[Russ Allbery]
> ip address also has one of the worst output UI decisions I've ever seen,
> namely this line:
>
> inet 192.168.0.195/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global dynamic wlan0
>
> specifically "192.168.0.195/24", which is notation (IIRC) invented by this
> command, used nowhere else in
[Johannes Schauer]
> Old sbuild will not help you. The problem is mainly, that older
> chroots contain an apt installation that has no support for the
> [trusted=yes] option in sources.list.
So if someone really needs this, I guess a workaround would be to
backport apt 1.0 to squeeze...?
Yes,
[Chris Boot]
There probably doesn't need to be an ABI break for every version, but
there is with 2.4.6 = 2.4.7 due to the addition of some variables. If
this was a shared library it wouldn't necessitate a soname bump as it's
essentially just a new symbol, but a plugin that happens to use this
[The Wanderer]
it is IMO not viable for actual use - except perhaps by people who
already know completely what they are doing and how to override
aptitude's suggestions.
That sounds like you believe aptitude has only a command-line
interface. Mostly I use its full-screen interface. (To see
[Andrey Rahmatullin]
Not all Debian contributors are Debian Contributors whatever that means.
Lots of people without keys somewhere in official keyrings are doing
useful work. Some of them are even maintaining packages.
And actually, come January, a pretty high fraction of official Debian
[Daniel Pocock]
Would it be worthwhile giving people another option, for example,
allowing a percentage of DDs to formally veto decisions? Would this
be better than people leaving outright?
That sounds like a pretty good description of either a GR, or the
Technical Committee. We have both
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
- database-server: commonly one would expect MySQL, and postgress gets
installed
[Paul Wise]
Isn't tasksel for people with no expectations? People who know
something about the technology they are looking for will install the
relevant
[Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo]
If you agree that source-is-missing also applies in those cases, do
you also think that we should immediately declare all source packages
in Debian containing a 'configure' script as somehow non free (unless
we can check unambigously that they were generated by
[Paul Tagliamonte]
I was going to send a mail about this yesterday. I've decided
I'm going to start a quest to support this. I settled on
Build-Indep-Architecture myself.
Sorry for the bikeshedding, but don't we already have ways to express
exactly what we mean?
Build-Depends-Indep:
[micah]
it feels like a bit too aggressive pressure for my tastes. I've seen
a lot of developers of packages who have found out their package will
be removed from testing, but don't have the time to resolve the
situation before it gets removed, resulting in much pulling of hair.
If only we
[Christoph Anton Mitterer]
btw: And quite obviously, this post is not about bashing upstart,..
No, and it's also not about Debian. Could we ... do our Canonical
bashing somewhere else? Please? Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
[Norbert Preining]
On Di, 03 Sep 2013, Peter Samuelson wrote:
texlive-lang-european? It doesn't look like it to me (no Breaks or
Conflicts), but I haven't actually tried it.
conflicts there are, texlive-base conflicts with all the old packages.
I misspoke. There is a Conflicts
[Thorsten Glaser]
I absolutely do not want to see anything related to ruby on my
systems.
Why? Is this just an emotional reaction, or is it the 13 MB of
dependencies, or something else?
I wonder if anyone feels the same way about, say, libraries written in
FORTRAN, or binaries linked against
[Norbert Preining]
I understood your proposal, of course. Still, since there are no rdepends
besides very few (1?) build-depends on these two packages, I consider
it a a waste of resources.
Sounds like you are saying 'texlive-lang-danish' is only useful as a
package dependency - in other
Sounds like you are saying 'texlive-lang-danish' is only useful as a
package dependency - in other words, users would never install it
explicitly because they want its functionality. Is that correct? This
[Norbert Preining]
I never said that. The functionality is now in
[Thomas Goirand]
Oh ok. Not useful at all if you ask me. Why? Because sometimes, you
can't change the MAC address. For example, if you use the OpenStack
bare metal driver, then you continue to use virtual machine images,
though they will be used on a real hardware where you can't change
the
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 01:30 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
That's correct. If you want to talk to a loopback-only service,
you should be connecting to 'localhost', *not* to the hostname.
[Christoph Anton Mitterer]
Well why not? Imagine that one server in a cluster serves a debian
package
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 08:04:00AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
This comes up periodically. They aren't real.
[Darac Marjal]
It would appear they're real enough to trigger clamav's detection,
which was the problem the OP was having.
Yes. It is not really a fixable problem. The test
[Alberto Garcia]
I was unaware of this thing and I'm sure I'm overlooking something,
so can someone give a simple example of actual problems introduced by
using epochs?
