Joel as you can see from the CC: headers above this email is going out to
more than just yourself. The point(s) I'm making below I consider to be
important to the Debian project as a whole.
As can be seen from bug #23367, you sent me an email to tell me there was
a newer version of gd than the
Dermot John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that a non-maintainer release was normally only done where
either a security hole needed to be fixed quickly or where a serious
problem existed with a package that the maintainer had not fixed for some
time.
The previous version was
Dermot == Dermot John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dermot I now see that you have uploaded a non-maintainer release of
Dermot this new version to master.debian.org! To be blunt I'm pissed
Dermot about this...indeed this is *not* the first time someone has
Dermot decided to do a
At 16:10 -0700 1998-06-15, Dermot John Bradley wrote:
Joel as you can see from the CC: headers above this email is going out to
more than just yourself. The point(s) I'm making below I consider to be
important to the Debian project as a whole.
As can be seen from bug #23367, you sent me an email
Perhaps clearer guidelines on this would be useful.
no ! people are not good at following guidelines.
but computers are. so we need to move some thing to automatic stuff.
something like a cvs server or so could help.
andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Ian, should non-maintainer releases be allowed into frozen/unstable
without checking with the maintainer first?
this is nothing where ian needs to do a statement :
people should behave and help each other.
in this case there was good will, but bad behaviour (i guess).
please both : cool down
6 matches
Mail list logo
