no changes to the Debian package itself, it's just a upstream
> update.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions or comments!
>
I only notice this request when I see bug #1059516. I have uploaded 1.14.0-2.
--
Shengjing Zhu
un testing for any build regressions with the newer version yet.
>
This is a known regression in 1.5.3, see
https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/1596#issuecomment-1981208282
--
Shengjing Zhu
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891746
--
Shengjing Zhu
My last attempt for the grpc-go transition is stuck at the protobuf things.
One thing that might help is gprc-go is finally going to use the new
protobuf library, https://github.com/grpc/grpc-go/pull/6961
So we could decouple the grpc-go transition from the protobuf things.
--
Shengjing Zhu
alsa runner too. I've asked on
> #salsa to see if there are any guidelines.
>
I'm not a salsa admin, so it's not accurate. We don't lack the runner
resource, because it's on Google cloud, and we (the Debian project)
have budgets for it. The Gitlab CI not only needs runner resources,
but also resources on the scheduler, which is the main Gitlab
instance.
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:56 PM Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
> Shengjing Zhu writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 7:30 PM Simon Josefsson wrote:
> >> Shengjing Zhu, what do you think, can we request removal of this package
> >> from unstable?
> >>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 7:30 PM Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Shengjing Zhu, what do you think, can we request removal of this package
> from unstable?
>
Why would you bother with packages that are only in unstable?
I'm not sure how best to handle removal for team maintained packages.
I'm no
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:07 PM Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
> Shengjing Zhu writes:
>
> >> >> How do you all QA test Go packages before uploading them without a Salsa
> >> >> pipeline? Manually on local developer machine?
> >> >>
> >&g
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 3:00 AM Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
> Shengjing Zhu writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 11:18 PM Simon Josefsson
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi. I read about the Go teams CI/CD pipeline here:
> >>
> >> https://go-te
s. The "test_the_archive" job would still run on the go
> runner since the job is tagged, and that job would not run on the normal
> shared runners either.
>
> /Simon
--
Shengjing Zhu
rt version upgrade between Debian
releases.
--
Shengjing Zhu
.6.0 -> 0.4.0). If we
reuse old packages, we need to introduce epochs, which is not ideal.
So new source and binary packages are preferred.
> it's needed by quick-go 0.40 and surely soon many others.
>
> Jérémy
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 6:24 PM Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>
>
> Le mar. 2 janv. 2024 à 11:18, Shengjing Zhu a écrit :
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:58 PM Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Le mar. 2 janv. 2024 à 06:50, Shengjing Zhu a é
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:58 PM Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>
>
> Le mar. 2 janv. 2024 à 06:50, Shengjing Zhu a écrit :
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:34 AM Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Le lun. 1 janv. 2024 à 19:29, Domenico Andreol
ward would be to drop it so I can re-create it.
>
No, the repo is good, please don't force push it.
Please use the `gbp import-orig --upstream-vcs-tag` option to import
upstream new versions.
--
Shengjing Zhu
protobuf and grpc-go.
For safety, yes please upload to experimental, and people can try
rebuilding their packages and test them.
> I realise I'm speaking at a very surface level so I am adding in Shengjing
> (zhsj) to the
> thread and recluse myself from any uploads for this package meanwhile.
>
> Best,
> Nilesh
--
Shengjing Zhu
e the salsa repo with command `dh-make-golang
create-salsa-project`, as it will do the right settings for you.
--
Shengjing Zhu
uot;own" the package, all is good?
Just usual Debian rules. And no need for a 2nd uploader.
--
Shengjing Zhu
t;
I think backports don't have any specific rules here.
> More specifically (not sure if it matters), my interest is in Prometheus
> and related packages.
>
There is a #debian-prometheus channel on IRC.
--
Shengjing Zhu
hasn't been run (skipped due to not installing
criu), not sure if I just forgot or the debci infra doesn't support.
