rally requires builds to be done on buildds, from source if
> > possible.
>
> Are you sure about that? Is there a policy?
I thought there was a socially-enforced policy, but I can't find it
written down, and perhaps it doesn't exist. Certainly the preference is
that apps are built from so
On 08.12.21 08:27, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 7 December 2021 23:35 GMT, Simon McVittie:
I believe what Vincent meant is that the generic non-Flatpak binaries
provided by the "Ungoogled Chromium" project are compiled on unknown
machines and require trusting their submitter
❦ 7 December 2021 23:35 GMT, Simon McVittie:
> I believe what Vincent meant is that the generic non-Flatpak binaries
> provided by the "Ungoogled Chromium" project are compiled on unknown
> machines and require trusting their submitters, whereas the Flatpak
> binari
On Tue, 2021-12-07 at 23:35 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Flathub generally requires builds to be done on Flathub's
> infrastructure, from source code if possible, in the same way Debian
> generally requires builds to be done on buildds, from source if
> possible.
Are you sure about that? Is
it is open-source.
The only example I'm aware of is Firefox, which is built by
Mozilla's CI and provided to Flathub as binaries.
I believe what Vincent meant is that the generic non-Flatpak binaries
provided by the "Ungoogled Chromium" project are compiled on unknown
machines and require trusting
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:45:27PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Same here. And they are now following security updates closely (in the
> past, there could lag two or three weeks behind). Flatpak compiles it
> from source (while UngoogledChromium let contributors compile it and
> publish the
❦ 7 December 2021 21:46 +01, Mathias Behrle:
>> (I have been running an ungoogled-chromium for a while (ca. a year
>> ago?), however at that time their chrome wasn't extremely stable so I
>> gave up again. Does anybody have experience using it recently?)
>
> (Using c
* Tomas Pospisek: " ungoogled-chromium? [was: Re: Bug#995212: chromium: Update
to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)]" (Tue, 7 Dec 2021 19:43:10 +0100):
> (I have been running an ungoogled-chromium for a while (ca. a year
> ago?), however at that time their chrome wasn't ext
m-team/chromium/-/blob/master/debian/patches/series
2.
https://salsa.debian.org/chromium-team/chromium/-/tree/master/debian/patches/disable
3.
https://salsa.debian.org/chromium-team/chromium/-/tree/master/debian/patches/system
I'd also like to point out, that the ungoogled-chromium project has some
o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name : ungoogled-chromium
Version : 84.0.4147.105-1.1
Upstream Author : Eloston
* URL : https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: Python
10 matches
Mail list logo
