Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sctplib
Version : 1.0.0-pre19-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://tdrwww.exp-math.uni-essen.de/dreibholz/rserpool/
* License : LGPL
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rsplib
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://tdrwww.exp-math.uni-essen.de/dreibholz/rserpool/
* License : LGPL
Description
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: socketapi
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://tdrwww.exp-math.uni-essen.de/dreibholz/rserpool/
* License : LGPL
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 09:51:33PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
Admin installs from cd. Admin runs programs. Admin finds something he
thinks
is a bug. Admin reads changelog to see if the bug existed previously.
hmm.. why would he do that?
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:00:58AM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
Hello,
This is off-topic for debian-devel -- we have a -vote list for discussion
of votes, please use it. Followups to -vote.
In,
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/comp/vote.html
you claim:
] Generalised
Perhaps we can look at this a different way. I haven't read anyone
voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
loud) is a 'good fellow'. I'm supposing that all of us agree that
he's a snake-oil salesmen of the odious kind, interested most in
lining his pockets and the
(Unintentionally, I first sent the reply to you directly.)
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Incidentally North America != USA.
And your point is, what?
A Canadian conference would be in North America and satisfy the
objections of people who don't like the US,
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:55:31PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
Perhaps we can look at this a different way. I haven't read anyone
voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
loud) is a 'good fellow'.
Probably because it's completely off topic for this mailing list. Take
it
Hello,
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:45:51PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
I'm going to focus only on your claim that this page shows an example
of the violation of monotonicity by Manoj's proposal.
Monotonicity (http://electionmethods.org/evaluation.html#MC) requires
With the relative order or
Martin Schulze wrote:
Only a few people will probably have noticed the mess resulting from
tons of different kernel packages in the stable (and unstable)
distribution. Not only there are several versions of kernel source in
each architecture, they are also different for most architectures.
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent dangers to non-americans
coming into the country.
Two of the people I
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:04:05AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Martin Schulze wrote:
Only a few people will probably have noticed the mess resulting from
tons of different kernel packages in the stable (and unstable)
distribution. Not only there are several versions of kernel source in
Frank Gevaerts wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 10:15:54AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
plug
I could use some non-mac m68k boxes to do exactly that :-)
/plug
Does that include boxes that are not supported by the kernel yet ? I
have a VME 68030 board with full hardware documentation
On Fri, 23 May 2003 17:04, Martin Schulze wrote:
I wonder if some people (Maybe Manoj and Russell, who are both quite
competent) could help with this effort.
I would love to contribute, however at the moment I am over-committed already.
Progress towards getting SE Linux support in main is
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 09:39:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:49:52PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616)
Ugh, also this
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debnest
* License : GPL
Description : Nested Build System of Debian Source Package
I'm writing a debian build system to create debian binary packages
such that their original upstream
subscribe
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:12:35AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
And it generally causes confusion in bug submitters' mind: how many of
them knows the difference between a fixed and a closed bug? A brief
note about NMU changes incorporation in changelog and closing those
bugs in BTS by
Martin Schulze wrote:
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
While convenient for american developers, there are rather a number of
non-american developers who will not set foot on American soil, due in
part to the DMCA and (I imagine) the apparent dangers to non-americans
coming into the country.
Two of the people
Hi,
bugs.debian.org's web interface now decodes each part of MIME messages
for display, so for example quoted-printable and (God forbid)
base64-encoded text is now displayed in a readable form. In addition,
attachments are now only displayed as a download link rather than as a
download link plus
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manoj emphasized[1] that using one single kernel source package per
kernel version and maintaining several patch packages for each
architecture which finally build our kernel-image-$version packages is
possible.
It seems that there is some confusion
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:20:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
bugs.debian.org's web interface now decodes each part of MIME messages
for display, so for example quoted-printable and (God forbid)
base64-encoded text is now displayed in a readable form. In addition,
attachments are now only
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:20:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Hi,
bugs.debian.org's web interface now decodes each part of MIME messages
for display, so for example quoted-printable and (God forbid)
base64-encoded text is now displayed in a readable form. In addition,
attachments are now
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 05:58:15PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
That's not a problem, you just have to run diff between the source tree for
the platform in question and the Linus tree.
This only works if we have a _clean_ kernel-source-2.X.Y package. One of
the reasons why maintaining
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:45:58PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Is there any chance of these changes being merged into the debbugs
package? It's last update is over a year old...
Actually the last upload to experimental was Sun, 17 Nov 2002. But yes,
there should really be an upload to
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcodetext-perl
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Hans Jeuken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://cpan.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Syntax Highlighting for Tk
At 10:27 pm, Friday, May 23 2003, Wouter Verhelst mumbled:
Is there any chance of these changes being merged into the debbugs
package? It's last update is over a year old...
debbugs_2.4_all.deb 18-Nov-2002 22:0280k
Not quite. Well, that's experimental, but whatever.
