Re: Re: Port to LoongArch architecture for Debian

On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 1:58 PM 张丹丹 wrote: > > Hi,pabs >Nice to receive your reply. > ,this document you have initiated and > contributed which gives us a lot of guidance. > > The result of the discussion on debian-dpkg is that dpkg architecture is >

Re: Re: Port to LoongArch architecture for Debian

-原始邮件- > 发件人: "Paul Wise" > 发送时间:2022-11-04 10:57:55 (星期五) > 收件人: "张丹丹" , debian-devel@lists.debian.org > 抄送: > 主题: Re: Port to LoongArch architecture for Debian > > On Thu, 2022-11-03 at 20:11 +0800, 张丹丹 wrote: > > > Port to L

Re: Port to LoongArch architecture for Debian

On Thu, 2022-11-03 at 20:11 +0800, 张丹丹 wrote: > Port to LoongArch architecture for Debian, now in the "Downstreaming" > section in the port life-cycle according to > . I initiated this document and wrote a fair bit of it, with help from the rest of the

Re: Port to LoongArch architecture for Debian

Hi helmut, Nice to communicate with you on RPC. First, helmut means, I think one of the early bootstrap failures is around libanl/libutil. do you think loong* should ship with those stub libraries or not? I see that in your rebootstrap fork, you opt for not having libanl/libutil (in