On October 23, 2003, I was invited to attend a Open Source Education
Foundation (OSEF)[0] public meeting, and walked out as a board member of
their newly expanded board. This is, I believe, an important step that
will strengthen both Debian Jr. and OSEF.
OSEF and Debian Jr. are not strangers.
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 09:01:13AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
| L'installateur Debian est dans un état utilisable en ce moment.
|
| wget -nd
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/daily/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
|
|[../..]
Bonjour ,
J'ai essaye la version du 30 octobre.
Sauf
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:43:07AM +0100, sferriol wrote:
[...]
il faudrait mieux améliorer cdebconf, car à l'avenir je pense qu'il va
remplacer debconf.
Heu, franchement ça m'étonnerait, sa seule fonction est d'être utilisé
dans le debian-installer, et on ne se prive pas pour rajouter des
Greg Stark wrote:
The only interface for rolling back is switching the entire machine to an
earlier distribution and telling apt to try to downgrade -- which is unlikely
to work. And worse, every time you run apt it only downloads and unpacks
*more* packages, all of which, of course, fail as
Theodore == Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Theodore com-err is pretty safe and low-risk, so there should be
Theodore no problem using the latest version in unstable.
Oki. Will do. Thanx.
--
fissionable radar KGB 747 Saddam Hussein iodine domestic disruption
president BATF
Joerg == Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joerg Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where can I find '= 2.0-1.33-2' (or something around that
number)? It used to be an 'attic' (morgue I think it is
called) on ftp-master. This however only have files roughly
Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I finally convinced a sysadmin friend of mine that Debian was the way and the
light. He started a new job and showed up on his first day to set up his
machine by installing Debian. In short, things went horribly wrong and he
started this new job by wasting
A levelezm azt hiszi, hogy [EMAIL PROTECTED] a kvetkezeket rta:
but I wouldn't touch Herbert's kernels with a ten-feet pole.
[]
a) I can do better
usual response
Please do then.
/usual response
I guess having kernel-image-vanilla and/or
kernel-image-onlybugfix in debian would not hurt.
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:43:29PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 03-Nov-03, 14:21 (CST), Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
insert usual rant on how useless stable is for desktop and how testing
is even worse than unstable
Oh, not this crap again. Or perhaps you're contending that
Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joerg If it was a package then its available at
Joerg snapshot.debian.net
Is this web only (tried both ssh and ftp)?
Yes.
But apt-able if you want.
For every single day you need. Read its webpage. :)
--
bye Joerg
Christian bignachos: the
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:53:36AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
It would be helpful if Debian could even be installed on machines newer
than about 2 years old. Neither my KT400 based machine nor my i875P
based machine could be installed using the standard Debian
boot-floppies. I had to resort to
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:05:56PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
I finally convinced a sysadmin friend of mine that Debian was the way and the
light.
Ah, there's your mistake.
Don't do that. Anybody who uses Debian as a result of this sort of
evangelism is going to have a similar experience, so
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:47:30AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
So all it would take to make the tools handle this would be to somehow make
apt aware of more revisions of packages. They're all in the pool after all.
Short of making some king of humongous mega-Packages file with every revision
of
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 07:42:27 -0500, spender [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Go ahead and do it. I could frankly care less if your users get
owned.
There's another exploitable bug in Exec-shield that I've known of
for months. Maybe you'll find it after you put it into Debian.
Maybe not. This
Hi!
I volunteered to make a package for exec-shield because it meets the Debian
criteria, I have time to do it, and it interests me. PaX would take much
more time so I can't do it.
You cannot do it or you don't want to do it? In fact, anyone can do it Russell,
I'm pretty sure even you can
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 08:17:06AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
I challenge the assertion that this affects a large portion of users.
In the past few months, I've installed woody on roughly 30-40
different types of box, all aged 0-3 years, and only one was
unsupported by woody (and that was
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:22:10AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
| I refuse to use nvidia products, but I somehow doubt that boards based
| on their nforce2 chipset work properly either.
I have a machine using the nforce2 chipset and the Woody installer
doesn't recognise its IDE controller. (Proper
[NB: When reponsding using the web archives, please get the References
and In-Reply-To: correctly. You may also consider setting MFT:]
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003, Peter Busser wrote:
PaX would take much more time so I can't do it.
You cannot do it or you don't want to do it?