--
Shengjing Zhu
team has one package in Go as well.
https://salsa.debian.org/input-method-team/fcitx5-bamboo
--
Shengjing Zhu
to. Once
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/456 is
merged, lintian will be silent for that.
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:11 AM Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:03:00AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >
> > This is not right, you should check the Built-Using field. For example
> > grep-dctrl -F Built-Using golang-yaml.v2 -sPackage
> >
&g
that
> can/should/must be rebuilt? Is there anything else that I need to do in
> relation to this?
>
> Regards,
>
> -Roberto
>
> [0] https://lts-team.pages.debian.net/wiki/TestSuites/golang.html
> [1]
> https://www.debian.org/releases/{buster,bullseye,bookworm}/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#golang-static-linking
>
> --
> Roberto C. Sánchez
--
Shengjing Zhu
opies of
> code, especially if it's already in the archive, but I wonder if this
> might be a situation that warrants an exception and note in the
> package's d/README.source.
>
> Thoughts or suggestions welcomed!
>
> Thanks,
> Mathias
--
Shengjing Zhu
has Go1.19, but
Go1.19 is to be EOL in the next few weeks when Go1.21 is released.
Allowing Go to download a newer toolchain by default would just make
such an old version more useful...
I incline to leave the GOTOOLCHAIN value as is, any thoughts?
--
Shengjing Zhu
ed above, I don't see chezmoi being comparable
to kubernetes.
> To support this effort, I try to be friendly to maintainers and will happily
> make any necessary changes to the chezmoi repo.
>
> Please advise,
> Tom
--
Shengjing Zhu
0 tag, so the pipeline fails.
Besides, could you run `ratt` test locally as it's a major version bump up.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:12 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 9:09 PM Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> >
> > Packages will be removed from experimental if it contains a newer version
> > in unstable (a so called "NVIU" removal).
> >
>
&g
er than zigo's version in experimental.
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 7:43 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> On 6/26/23 09:04, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > Why don't you work on the experimental suite until the major packages
> > have been ready to migrate?
>
> Because I tried to do that, and nobody cared doing the work to fi
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 3:04 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 2:52 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 6/25/23 11:54, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > > Hi zigo,
> > >
> > > You golang-google-grpc 1.38.0 to unsta
that aren't being addressed, these will be auto-RM at some
> point, and that is a good thing. Let's fill RC bugs instead of reverting
> this upload.
This is not the process for the transition. You should fill RC bugs
first then introduce breakages in unstable.
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 2:52 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 6/25/23 11:54, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > Hi zigo,
> >
> > You golang-google-grpc 1.38.0 to unstable, which was experimental
> > previously.
> > It's great to see you want to work
-google-grpc 1.38.0 upload. (Since
the version in experimental has been cruft, so the page is blank
currently).
--
Shengjing Zhu
.1`, instead of doing it manually.
--
Shengjing Zhu
small. The version for that package is awkward.
--
Shengjing Zhu
able to rename it. Could someone remove the old repo:
> https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-uber-jaeger-lib_OLD
> (note the "_OLD" suffix)?
>
Done
--
Shengjing Zhu
`dh-make-golang -type library` option.
--
Shengjing Zhu
m if they can tag a new version, to indicate
they are confident about the change?
--
Shengjing Zhu
g does that for you when you do the initial
packaging. But there's no much doc about consuming from an existing
repo on salsa :/
--
Shengjing Zhu
accepted for go team.
Which part confuses you? Do you try the `--upstream-vcs-tag` option
and see its behavior?
--
Shengjing Zhu
-uscan
--upstream-vcs-tag=v1.1.20`
> 10 git log
> 11 dch -v ... (and Update debian/)
> ```
We just use `gbp dch`.
Besides, a question for uploaders of golang-github-zyedidia-pty, do we
really need this fork? Can you convince upstream to forward their
patch to https://github.com/creack/pty?
--
Shengjing Zhu
ndoring is not hardly forbidden. But you may be rejected
by ftp-master by vendoring a bunch of libraries.
