Agustin Henze writes:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: libjs-jquery-slides
Version: 1.1.9
Upstream Author: Nathan Searles
URL: http://nathansearles.com
License: Apache-2.0
Description: Simple
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:05:46PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
- Private dependencies, as they leak to rdeps. When a library uses
another library privately this dependency gets linked in directly
in all
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 03:54:06PM +0100, Steffen Vogel wrote:
Package name: sun
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Steffen Vogel p...@steffenvogel.de
URL :
http://www.steffenvogel.de/2012/12/23/cron-jobs-fur-sonnenauf-untergang/
License : GPL
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:28:52AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Package name: sun
Description : sun calculates the sun's rise/set times, the solar noon
and the daylight time duration
This package apparently shares functionality with the redshift package
already in Debian.
* Wouter Verhelst:
Strictly speaking, if you're only using static libraries this is not
really true; once you've compiled something against a static library,
the static library might change in whatever way it sees fit, the
compiled binary will continue to work, with or without recompilation.
Hi Reinhard,
Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com writes:
Consider this from the application perspective: Say an application
links against a library libfoo.a. At some point, libfoo decides to
include compression support, and requires functionality from libz. No
problem for the library package
On 2013-01-03 08:41, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:05:46PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
- Private dependencies, as they leak to rdeps. When a library uses
another library privately this
Hi Florian,
Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes:
My main worry is that, for example, a fix in another, otherwise
unrelated dependency prompts a rebuild, and this picks up behavioral
changes which haven't been visible before, but lingering in the static
library. Essentially, we end up
* Michael Stapelberg:
Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes:
My main worry is that, for example, a fix in another, otherwise
unrelated dependency prompts a rebuild, and this picks up behavioral
changes which haven't been visible before, but lingering in the static
library. Essentially,
On 2013-01-03, Alastair McKinstry alastair.mckins...@sceal.ie wrote:
(1) pkg-config files for libraries, in particular all those that ship
static libs, to be a
release goal for jessie.
rather get rid of static libs.
It would be useful / interesting if pkg-config information could be used
to
* Sune Vuorela:
On 2013-01-03, Alastair McKinstry alastair.mckins...@sceal.ie wrote:
(1) pkg-config files for libraries, in particular all those that ship
static libs, to be a
release goal for jessie.
rather get rid of static libs.
We might want to extend static libraries with LTO data one
Hi Florian,
Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes:
Could you provide an example please? I don’t understand how this is
different with static linking than with dynamic linking yet.
With dynamic linking, you pick up the behavior change along with
apt-get upgrade, so I expect that we get
* Michael Stapelberg:
Hi Florian,
Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de writes:
Could you provide an example please? I don’t understand how this is
different with static linking than with dynamic linking yet.
With dynamic linking, you pick up the behavior change along with
apt-get upgrade, so
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
One might argue that the static case is actually better because it is
more predictable, but our post-release support model is heavily
dependent on minimal changes (because we cannot do full QA
post-release). Such minimal changes are
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 general
Bug #697270 [kernel-image] PC 32-bit programs fails to work on amd64
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image'
Bug reassigned from package 'kernel-image' to 'general'.
No longer marked as found in versions 3.2.0.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
+++ Franz Zinn [2013-01-02 14:42 +]:
Hi,
I am trying to build a cross version of binutils (Squeeze version
2.20.1) using the directions in debian/README.cross with the command
line
TARGET=sparc fakeroot debian/rules binary-cross
Hmm. I use TARGET=sparc dpkg-buildpackage
the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package name: ruby-spoon
Version: 0.0.2
Upstream Author: Charles Oliver Nutter
URL:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
With Built-Using, we get a way to rebuild packages that embed parts of
other packages:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-built-using
Not sure if the buildd stuff will automatically schedule rebuilds or
if we will notice due to
Hi Gergely,
if you take the effort to reassign to general, why dont you lower the severity
as well?
And, if you explain how this is a user error, why dont you close it straight
away?
