On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 04:07:02PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> >> Is there any reasonable way to get this spelling error corrected in the
> >> changelogs across all these packages?
> > As those are specifically binNMU changelogs, I don't think so.
>
> You still can do a NMU or send a patch to
On 2021-08-25 at 10:22, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-08-25 16:07:02, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>> You still can do a NMU or send a patch to the maintainer...
>
> Any future upload or binNMU will get rid of my typo without any
> additional action.
So no action is needed, this will resolve
On 2021-08-25 16:07:02, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> On 25.08.21 15:23, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:19:34AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> >> Is there any reasonable way to get this spelling error corrected in the
> >> changelogs across all these packages?
> > As those are
On 25.08.21 15:23, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:19:34AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>> Is there any reasonable way to get this spelling error corrected in the
>> changelogs across all these packages?
> As those are specifically binNMU changelogs, I don't think so.
You
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:19:34AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> Is there any reasonable way to get this spelling error corrected in the
> changelogs across all these packages?
As those are specifically binNMU changelogs, I don't think so.
> Or is this too minor to be worth bothering with, and
I'm not sure if this is worth giving any attention to, but it's the sort
of thing that's going to keep bothering me at a mild level if nothing is
done about it, so I figure I might as well at least ask.
Over the period since the release, I've seen quite a few packages show
up in testing with an
6 matches
Mail list logo
