Re: package name changes in atlas-cpp (was Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration)

2005-11-30 Thread Stephan Hermann
Hi Steve, On Tuesday 29 November 2005 12:15, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:38:32AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: I don't see any reason to rename the -dbg packages, generally. For the first cxx transition during Breezy development, I renamed libatlas-cpp-0.5 to

Re: package name changes in atlas-cpp (was Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration)

2005-11-30 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:08:15PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: Well, I will try to revert the change, no problem. But even for libatlas-cpp-0.6 there was a soname change (if you see this bugreport about the rename of libatlas-cpp-0.5) and there was no need to rename libatlas-cpp-0.6

Re: package name changes in atlas-cpp (was Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration)

2005-11-30 Thread Stephan Hermann
Hi Michael, On Wednesday 30 November 2005 22:00, Michael Koch wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:08:15PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: Well, I will try to revert the change, no problem. But even for libatlas-cpp-0.6 there was a soname change (if you see this bugreport about the rename of

Re: package name changes in atlas-cpp (was Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration)

2005-11-30 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:10:58PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: Hi Michael, On Wednesday 30 November 2005 22:00, Michael Koch wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:08:15PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: Well, I will try to revert the change, no problem. But even for libatlas-cpp-0.6 there

Re: package name changes in atlas-cpp (was Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration)

2005-11-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:21:34PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:10:58PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: Don't worry :) If new 0.6.0 upstream source will change the soname and the package is named to libatlas-cpp-0.7 then you can just conflicts/replaces to

Re: package name changes in atlas-cpp (was Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration)

2005-11-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:09:00AM -0600, Ming Hua wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:28:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: * Rename and rebuild the libraries listed below. The new suffix for these packages should be in any case c2a (instead of c2). No new suffix is needed when the

Re: package name changes in atlas-cpp (was Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration)

2005-11-29 Thread Stephan Hermann
Hi Ming, Steve, others, I did the merge and rename of this library package, so I think I should answer as well: On Tuesday 29 November 2005 11:03, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:09:00AM -0600, Ming Hua wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:28:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:

Re: package name changes in atlas-cpp (was Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration)

2005-11-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:38:32AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: Hi Ming, Steve, others, On Tuesday 29 November 2005 11:03, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:09:00AM -0600, Ming Hua wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:28:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: * Rename and

package name changes in atlas-cpp (was Re: library renaming due to changed libstdc++ configuration)

2005-11-28 Thread Ming Hua
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:28:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: * Rename and rebuild the libraries listed below. The new suffix for these packages should be in any case c2a (instead of c2). No new suffix is needed when the soname changes in a new upstream upload. I noticed that