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Your message dated Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:32:54 +0100
with message-id 201301031632.56423.hol...@layer-acht.org
and subject line Re: Processed: Re: Bug#697270: PC 32-bit programs fails to
work on amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #697270,
regarding PC 32-bit programs fails to work on amd64
to be
Hi Gergelzz :-)
On Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2013, Gergelzz Nagy wrote:
Because I haven't slept this year yet, and I forgot to change the Cc: to
-done@, and there's been about 5 minutes between the Control: header and
the rest of my mail, during which I completely forgot about the
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org writes:
Hi Gergely,
if you take the effort to reassign to general, why dont you lower the
severity
as well?
And, if you explain how this is a user error, why dont you close it straight
away?
Because I haven't slept this year yet, and I forgot to
User error? Huh ?
No ! This is a Debian Bug !
Debian clearly says: File does not exist, while in fact it DOES EXIST.
This is a 100% proof of Debian bug.
--
-Alexey Eromenko Technologov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Please keep in mind, that I have wasted 4 hours of my personal time on
this Debian bug, and do you think this is reasonable ?
--
-Alexey Eromenko Technologov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
+++ Wookey [2013-01-03 12:42 +]:
Franz Zinn wrote:
Hmm. I use TARGET=sparc dpkg-buildpackage
I tried this (with 2.23.1) and found a bug - --target in configure is set to
'sparc'
rasther than sparc-linux-gnu which means it builds for sparc-sunos.
This may well be due to my modifications
On 01/04/2013 01:02 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Please keep in mind, that I have wasted 4 hours of my personal time on
this Debian bug, and do you think this is reasonable ?
It all depends.
How did you even install Firefox 32 bits? We don't have such a
package in Debian. It's rebranded as
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
on a 64 bits arch Debian, when really, you'd better just do:
apt-get install iceweasel
and use your newly installed browser in 64 bits mode...
Not, because my job requires the latest FireFox (latest-and-greatest).
And the
Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com writes:
User error? Huh ?
No ! This is a Debian Bug !
Debian clearly says: File does not exist, while in fact it DOES EXIST.
This is a 100% proof of Debian bug.
That's the error message that you get when the dynamic loader for a binary
doesn't exist. I
But having 32-bit LSB compliance will help people a _LOT_.
--
-Alexey Eromenko Technologov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
on a 64 bits arch Debian, when really, you'd better just do:
apt-get install iceweasel
and use your newly installed browser in 64 bits mode...
Not,
On 01/04/2013 01:31 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
on a 64 bits arch Debian, when really, you'd better just do:
apt-get install iceweasel
and use your newly installed browser in 64 bits mode...
Not, because my job requires the
Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com writes:
User error? Huh ?
It is, I'm afraid.
No ! This is a Debian Bug !
No, it is not.
Debian clearly says: File does not exist, while in fact it DOES
EXIST.
It does not. However, the file the message is referring to is not the
file you think it refers
Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com writes:
But having 32-bit LSB compliance will help people a _LOT_.
Debian provides LSB compliance via the lsb set of packages. Not everyone
wants to have all LSB packages installed or particularly cares about LSB
compliance. If you do:
aptitude install
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com wrote:
But having 32-bit LSB compliance will help people a _LOT_.
This does not mean you can't run 32bit application under a 64bit
Debian installation, it's because the support is not added into
default installation as the feature
Le jeudi, 3 janvier 2013 18.44:59, Alexey Eromenko a écrit :
But having 32-bit LSB compliance will help people a _LOT_.
By the way:
* Debian is not LSB-certified
* ... but the lsb-* packages try to provide a working implementation.
No work has been attempted to provide Multi-Arch lsb packages
Ubuntu has done some poor decisions but it has done some other that are
okay. We should consider merging some of them back.
Im thinking about the 6 months release thing. Without further ado, here's
the proposal pre-draft:
_Proposal_:
Add a new release stage between stable and testing. Called
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org wrote:
release and lsb-base being Architecture: foreign). Patches are welcome to make
Wheezy+1 more suitable to your needs.