One real problem is that epochs make it easier to introduce human
error in specifying reverse runtime and build deps. E.g.:
[Matt Zagrabelny]
I've grepped the d-d list, but didn't find any threads regarding
fixing epochs in package versions.
This does come up occasionally.
If so, could we add a field to debian/control such as
Supersede-Epoch. If set to 'yes', then dpkg considers this package
to have an epoch of
[Igor Pashev]
Currently /var/lib contains data for system utilities (dpkg, apt,
aptitute) and for user application like databases.
What about moving default location for applications to /export ?
Wrong list, please bring this up instead on fhs-discuss. (If that
still exists - it looks a
[James Cloos]
And where does one find dh_make?
Searching on goog suggests it would be part of debhelper. But it isn't:
Someone suggested 'apt-file', but in this case the simpler thing is:
apt-cache search dh_make
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
[Mathieu Malaterre]
I do not believe in debian life-span, a package manager ever switch
an implementation of a package. So libjpeg9 and libjpeg-turbo will
have to co-live.
It happens. Look at the source for 'libc6'. It used to be glibc,
these days it is a fork called eglibc. Likewise the
Zack,
Thank you SO MUCH for your service this past 3 years. Your hard work,
persistence, calm voice and especially your transparency have been much
appreciated.
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Russ Allbery]
Oh, I thought they'd given up on Safe. For some reason it stuck in
my mind that it had too many issues and ended up being deprecated.
Apparently, I either made that up or misremembered something.
Possibly you were thinking of suidperl, the hack to allow Perl programs
to use
[Charles Plessy]
- If mentors.debian.org needs to follow the DMCA, why would
mentors.debian.net be exempt of it ?
It's not exempt, but it's also not Debian's problem.
- If mentors.debian.org can distribute unreviewed packages by becomming a
DMCA safe harbor, wouldn't it be
all amd64
Version: 1.7.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Description:
libapache2-svn - Apache Subversion server modules for Apache httpd
libsvn-dev - Development files for Apache Subversion libraries
+++ Jonathan Dowland [2013-04-05 10:09 +0100]:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:07:31AM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
This java code should be replaces with something in perl/python/non-JVM.
Why?
[Wookey]
Because it's an entirely unnecessary circular build-dependency. java
is not part of
[Jonathan Dowland]
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:45:19PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
You seem to believe that unstable is more important than stable
releases. I do not. One of us is in the wrong project.
If, you are suggesting here, that the release process in Debian is utterly
set in stone
[Vincent Lefevre]
I disagree. If the freeze occurred only once (almost) all RC bugs
were fixed, there would be (almost) no delay. I suspect that the
length of the freeze is due to the fact that the freeze occurred
while too many RC bugs were already open.
Agreed: in July 2012, many - too
Anyway, rsync sounds like the most appropriate mechanism to
transfer these particular databases.
[iceWave IT]
My blacklists should be available for everyone not only for those who
can connect with my server via ssh...
rsync doesn't require ssh; for your scenario you probably just want
[Joachim Breitner]
this seems to be a good disk-space for human-time trade to me as well:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699333
I'm a bit confused. Given that perhaps 99% of Built-Using would be for
trivial things like crt1.o and libgcc.a, which are concentrated into a
[Benjamin Drung]
Image the opposite. You want to package a software that is only
available in a downstream distribution (e.g. Ubuntu or Linux
Mint). Do you prefer to have a non-native format or a native format?
If their native format is an archive in gzipped tar file format, like
ours is, I'm
[Holger Levsen]
Hi Andreas,
On Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
the following packages from wheezy ship files that are excluded from
the .md5sums file:
gridsite: FILE WITHOUT MD5SUM /var/lib/gridsite/.gacl
gridsite: FILE WITHOUT MD5SUM
[Joachim Breitner]
And a foo-dev Recommends: foo-prof is not suitable because?
because we cannot tell what the user will want. For example, a user of
xmonad will not want -prof packages installed, and an addition 400MB of
useless stuff on his computer is not in his, and hence our,
[Timo Juhani Lindfors]
Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org writes:
Note that this adds a keyring to the current list. If the intent
is to use the specified keyring alone, use --keyring along with
--no-default-keyring.
You probably read man gpg but gpgv is simpler:
gpgv
[Timo Juhani Lindfors]
Is
/usr/bin/gpgv --quiet --keyring /etc/myprogram/trusted.gpg file file.sig
chmod a+x file
./file
still a safe way to ensure that only code signed by a key in trusted.gpg
gets executed?
