Source: racket-mode
Version: 20231222git0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 20240129git0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: emacs-posframe
Version: 1.1.7-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.4.2-1
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: emacs-wgrep
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.0.0-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days
Source: hl-todo-el
Version: 3.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.6.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: racket-mode
Version: 20210916git0-2
Severity: serious
Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since December
2022 in testing. Can you please investigate the
Source: flycheck
Version: 32~git.20200527.9c435db3-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since January
2023. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some
of
Hi Sean,
On 09-12-2022 18:56, Sean Whitton wrote:
If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues
beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Alright, all the RC bugs are closed. Of the four autopkgtest failures,
emacs-deferred and flycheck we
Source: esup-el
Version: 0.7.1-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of esup-el the autopkgtest of esup-el fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of esup-el
from unstable. It passes
Package: elpa-dash
Version: 2.19.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Dear maintainers,
With the upload of 2.19.0+dfsg-1 elpa-dash took over
elpa-dash-functional via a Provides. However, elpa-helpful has a
versioned dependency on elpa-dash-functional. Policy 7.5 says this:
"""
If the Provides field does
Source: rtags
Version: 2.38-3
Severity: serious
Tags: bulleye-ignore
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, due to glibc reporting
a regression, I looked into the
Source: org-mode-doc
Version: 9.3-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 9.4.0-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
You uploaded the latest version of org-mod-doc as a source only. That's
the required way for the main archive,
Source: weechat-el
Version: 0.5.0-4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of weechat-el the autopkgtest of weechat-el fails
in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary
Source: haskell-mode
Version: 16.1-8
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 17.1-2
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and
13 matches
Mail list logo