You may carry one or two convenient copies of vendor libraries, but
it's not good to advertise such for newcomers, which is not good
practice after all.
Anyway, Mark comes from Fedora, I think we share the same packaging
policy (name convention, vendor, etc).
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 2:13 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 1:54 AM Alexey Lukyachuk wrote:
> >
> > Ho everyone!
> > I have added new package cri-o to debian:
> > https://mentors.debian.net/package/cri-o/
> >
> > It's written in
red flag is that you keep all the
vendor copies.
--
Shengjing Zhu
LED=0? We should avoid this in Debian
packaging. Shared binary is much preferred for distribution packages.
Generally speaking, I prefer not hacking build flags in individual
packages. This is the job of dh-golang.
--
Shengjing Zhu
hangelog entry (version
> 0.4.0-1, distribution unstable) and new commits in its VCS. You should
> consider whether it's time to make an upload."
>
Any reason why you want to update to 0.4.0?
There is no code change in 0.3.0 and 0.4.0. I prefer to save some
build time currently.
--
Shengjing Zhu
> Is this a safe/sane change to make? The packages I modified are
> listed below, and only produce *-dev binary packages:
AFAIK, it's safe to use
+ pb.go generated by protoc-gen-go 1.3 +
golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-3-dev|golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5-dev
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> I see gobgp 3.9.0 is uploaded to unstable, but has autopkgtest regression.
>
> > panic: protobuf tag not enough fields in StartBgpRequest.state:
>
> This is exactly the runtime panic caused by the combination of
&
-go(either protoc-gen-go-1-3 or protoc-gen-go/1.28.1).
So we still need to figure out how to handle protobuf dependency in grpc-go.
--
Shengjing Zhu
t; any transient build failures if possible.
You can't add the source package name to Breaks. So you need "Breaks:
lxd (<< 5.0.1-3)", it may look weird, but I'm not aware of other
better ways.
--
Shengjing Zhu
hed to gobgp 3.9.0 to the experimental branch. I've
temporarily disabled pb.go regeneration. I'll leave it to you to
verify and upload.
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 07:54:49AM +, Peymaneh wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 22. Dezember 2022 08:00:36 MEZ schrieb Daniel Swarbrick
> :
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 22.12.22 16:30, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >
> >> So I think we can follow upstream, which means:
> >&
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 01:31:17PM +1300, Daniel Swarbrick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm throwing this out to the team in hope of getting some help with a tricky
> problem regarding two packages central to the Prometheus ecosystem.
>
> golang-github-prometheus-common and
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 01:52:32AM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Something related to protobuf has shifted in unstable, which is now
> causing gobgp to FTBFS. I've tried to figure out the correct way to fix
> it, but haven't been able to, so I'm asking the team for guidance.
>
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 02:04:58AM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> I've been working on updating/packaging several golang packages (plus
> their own dependencies) that will be needed by new feature releases of
> LXD. I'm trying to keep ahead of the large changes in LXD's dependency
> tree
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:11:19AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> On 24 November 2022 7:34:58 am IST, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> > I've been working on updating/packaging several golang packages (plus
> >their own dependencies) that will be needed by new feature releases of
> >LXD. I'm trying to
Hi
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:58:29PM +0530, Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote:
>
>
> On 23/11/22 4:34 am, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > On 11/22/22 17:17, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > > Hi zigo,
> > >
> > > I can see you have tagged a new version of
> > > golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-middleware
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 02:49:28PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 RFP: golang-github-pierrec-lz4.v4 -- LZ4 compression and
> decompression in pure Go (v4)
> Control: noowner -1
>
> TLDR: this missing package is blocking updates for syncthing as well as
>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 9:07 PM Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> El 21/11/22 a las 3:19, Shengjing Zhu escribió:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:03:40AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >> I've detected a bunch of Go packages which do not build from source because
> >> t
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:33:58AM +, Peymaneh wrote:
> An alternative that I consider is vendoring grpc/genproto apiv2 within
> golang-github-google-cel-spec-dev so that hopefully caddy can migrate to
> bookworm eventually... But that would not help other Go packages with the
> facing
[ replace alioth and tracker email address with debian-go@lists.debian.org ]
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:03:40AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Dear Go maintainers:
>
> I've detected a bunch of Go packages which do not build from source because
> they use tzdata without a build-dependency.
