Hideki Yamane writes ("propose: provide "docker" package as docker, not
wmdocker"):
> I'd like to propose wmdocker package would rename its source
> package from docker to wmdocker, and then docker.io package
> provides docker binary package and transitional d
Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> On 05/12/22 18:19, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> how do you avoid that people who still have got the transitional docker
>> (--> wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker
>> (from docker.io)?
> How was the transition from git-the-file-viewer to
On 05/12/22 18:19, Andreas Metzler wrote:
how do you avoid that people who still have got the transitional docker
(--> wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker
(from docker.io)?
How was the transition from git-the-file-viewer to git-the-VCS handled
in lenny/squeeze?
On Mon, 05 Dec 2022 at 18:19:16 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> how do you avoid that people who still have got the transitional docker
> (--> wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker
> (from docker.io)?
One option (although I hope someone has a better suggestion) would be
On 2022-12-04 Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to propose wmdocker package would rename its source package
> from docker to wmdocker, and then docker.io package provides docker
> binary package and transitional docker.io package.
> Most of users who is not Debian expert still confusing
Hi,
I'd like to propose wmdocker package would rename its source package from
docker
to wmdocker, and then docker.io package provides docker binary package and
transitional docker.io package.
Most of users who is not Debian expert still confusing with docker package, so
I want to fix it in
6 matches
Mail list logo