From the manpage:
Note that this adds a keyring to the current list. If
In bug #695229, I noted that an Architecture: all package really should
be Multi-Arch: foreign. This led to an IRC discussion between Goswin,
Steve L. and me in which I formulated the proposal:
If a package is 'Architecture: all', and all its dependencies are
'Multi-Arch: foreign'
[Helmut Grohne]
I ask you not to use this proposal for the following reasons:
* Given a package it is now much harder to see whether it is tagged M-A
or not. Especially you can no longer determine the tagging by simple
examination of package lists.
That's fair. Though I imagine if
[Hideki Yamane]
henrich@hp:/tmp$ du -k Packages.*
6052Packages.bz2
5812Packages.xz
henrich@hp:/tmp$ time bzip2 -d Packages.bz2
real0m0.999s
user0m0.956s
sys 0m0.020s
henrich@hp:/tmp$ rm Packages
henrich@hp:/tmp$ time xz -d Packages.xz
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:47:43AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
On the other hand, widespread dumb-ass assumptions about i386/amd64 may
cause quite a bit of issues: basically any Makefile that talks about x86
is somewhat suspicious. This is the main reason one may want to oppose
the
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
And an annoying technical detail makes it suboptimal to add the microcode
packages as a recommendation of the firmware-linux-nonfree package.
...which is that dpkg does not support architecture-specific relations
in binary packages.
[vangelis mouhtsis]
Can please someone explain why a package should be orphaned
from maintaining? (i hope the reason is not lack of maintainers)
Yes it is. Or more precisely, every package needs a maintainer with:
1) the skills to maintain it (familiarity not only with Debian
packaging in
[Kelly Clowers]
But I basically never report bugs. I have used Sid for years, and in
fact I often don't notice bugs in my personal workflow (maybe if I
can think of myself as a user? I notice end-user-impacting bugs in
other areas). If someone comes over and sees me working the might
say,
[Joerg Jaspert]
As one thing to keep in mind - we have an acl structure in dak.
Currently it reads something like
all DD keys are allowed all uploads.
all DM keys are allowed their own uploads according to DM rights.
all buildd keys are allowed binary only uploads for their arch.
It is
This preserves the ability to upload a manual binNMU, which is not
common, but is useful and sometimes necessary. (And not only for
bootstrapping an arch or a compiler.)
...and I forgot to add that something like this is required by the GR
http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_002, or at
[Christoph Anton Mitterer]
Wouldn't it make sense to start discussions about moving to the
strongest possible?
No. What makes sense is to use a hash that has the properties that are
needed for a particular application.
To use your example of dpkg file checksums, their purpose has _nothing_
[Chris Knadle]
However since all DNS servers are generally meant to use port 53, I
think it's unlikely to install more than one DNS server locally, so
I'm not sure if doing this makes sense from a packaging perspective.
[I can see how it does from an administration perspective.]
It's
[Joachim Breitner]
Would it be possible to extend the syntax to specify lists of
packages not by name, but by Maintainer,
e.g. pkg-haskell-maintainers@l.a.d.o? Bonus points if such an
assigment is expanded at dinstall time, so that the statement “DM
1234 may upload all packages owned by
[Neil Williams]
These are not native packages, they are expressly used by other
distributions than Debian or even Debian derivatives - just because
I'm on the upstream team / am the entire upstream team does NOT mean
that I am justified in polluting the tarball released to RPM users
with
[Russ Allbery]
The problem is that the software is called wallet, both the software
itself and the primary client binary that users invoke. And, of
course, we have a bunch of documentation and automation at Stanford
that assumes that name.
That actually seems like a reasonable name to me.
[Thomas Goirand]
Typically, I have / on 2 small RAID1 partitions making the array on the
first
2 HDD (1 or 2 gigs), and /usr on a LVM on a much, much larger RAID array
(I use mostly software RAID1 and RAID10, but in some cases, much bigger
hardware RAID5). So yes, that's my usual server
[Russ Allbery]
All PAM modules are installed under /lib, because that's the path
used by libpam to load them. However, I don't think the vast
majority of PAM modules could be considered critical for early boot
or need to be usable without /usr mounted
It seems pam already looks in both
[Jonas Smedegaard]
Format:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Source: http://susy.oddbird.net/
Repackaged, excluding non-DFSG licensed fonts and source-less
JavaScript
Files-Excluded:
docs/source/javascripts/jquery-1.7.1.min.js
[Peter Samuelson]
And there is something to be said for the dpkg-source / debhelper
style, in which each configuration parameter lives in its own tiny
file (e.g., 'debian/source/format', 'debian/compat',
'debian/pyversions') rather than as fields of a larger file that is
only tangentially
Automating get-orig-source is a fine idea, but tying it to DEP-5
would be unfortunate.