--
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libsyntaxhighlight-perl
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Cory Johns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://cpan.org
* License : GPL
Description : Highlighting of
~~
http://www.eyangsoft.com
popgo2.0
hoho~~~email:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:93658488
13320220950
~~
2003-5-23
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:56:46PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:45:58PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Is there any chance of these changes being merged into the debbugs
package? It's last update is over a year old...
Actually the last upload to experimental was
Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:20:39 -0500
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries
to hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and
my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see
On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Morgon Kanter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD have priority over a non-DD ?
Perhaps Morgon wants to become a DD ... and
Hi,
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
initiative, but there are many others that are being
excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
- Guidelines to Debian subprojects (Do you known
what are the official and unofficial
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:28:34AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
And it generally causes confusion in bug submitters' mind: how many of
them knows the difference between a fixed and a closed bug? A brief
note about NMU changes incorporation in changelog and closing those
bugs in BTS by hand
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:20:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
bugs.debian.org's web interface now decodes each part of MIME messages
for display, so for example quoted-printable and (God forbid)
base64-encoded text is now displayed in a readable form.
I should mention also that to get a
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:04:05AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
To make it more interesting, Matt Zimmerman revealed[2] that merging all
kernel source packages would save space of one CD from our archive and our
CD images.
I was probably exaggerating slightly; I did not do the calculations.
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
None taken. And no, I am not.
[a DD]
OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD have priority over a non-DD ?
Perhaps Morgon wants to become a DD ... and packaging fltk1.1
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful information when you start out by showing you
haven't done
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Hi,
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
initiative, but there are many others that are being
excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
- Guidelines to
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 05:51:14PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
bugs.debian.org's web interface now decodes each part of MIME messages
for display, so for example quoted-printable and (God forbid)
base64-encoded text is now displayed in a readable form. In addition,
attachments are now only displayed as a download
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:58:05PM +0200, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
spiralsynthmodular (http://www.pawfal.org/Software/SSM/) : a modular
software synth. Needs fltk.
I'll take this one.
--
Chris
pgpFjKF7aVL4U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Goulais, Raphael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does this mean that debian policy is that DD have priority over a non-DD ?
Perhaps Morgon wants to become a DD ... and packaging fltk1.1 could be an
interesting work for him, and could give him some help in the process of
displaying interest to the
Marc Singer wrote:
(Unintentionally, I first sent the reply to you directly.)
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Incidentally North America != USA.
And your point is, what?
that north america contains not one, but three countries: Candada, USA,
and Mexico
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:39AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
bugs.debian.org's web interface now decodes each part of MIME
messages for display, so for example quoted-printable and (God
forbid) base64-encoded text is now displayed in a readable form.
On Fri, 23 May 2003 12:21:05 +1000, Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:20:39 -0500
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries to
hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and
my loved
On Thu, 22 May 2003 20:55:31 -0700, Marc Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Perhaps we can look at this a different way. I haven't read anyone
voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
loud) is a 'good fellow'. I'm supposing that all of us agree that
he's a snake-oil
On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:43:22 -0500, Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It may be too little if only one person does it... But I know *MANY*
people who simply will avoid (to de extent possible in Mexico, at
least) buying any American goods.
In my particular cas -and I think many other
On Fri, 23 May 2003 12:38:09 +1000, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, 23 May 2003 03:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
You are taking personal actions inimical to the standard of living
of me and my loved ones in retaliation for actions by my government
(which I have little control
On 2003.05.23 12:51, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful information when you
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 10:03:38AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
Marc Singer wrote:
(Unintentionally, I first sent the reply to you directly.)
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Incidentally North America != USA.
And your point is, what?
that
Stephen Frost dijo:
Those who have concerns or political issues need not attend but that
should not stop the conference from happening if there are enough
people who are interested.
Absolutely true, but I found Canada much mor affordable than the States
last summer ;-)
--
I would
I don't think there is any definition for what an official Debian
subproject is. And even if there were, whether it's on www.debian.org or
not would not be a reliable indicator. I choose to use www.d.o for Debian
Jr. because it is convenient for me to keep the pages there. Other
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 07:37:21PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
The fact a project is hosted somewhere usually imply some special
relations to his host.
Sure.
So even if, for Debian people, being hosted on www.debian.org is not a
reliable indicator, it's highly possible that many persons rely
On 2003.05.23 13:56, Ben Armstrong wrote:
[...]
