Il giorno ven 19 ago 2022 alle 14:43:27 -07:00:00, Russ Allbery
ha scritto:
Debian specifically disallows providing the same binary path from
multiple
packages in cases where the two binaries do not do the same thing with
roughly the same arguments [1]. It would create a situation where
Andrea Pappacoda writes:
> Would alternatives really be that bad? What if the current /usr/bin/muon
> was moved to /usr/bin/muon-kde, muon-build was installed to
> /usr/bin/muon-build and /usr/bin/muon was shared between the two
> packages? What issues could it cause?
Debian specifically
On 2022-08-19 23:14, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
Would alternatives really be that bad? What if the current /usr/bin/muon
was moved to /usr/bin/muon-kde, muon-build was installed to
/usr/bin/muon-build and /usr/bin/muon was shared between the two
packages? What issues could it cause?
I don't
Il giorno ven 19 ago 2022 alle 18:51:31 +01:00:00, Simon McVittie
ha scritto:
I'm not Paul, but I suspect he was looking at Policy ยง10.1:
Two different packages must not install programs with different
functionality but with the same filenames. (The case of two
programs
having
Hi,
On 19-08-2022 18:10, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 16:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 19-08-2022 17:41, Luca Boccassi wrote:
And if KDE Muon is indeed dead, simply having a "Conflicts: muon" and
using the same path should be ok as well?
No.
Care to elaborate a little?
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 19:19:25 +0200, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> > And if KDE Muon is indeed dead, simply having a "Conflicts: muon" and
> > using the same path should be ok as well?
>
> I had the same idea, even if it is not extremely elegant. But Paul doesn't
> seem to agree; why?
I'm not
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 16:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> On 19-08-2022 17:41, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > And if KDE Muon is indeed dead, simply having a "Conflicts: muon" and
> > using the same path should be ok as well?
>
> No.
Care to elaborate a little?
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
On 19-08-2022 17:41, Luca Boccassi wrote:
And if KDE Muon is indeed dead, simply having a "Conflicts: muon" and
using the same path should be ok as well?
No.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 15:48, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 13:57:50 +0200, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> > The upstream name is "muon", but this package and /usr/bin/ name is already
> > used by KDE Muon, a [dead] synaptic alternative.
> >
> > I'm not sure how to handle this
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 13:57:50 +0200, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> The upstream name is "muon", but this package and /usr/bin/ name is already
> used by KDE Muon, a [dead] synaptic alternative.
>
> I'm not sure how to handle this conflict; naming the Debian package "muon-
> meson" or "muon-build"
10 matches
Mail list logo