Russell has made it
On Tuesday 04 Nov 2003 05:47, Greg Stark wrote:
to list the available revisions then explicitly
apt-get install libc6:2.3.2-8
Actually this wouldn't really have helped my friend at all because he was
unlucky enough that the *first* version of libc6 from unstable that he saw
happened to be
Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Regardless updating boot-floppies when new kernels come out would be a
good idea so that newbies with recent machines can still use Debian.
Iirc Eduard Bloch (blade) provides inofficial updated boot-floppies on
people.debian.org.
cu
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
So, please don't start insulting and accusing people for doing good work
and proposing to do even more of it. If there are technical reasons that
cause you to prefer that exec-shield does not become part of Debian's
standard kernel, just put them on the table, but save
On Nov 04, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:53:36AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
It would be helpful if Debian could even be installed on machines newer
than about 2 years old. Neither my KT400 based machine nor my i875P
based machine could be installed
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Peter Busser wrote:
- Running paxtest shows the differences between PaX and exec-shield.
Everyone is invited to run paxtest to see for yourself.
the reply below mostly a re-sent of a mail i sent to you privately - but
you repeat this argument again without any
Hi!
[NB: When reponsding using the web archives, please get the References
and In-Reply-To: correctly. You may also consider setting MFT:]
I can't post from the lists.debian.org site.
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003, Peter Busser wrote:
PaX would take much more time so I can't do it.
You cannot
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:04:11 +
Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er, doesn't apt-get install libc6=2.3.2-8 do exactly this?
No because of a conflict with (file own by) libdb1-compat.
Well, it was the problem I faced.
Best regards,
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
: :' :
This one time, at band camp, Ian Murdock wrote:
We have ported Red Hat's Anaconda installer to Debian;
This rocks. I have an extensive PXE+kickstart based server build system at
work and I was considering hacking d-i to read a kickstart configuration
file, this looks like it's saved me the
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:54:25PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:04:11 +
Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er, doesn't apt-get install libc6=2.3.2-8 do exactly this?
No because of a conflict with (file own by) libdb1-compat.
Uh, 2.3.2-8 is well after the
Hi!
the reply below mostly a re-sent of a mail i sent to you privately - but
you repeat this argument again without any apparent answer to my
counter-arguments.
I already suggested you to reread the PaX documentation, there are the answers
to your questions. There is no need to copy/paste it
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:39:46PM +0100, Peter Busser wrote:
Why not volunteer to make the .deb, get a sponsor and get it uploaded
then?
Good idea! Already did that in fact. So who do I send this new kernel-source
.deb to?
You can use the mentors service to exchange your packages with
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:18:00 +
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:54:25PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:04:11 +
Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er, doesn't apt-get install libc6=2.3.2-8 do exactly this?
No because of a
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:47:30AM -0500, Greg Stark said
or perhaps a little less automatic,
apt-cache show libc6
to list the available revisions then explicitly
apt-get install libc6:2.3.2-8
With a s/:/=/ and a sources.list line pointing at sid, say, two days ago
on
* Peter Busser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031104 13:55]:
You didn't touch the other facts in the list, because you know you don't have
any proof to easily dismiss them. You would be my hero if you succeeded in
improving on PaX. But in all honesty, exec-shield does not do that I'm afraid.
In fact,
on Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:57:34PM -0500, Greg Stark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First, I think what Daniel Jacobowitz said is entirely true. Why didn't you
start with testing?
Sure testing is less likely to trigger this.
Frankly, I'd have
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Peter Busser wrote:
the reply below is mostly a re-send of a mail i sent to you privately
but you repeat this argument again without any apparent answer to my
counter-arguments.
I already suggested you to reread the PaX documentation, there are the
answers to your
Christoph Martin schrieb:
I have build unofficial Galeon 1.2.12 packages for Debian woody based on
the Mozilla 1.5 packages backported to woody from
http://debian.relativ.org/.
Just add the following line to your /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://www.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de debian/
The
Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003, Peter Busser wrote:
In fact, anyone can do it Russell, I'm pretty sure even you can do
it:
Why not volunteer to make the .deb, get a sponsor and get it uploaded
then?
Good idea! Already did that in fact. So who do I send this
Peter Busser wrote:
Summary: i can see no significant differences between the paxtest output -
all the differences seem to be bogus, see the details below.
Fact is: There is a difference in paxtest output between PaX and exec-shield.
And it is not a difference in exec-shield's advantage.
Peter, no
Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I volunteered to make a package for exec-shield because it meets
the Debian criteria, I have time to do it, and it interests me.
PaX would take much more time so I can't do it.
