-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 02:45:30 +1000
Source: supercat
Binary: supercat
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5.5-4.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Kumar Appaiah <aku...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Craig Sand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 01:53:39 +1000
Source: supercat
Binary: supercat
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5.5-4.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Kumar Appaiah <aku...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Craig Sand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 18:49:51 +1000
Source: supercat
Binary: supercat
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5.5-4.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Kumar Appaiah <aku...@debian.org>
Changed-By: Craig Sand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:33:28 +1000
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.07
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Craig Sanders <c...@taz.net.au>
Changed-By: Craig Sanders <c...@t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:00:54 +1000
Source: arpwatch
Binary: arpwatch
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.1a15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: KELEMEN Péter f...@debian.org
Changed-By: Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au
from Sebastian Reichelt sebasti...@gmx.de to initialise
interface variable (Closes: #289426)
* updated watch file to v3 (Closes: #529097)
* applied patch from Sebastian Reichelt to display IP in subject if hostname
unknown (Closes: #288994)
-- Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au Tue, 01 Sep 2009
.
Other polite conventions regarding NMUs are spelled out in the developer's
reference http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu.
thanks.
craig
--
craig sanders c...@taz.net.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:24:02 +1000
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.02
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au
Changed-By: Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:56:54 +1000
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.01
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au
Changed-By: Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 16:53:51 +1000
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au
Changed-By: Craig Sanders c...@taz.net.au
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:46:38 +1000
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.96
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:58:57 +1000
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.96.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:53:30 +1000
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.95
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 07:43:37 +1100
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.94
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:27:22 +1100
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.93
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:26:50 +1100
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.92
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:20:26 +1100
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.91
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:48:19 +1100
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:12:18 +1100
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:53:17 +1100
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:29:20 +1100
Source: dlocate
Binary: dlocate
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:30:26PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Which is better? I like the default keys because you learn how to use nvi
very efficiently knowing the hjkl-style keys :) I'm searching for as many
opinions as possible so please speak up!
i agree. hjkl keys are betterand gives
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:32:04PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
DNSBL's and spamassasin seem quite good at dealing with spam and are much
less annoying. That combined with some new laws that are being enacted to
combat spam should keep it to a managable level.
oh, please tell me that these new
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:11:09AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:00:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:55:31PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
Do you have the sheet music for dueling banjos? I would like to
get it if possible.
If you
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:09:57PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:40:15 +1000
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:04:39AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
I'm coming to the view that we're approaching the era where all mail is
going to have to
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:47:46AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Ah, reductio ad absurdum. Such a wonderful means of demonstrating that you
can't think up a decent argument, so you'll take something to it's illogical
extreme to try and scare some people.
more accurately, it is a useful tool
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 10:42:17AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 03:48:13PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
the point that you keep on missing is that TMDA and similar programs send
confirmation emails to innocent third-parties who did *NOT* send an
email.
TMDA and all C
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 04:01:19PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Backup MX servers serve no useful purpose in the modern Internet, this is why
big sites such as microsoft.com and hotmail.com don't have them.
agreed.
If you have a backup MX then it should know all the acceptable email
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 11:49:40PM +, Brian May wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 04:01:19PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
That is the idea behind autorespoonders after all, to tell the sender
that his mail didn't get through because it didn't meet some required
criteria.
A SMTP 550
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:21:22AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:35:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
#2, Misplaced burden, is the reason for the 'grave' severity.
People have a right to ask that unkown people that e-mail them confirm the
e-mail.
the point that
this question really belongs on debian-user, not on debian-devel.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 07:55:28PM +0200, Dennis Stampfer wrote:
I have to log out a user who is logged in via ssh. The information that he
is not allowed to login comes from the utmp-file like the pid to kill.
if he's not
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 06:10:33PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:11:13AM +0200, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
|100 million users
| 1000 installations
|
| I would recommend to exchange these last two lines. More installations
| than users?
If you read it
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 02:36:24PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
This upstream change makes no sense from a usability standpoint; this new
stunnel package would be pretty useless to me, and I wouldn't want to have it
automatically installed on my systems if I were using the previous,
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:49:19PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
If I ever add filtering to the notes debconf allows to be displayed,
notes that refer the user to README.Debian will be at the top of the
list to never be displayed.
Of course, I am much more likely to bow to the pressure of notes
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:33:16PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:08:05PM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
E) Email does binary attachments and uses MIME (mime types, base64
encoding) to attach and send them with the message. You can't do this
by doing what is described
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:10:09PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:56:42AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Fellas, looking in the Packages files, some big packages have little
descriptions, some little packages have big descriptions,
and this package description went
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 04:15:29PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:41:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:17:58PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
the worst culprits are usually sets of binary packages from the one
source file
which
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 07:07:46AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
Anyway, one liner snob descriptions just have to go.
