On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 09:49:22PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Dan == Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we
Dan should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time
Dan to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 10:56:56PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Dan == Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we
Dan should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time
Dan to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and
Dan == Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we
Dan should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time
Dan to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why
Dan the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 10:05:09PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Nobody has moved on getting libstdc++2.8 back in slink, even without
a -dev.
Is anyone going to do this?
Ben
See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we should? right
now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time to
Dan == Dan Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan See, it's not Is anyone going to? or Do we agree we
Dan should? right now. It's does anyone but Dan have the time
Dan to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why
Dan the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose
On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 12:54:27PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Ray == Ray J.H.M. writes:
Ray Personally, I'd rather see the packages that still depend on
Ray libstdc++2.8 recompiled for libstdc++2.9 .
Of course, of course, nobody's arguing that. APT will be recompiled
for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, do we have a consensus?
2.8 should go back in slink, but marked as a oldlib.
All packages which we have source to should be recompiled with 2.8 if
possable?^
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 03:36:54AM -0700, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, do we have a consensus?
2.8 should go back in slink, but marked as a oldlib.
All packages which we have source to should be recompiled with 2.8 if
possable?
Nobody has moved on getting libstdc++2.8 back in slink, even without
a -dev.
Is anyone going to do this?
Ben
--
Brought to you by the letters F and E and the number 5.
Nerd. Loser. Jerk. Moron. Worm. Scum. Idiot. Fool. -- Pkunk, SCII
Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow?
[Note: [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't work]
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 10:05:09PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
Nobody has moved on getting libstdc++2.8 back in slink, even without a
-dev.
Daniel Jacobowitz (drow) is working on this IIRC,
Personally, I'd rather see the packages that still depend on
Ray == Ray J.H.M. writes:
Ray Personally, I'd rather see the packages that still depend on
Ray libstdc++2.8 recompiled for libstdc++2.9 .
Of course, of course, nobody's arguing that. APT will be recompiled
for libstdc++2.9. However, commercial apps and apps that are not part
of Debian
11 matches
Mail list logo
