoc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:53:38 +0200
Source: libprintsys
Binary: libprintsys
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 20:45:08 -0800
Source: ifhp
Binary: ifhp
Architecture: sparc
Version: 3.5.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Luca Filipozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 18:40:38 +0200
Source: gnutls
Binary: gnutls-dev gnutls-doc gnutls3
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.3.5-3.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jordi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:07:48 -0400
Source: rxvt
Binary: rxvt rxvt-ml
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:2.6.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Brian Mays [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:08:27 -0400
Source: rxvt-beta
Binary: rxvt-beta-ml rxvt-beta
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.7.8-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Brian Mays
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 06:43:22 +0200
Source: affiche
Binary: affiche
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.5.0-1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthias Klose [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:35:26 +0100
Source: powertweak
Binary: powertweak-gtk powertweak-text powertweak powertweak-extra powertweakd
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.99.4-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:23:58 +0200
Source: xnc
Binary: xnc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 4.4.7-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Grzegorz Prokopski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:01:18 +0100
Source: x2x
Binary: x2x
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.27-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/sparc Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Charles Briscoe-Smith [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:36:48 +1100
Source: parted
Binary: libparted1.4 libparted1.4-dbg libparted1.4-i18n parted-doc parted
libparted1.4-dev parted-bf
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.4.24-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
(followups to -legal, please)
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:17:48PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
Excerpting is allowed by copyright law under the fair use principle, and
one need not accept any license governing a work to exercise that right
to fair use.
Australia, for example, doesn't have a
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:32:16PM -0700, Mark Rafn wrote:
I'm not certain I agree. Point one of the social contract is Debian Will
Remain 100% Free Software. The obvious reading of this is that anything
that is not free software cannot be in Debian.
This includes non-free software AND
Hello,
in general I like the idea of descriptions of manpages. I would like it
even more if it would regard i18n descriptions which are produced by
the ddtp server.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:32:16PM -0700, Mark Rafn wrote:
I'm not certain I agree. Point one of the social contract is Debian Will
Remain 100% Free Software. The obvious reading of this is that anything
that is not free software cannot be in Debian.
I tend to doubt that *either* was
Hello,
it would be nice if treetool could be available for all released architectures.
Cureently only ia64 is missing.
auric:~ madison treetool
treetool |2.0.2-1 |stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, powerpc,
sparc treetool |2.0.2-2 | testing | source, alpha, arm, i386,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tille, Andreas) writes:
Could any kind soul please do the job or just poin to an ia64 box with
installed build dependencies?
Done.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I and the upstream author have fixed the C++ problem that inhibit
gmetadom to build on HPPA with g++ 3.0.
Could someone then rebuilt gmetadom and two of the packages that depend
on it on HPPA?
The three packages are the ones of the subject given in the order in
which they have to be rebuilt.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:25:22AM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:02:34PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
you propose to add 'some' diff files for all files on ftp-master.d.o?
With rsync we need only one rsync-checksum file per normal file and
all apt's
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 17:25, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
What you are suggesting is that the server store checksums for precalculated
blocks on the server. This would be 4 bytes per 1k in the original file or
so. The transaction proceeds as follows:
1. Client asks for checksum list off
Hi,
Your package upload (cl-imho, manpages-de, tiger) was rejected due to a
mismatch in the original source md5sum. I saw this in
auric:/org/ftp.debian.org/incoming/REJECT/*.reason . The package I
maintain (lire) was rejected for the same reason. I have absolutely no
idea how this was caused,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
s/refused/discouraged/ and I would agree. Isn't the goal of Debian
providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
software anymore? IMHO the we support non-free software clause was
I think this is one of the goals
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
Your package upload (cl-imho, manpages-de, tiger) was rejected due to a
mismatch in the original source md5sum. I saw this in
auric:/org/ftp.debian.org/incoming/REJECT/*.reason . The package I
maintain (lire) was rejected for
Hi Jeroen,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:42:51PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
rant
I'm getting sick of people who can't read. Let's say the same thing
for the next time. Maybe a lot of people on this list just need
glasses, so I do it in upper case that you can easily read it:
I have yet to
Hi Donald,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:54:54PM -0500, Donald J Bindner wrote:
Well, I didn't expect to inspire such a vibrant thread! A couple
of responses (not in anger, just adding some perspective).