$ apt-cache show emacs21
Description: The GNU Emacs editor
GNU Emacs is the extensible self-documenting text editor.
Oops, I see, it is self-documenting.
that's actually a
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:22:08AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
As I have said before, as long as the default is to not cause data loss for
everyone (since dropping emails may cause data loss), but allow people to opt
in to have their mail filtered, I would have no objection. Opt in
a query for potassium results in the following output:
:C: dict 1.8.0/rf on Linux 2.4.19-xfs
:D: * potassium 1
:I: quit: d/m/c = 1/0/7; 0.000r 0.000u 0.000s
if you have any other tests you'd like me to run, i'll leave dictd
installed here for a day or two...then i'll remove it.
craig
--
craig
anyway.
either 1) you're a troll or 2) you resent having to learn or understand
anything about your computer or 3) both.
in any case, my advice to you is thæ same: linux is probably not for
you, you would be happier staying with windows.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:15:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i remember a year or so ago when i complained about this worthless
practice i said that it would end up consuming hundreds of megabytes
- i was told that was ridiculous, it would
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 07:27:06PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:01:12PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
Current cost of hard disk is something between $1.00 and $1.50 per
gigabyte.
it's not just the cost of disk space, it's the cost of bandwidth too
9ca48708f119e3776fae836e2a8ab026d59244a5 4482
main/debian-installer/binary-sparc/Packages.gz
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
packages.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pedantically for the sake of arguing pedantically. doesn't matter what
the issue is, the main thing is that a good (i.e. long-winded and
tedious) argument is had until everyone is bored into apathy.
this practice is, of course, a wonderful morale booster. hip hip hooray.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL
an MUA safely, create another account on your system (you
can have mail delivered to it by setting up .forward to CC your real
account's mail to it) and login as (or su - to) that userid before
running the MUA.
better yet, just stick with mutt. It Workstm :-)
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL
is too small.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
=$db_name:host=$db_host ;
(using db_port, db_user, and db_password as well if required)
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
multi-line windows style .ini configurations, but the IniConf
module parses it automatically into a hash for you. it's almost ideal
for what you want to do, if you can handle the ugliness of .ini style
configurations.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:55:13AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
yawn. you're wrong. again.
I have seen no quotes from you, of other, *outside* sources, that show
'zonefile' in widespread use. I *have* seen posts saying that 'zone
file' is, however
[ drivel deleted ]
in a word, No.
btw, learn to spell authoritative.
OTOH, it's kind of amusing to read someone who can't spell attempt to
harangue me over spelling.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 10:08:04PM -0600, Russel Ingram wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
I've used the make-kpkg command to create kernel packages, but they
always come out with a custom-1.00 label on them and I haven't figured
out how to get around that.
RTFM. see
that.
RTFM. see the --revision option.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
. dunno
if it looks at References: or In-Reply-To: lines for that, but it
certainly uses From:, To:, and CC: headers.
makes it quite easy to spot your messages and replies to them in large
threads.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:37:02AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
* Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010905 20:17]:
the correct solution is to NOT compile ECN support into the distribution
kernels. that's a choice that should be left up to the individual system
So, lets fix one problem
system
admin - if they want it, they can compile a kernel to support it.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
, and widespread adoption of it should be encouraged
- BUT enabling it should require an informed act by the user since it is
likely to result in network outages at the moment.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabricati Diem, PVNC.
-- motto of the Ankh-Morpork City Watch
have
one big repository that could be used by everyone.
a fine idea (really, i'm not being sarcastic).
but ALL it is doing is making yet another unstable.
think about it: that's all it is - just another unstable tree, but with
different versions of stuff.
why bother?
craig
--
craig sanders
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 06:36:30PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Craig == Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig why is application bar any *more* reliable or trustworthy
Craig just because it is compiled against an old version of libc6
Craig in potato?
It is not so much
getting closer to freeze. lets move on.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
flavour covers a very large chunk of the
i386 userbase.
a 386 kernel covers all of the ia32 userbase.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
,
with the modules_image target.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:41:22PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:19:12PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
anyone running SMP ought to have enough of a clue to compile their
own kernel.
This is the point where I disagree. I really hate having to build my
own kernel
- or they should learn how to edit the startup scripts (or
inetd.conf) if they want non-standard behaviour.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
non-localhost connections that aren't explicitly allowed (by ip address)
in /etc/hosts.allow
Having daemons shut off by default is not the way to go, however.
yep.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32
should be split into separate packages. if it bothers you
enough, file a bug report. i'm happy with the way it is.
or
2. the handful of people who want the ssh client but not the ssh daemon
can learn how to edit /etc/init.d/ssh
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D
appropriate to have a dozen or so kernel-image
packages (and associated kernel-headers packages) per kernel version,
when one(*) will do.
