On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 07:31:09PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > Obviously I cannot promise anything here; I'm currently even more in the
> > dark
> > than you. :-) But if there's a list of relevant bugs somewhere, I at least
> > have a place to try to understand the issues at hand.
The one
On 06.12.21 20:43, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:58:17PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on d-release
that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a discussion
about ending security support for
On 07.12.21 19:14, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 07:05:29PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
So you being a DD and soon at work on Chromium the hope was that maybe you
could conduct some of upstream love to care about the world outside of
Google (?), here in particular
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 07:05:29PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> So you being a DD and soon at work on Chromium the hope was that maybe you
> could conduct some of upstream love to care about the world outside of
> Google (?), here in particular Debian's effort to provide Chromium to its
>
Hi Steinar,
On 07.12.21 10:07, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
I note that Steinar Gunderson [1] is now employed by Google to work on
Chrome, so maybe there could be hope talking to him?
It's right that I'm just joining the
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> I note that Steinar Gunderson [1] is now employed by Google to work on
> Chrome, so maybe there could be hope talking to him?
Hi,
It's right that I'm just joining the Chromium team, although probably not in
an area that is
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> The biggest difficulty, as far as I can tell from my look at Chromium from
> several months ago, is that our patch set [1] needs a lot of attention with
> every chromium release.
And let me ask another silly question: where can we actually see a CI log for a
failed
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:58:17PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> >> So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on
>> >> d-release that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a
>> >> discussion about ending security support for
On 06.12.21 22:53, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 08:53:37PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
I have good experience with some of my upstreams where they supported me by
adapting their build system to enable building without the bundled/vendored
dependencies. Has this been tried? Would
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 08:53:37PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I have good experience with some of my upstreams where they supported me by
> adapting their build system to enable building without the bundled/vendored
> dependencies. Has this been tried? Would it be worth pursuing?
It has been,
Hi,
On 06-12-2021 20:43, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
One lesson we may take from Mint, though, is that it's not worth trying
to patch Chromium as much as we'd like. Anything that we can do to
simplify the Chromium packaging will help us keep the package
up-to-date, which in turn will help us keep
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:58:17PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> >> So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on
> >> d-release that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a
> >> discussion about ending security support for it in stable.
> >
> > The
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 05-12-2021 03:36, Andres Salomon wrote:
>> So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on d-release
>> that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a discussion
>> about ending security support for it in stable.
>
> The problem really
13 matches
Mail list logo