Debian Jr. is a personal subproject[0] within Debian. It is my chosen area
of focus for Debian, and as such, the only blessing I have had from the
Debian project for it is the little parcel of web space I have for the
Debian Jr. home page
If your countrymen share that sort of attitute it explains why the
USA is in so many wars.
Yeah. We rarely suffer fools gladly.
Stop it, you're killing me. People from the USA describing others as fools.
One only has to look at the dross in US newspapers and TV news bulletins to
understand
My government may do things in a fashion that could be
improved (to put it mildly), but as a people, we are generally
benevolent, until something impinges on our consciousness and makes
us take notice. And given our collective attention span, it takes a
lot.
I'm not a DD but I
On 2003.05.23 15:10, Ben Armstrong wrote:
[...]
That being said, I do believe we need a better (more comprehensive) list of
such projects with higher visibility on the web site. But that list will
likely consist of pointers both to www.d.o and other sites
(people.debian.org, alioth, and
El día 23 may 2003, Gustavo Franco escribía:
Hi,
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
initiative, but there are many others that are being
excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
- Guidelines to Debian subprojects
On Thu, 22 May 2003, Marc Singer wrote:
Perhaps we can look at this a different way. I haven't read anyone
voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
loud) is a 'good fellow'.
Well since you asked. I think GWB is a 'good fellow'.
I'm supposing that all of us agree
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 07:07:19PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
If your countrymen share that sort of attitute it explains why the
USA is in so many wars.
Yeah. We rarely suffer fools gladly.
Stop it, you're killing me. People from the USA describing others as fools.
One only has to look
On 2003.05.23 16:06, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
[...]
Just because nobody proposed it? debian-lex started no so much ago,
and it was simply somebody proposing it and creating and mantaining
it.
BTW, apt-get install subproject-howto
Hi,
I guess that subproject-howto can be the
That's funny considering just how many people are risking their LIVES to
get here. Then again, maybe its not, maybe its an insult to the ones
who've died trying to get here over the years.
I don't think not wanting to go somewhere is an insult to other people who do
want to go there.
The
Hi,
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:14:48PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2003, Marc Singer wrote:
Perhaps we can look at this a different way. I haven't read anyone
voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out
loud) is a 'good fellow'.
Well since you
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:56:06PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
I guess that subproject-howto can be the start to 'Debian
Subproject Guidelines' or 'Debian Subproject Policy'.What do you
think, Ben?
Sure, it could be a start. The subproject-howto is intended to be a
hands-on guide to
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:01:46PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
That being said, there is certainly a difference between projects which
fork Debian to make a new distro (i.e. providing own versions of existing
Debian packages) vs. projects which add packages of their own (outside
Debian)
[Matt Zimmerman]
a) Can I get the hostname in my shell script another way (this could be a
question for this list)?
getent hosts foo.bar.baz
getent is available on Linux and Solaris (7 and 8).
It is not available on Tru64 Unix 5.2, Irix 6.5.15, Mac OS X 10.2,
HP-UX (11.00 and 11.22) and AIX
Michael Banck wrote:
/me invokes azeem's law[0]. This thread has ended.
[0] Whenever Matt Ryan enters a Flamewar, no more non-value can be added
to it and therefore the thread will die.
I'm not sure why you see my input as non-value? Surely its not the fact that
a bunch of tightly wound geeks
Hi,
I'm one of the core maintainers of GnuCash. The Debian Maintainer
has asked for my help in debugging some of the autobuild problems
with various Debian platforms. Unfortunately he cannot provide
sufficient information to help debug the problem.
In particular, part of the problem appears to
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:10:35PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2003 12:38:09 +1000, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
PPS Be grateful that you have more control over your government than
I have over mine. My government obeys yours.
So you can't control your
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
My only objection to a conference in the US is the weather is
miserable.
Which part of the US? Surely the weather in Los Angeles isn't
miserable... unless you consider the total absense of weather to be
miserable.
I want to go somewhere warm!
107F
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:14:48PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
My only objection to a conference in the US is the weather is miserable.
I want to go somewhere warm!
You want warm? Come out to Southern California, Florida, or Hawaii for
warm weather pretty much the whole year 'round. We don't
I just ran some stats on my APT sources (mostly Woody), and discovered
that the distribution of number of packages per developer is very
uneven. This is the histogram of developers with the specific number
of packages they maintain:
Packages Developers
1 239
2
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:11:57PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Matt Zimmerman]
a) Can I get the hostname in my shell script another way (this could be a
question for this list)?
getent hosts foo.bar.baz
getent is available on Linux and Solaris (7 and 8).
It is not available
[Derek Atkins]
In particular, part of the problem appears to happen during the
configure phase. In order to debug the configuration problem
I need access to the config.log during the failed build process.
