What do you think about this approach to get modern grpc into unstable?
Here is grpc: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-google-grpc
1) Upload a new package golang-google-grpc-legacy identical to
golang-google-grpc 1.38.0+really1.33.3-1 from unstable.
2) Wait for golang-google-grpc-legacy to
Jérémy Lal writes:
> Le lun. 12 févr. 2024 à 22:11, Simon Josefsson a
> écrit :
>
>> Jérémy Lal writes:
>>
>> > golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-prometheus should be deprecated in
>> > debian as well, and replaced by
>> > https://github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware
>> >
>> > First
Le lun. 12 févr. 2024 à 22:11, Simon Josefsson a
écrit :
> Jérémy Lal writes:
>
> > golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-prometheus should be deprecated in
> > debian as well, and replaced by
> > https://github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware
> >
> > First move is to report a RC-bug on
Jérémy Lal writes:
> golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-prometheus should be deprecated in
> debian as well, and replaced by
> https://github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware
>
> First move is to report a RC-bug on that package, so it gets removed from
> testing if no one steps in.
>
Simon Josefsson writes:
> Further progress on grpc. I've rebuilt 1.60.1 with some EXCLUDE fixes
> thanks to help on irc, we've gone from 22 reverse build failures down to
> 16 failures, here is the pipeline:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-google-grpc/-/pipelines/629139
I did a review
Hello
Le lun. 12 févr. 2024 à 21:49, Simon Josefsson a
écrit :
> Simon Josefsson writes:
>
> > Further progress on grpc. I've rebuilt 1.60.1 with some EXCLUDE fixes
> > thanks to help on irc, we've gone from 22 reverse build failures down to
> > 16 failures, here is the pipeline:
> >
> >
Simon Josefsson writes:
> Further progress on grpc. I've rebuilt 1.60.1 with some EXCLUDE fixes
> thanks to help on irc, we've gone from 22 reverse build failures down to
> 16 failures, here is the pipeline:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-google-grpc/-/pipelines/629139
Getting grpc
Hi Simon,
On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 18:01 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Thank you -- I have uploaded s2a to experimental.
Thanks for the upload.
> Trying to build
> golang-google-api 0.157.0 fails with error below - are these
> dependencies important?
FYI, M Hickford is working on updating
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 18:05:23 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Tom Parkin writes:
>
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 20:15:11 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> >> golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp
> >> https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-google-grpc/-/jobs/5191076
> >> === RUN
Tom Parkin writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 20:15:11 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp
>> https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-google-grpc/-/jobs/5191076
>> === RUN TestBasicSendReceive/5:_send/recv_[::1]:9000_[::1]:9001_L2TPv3_IP
>> level=info
Maytham Alsudany
writes:
>> https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-google-grpc/-/pipelines/629139
>>
>> The failures now suggest problems on other packages, list of initial 10
>> broken packages that I looked at:
>>
>> cadvisor:
>> crowdsec:
>> etcd:
>> gitlab-ci-multi-runner:
>>
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 20:15:11 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp
> https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-google-grpc/-/jobs/5191076
> === RUN TestBasicSendReceive/5:_send/recv_[::1]:9000_[::1]:9001_L2TPv3_IP
> level=info function=transport
Hi Simon,
On Mon, 2024-01-22 at 20:15 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Further progress on grpc. I've rebuilt 1.60.1 with some EXCLUDE fixes
> thanks to help on irc, we've gone from 22 reverse build failures down to
> 16 failures, here is the pipeline:
:)
>
>
Further progress on grpc. I've rebuilt 1.60.1 with some EXCLUDE fixes
thanks to help on irc, we've gone from 22 reverse build failures down to
16 failures, here is the pipeline:
https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-google-grpc/-/pipelines/629139
The failures now suggest problems on other
Simon Josefsson writes:
> It seems clear that grpc cannot go to unstable right now due to reverse
> dependency build failures:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-google-grpc/-/pipelines/627711
I took a look at some of these failures. For example,
Shengjing Zhu writes:
> For safety, yes please upload to experimental, and people can try
> rebuilding their packages and test them.
I have uploaded grpc 1.59.0 to experimental, to allow build testing of
reverse dependencies. Rekor needs grpc via in-toto via spiffe, and
looks like it may need
Hi. What is the status of golang-google-grpc? My packaging effort of
sigstore's rekor needs golang-google-grpc 1.53 according to
github.com/spiffe/go-spiffe and fails with errors below. I have built
golang-google-grpc from debian/experimental and the packages works fine
for spiffe. When can a
Hi Nilesh,
On Thu, 2023-12-28 at 18:38 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 06:36:48AM +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> > > Updates of gRPC can usually never go to unstable directly. IMHO you
> > > probably should've pushed to d/experimental
> > > branch instead.
> >
> > My
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 06:36:48AM +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> > Updates of gRPC can usually never go to unstable directly. IMHO you
> > probably should've pushed to d/experimental
> > branch instead.
>
> My mistake, wrong branch!
Can you please push your changes to experimental branch and
Hi Nilesh,
On Tue, 2023-12-26 at 21:54 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 12/24/2023 7:29 AM IST Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> > > This is a package with a lot of (important) reverse-dependencies and this
> > > is a minor
> > > version (assuming they comply with semver.org) bump.
> > > Have you
On 12/24/2023 7:29 AM IST Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> > This is a package with a lot of (important) reverse-dependencies and this
> > is a minor
> > version (assuming they comply with semver.org) bump.
> > Have you verified that it does not cause any regressions in the reverse-deps
> > with
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 1:56 PM Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 07:56:23AM +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> > Hi Nilesh,
> > > This is a package with a lot of (important) reverse-dependencies and this
> > > is a minor
> > > version (assuming they comply with semver.org) bump.
> >
On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 07:56:23AM +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> Hi Nilesh,
> > This is a package with a lot of (important) reverse-dependencies and this
> > is a minor
> > version (assuming they comply with semver.org) bump.
> > Have you verified that it does not cause any regressions in the
Hi Nilesh,
> This is a package with a lot of (important) reverse-dependencies and this is
> a minor
> version (assuming they comply with semver.org) bump.
> Have you verified that it does not cause any regressions in the reverse-deps
> with ratt[1] or ruby-team/meta[2]?
>
> [1]:
Hi Nilesh,
> This is a package with a lot of (important) reverse-dependencies and this is
> a minor
> version (assuming they comply with semver.org) bump.
> Have you verified that it does not cause any regressions in the reverse-deps
> with ratt[1] or ruby-team/meta[2]?
I haven't yet, but
On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 09:32:37PM +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor to review and upload the following packages.
>
> New packages:
> - golang-github-google-s2a-go
>
> Updated packages:
> - golang-google-grpc (Team upload, update to 1.59.0)
>
> I know
Hi Go team,
I'm looking for a sponsor to review and upload the following packages.
New packages:
- golang-github-google-s2a-go
Updated packages:
- golang-google-grpc (Team upload, update to 1.59.0)
I know golang-google-grpc's latest version is 1.60.0, but it was only recently
released and
27 matches
Mail list logo