1) free vs. non-free alternatives
I use VMWare 2.0. If you think that bochs and
* Jeroen Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20020409 20:45]:
You don't have to tell me how glibc works, I develop it.
Yeah, and Daniel Stone is a Linux kernel developer.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:26:17AM -0700, Robert Tiberius Johnson wrote:
- I tend to update every day. For people who update every day, the
diff-based scheme only needs to transfer about 8K, but the
checksum-based scheme needs to transfer 45K. So for me, diffs are
better. :)
I think you'll
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:28:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
0 days of diffs: 843.7 KiB (the current situation)
...which pretty much matches what I'd expect: at the moment, just to
update main, people download around 1.2MB per day;
Uh, obviously this should be 843KiB. (I'd been playing
Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversion depends on them!
Subversion needs to update :) Happily, I don't have to be back compat, but I
will add a provides for apache2-modules. We scrapped the seperate deb as it
was
Od: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 10
11:26:22 2002
Temat: Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0
Data: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:25:53 +0200
* Jeroen Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20020409 20:45]:
You don't have to
Quoting Marcelo E. Magallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
missing... try deb http://people.debian.org/~ssmeenk/ ./ for
http://people.debian.org/~mmagallo/packages/subversion/ sid/i386/
should work.
Okay, I admit, i'm a mess at creating apt-lines :)
Your packages are fine, Thom will add
Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Now let's lart Thom for compiling apache2 against libdb3, instead of
libdb4, which renders subversion unusable :)
Again, I don't know about this...
I'm pretty unhappy about the LARTing ;-)
heh.. sorry? :)
Regards,
Sander.
--
| Is er een ander
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:44:19AM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:37:35AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
Your package upload (cl-imho, manpages-de, tiger) was rejected due to a
mismatch in the original source md5sum.
Most likely this is caused by different timestamps
Hi,
anyone know about this problem in debian?
yes
^z
bg
and the terminal ignore any pressed key || combination.
Seems to be debian-specific, does not happen on slackware (don't know
about any other distros)
Michal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:58:24AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:39:19PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I beleive this method is patented by somebody, [snip]
has someone a pointer?
Here's some stuff from my mail archives - I haven't checked whether
the links
Sander Smeenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your packages are fine, Thom will add 'Provides' lines for the
apache2-modules packagename. :) Thanks alot for your effort to package
this.
These are actually David's packages, I just updated them.
Now let's lart Thom for compiling apache2
* Sander Smeenk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Quoting Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Very nice :) But I have 2 things:
1) Where's apache2-modules? Subversion depends on them!
Subversion needs to update :) Happily, I don't have to be back compat, but I
will add a provides for
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:22:50AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:25:22AM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
With the standard rsync algorithm, the rsync checksum files would actually
be 8 times larger than the original file (you need to store the checksum
for
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Michal Medvecký wrote:
Hi,
anyone know about this problem in debian?
yes
^z
bg
and the terminal ignore any pressed key || combination.
Well, I don't see anything unexpected:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ yes
y
y
y
y
[lots of y's...]
y
y
y
[1]+
* Marcelo E. Magallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Sander Smeenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your packages are fine, Thom will add 'Provides' lines for the
apache2-modules packagename. :) Thanks alot for your effort to package
this.
These are actually David's packages, I just updated
On Sunday 07 April 2002 22:26, King Leo (Martin Oberzalek) wrote:
Hello,
it's not possible linking a C++ library compiled with g++-2.9x to a C++
application compiled with g++-3.0.
We all no the reasons...
My question is how I should handle this, on debian distributions that
are based on
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:49:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Jeroen Dekkers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Isn't the goal of Debian
providing a free system so users don't have to run any non-free
software anymore?
No, no, nonono, no, no, no.