>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:53 AM Peymaneh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 26.10.22 um 20:27 schrieb Shengjing Zhu:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 6:53 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >>
> >> I should have mentioned it earlier. For this particular tra
,
which is corresponding to 1.6.7~rc0-1 in unstable.
--
Shengjing Zhu
; only to 0.91.0 as required by rclone.
>
>
> golang-google-api-dev 0.91.0 will need golang-google-grpc 1.47.0.
>
Upstream already wants grpc 1.44 for 0.61.0(the version in unstable).
https://github.com/googleapis/google-api-go-client/blob/v0.61.0/go.mod
So it's lucky that it works with old grpc. What error when building
0.91.0 with old grpc?
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:48 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:43 AM Drew Parsons wrote:
> >
> > On 2022-11-15 12:02, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > On 2022-11-09 19:04, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > >> With today's release of pristine-tar we'
> only to 0.91.0 as required by rclone.
>
>
> golang-google-api-dev 0.91.0 will need golang-google-grpc 1.47.0.
>
Oops!..
> Shengjing Zhu, you've been processing golang-google-grpc recently.
> Would you be able to upgrade it in debian unstable to a more recent
> vers
ng, I think you don't need to wait that long. As it's
a team package, I bet foka is happy to see you helping to update that.
But you need to check if that breaks other packages, like running
`ratt(1)`. And if the results are fine, then just go ahead. I don't
think anyone will complain in this situation.
--
Shengjing Zhu
f
github.com/golang/gddo, which is a dead project.
--
Shengjing Zhu
ts.
We should not include local patches for such a reason.
--
Shengjing Zhu
Hi,
The go team has a dedicated list. I have added it to CC.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 05:47:17PM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Hi Go packagers! I just opened an RFP for aws-sdk-go-v2. I believe it
> should be a new package, rather than an update to the aws-sdk-go package
> we currently ship,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:19:54PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/27/22 15:40, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 4:09 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > Packages currently in Experimental uploaded by someone else that will
uck here, as you need a newer genproto package. We still need to
figure out how to deal with this package...
--
Shengjing Zhu
.debian.org/debian-go/2022/10/msg00048.html
In short, it has been stalled for 3 years. And the solution is not
just upload what is in experimental to unstable.
--
Shengjing Zhu
Hi all,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 6:53 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> I should have mentioned it earlier. For this particular transition
> (google/protobuf 1.3 -> 1.4+), ratt is not enough. For example,
> containerd will panic at runtime (root cause is #975431). The
&g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Shengjing Zhu
* Package name: golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5
Version : 1.5.2-1
Upstream Author : Go
* URL : https://github.com/golang/protobuf
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Description : Go
Upstream Author :
> * URL : https://github.com/kr/pretty
> * License : MIT
> Programming Lang: Go
> Description : Pretty printing for Go values
It has already been packaged. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-pretty
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:05 PM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Shengjing Zhu (2022-10-12):
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:37 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > > Thanks for the detailed plan! All look good to me except this.
>
> Many thanks for the review and the few uploads!
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:37 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 6:30 PM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > New -vN packages:
> > -
> >
> > - golang-github-apparentlymart-go-textseg-v13
> >+ required by (updated) gola
ump to v13 without introducing new package. I'll
try today and if I fail I will let you know.