How about changing it from a kernel bug to tasksel feature ?
I recommend: tasksel to install 32-bit
clone 697270 -1
retitle -1 misleading error message when ELF interpreter does not exist
reassign -1 bash
severity -1 normal
merge -1 609882
retitle 697270 i386 multiarch not enabled and ia32-libs not installed by
default on amd64
severity 697270 minor
tags 697270 +wontfix
thanks
Hi Alexey,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 697270 -1
Bug #697270 {Done: Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org} [general] PC 32-bit
programs fails to work on amd64
Bug 697270 cloned as bug 697299
retitle -1 misleading error message when ELF interpreter does not exist
Bug #697299
Timo Weingärtner t...@tiwe.de writes:
2013-01-03 um 18:32:28 schrieb Russ Allbery:
Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com writes:
User error? Huh ?
No ! This is a Debian Bug !
Debian clearly says: File does not exist, while in fact it DOES EXIST.
This is a 100% proof of Debian bug.
I guess it
Hallo Russ Allbery,
2013-01-03 um 19:26:46 schriebst Du:
Timo Weingärtner t...@tiwe.de writes:
2013-01-03 um 18:32:28 schrieb Russ Allbery:
Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com writes:
User error? Huh ?
No ! This is a Debian Bug !
Debian clearly says: File does not exist, while in fact
Timo Weingärtner t...@tiwe.de writes:
Hallo Russ Allbery,
I think that's asking quite a lot of bash. Wouldn't it have to open
the binary and parse the ELF headers, extracting the INTERP header, in
order to verify that? Does it really make sense to encode
understanding of ELF binary layout
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:26:46AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
That's the error message that you get when the dynamic loader for a
binary doesn't exist. I think that's been the case for as long as
Linux has existed.
That's already reported as bug #609882.
I think that's asking quite a
On 01/03/2013 02:16 PM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org wrote:
release and lsb-base being Architecture: foreign). Patches are welcome to
make
Wheezy+1 more suitable to your needs.
How about changing it from a kernel bug to
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:01:26AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Alexey Eromenko al4...@gmail.com wrote:
But having 32-bit LSB compliance will help people a _LOT_.
This does not mean you can't run 32bit application under a 64bit
Debian installation, it's because
On 03/01/13 19:18, alberto fuentes wrote:
Request for comments!
AFAIK there is already an ongoing effort to provide an usable updated
rolling release of Debian.
http://joeyh.name/code/debian/cut/
http://cut.debian.net/
Isn't this (more or less) what you are asking for?
signature.asc
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org wrote:
release and lsb-base being Architecture: foreign). Patches are welcome to
make
Wheezy+1 more suitable to your needs.
How about changing it from a kernel bug to
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:26:46AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Debian clearly says: File does not exist, while in fact it DOES EXIST.
This is a 100% proof of Debian bug.
I guess it is bash telling you that.
That's the error message that you get when the dynamic loader for a
binary
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro
Control: block 697193 by 622928
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: libandroid-json-org-java
Version : 20090211 (to mimick the last json.org version)
Upstream Author : The Android Open
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:59:02PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
You installed a 32-bit application on a 64-bit system. That will only
work if you also install the 32-bit supporting libraries, including the
dynamic linker. This is not a bug in Debian.
And no, installing 32-bit libraries by
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:18:27 +0100, alberto fuentes wrote:
The only ways to prevent this if you are running the more or less
up-to-date testing are:
* Pin packages with RC bugs on upgrade. This is:
- Non trivial: it makes you understand how bad the bug is and know how
the pinning system
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:45:45PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
* Pin packages with RC bugs on upgrade. This is:
- Non trivial: it makes you understand how bad the bug is and know how
the pinning system works
No and yes.