Yes, of course. That's one of Debian's main
Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
Od: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 10
11:26:22 2002
Temat: Re: sid: libc6-2.2.5-4 kills vmware workstation 3.0
Data: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:25:53 +0200
* Jeroen Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:26:17AM -0700, Robert Tiberius Johnson wrote:
This looks like an interesting algorithm, so I decided to compare it to
the diff scheme analyzed in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200204/msg00502.html
The above message also gives my analysis
Hi Raphael!
You wrote:
Please grab it, burn it, and try to boot on it (you can also install
Debian with it if you want :-)).
I just tried it, and it seems to work very well. I had no problems
booting whatsoever.
If you have troubles during the installation process, please report your
I mean:
yes
^z
fg (sorry:)
^c
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Michal Medveck wrote:
Hi,
anyone know about this problem in debian?
yes
^z
bg
and the terminal ignore any pressed key || combination.
Seems to be debian-specific, does not happen on slackware (don't know
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:29:05PM +0200, Michal Medvecký [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
I mean:
yes
^z
fg (sorry:)
^c
Nothing strange happens to me with zsh or bash when I try that.
Daniel
--
/ Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---\
|
Evening ladies and gents,
got a file here that's set suid root as a tty device.
$ dpkg -S /dev/ptmx
dpkg: /dev/ptmx not found
$
doing a
$ grep ptmx -r /var/lib/dpkg/ | less
snipped
$
shows the tetex-base tetex-extra packages and their
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:52:21AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:32:16PM -0700, Mark Rafn wrote:
I'm not certain I agree. Point one of the social contract is Debian Will
Remain 100% Free Software. The obvious reading of this is that anything
that is not free
Quoting Marcelo E. Magallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Now let's lart Thom for compiling apache2 against libdb3, instead of
libdb4, which renders subversion unusable :)
Again, I don't know about this...
Thom does :) He didn't want tons of emails questioning where to get
libdb4
Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
gettext (0.10.40-5) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Modified /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50gettext.el so that it only uses
modify-coding-system-alist when it's actually ok to do so.
This closes: #110416 (xemacs21) and also closes: #141446 (emacs19).
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 05:51:30AM -0700, David D. W. Downey wrote:
I know that a grep -i ptmx -r kernel-source-2.4.18/ will show a
Pseudo-tty which is fine. The devices.txt shows that it's a Master pty
for the pty master multiplex, and the lettering positions within the pty array
list.
at 20020410-0651
**
Checking available source versions...
sbuild received SIGTERM -- shutting down
**
Finished at 20020410-0651
Build needed 00
Quoting Peter S Galbraith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk space
Just FYI, this '0k disk space' means there was 0k disk space needed to
build the package. (Since it got killed with SIGTERM).
Ah, I thought the reverse for some reason (killed because of no space).
But
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:01:57PM +0200, Michal Medveck? wrote:
Hi,
I think the y stream of the background process running
obfuscates your command prompt and it seems not
to be accepting commands...
On my potato with 2.4.18 if I do:
bash ~$ yes|grep -v y
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:29:49PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:22:50AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:25:22AM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
With the standard rsync algorithm, the rsync checksum files would actually
be 8
Dear Nicolas,
woody is coming and libxslt package in testing is still at version
1.0.12 which has a fastidious bug/feature that create .memdump files
spread all over the filesystem (includeing / !!!). In later versions
at least this bug/feature is not compiled unless explicitely stated with
a
In reference to a message from Stefano Zacchiroli, dated Apr 10:
I and the upstream author have fixed the C++ problem that inhibit
gmetadom to build on HPPA with g++ 3.0.
Could someone then rebuilt gmetadom and two of the packages that depend
on it on HPPA?
if you upload new
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:06:44AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello everybody,
release is coming soon ... and we need a bit of feedback about
a new feature we plan to use on CD1 of Debian woody for i386.
On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a core
component
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
I just tried it, and it seems to work very well. I had no problems
booting whatsoever.
I did just a quick look (no real install just booted and selected the
language) and I really like the i18n stuff!!!
