On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:48:05PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
On 04/13/2013 04:18 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
So here is where we stand, with little improvement from last week: [1]
root@max:/# for p in `apt-cache showpkg r-base-core | \
grep r-base-core 2 | sort | awk -F,
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:18:05AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Charles, failing that, shall we coordinate off-list? Re-building in chroot
takes about a minute or two each but sadly some of these package appear
effectively orphaned (eg gpplot2, single upload 15 months ago -- is that
really
Le Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 09:18:05AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
I would be really terrific if the the debian-med, debian-science, debichem
teams could update some of these packages.
Charles, failing that, shall we coordinate off-list? Re-building in chroot
takes about a minute or
So here is where we stand, with little improvement from last week: [1]
root@max:/# for p in `apt-cache showpkg r-base-core | \
grep r-base-core 2 | sort | awk -F, '{print $1}'`; \
do echo -n $p,; apt-cache show $p | grep Maintainer | \
sed -e 's/.*//'
On 04/13/2013 04:18 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
So here is where we stand, with little improvement from last week: [1]
root@max:/# for p in `apt-cache showpkg r-base-core | \
grep r-base-core 2 | sort | awk -F, '{print $1}'`; \
do echo -n $p,; apt-cache show $p |
On 07.04.2013 03:07, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Ah, thanks Chris, I wasn't aware of that! But then it seems to me
that the correct lines should be:
Build-Depends: ..., r-base-dev, ...
[...]
Depends: ..., ${R:Depends}, ...
as the source package is *not* dependent upon the R version, only the
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
On 07.04.2013 03:07, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Ah, thanks Chris, I wasn't aware of that! But then it seems to me
that the correct lines should be:
Build-Depends: ..., r-base-dev, ...
[...]
Depends: ..., ${R:Depends}, ...
On 7 April 2013 at 13:01, Julian Gilbey wrote:
| On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
| On 07.04.2013 03:07, Julian Gilbey wrote:
| Ah, thanks Chris, I wasn't aware of that! But then it seems to me
| that the correct lines should be:
|
| Build-Depends: ...,
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:04:41PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
First off, let me apologize. I clearly did this the wrong way and should have
contacted -release and -devel beforehand. My bad -- I'm sorry for extra work
this created for the release managers and maintainer, particularly at
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Julian Gilbey j...@debian.org wrote:
So something doesn't make sense somewhere: if my package doesn't care
which version of R it's building against, but R itself cares, then
surely there should be some way of querying r-base-dev during the
build process to
On 6 April 2013 at 19:30, Chris Lawrence wrote:
| On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Julian Gilbey j...@debian.org wrote:
| So something doesn't make sense somewhere: if my package doesn't care
| which version of R it's building against, but R itself cares, then
| surely there should be some way
On 6 April 2013 at 21:55, Julian Gilbey wrote:
| R print(todo[ order(todo[,2]), ], row.names=FALSE)
| pkg
maint
| r-cran-erm
j...@debian.org
| r-cran-raschsampler
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 07:48:20PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| If you're using cdbs and r-cran.mk in debian/rules, you can add
| Depends: ${R:Depends} to debian/control to pick up the current binary
| dependency. I've migrated almost all of my packages over and it makes
| life easier.
First off, let me apologize. I clearly did this the wrong way and should have
contacted -release and -devel beforehand. My bad -- I'm sorry for extra work
this created for the release managers and maintainer, particularly at this
time.
R 3.0.0 was released on April 3 as scheduled. As usual, I
14 matches
Mail list logo