You cannot do it or you don't want to do it? In fact, anyone can do
it
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 19:53, Peter Busser wrote:
I volunteered to make a package for exec-shield because it meets the
Debian criteria, I have time to do it, and it interests me. PaX would
take much more time so I can't do it.
You cannot do it or you don't want to do it? In fact, anyone can
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-11-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cdcat
Version : 0.92
Upstream Author : Peter Deak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://cdcat.sf.net
* License : GPL
Description : a graphical (QT based) catalog program
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:42:27AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go ahead and do it. I could frankly care less if your users get owned.
In that case it seems safer to avoid using any software you helped
to develop.
Richard Braakman
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:20:26PM +0100, Jorge Bernal (Koke) wrote:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-11-04
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cdcat
Version : 0.92
Upstream Author : Peter Deak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://cdcat.sf.net
*
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:45:10PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
Please apply the following patch:
--- config.cpp-orig 2003-11-04 15:36:58.0 +
+++ config.cpp 2003-11-04 15:37:06.0 +
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
#else
if(getenv(HOME) == NULL)
return 1;
-
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:45:10 +
Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please apply the following patch:
Done :)
--
Dios es real, a no ser que sea declarado como entero
Jorge Bernal Koke http://sindominio.net/~koke/
Jabber-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:22:10AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
Intel
-
i845 10 Sept 2001
i875 14 Apr 2003
i865 21 May 2003
The last two don't have AGP support before 2.4.23-preX (not sure if X
is 1 or not), and the on-board network cards which many of the the
motherboards based
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:53:36AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
It would be helpful if Debian could even be installed on machines newer
than about 2 years old.
It would be helpful if people wouldn't make sweeping generalizations all the
time. Only a part of the new machines are made with hardware
Also note that I use LSM on all my kernels, so anything that conflicts with
LSM is something that I have no ability to test and therefore no interest in
maintaining. I'm sure I could get PaX working with LSM, but it would take
some work. Anyway I'll look into this matter after I upload an
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:53:36AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
It would be helpful if Debian could even be installed on machines newer
than about 2 years old.
It would be helpful if people wouldn't make sweeping generalizations all the
time. Only a
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:56:23AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now surely, Russell, a security expert such as yourself is capable of
copy+pasting that last reject in the file. Doing this took one minute.
I would imagine this was much less time than it took for you to write
your
Chris Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er no they are not all in the pool. The only packages in the pool are
the current versions for stable/testing/unstable/experimental. There are
also the few packages that haven't been completely compiled on all archs
yet and so are still left in archive
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:56:37AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
It would be helpful if Debian could even be installed on machines newer
than about 2 years old.
It would be helpful if people wouldn't make sweeping generalizations all the
time. Only a part of the new machines are made with
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:47:30AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
So all it would take to make the tools handle this would be to somehow
make apt aware of more revisions of packages. They're all in the pool
after all. Short of making some king of humongous mega-Packages file with
every revision of
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Are you so certain that Exec-shield stops execution in shared
library bss/data? [...]
no, it doesnt, this is the main (and pretty much only) substantial
difference between exec-shield and PaX. Exec-shield will stop execution in
ET_EXEC
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:53:04PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:22:10AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
| I refuse to use nvidia products, but I somehow doubt that boards based
| on their nforce2 chipset work properly either.
I have a machine using the nforce2 chipset
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:11:43AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Suggested project: Create a package that, a-l-apt-move, pulls packages
out of the apt cache and creates apt repositories from them. But make it
create a new repository after every upgrade, by hooking into apt. And
auto-add these
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: synaptic-touchpad
Version : 0.12.0
Upstream Author : Peter Österlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340/touchpad/index.html
* License : GPL
Description : Synaptics TouchPad driver
Hi there,
I would like to give three of my packages for adoption:
dumpasn1
This is a useful program if you work with files using the ASN.1 syntax,
eg. X.509 cerificates. I needed this in my previous job, but not any
more.
Upstream is responsive, no bugs.
tcpreen
This is a sort of proxy. It
[@ -legal: please cc me on reply as I'm not subscribed]
Hi folks,
We (Network UPS Tools project) are currently
looking at creating a complete documentation
set using docbook, for output formats and i18n
reasons.
This improvement in the upstream will, by side
effect, (re)create a nut-doc package in
Le mar 04/11/2003 à 16:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Also, I think both you and Ingo will be interested to see the results of
a bugfixed version of paxtest. Are you so certain that Exec-shield
stops execution in shared library bss/data? Or did you just say it
because that's what a
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (local.debian-devel) you wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: synaptic-touchpad
Version : 0.12.0
Upstream Author : Peter Österlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340/touchpad/index.html
*
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:51:52PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mar 04/11/2003 à 16:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Also, I think both you and Ingo will be interested to see the results of
a bugfixed version of paxtest. Are you so certain that Exec-shield
stops execution in shared
Hi Alex.