[Jonas Smedegaard]
You mean that you prefer a separate file for this info?
What should be its name? What should be its syntax?
...and why start from scratch with this - or does something else
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:57:46 -0500
Source: mtink
Binary: mtink mtink-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.0.16-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson
s...@debian.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Closes: 677788
Description:
lesstif-bin - user binaries for LessTif
lesstif-doc - documentation for LessTif
lesstif2 - OSF/Motif 2.1 implementation released under LGPL
lesstif2-dbg - lesstif2 debugging files
lesstif2-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:17:04 -0500
Source: mtink
Binary: mtink mtink-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.0.16-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson
[Holger Levsen]
if thats true, I don't want any of my package maintainance jobs. can
you please fire me?
You've been around awhile. If that is true, you should know how to RFA
or orphan packages and/or retire from the Project. You should know by
now that it isn't up to others to fire you.
all amd64
Version: 1.7.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Description:
libapache2-svn - Apache Subversion server modules for Apache httpd
libsvn-dev - Development files for Apache Subversion libraries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:55:09 -0500
Source: gpm
Binary: gpm libgpm2 libgpm-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.20.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson pe
all amd64
Version: 1.6.18dfsg-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Description:
libapache2-svn - Subversion server modules for Apache
libsvn-dev - Development files for Subversion libraries
libsvn-doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:26:56 -0500
Source: serf
Binary: libserf1 libserf-dev libserf1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:18:56 -0500
Source: serf
Binary: libserf1 libserf-dev libserf1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 11:20:49 -0500
Source: gpm
Binary: gpm libgpm2 libgpm-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.20.4-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson pe
[Raphael Hertzog]
It the next upstream version of your javascript library provides new
files, they will not be in the symlink tree that you built in your
package. So at runtime, it will fail because of the missing file.
Forgive me if I'm missing something basic here, but this sounds like a
-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 source
Version: 1.6.17dfsg-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Description:
libapache2-svn - Subversion server modules for Apache
libsvn-dev - Development files for Subversion libraries
[Philip Ashmore]
On my machine running set set.txt ls -lsa set.txt reveals that my
environment contains 225517 of stuff - some of it is even being
taken up by
exported function definitions!
As mentioned earlier, 'set' is not reporting much more than the
environment exported to external
[Philip Ashmore]
I guess I'm confused as to why bash completion needs these.
Easy enough to read /etc/bash_completion and /etc/bash_completion.d/*
and see for yourself why it needs these.
bash-completion is full of special cases to do the right thing in
hundreds or thousands of different
Switch to the deadline IO scheduler
[...] and make proper use of cgroups.
[...] And disable memory overcommit
[Serge]
instead of fixing a single default option you suggest every debian
user to tweak and/or rebuild the kernel? Are you serious? ;)
What?!? and/or rebuild the kernel is
[Steve McIntyre]
You're not measuring the time taken to sync to the flash drive
either, so all you're going to be seeing is the speed of writing to
cache.
Huh, I figured the 'sync' call at the end of each test run covered
that.
I've done lots of work with USB flash and MMC/SD cards over the
[Russell Coker]
Would it be possible to have somewhere on the Debian servers for
storing such files so that they can be referenced in a README file or
something rather than sent to everyone? I'm sure that most people
who build a Wordpress package won't use them.
As Paul Wise said, best if
[Steve McIntyre]
(http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch04s03.html.en)
While it is refreshing to see cat debian.iso /dev/sdX instead of
the usual dd nonsense (it seems there's an extremely widespread myth
that you need to use dd any time you're reading or writing block
devices), I
[Samuel Thibault]
I think cp is even more straightforward.
Does cp accept that way since a long time?
I'm not sure, but I've been using things like cp boot.img /dev/fd0
for probably 10 or 15 years on various Linux and Unix systems. (The
fact that I referred to a floppy drive may give some
[Steve McIntyre]
The major win with dd onto a raw device is that you can specify the
block size. For most USB sticks, using a block size of 4MB or so is
going to be *much* faster than using the default for dd (512 bytes)
or cp (10 KB IIRC).
That seemed a little fishy to me, since none of the
[Uoti Urpala]
The reason why most old applications do not follow that approach (at
least not yet) is pretty obvious: their authors never considered it.
etc-overrides-lib semantics have only become a seriously considered
alternative fairly recently.
If I'm not mistaken, I first saw this sort
[David Weinehall]
So... A (admittedly expensive) pre-inst script that checks the
system for calls to /usr/sbin/node outside of Debian packages would
likely do the trick?
