On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 01:13:04PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
It's trivial to add uids to a GPG key, and headers aren't actually
signed anyway, so you could replay signed messages to the server.
A global, confirmed by default subscribe me to all my bugs might do
the trick, though.
--
You
Steve Langasek wrote:
This is nice to see.
IME, as a release manager/bug triager and as a member of package maintenance
teams, the distributions I want to be able to use for bug mails are:
- to the submitter and to the maintainer (most common)
- to the maintainer only
and IME as a sole
As in once you confirmed one subscription the next one doesn't ask
anymore? Sort of greylisting?
Sounds good.
It should always ask for confirmation unless someone has specifically
made the decision that they don't want to have to opt-in.
Maybe it should honour subscription requests
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:30 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe
to it. Would this be a straightforward hack?
What has
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 06:25 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Don Armstrong]
What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
is added to prevent that.
Sounds good. But since this information was already
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 00:33 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
As in once you confirmed one subscription the next one doesn't ask
anymore? Sort of greylisting?
Sounds good.
It should always ask for confirmation unless someone has specifically
made the decision that they don't want
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 01:05:51PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:30 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to
[Re-sent, gmane seems to have swallowed the original version.]
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Florian Weimer]
Developers must be careful to Cc: the submitters, otherwise they
probably never receive the message.
What about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? I thought it send
a
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 12:39:19PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Petter Reinholdtsen:
[Florian Weimer]
Developers must be careful to Cc: the submitters, otherwise they
probably never receive the message.
What about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address?
It's an alias for the email address
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:37:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:11:14PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply
* Jochen Voss:
Hi Goswin,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
subscribing [the initial submitter] is already the current way.
Really? Since when is this the case?
Just to stress Jochen's point: only closing a bug report automatically
triggers mail to the
* Don Armstrong:
No, it wouldn't. The messages are only sent to people after they have
made it through the spam filters, and for sumitter, it's even more
difficult, because the message must be formatted properly to actually
generate a new bug instead of an error.
The idea was for the
[Florian Weimer]
Developers must be careful to Cc: the submitters, otherwise they
probably never receive the message.
What about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? I thought it send
a message both to BTS and to the submitter? I use it all the time
when I want the submitter to get the message. I
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Not subscribing the initial submitter would be insane and subscribing
him is already the current way.
Not in the sense that's being discussed here, it isn't.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
* Petter Reinholdtsen:
[Florian Weimer]
Developers must be careful to Cc: the submitters, otherwise they
probably never receive the message.
What about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address?
It's an alias for the email address of the submitter. AFAICS,
messages to this address do not end up in the
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Jochen Voss:
Hi Goswin,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
subscribing [the initial submitter] is already the current way.
Really? Since when is this the case?
Just to stress Jochen's point: only closing a
[Don Armstrong]
What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
is added to prevent that.
Sounds good. But since this information was already tracked, I figured
there must have been a (good?) reason this
Hello Don,
Am 2005-07-22 15:30:35, schrieb Don Armstrong:
What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
is added to prevent that. [It's possible that this subscription would
happen without even needing to
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:11:14PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED], where
nnn is the bug number you wish to {,un}subscribe to.
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:11:14PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED], where
nnn is the
[Pascal Hakim]
It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THANK YOU, those of you who coded and deployed this! This is something
I've wanted as long as I can
Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi everyone,
One of the oft-requested features for the BTS had been the ability to
subscribe to bugs.
It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
the Bug Tracking System.
...
Many thanks to Joachim Breitner and Don
On 22/07/05, Pascal Hakim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
One of the oft-requested features for the BTS had been the ability to
subscribe to bugs.
It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email to
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 00:33 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
now, how about [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I have a
feeling that co-maintainers/uploaders get bug reports for a project.
Use the package tracking system[1] for this.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org
--
To
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe
to it. Would this be a straightforward hack?
What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
submitters
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe
to it. Would this be a straightforward hack?
What has actually been
* Goswin von Brederlow:
What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
is added to prevent that. [It's possible that this subscription would
happen without even needing to confirm the subscription... but
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow:
What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
is added to prevent that. [It's possible that this subscription would
happen without even
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe
to it. Would this be a
Hi Goswin,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
subscribing [the initial submitter] is already the current way.
Really? Since when is this the case?
Jochen
--
http://seehuhn.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
30 matches
Mail list logo