No, because apt-listbugs exists and provides a nice
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tanguy Ortolo tanguy+deb...@ortolo.eu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: fonts-opendyslexic
Version : 20121109
Upstream Author : Abbie Gonzalez ab...@abbiecod.es
* URL : http://dyslexicfonts.com/
*
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 05:12:03 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
* Pin packages with RC bugs on upgrade. This is:
- Non trivial: it makes you understand how bad the bug is and know how
the pinning system works
No, because apt-listbugs exists and provides a nice interface so users
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 519 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 141 (new: 1)
Total number of packages
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:35:43PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:59:02PM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
You installed a 32-bit application on a 64-bit system. That will only
work if you also install the 32-bit supporting libraries, including the
dynamic linker. This is
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:43:56AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
The problem to be solved is that ISVs provide binaries for Linux i386
and our users want to run them on amd64. LSB, x32 and ARM are
completely irrelevant - the important thing is to make it easy to
install whatever libraries those
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:41:15AM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:05:46PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
- Private dependencies, as they leak to rdeps. When a library uses
another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/03/2013 08:15 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
http://cut.debian.net/
Isn't this (more or less) what you are asking for?
Isn't this (more or less) dead?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment:
On 01/03/2013 06:32 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 05:12:03 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
No, because apt-listbugs exists and provides a nice interface so users
don't have to care about pinning details for themselves.
Can apt-listbugs do anything more than abort the
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:18 PM, alberto fuentes paj...@gmail.com wrote:
_Proposal_:
Add a new release stage between stable and testing. Called usable or
whatever name we find fit for it
stable - usable - testing - sid
Migrate packages after a period* in testing without RC bugs.
*a 2-4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:38:45 +0100
Source: upower
Binary: upower upower-doc libupower-glib1 libupower-glib-dev
gir1.2-upowerglib-1.0
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.9.19-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:46:26 +0100
Source: picard-tools
Binary: libsam-java picard-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.82-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:08:51 +0100
Source: biojava3-live
Binary: libbiojava3.0-java libbiojava3-java libbiojava3-java-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:24:54 +0100
Source: libchado-perl
Binary: libchado-perl chado-utils
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.23-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:52:10 +0900
Source: euca2ools
Binary: euca2ools
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.2-1~experimental1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Eucalyptus Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:38:25 +
Source: grub2
Binary: grub2 grub-linuxbios grub-efi grub-common grub2-common grub-emu
grub-emu-dbg grub-pc-bin grub-pc-dbg grub-pc grub-rescue-pc grub-coreboot-bin
grub-coreboot-dbg grub-coreboot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:26:06 +0100
Source: flashgot
Binary: xul-ext-flashgot
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5.2+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Mozilla Extension Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:52:18 +0200
Source: verilator
Binary: verilator
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.843-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Electronics Team
pkg-electronics-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:25:44 +0100
Source: libflexdock-java
Binary: libflexdock-java libflexdock-java-doc libflexdock-java-demo
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.1-1~exp2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:18:00 +0100
Source: bsdmainutils
Binary: bsdmainutils
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 9.0.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Bsdmainutils Team pkg-bsdmainut...@teams.debian.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:27:09 +0200
Source: libverilog-perl
Binary: libverilog-perl
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.318-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:43:56 -0300
Source: ruby-activerecord-2.3
Binary: ruby-activerecord-2.3
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3.14-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:21:18 -0300
Source: ruby-activerecord-3.2
Binary: ruby-activerecord-3.2
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.2.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:34:45 +0100
Source: patch
Binary: patch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.7.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Berg m...@debian.org
Changed-By: Christoph Berg m...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:25:53 +0100
Source: quilt
Binary: quilt
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.60-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Quinson mquin...@debian.org
Changed-By: Martin Quinson mquin...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:12:05 +0100
