Enrico Zini wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:55:33PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
http://www.debian.org/devel/, Projects section:
* Debian Web Pages
[...]
* Alioth: Debian GForge
Certainly seems that they're listed.
The Debian Usability Research seems to be missing:
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Hi,
[1] = Mono for Debian, ipv6 (is it official or unofficial?),
ddtp, ...
IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
Thanks
Fabio
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
I think that might be way, way too formal for what it is. I'm not too
fussed what it is called as it was setup
On Sun, 25 May 2003, Craig Small wrote:
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IPv6 is an official subproject founded by Craig Small, even if we host
experimental packages outside Debian for various reasons.
I think that might be way, way too formal for what it is. I'm not too
Le Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:22:08PM -0300, Gustavo Franco écrivait:
You didn't understand my affirmation.Debian Desktop is on www.debian.org
and many others aren't there, for example: Mono for Debian and ipv6.
What are the rules to be there? AFAIK, there are no documented rules.
The rules are
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:55:33PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
http://www.debian.org/devel/, Projects section:
* Debian Web Pages
[...]
* Alioth: Debian GForge
Certainly seems that they're listed.
The Debian Usability Research seems to be missing:
On Sat, 24 May 2003 10:19:38 +0200
Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.debian.org/devel/, Projects section:
* Debian Web Pages
[...]
* Alioth: Debian GForge
Certainly seems that they're listed.
The Debian Usability Research seems to be missing:
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 10:28:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The rules are quite simple: is there someone willing to write those
pages ? I have this very same problem for DebianEdu, if I want a page on
www.debian.org I have to prepare it but I have no time for that. I also
don't have any
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:58:31PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful information when you start out by showing you
Em Sat, 24 May 2003 06:11:18 -0400, David B Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
On Sat, 24 May 2003 10:19:38 +0200
Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.debian.org/devel/, Projects section:
* Debian Web Pages
[...]
* Alioth: Debian GForge
Certainly seems that
Hi,
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
initiative, but there are many others that are being
excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
- Guidelines to Debian subprojects (Do you known
what are the official and unofficial
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful information when you start out by showing you
haven't done
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Hi,
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
initiative, but there are many others that are being
excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
- Guidelines to
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 05:51:14PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern
On 2003.05.23 12:51, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:58:45AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't?
You're on crack. http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
It's hard to discern useful information when you
I don't think there is any definition for what an official Debian
subproject is. And even if there were, whether it's on www.debian.org or
not would not be a reliable indicator. I choose to use www.d.o for Debian
Jr. because it is convenient for me to keep the pages there. Other
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 07:37:21PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
The fact a project is hosted somewhere usually imply some special
relations to his host.
Sure.
So even if, for Debian people, being hosted on www.debian.org is not a
reliable indicator, it's highly possible that many persons rely
On 2003.05.23 13:56, Ben Armstrong wrote:
[...]
Debian Jr. is a personal subproject[0] within Debian. It is my chosen area
of focus for Debian, and as such, the only blessing I have had from the
Debian project for it is the little parcel of web space I have for the
Debian Jr. home page
On 2003.05.23 15:10, Ben Armstrong wrote:
[...]
That being said, I do believe we need a better (more comprehensive) list of
such projects with higher visibility on the web site. But that list will
likely consist of pointers both to www.d.o and other sites
(people.debian.org, alioth, and
El día 23 may 2003, Gustavo Franco escribía:
Hi,
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
initiative, but there are many others that are being
excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
- Guidelines to Debian subprojects
On 2003.05.23 16:06, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
[...]
Just because nobody proposed it? debian-lex started no so much ago,
and it was simply somebody proposing it and creating and mantaining
it.
BTW, apt-get install subproject-howto
Hi,
I guess that subproject-howto can be the
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:56:06PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
I guess that subproject-howto can be the start to 'Debian
Subproject Guidelines' or 'Debian Subproject Policy'.What do you
think, Ben?
Sure, it could be a start. The subproject-howto is intended to be a
hands-on guide to
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:01:46PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
That being said, there is certainly a difference between projects which
fork Debian to make a new distro (i.e. providing own versions of existing
Debian packages) vs. projects which add packages of their own (outside
Debian)
On Fri, 23 May 2003 11:58:45 -0300
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Why Debian Desktop subproject is on official website
and many others[1] aren't? The Debian Desktop is a good
initiative, but there are many others that are being
excluded from the website.I've some ideas:
-
24 matches
Mail list logo