This can be fixed in the package build script (debian/rules). Just
call configure like
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 05:01:51PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:20:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
bugs.debian.org's web interface now decodes each part of MIME
messages for display, so for example quoted-printable and (God
forbid) base64-encoded text is now
Guido Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This only works if we have a _clean_ kernel-source-2.X.Y package. One of
the reasons why maintaining kernel-patch-2.X.Y-arch packages is such a
pain is the asymmetry between i386 and other arches - almost every time
a new kernel-source package is
On Thu, 22 May 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2003 22:39:02 +1000, Russell Coker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote:
You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the
U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you
I have no objection to the existence of a Debian conference in the US,
particularly given that people are clamouring for one. (I probably
won't go, though.)
However, I have been bothered by something for a while now: there is no
real way to distinguish debconf from some other Debian
* Petter Reinholdtsen
| I suspect a more even distribution of packages per maintainer would be
| a good thing. :)
I think your stats are wrong, at least they are different from
http://www.debian.gr.jp/~kitame/maint.cgi
Not necessarily -- some packages are a lot of work, like xfree, glibc,
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The citizens of the US have a little more power than the rest of the world,
in that you have a *vote* as to who gets to fuck the rest of the
world.
Well, didn't work that way last time...
--
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I am the rocks.
Looking
Not necessarily -- some packages are a lot of work, like xfree, glibc,
apache, some are a decent amount of work, like mailman, cvs and some
are close to zero work, like chrpath and xslide. People also have
different amounts of time available -- those who are paid to do Debian
maintainence
Do we need some method of deciding what constitutes 'the' Debconf?
Or maybe we need to be more freeform. There is no inherent betterness of
say the Oslo conference over one held near Washington, DC. Maybe there are 4
of them one year and only one the next. Maybe we start holding one every
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Alan Shutko wrote:
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The citizens of the US have a little more power than the rest of the world,
in that you have a *vote* as to who gets to fuck the rest of the
world.
Well, didn't work that way last time...
Maybe the US
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 05:26:28PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
So, why do you think having a more even distribution is a good thing?
Or rather, why is the current situation so bad?
indeed. Some packages are worth 10 normal packages in the amount of work
they require.
And a
Manoj Srivastava dijo [Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:05:08AM -0500]:
It is easy to take actions secure in the feeling that there
are no consequences (which seems to be part of your complaint against
my goverment).
Not at all. I know that if your economy suffers, mine suffers doubly so.
On Fri, 23 May 2003 11:58:45 -0300
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
initiative, but there are many others that are being
excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
-
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I just ran some stats on my APT sources (mostly Woody), and discovered
that the distribution of number of packages per developer is very
uneven. This is the histogram of developers with the specific number
of packages they
On Fri, 23 May 2003 17:33:58 -0700
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debconf is about Debian developers trying to meet other devels and users.
Its about trying to make us a stronger organization. Its about hacking and
all of the other reasons we love Debian.
Treating it like a
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 05:26:28PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Not necessarily -- some packages are a lot of work, like xfree, glibc,
apache, some are a decent amount of work, like mailman, cvs and some
are close to zero work, like chrpath and xslide. People also have
different
On Sat, 24 May 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
The script can't even get everything a Debian Developer does for Debian.
While most, if not all, active Debian Developers do packaging work,
there's other stuff to be done -- such as taking care of autobuilders,
being a sysadmin, ftp-master,
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
Oh no, the Collins family has 2 acres per child...those poor kids! Uh,
you say that 3.5 acres of your yard is a lake?
Dredging. With a snorkel.
El Viernes, 23 de Mayo de 2003 13:50, Celso González dijo:
Al hacer dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot obtengo lo siguiente
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ap-utils-1.3.1$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is ap-utils
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.3.1-2
dpkg-buildpackage:
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo, a las 14:17 CEST del viernes 23 may 2003, comentó:
El día 23 may 2003, Celso González escribía:
Al hacer dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot obtengo lo siguiente
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ap-utils-1.3.1$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is ap-utils
El día 23 may 2003, Jesús Roncero escribía:
El Jueves, 22 de Mayo de 2003 18:27, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo se atrevió a
teclear:
investigando. Hacer un paquete único así, con este, me ha resultado en
cierto punto fácil, pero supongo que la aproximación para tratar este
software (los dos
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:04:48PM -0300, Ricardo Bimbo wrote:
Sou Ricardo Bimbo do Governo Eletrônico da Prefeitura de São Paulo. Fazemos
os projeto Telecentros e temos 57 unidades abertas (serão 107 até agosto)
usamos Debian em todos os nossos Telecentros e até hoje já oferecemos cursos
a
96 matches
Mail list logo