Source: ircd-ratbox
Binary: ircd-ratbox ircd-ratbox-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.0.7.dfsg-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Marc Dequènes (Duck) d...@duckcorp.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:43:16 +
Source: libopenusb
Binary: libopenusb-dev libopenusb0 libopenusb-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.1.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Simon Richter s...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:07:39 -0800
Source: openafs
Binary: openafs-client openafs-fuse openafs-kpasswd openafs-fileserver
openafs-dbserver openafs-doc openafs-krb5 libkopenafs1 libafsauthent1
libafsrpc1 libopenafs-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:12:59 -0500
Source: mxml
Binary: libmxml-dev libmxml1
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.7-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Luis Uribe a...@eviled.org
Changed-By: Luis Uribe a...@eviled.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:19:13 +0100
Source: gnucash
Binary: gnucash gnucash-dbg gnucash-common python-gnucash
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1:2.4.10-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sébastien Villemot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:17:25 -0400
Source: geiser
Binary: geiser
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.2-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Bremner brem...@debian.org
Changed-By: David Bremner brem...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:40:43 +0100
Source: gnucash
Binary: gnucash gnucash-dbg gnucash-common python-gnucash
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1:2.4.11-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sébastien Villemot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:06:41 -0800
Source: openafs
Binary: openafs-client openafs-fuse openafs-kpasswd openafs-fileserver
openafs-dbserver openafs-doc openafs-krb5 libkopenafs1 libafsauthent1
libafsrpc1 libopenafs-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:07:33 +0100
Source: ldap-git-backup
Binary: ldap-git-backup
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Elmar S. Heeb el...@heebs.ch
Changed-By: Elmar S. Heeb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:42:27 +0100
Source: logilab-common
Binary: python-logilab-common python3-logilab-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.58.3-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:30:05 +
Source: pcre3
Binary: libpcre3 libpcre3-udeb libpcrecpp0 libpcre3-dev libpcre3-dbg pcregrep
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:8.31-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Baker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:14:04 +0100
Source: fwsnort
Binary: fwsnort
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.6.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Franck Joncourt fra...@debian.org
Changed-By: Franck Joncourt fra...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:43:12 +0100
Source: nmap
Binary: nmap zenmap
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 6.00-0.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hilko Bengen ben...@debian.org
Changed-By: Hilko Bengen ben...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 01:29:54 +0400
Source: tarantool
Binary: tarantool-common tarantool tarantool-dbg tarantool-client
tarantool-client-dbg libtarantool1 libtarantool1-dbg libtarantool-dev
libtarantoolnet1 libtarantoolnet1-dbg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:15:18 +0100
Source: twisted
Binary: python-twisted-core python-twisted-bin python-twisted-bin-dbg
twisted-doc python-twisted
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 12.3.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:34:19 +0100
Source: uicilibris
Binary: uicilibris
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Georges Khaznadar georg...@debian.org
Changed-By: Georges Khaznadar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:15:16 +0100
Source: xmonad
Binary: xmonad libghc-xmonad-dev libghc-xmonad-prof libghc-xmonad-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.11-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Haskell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 16:35:33 +0100
Source: xmonad-contrib
Binary: libghc-xmonad-contrib-dev libghc-xmonad-contrib-prof
libghc-xmonad-contrib-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.11-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:03:42 +0100
Source: bluetile
Binary: bluetile
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group
pkg-haskell-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:38:09 +0100
Source: psad
Binary: psad
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Franck Joncourt fra...@debian.org
Changed-By: Franck Joncourt fra...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:36:56 +0100
Source: libvirt
Binary: libvirt-bin libvirt0 libvirt0-dbg libvirt-doc libvirt-dev
python-libvirt libvirt-sanlock
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.0.1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:49:16 +0100
Source: uicilibris
Binary: uicilibris
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.12-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Georges Khaznadar georg...@debian.org
Changed-By: Georges Khaznadar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:22:46 -0500
Source: haskell-http-reverse-proxy
Binary: libghc-http-reverse-proxy-dev libghc-http-reverse-proxy-prof
libghc-http-reverse-proxy-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.1.1-1
Distribution:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:31:21 -0500
Source: haskell-project-template
Binary: libghc-project-template-dev libghc-project-template-prof
libghc-project-template-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.1.1-1
Distribution:
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
