Craig == Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig debian provides mechanisms for easy upgrade between release
Craig versions, and we always have provided that - why complicate
Craig matters with branched sub-releases of old versions?
You say stable is old. That is exactly
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 02:32, Craig Sanders wrote:
Currently there are two usable repositories of Potato packages.
There's a repository of kernel-related packages to run 2.4.x kernels
on Potato, and there's a repository of LDAP related packages and other
things that Wichert is
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 04:49:04PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
You say stable is old. That is exactly Russell's point. Some people
want a mostly stable system, but need some up-to-date packages from
woody.
that's a choice people have to make.
you can have an old 'stable' release, or you can have
Craig == Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig why is application bar any *more* reliable or trustworthy
Craig just because it is compiled against an old version of libc6
Craig in potato?
It is not so much the new application I was thinking of, but all the
old stable
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 06:36:30PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Craig == Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig why is application bar any *more* reliable or trustworthy
Craig just because it is compiled against an old version of libc6
Craig in potato?
It is not so much the
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell I would like a version of Potato that is not entirely
Russell frozen. It should have updates not only for security
Russell reasons but also for addition of new programs, and for
Russell adding new programs which add
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russell To manage this fully through the Debian system we will
Russell need support in the BTS for reporting bugs to different
Russell people depending on the package version. Is this
Russell possible?
Another problem which I
On Tuesday 08 May 2001 01:28, Chad C. Walstrom wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
I would like a version of potato that is not entirely frozen.
...
I am willing to be involved in back-porting packages (there's many
things that I back-port for my own use
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
But if someone is willing to back-port a package, and to maintain it
(fixing any bugs that may be reported against it), then why not make
room on the archives for it?
Would there be any problem to just set up your own Debian-style site with
BTS and
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
Currently there are two usable repositories of Potato packages.
There's a repository of kernel-related packages to run 2.4.x kernels
on Potato, and there's a repository of LDAP related packages and other
things that Wichert is
On Tue, 8 May 2001, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
Would there be any problem to just set up your own Debian-style site with
BTS and apt-able archive, where people can contribute if they want and
where you can semi-automatical merge in upstream (here Debian) updates
(mostly critical bugs and
Currently there are two usable repositories of Potato packages. There's a
repository of kernel-related packages to run 2.4.x kernels on Potato, and
there's a repository of LDAP related packages and other things that Wichert
is maintaining.
Both of these are good work, but even combined they
i have libssl openssh 2.5.2p2 for potato at
http://people.debian.org/~ieure/potato_ssh
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
Currently there are two usable repositories of Potato packages. There's a
repository of kernel-related packages to run 2.4.x kernels on Potato, and
there's a
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:45:53PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
I would like a version of potato that is not entirely frozen.
...
I am willing to be involved in back-porting packages (there's many
things that I back-port for my own use and should share).
...
Also we have to consider the
Hi,
At Mon, 7 May 2001 09:51:24 -0700 (PDT),
Ian Eure wrote:
i have libssl openssh 2.5.2p2 for potato at
http://people.debian.org/~ieure/potato_ssh
Good job.
If you execute 'dpkg-scanpackages . /dev/null | gzip -9 Packages.gz'
in this directory, we'll be more happy :-)
--
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL
15 matches
Mail list logo