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 8:48 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> Daniel Swarbrick 于 2022年9月13日周二 08:26写道：
>>
>> On 12.09.22 22:41, Martina Ferrari wrote:
>>
>> > On 10/09/2022 16:13, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> >> src:nomad still B-D on consul, although
Daniel Swarbrick 于 2022年9月13日周二 08:26写道：
> On 12.09.22 22:41, Martina Ferrari wrote:
>
> > On 10/09/2022 16:13, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> >> src:nomad still B-D on consul, although you are right that it is out
> >> of testing, but
> >> IIRC it was in a good shape a while ago(but not now), even made
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 4:38 AM John Goerzen wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 09 2022, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 3:59 AM John Goerzen wrote:
> >> (you can see I tried everything I could think of to stop the tools stuff
> >>
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 3:59 AM John Goerzen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 05 2022, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 05:44:36PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> At least two Debian packages use https://github.com/inetaf/
On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 05:44:36PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> At least two Debian packages use https://github.com/inetaf/netstack,
> which was a popular pure-Go TCP/IP networking stack. It was a fork of
> gvisor, pulling out the networking stack from what was a more ambituous
>
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 1:09 AM Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 12:57:33AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 5:52 PM Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > > for each go release the revision numbers can be of form
> > > 0.1.0+go1.xy-
&
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 5:52 PM Nilesh Patra wrote:
> for each go release the revision numbers can be of form
> 0.1.0+go1.xy-
>
The version looks problematic. I would use `0.0~go1.x~-1`
Let go1.x be the first part.
--
Shengjing Zhu
at
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/docker/-/merge_requests/7
> PS: I have cloned bug #1015218 into #1017982, to separate the CVS
> issues. So the former can be closed with your patch, while the latter
> will probably require an upgrade to 1.9.
>
> --
> Martina Ferrari (Tina)
>
--
Shengjing Zhu
gitaly-git2go-v15: no matching files found
> packed_binaries.go:14:12: pattern _build/bin/gitaly-hooks: no matching
> files found
packed_binaries.go uses go:embed[1] feature, which means every file
listed at go:embed line should be available before running `go`
command on that file.
[1] , https://pkg.go.dev/embed
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 7:53 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:28 PM Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > On 09.07.19 21:54, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > > Dear -devel list,
> > >
> > > Looks like dh_dwz was recently added into
ges when
> built in compat12 mode.
Now with golang-1.19, all Go packages ftbfs with
dwz: Found compressed .debug_aranges section, not attempting dwz compression
Could the debhelper ignore the dwz error? Or can a debhelper addon
(e.g. dh-golang) be allowed to override dh_dwz globally?
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 04:22:52PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current salsa-CI setting is designed in a way that it checks
> that onupdating a package a reverse dep is not breaking (as things work this
> way in the
> go world) -- great.
>
> However, it still lacks the intensive
Hetzner Cloud api, then it means useless. Letting it migrate to
testing does more harm. It needs an active maintainer who uses it.
--
Shengjing Zhu
out, but wanted to ask first before I did so.
>
I think you should respond directly to BTS(both for git-lfs and other
buggy packages), instead of sending to debian-go@ mailing list.
For #997544, ask lucas on BTS to rebuild again with his environment.
--
Shengjing Zhu
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 3:42 AM Mathias Gibbens wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-06-16 at 01:06 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 12:49 AM Domenico Andreoli
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Pirate,
> > >
> > > I'm attempti
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 12:04 AM Domenico Andreoli wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:43:35PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:11 AM Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear DGPT,
> > >
> > > I see that dh-make-g
s for the new
package(It's new, since no existing package is called
golang-github-go-macaroon-bakery-macaroon-bakery).
--
Shengjing Zhu
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:01:04AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> I tried searching for "#debian-golang" in the OFTC IRC server, but only found
> "#debian-go". Was the #debian-golang channel changed to or replaced by
> #debian-
> go? I also searched this mailing list's archives and didn't
cb1ab488d7efa28d0298b65317060a/make.go#L511
--
Shengjing Zhu
1 - 100 of 305 matches
Mail list logo