I'd like to know if you are still working for your debian packages,
specially libelfg0 which one of my packages may depend on.
If you have no time, I'd like to take over this package since it's
pretty important for me.
Thanks.
--
Andres Roldan
Fluidsignal Group [EMAIL
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:49:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Are you so certain that Exec-shield stops execution in shared
library bss/data? [...]
no, it doesnt, this is the main (and pretty much only) substantial
difference between
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:49:38PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote:
Knowing that:
- NUT is a pure GPL project, thus we need a _free_
documentation licence,
So, what are your advices about choosing a _free_
documentation licence for NUT?
Why not use the GPL to cover the documentation as well?
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] the main point of my argument: exec-shield=2 means enabling
exec-shield on all binaries but the ones it is disabled for. This would
be a secure-by-default design, and yet it's being recommended for
testing purposes only? [...]
yes. It's a
Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[@ -legal: please cc me on reply as I'm not subscribed]
Hi folks,
We (Network UPS Tools project) are currently
looking at creating a complete documentation
set using docbook, for output formats and i18n
reasons.
That's great. Thanks.
This
On Tue 4 November, spender wrote:
I've spared you your precious time and gone ahead and done this for
you.
You might have a better reception if you dropped the attitude.
Anyone reading the thread will quickly form the opinion that maintaining
PaX within Debian would likely require frequent
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm looking for someone to take over maintenance of the lm-sensors
hardware monitoring package, along with the corresponding i2c interface
kernel modules. These two packages have the same upstream and they're
pretty closely related, so it'd be nice if they had the
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Exec-shield can stop, but will stop is a completely different
matter. I'll let the bugfixed paxtest tell this story, however.
i am 100% sure that by taking the range-property of exec-shield into
account you can construct 'bugfixed' mapping
Hi there!
Well, this is to announce that I just [re-]packaged the Linux kernel. It's
not that I'm unhappy with the current (somewhat strange) way of packaging
Linux, but rather than I wanted to try something new and package it as a
standard Debian package (which means, sources in orig.tar.gz,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:01:10PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
Hm, it appears to be true that not every single revision is here. But there
are certainly more than just the unstable and testing revisions too:
libc6_2.2.5-11.2_i386.deb 26-Sep-2002 11:32 3.2M
stable
since a few points have been made regarding $subject, let me clear
up a few of them:
1. 'It seems that exec-shield does 99% of what PaX does'
i don't know the origin of that number above, for now i'll just
stick to the facts i know:
- PaX implements perfect non-executable pages on amd64,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:20:26PM +0100, Jorge Bernal (Koke) wrote:
Description : a graphical (QT based) catalog program
The cdcat is a graphical (QT based) multiplatform (Linux/Windows)
catalog program which scan your directoryes/drives you want and
memoryze the filesystem
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: libgetopt-argvfile-perl
Version : 1.06
Upstream Author : Jochen Stenzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Getopt-ArgvFile/
License : Artistic
Description : simple supplement to option
Hello Developers,
I would like to inform you, that some important changes happened to
t1lib 1.3.1-4[1] package.
I changed the naming scheme. All binary packages contain version in its
name, i.e.: t1lib-dev is now named t1lib1-dev. Of course old packages are
provided as a dumb packages with
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ben Armstrong wrote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
For two years, Justin Zeigler of OSEF has handed out Knoppix for Kids
CDs[1] to dozens of Trick-or-treaters visiting his house on Halloween.
Sigh.. Ben, your email comes five days too late. We could have had so
much fun now
On Tuesday 04 Nov 2003 21:54, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ben Armstrong wrote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
For two years, Justin Zeigler of OSEF has handed out Knoppix for Kids
CDs[1] to dozens of Trick-or-treaters visiting his house on Halloween.
Sigh.. Ben, your email
On 03-Nov-03, 16:22 (CST), Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, not this crap again. Or perhaps you're contending that what is
usefull for you is usefull for everybody.