(*) or whatever the minimum number is that will boot on all ia32 boxes.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674
there should be dozens of kernel-image and
kernel-headers packages when one is enough to do the job.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
bloat has
been the topic of this thread from the beginning.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
. i started the thread, i know what i started.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:30:31PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
[...]
i think you've done a good job of summarising the issues.
i hope we can resolve this soon.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 07:30:47PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:47:44AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
what is the DIFFERENCE between kernel-headers-2.4.2 and all the other
2.4.2 kernel headers packages?
Kernel-headers-2.4.2 is built with the default config file
the optimization they want, and we compile the kernel for
them.
well said. couldn't agree more.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
on boot floppies to one.
you're missing the point again.
nobody is disputing that using initrd was a good idea - it's a useful
tool.
what is being disputed is the package bloat of having dozens of
kernel-image packages taking up approx 110MB for EACH kernel version.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL
-headers-2.4.2-pentiumiii
kernel-headers-2.4.2-pentiumiii-smp
?
it's only one kernel, one source tree...so where do all these different
header files come from? what's the point of them? what do they provide
that just plain kernel-headers-2.4.2 doesn't provide?
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL
going to notice the difference
between a 386 kernel and a k7 kernel.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:39:00AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:20:42AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
what, exactly, is the difference between kernel-headers-2.4.2 and:
kernel-headers-2.4.2-386
kernel-headers-2.4.2-586
kernel-headers-2.4.2-586tsc
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:37:35AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:15:03AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 07:24:13PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
How are they going to compile a kernel if they haven't even installed
Linux?
that's obvious
netscape whenever i need to visit an
SSL site)
i just learnt to work around it, because i'd be even more annoyed if it
started up a new binary every time.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
people will be
able to use the precompiled one rather than building their own.
there's good reason to worry about kernel modules now that there are
known hax0r stealth modules which exist purely to hide the fact that a
system has been compromised.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED
enough to earn a great deal of respect.
if users don't know that this exists or don't realise how useful it is,
then that can be solved with education.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
-image bugs.
Go ahead, I'll close them as soon as they're filed.
and i'll open them again or file new ones.
what you are doing is broken.
And what does this have to do with our discussion?
it's about as relevant as the rest of your digression on initrd and
modules.
craig
--
craig sanders
.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key: 1024D/CD5626F0
Key fingerprint: 9674 7EE2 4AC6 F5EF 3C57 52C3 EC32 6810 CD56 26F0
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 03:36:02PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 08:33:43AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
is there such a thing as cross-compilation for the kernel?
Yes - porting to new architectures would be nearly impossible
otherwise.
yep, true...but is it deep
Keith Owens and others have
got their fixed kernel build system into the kernel tree - that won't
happen until 2.5.x i believe.
i've successfully compiled several kernels using -j3, but it's not
something i'd want to rely on at the moment.
craig
--
craig sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key
means that an upgraded GNU tar is no longer a drop-in
replacement for older versions of GNU tar.
both options suck.
craig
--
craig sanders
calls.
there's really no excuse for running (non-ssl) telnetd any more. good
free ssh clients are available for just about every operating system.
craig
--
craig sanders
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:11:50PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
Mail-Followup-To is the correct header to use.
Mail-Followup-To isn't even a registered header! The closest thing to a
registry that RFC822 implies is in the hands of SRI International
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:15:23PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:23:55PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
the new 'testing' distribution (sid) should be even better - nearly
all the benefits of 'unstable' but tested to at least install properly
without error.
Wrong
--
craig sanders
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:43:05AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
[ Craig Sanders writes ]
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:26:25AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
And in the case of the debian mailing lists, you should reply to the
list.
some replies should go to the list, and some replies should
. it may be too much trouble for the completely clueless but
it's fine for anyone who's not afraid of getting their hands dirty.
the new 'testing' distribution (sid) should be even better - nearly
all the benefits of 'unstable' but tested to at least install properly
without error.
craig
--
craig
to do with debian.
there's no need to be so pompous and pretentious. you're just another
volunteer, not the Thought Police.
craig
--
craig sanders
destination. it
is not there so that mailing lists can screw with it.
craig
--
craig sanders
this allegation.
craig
--
craig sanders
need more than one version of a library installed, i
can compile it in /usr/local and set LD_PRELOAD appropriately.
craig
--
craig sanders
perform similar but
far from identical tasks. for some jobs, mod_perl is better while for
other jobs, speedy is better.
craig
--
craig sanders
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