Great job! Many thanks!
Kind regards
On Wednesday 10 Apr 2002 3:36 pm, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
As a last resort I can NMU it, even if I'm not very in touch with the
package nor with the upstream sources.
When I prepared the NMU libxslt greater than 1.0.12 needed a newer libxml2
than was available in the archive. Now it should
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-10
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: billard-gl
Version : 1.70
Upstream Author : Various [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.billardgl.de/
* License : GPL
Description : A billiard game using OpenGL
--
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
gettext (0.10.40-5) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
Does gettext still depend om emacs-* through gettext-el? I really would
like to see that fixed before gettext makes it to testing.
[...]
Hello,
afaics 0.10.40-4
LAPTOP
PENTIUM 4,WINDOW 98 2ND. 2.2 GHZ INTEL AT SPEEDS UP TO 2.8 GHZ
UTILIZING THE LATEST DDR RAM UPGRADE RAM TO 1024MB(PC2100)266MHZ
40 GB ULTRA ATA /100(BUILT IN HARD DRIVE UP TO40 GB
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Gerhard Muntingh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 01:36:40PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On Apr 07, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Isn't it a bit heavy to make debconf depend on python ?
Why would debconf have to depend on python? You stick the module in
and only
hi all,
i packaged gshield 2.7.1 for debian. everything is available at
http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gshield/ .
please check it!
thanks
cavok
-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:11:14AM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
if you upload new sources/versions they will automatically be retried,
please check the buildd logs at http://buildd.debian.org/ to see the
status.
Already done it, but I'm experiencing delays on hppa, so I asked here.
assuming
Am 10.04.02 um 15:57:37 schrieb Will Newton:
but beware that libxml2 currently has an RC bug so libxslt will be
blocked until that is fixed.
No RC bug there, Junichi Uekawa downgraded it himself.
I'm not sure if Nicholas reads this list, I had no success contacting him
previously.
Please
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
gettext (0.10.40-5) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Modified /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50gettext.el so that it only uses
modify-coding-system-alist when it's actually ok to do so.
This closes:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
But I don't know why it got killed ;)
Maybe some admin thought there were some important packages to process.
:-(
It's more likely killed because the build daemon was brought down for
maintenance. Since it didn't even download the source, the
Scheme Disk space Bandwidth
---
Checksums (bwidth optimal)26K 81K
diffs (4 days)32K 331K
diffs (9 days)71K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggerì:
You might have luck with 2.4 and the UDF filesystem and udftools.
Haven't tried it myself, so I'm not sure it'll work. :)
But I have already tried: the kernel still assume the cd drive as
read-only at low level (or so I've been said :) , so I can only
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve As a developer, I am by no means in a position to try to
Steve interpret what the phrasers of the Social Contract /really/
Steve meant to say. They wrote what they wrote, and I agreed to it
Steve as written; as did many other developers
Package: x2x
Version: 1.27-6
I no longer have the time or the inclination to maintain x2x. I've just
fixed a quick imake bug and orphaned it. A previous NMU'er has helpfully
debhelperised the package for you.
--
Charles Briscoe-Smith Hacking Free Software for fun and profit
When
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
The issue is that the Debian Social Contract doesn't say All software
in Debian will remain 100% free, it says Debian will remain 100% Free
Software.
Interesting. I had always read it as Debian will remain (100% Free)
Software,
Adam == Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Adam Um, you byte-compile when building the package, duh.
Adam Any runtime compilation is wrong(and yes, I include emacs in this).
Emacs doesn't do runtime byte compilation. Debian emacs add on
modules to install time bye compilation, which
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Emacs doesn't do runtime byte compilation. Debian emacs add on
modules to install time bye compilation, which is not run time. Any
reason you think byte compilation ought not to happen on
installation? (slowing down the install is one
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:14:36PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
If you have troubles during the installation process, please report your
problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are people working on the dutch translation of the installation? If not,
I could do it.