No, I didn't, My point was to object to YOUR contention that anything
over 3 months old is Useless. Woody Emacs works
I juest copied some descriptions from the cdcat website and it seems the english
of the author is worst than mine ;)
Here is he modified result (I'll update the package tomorrow if there's no
other correction):
Description: a graphical catalog program
The cdcat is a graphical multiplatform
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:20, Jorge Bernal (Koke) wrote:
Description : a graphical (QT based) catalog program
As Matthew said, drop QT based. Also drop the leading a, and
graphical too, I think.
What you should insert is what sort of catalog program it is. For
example:
Description: music
yes. It's a compatible opt-in for something that cannot be enabled for all
binaries, instead of an opt-out. You say it's a bug, i say it's a feature.
A really bad analogy: it's like spam, you want to opt-in not opt-out ;)
That is indeed a really bad analogy. Security shouldn't be as
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:00:57AM +0100, Jorge Bernal wrote:
Description: a graphical catalog program
Catalog of what? Music, by the look of it. Can it scan anything other than
MP3s? if not, you could say it's an MP3 catalog program.
The cdcat is a graphical multiplatform (Linux/Windows)
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:03:38 +1100
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe fix the capitalisation of CDCat to that which upstream uses.
What about this?:
Description: media catalog program
CDCat is a graphical, multiplatform media catalog program which scans the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Followup-For: Bug #212988
I just compiled a copy of turck-mmcache today, and absolutely love it.
It's working nearly perfectly on my system, integrating well with PHP4
and Apache. This doesn't seem like a terrifically difficult package to
put in: like all the
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since a few points have been made regarding $subject, let me clear
up a few of them:
1. 'It seems that exec-shield does 99% of what PaX does'
this is not the case and i'm not claiming it. If you feel attacked, please
dont - i'll stipulate that
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:44:40AM +0100, Jorge Bernal wrote:
What about this?:
Description: media catalog program
CDCat is a graphical, multiplatform media catalog program which scans the
directories/drives you specify and makes a list of the filesystem (including
the tags of
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:22:35PM -0500, Andrés Roldán wrote:
I'd like to know if you are still working for your debian packages,
specially libelfg0 which one of my packages may depend on.
If you have no time, I'd like to take over this package since it's
pretty important for me.
I have
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:17:12PM -0500, Alex Pennace wrote:
A well meaning NMU to unstable can be helpful in the interim.
Naturally, submit a bug to describe the NMU; a diff is useful. If I
notice any problems I'll work with the uploader while the package is
still in unstable.
I'm confused
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:42:14PM -0800, Tom wrote:
I'm confused by the concept of NMU: can anybody just arbitrarily upload
a new version of a package? I have a feeling that are some controls but
it seems pretty wild and wooly, and subject to abuse.
Any Debian Developer can, but not
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:48:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
I guess having kernel-image-vanilla and/or
kernel-image-onlybugfix in debian would not hurt.
Or kernel-image-hx ... what caught me out was believing
kernel-image-2.4.xx or whatever was relatively pristine. However naive
that makes
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:12:38PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:05:56PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
All he had to do was install an older version of libc6 and every other
package
would have been happy. All the infrastructure is there to do this, the old
packages are
On 4 Nov 2003, Greg Stark wrote:
So all it would take to make the tools handle this would be to somehow make
apt aware of more revisions of packages. They're all in the pool after all.
Short of making some king of humongous mega-Packages file with every revision
of every package -- which apt
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
second, paxtest had some bugs which Exec-Shield exposed and made
Exec-Shield appear better than it is. i've fixed them here and
expect to release 0.9.5 today or so. the results now look like:
i downloaded the new 0.9.5 paxtest package and
Scripsit Jorge Bernal (Koke) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CDCat is a graphical, multiplatform media catalog program which scans the
directories/drives you specify and makes a list of the filesystem (including
the tags of MP3s) and stores the result in a gzipped XML file.
Perhaps not drives, unless
What family is the potato bug in?
Because I saw one in my back yard.
It was reaaly freaky.
Tell me .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 08:06:58 +0100
Source: sawfish
Binary: sawfish-gnome sawfish sawfish-lisp-source
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:1.3+cvs20031104-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian Marillat [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:17:42 +0100
Source: root-portal
Binary: root-portal
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.5.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 22:16:50 +0100
Source: gcompris
Binary: gcompris-data gcompris-sound-de gcompris-sound-es gcompris-sound-fr
gcompris-sound-pt gcompris gcompris-sound-en
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:38:21 +0530
Source: openslp
Binary: libslp1 openslp-doc slpd libslp-dev slptool
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.0.11-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ganesan Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 16:47:43 +0100
Source: h5utils
Binary: h5utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7.2-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
