Re: DEP-5 copyright with different licenses for two parts of the same file

On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 09:45:36 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >This is the intended purpose of "and": cases where one file is covered by >multiple licenses simultaneously. Thank you. I missed the "Syntax" paragraph in the DEP-5 specification. Greetings Marc -- --

Re: DEP-5 copyright with different licenses for two parts of the same file

Quoting Marc Haber (2023-08-29 18:31:52) > in daemon(1), I have a file with has two contradicting licenses in the > same file. See > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/daemon/-/blob/master/libslack/getopt.c > > >From the wording of the second copyright notice, I think it is clear > that that notice

Re: DEP-5 copyright with different licenses for two parts of the same file

Marc Haber writes: > Now, how do I write this in a DEP-5 copyright file? Having two stanzas > for the same file gets flagged by Lintian as an Error, and the DEP-5 > syntax doesn't seem to allow to mention two Licenses in the License: > line. This is the intended purpose of "and": cases where

DEP-5 copyright with different licenses for two parts of the same file

Hi, in daemon(1), I have a file with has two contradicting licenses in the same file. See https://salsa.debian.org/debian/daemon/-/blob/master/libslack/getopt.c >From the wording of the second copyright notice, I think it is clear that that notice applies to the POD documentation included in the