On Friday 15 May 2015 23:53:36 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
But I find title misleading and description too short. Moreover you
should add link to normative or documentation. Why it is bad for
instance to carry cmake file here ?
The main practical reason why it is bad to carry a cmake file in
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2015-05-14 21:12, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.30+deb8u4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi! I am attaching a patch for detecting CMake private files.
I am not really versed in perl, so if you think something must
Processing control commands:
tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #785329 [lintian] lintian: Add check for CMake private files
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
785329: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785329
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# #485705 #514074 are blocking #509935. I can not forcemerge #401452 in
# #509935 as long as #485705 #514074 are still archived.
unarchive 485705
Bug #485705 {Done: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net} [lintian] [checks/nmu]
parsing of uploader
-=| Axel Beckert, 15.05.2015 21:32:29 +0200 |=-
I intent to move some lintian tests currently used by the Debian
Perl Team an packaged in the pkg-perl lintian profile shipped with
pkg-perl-tools into lintian.
Reason is that some of the lintian checks in pkg-perl-tools are useful
for
5 matches
Mail list logo