On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:50 AM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I now recall: The Rust library packages wreaking havoc by prematurely
> entering testing is (at least partly) due to the Rust team choosing to
> flag all(!) autopkgtests as flaky, so not really a concern for other
> teams (read: just don't
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2023-07-15 10:05:24)
> Quoting Nicolas Boulenguez (2023-07-12 15:55:09)
> > The Ada maintainers are considering a new naming scheme for -dev packages,
> > where
> > libada-foo-dev Provides: libada-foo-dev-HASH.
> > source packages Build-Depend: libada-foo-dev
> >
Hi
Le sam. 15 juil. 2023, 10:05, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> Quoting Nicolas Boulenguez (2023-07-12 15:55:09)
> > The Ada maintainers are considering a new naming scheme for -dev
> packages,
> > where
> > libada-foo-dev Provides: libada-foo-dev-HASH.
> > source packages Build-Depend:
Quoting Nicolas Boulenguez (2023-07-12 15:55:09)
> The Ada maintainers are considering a new naming scheme for -dev packages,
> where
> libada-foo-dev Provides: libada-foo-dev-HASH.
> source packages Build-Depend: libada-foo-dev
> binary -dev packages Depend: libada-foo-dev-HASH
> The intent
Hello.
The Ada maintainers are considering a new naming scheme for -dev packages,
where
libada-foo-dev Provides: libada-foo-dev-HASH.
source packages Build-Depend: libada-foo-dev
binary -dev packages Depend: libada-foo-dev-HASH
The intent is similar to the one of shared object versions, but
5 matches
Mail list logo