That seems like a pretty big violation of the spirit, and possibly the
letter, of Debian Policy.
I mean, why not just
[Patrick Lauer]
1.0_pre20120503 maybe
That'd be wrong if you expect a real _alpha, _beta or _pre of the given
version in the future. I think in that case you'd need something like
1.0_alpha_alpha20120503 or 1.0_alpha_pre20120503.
There's something to be said for imposed structure, but in this
interesting enough to talk about?
I ask because, if porting systemd to kFBSD is a mere matter of
emulating cgroups with jails (from what I understand, jails provide
roughly a superset of cgroups functionality), that's a somewhat
different picture than I've been assuming.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:43:53 -0600
Source: serf
Binary: libserf1 libserf-dev libserf1-dbg
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter
Foundation or the Apache
Software Foundation seems to be that, oddly, more people think
Canonical is evil than think the FSF and ASF are evil.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
-A: same-as libfoo but perhaps something like M-A: same [libfoo]
or M-A: same: libfoo or even M-A: same: libc6, libc6.1, libc0.1...
Finally, I note that this is somewhat similar to Enhances. But I don't
think it's a good idea to overload Enhances.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http
[Ian Jackson]
If you install on i386 your 2 binaries and libc6, you /do/ need the
i386 libfakeroot. Otherwise if you say fakeroot your binary it
won't work, no matter that /usr/bin/fakeroot is amd64.
libfakeroot is something of a special case, indeed. As a hack to my
proposal, perhaps it
-as libgimp2.0
Package: libsasl2-modules
Multi-Arch: same-as libsasl2-2
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
[Brad Spengler]
Frankly it makes more sense for me to offer .debs myself than to deal
with a bureaucracy and non-standard kernel in Debian. It contains
who-knows-what extra code, and I doubt anyone looked at any of it to
see if it allows for some way to leak information I prevent against a
pretty much what he already said. What he's asking is
whether this is actually a good idea, or whether there are better
options.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
[Kees Cook]
This doesn't work with source-format-1 packages without adding
chmod lines for the scripted debhelper config files in the rules
file. Perhaps this isn't a big deal since we should all be using
source-format-3 anyway.
We should? I prefer to think of this whole debacle as yet
[Bernd Zeimetz]
So there are sources which have executable debhelper files already? I
doubt it as you'd have to chmod them manually.
Not for native packages.
Not for packages in format 3.0 (quilt).
In both cases, execute permission in debian/ is preserved, with the
obvious exception of
intervention for
any dependency loop.
And (3) seems like a very complex workflow to solve a very small problem.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
[Goswin von Brederlow]
Where the relevant patches added to binutils and gcc for this?
See for yourself: http://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
[Jakub Wilk]
If a package is marked as Multi-Arch: same, files with the same
name have to be (byte-to-byte) identical across all architectures.
Unfortunately, not all packages obey this requirement.
[libsvn-java 1.6.17dfsg-2+b1]
usr/share/java/svn-javahl.jar
This file is in a package
-4 on kfreebsd-i386.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2020183045.ge2...@p12n.org
Version: 1.6.17dfsg-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Description:
libapache2-svn - Subversion server modules for Apache
libsvn-dev - Development files for Subversion libraries
libsvn-doc - Developer
suppose a side benefit
is you can use Recommends and cut down a little on the size of your
strict Dependency closure.)
- BinNMUs (see http://deb.li/CHYh).
So I guess we can ignore changelog.Debian.gz hits, as there's not much
we can do about them.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http
it is
going through Debian infrastructure. The latter even, I believe, uses
proper list software.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[Russ Allbery]
Compressing all the whitespace out of it seems fine to me; you can
fix that well enough using an indenter.
Yes, but why would _any_ obfuscator, I mean minimizer, compress
whitespace but not remove comments? The cleverest re-intender in the
world isn't going to be able to
[Olivier Berger]
For users, which don't read d-d-a and receive such emails (below),
it's a bit unclear what's really happening, IMHO :-/
Ummm ... don't we strongly encourage all package maintainers to read
d-d-a? If not, we should. It is very low traffic and sometimes
important.
--
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 01:22:27 -0500
Source: equivs
Binary: equivs
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
Changed-By: Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org
[Alessandro Ghedini]
It doesn't really sound as intended *only* for Parrot (ok, as of now it
does support only parrot, but in the future this may change).
Also, aren't parrot-nqp and nqp different things? (parrot-nqp is currently
used to build nqp).
Are you saying one of them is nqp and
1 - 100 of 622 matches
Mail list logo