We still don't have anyone to
Hi,
after unsuccessful attempts to contact the maintainer of gnuchess, Martin
Mitchell (he did not answer at all to my emails), I would like to propose
a change to the packaging of gnuchess. Andreas Tille did at least do an
NMU to update to version 5.03 which fixes several outstanding bugs. One
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The byte compilation should be done when the package is built, not
at runtime, not at install time.
So you're saying that the maintainer should need to either create
separate packages for a given add-on for all current (and future)
Emacs flavors, or that
#include hallo.h
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 10:45:35AM:
On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a core
component mere weeks before the scheduled release? There is no way that it
Why not? Weeks != days.
could receive sufficient testing in that
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:24:00PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve As a developer, I am by no means in a position to try to
Steve interpret what the phrasers of the Social Contract /really/
Steve meant to say. They wrote what they
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Alan Shutko wrote:
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The byte compilation should be done when the package is built, not
at runtime, not at install time.
So you're saying that the maintainer should need to either create
separate packages for a given add-on for all
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:30:08PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
current (and future) Emacs flavors within the one package, even though
for most people that will be useless data?
Not to mention requiring huge amounts of disk space for Emacs packages
even though the maintainer is likely to use only
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:03:11PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
The history section in my book, which is declared invarient in the
license, was written by Ian M. and has no technical bearing on the rest of
the book's content, but has every reason
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
Not to mention requiring huge amounts of disk space for Emacs packages
even though the maintainer is likely to use only one.
Is debian for maintainers or users?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 06:38:13PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
But does that mean they can posts question about problems with that
non-free software which are not related to Debian at all (the only
relation is that the user runs
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 14:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
I'd be happy to hear clarifications from the author and contemporaries,
then; to be honest, my memory of Debian history isn't good enough to
even know who to approach. (The debian-doc package is conspicuously
lacking of the relevant
Otto Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Packages: dict-easton, dict-gazetteer, dict-hitchcock
The listed packages are still located in the Potato directory,
possibly because there wasn't any update necessary during the full
Woody development phase, but maybe also because there is no interest
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is debian for maintainers or users?
Users are well-served by not requiring a maintainer to release new
byte-compiled versions of a package for a new flavor of Emacs.
--
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In a variety of flavors!
Stealing a rhinoceros should
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:56:08PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Mark Brown wrote:
Not to mention requiring huge amounts of disk space for Emacs packages
even though the maintainer is likely to use only one.
Is debian for maintainers or users?
Making it prohibitively
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:03:11PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
The freedom of expression of the author is what is being
protected by this clause. The freedom to express opinion without having
those statements twisted into something completely
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Emacs doesn't do runtime byte compilation. Debian emacs add on
modules to install time bye compilation, which is not run time. Any
reason you think byte compilation ought not to happen on
This happened to me on my first upload of libgmp3_4.0.1. At first I
thought it was a breakage caused by this library, but eventually resolved
the problem by upgrading ssh. (I use scp to do uploads to auric)
The tarball was being corrupted by ssh during the transfer.
HTH,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:54:54PM -0500, Donald J Bindner wrote:
Well, I didn't expect to inspire such a vibrant thread! A couple
of responses (not in anger, just adding some perspective).
1) free vs. non-free alternatives
I use VMWare 2.0. If you think that bochs and Plex86 aren't
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:33:00PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 10:45:35AM:
On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a core
component mere weeks before the scheduled release? There is no way that it
Why not? Weeks !=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 142164 general
Bug#142164: apt: output ignores locale
Bug reassigned from package `apt' to `general'.
severity 142164 wishlist
Bug#142164: apt: output ignores locale
Severity set to `wishlist'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
#include hallo.h
Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 04:45:08PM:
Why not? Weeks != days.
10 days != long enough to test a completely different _primary_ way of
booting the installation system.
a) isolinux is not completely new. It is syslinux, extended with ability
of reading
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:45:08PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:33:00PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
And sorry, IMHO is idepci the worst kernel-image to be used for CD#1 as
the only available flavor.
It seems to work for a large number of users, and that is its
101 - 200 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
