Bug#423171: possible-missing-colon-in-closes should not check ancient entires

2007-05-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: lintian Version: 1.23.30 Hi, I got these warnings on checking squirrelmail: W: squirrelmail: possible-missing-colon-in-closes l436:Closes #143277 W: squirrelmail: possible-missing-colon-in-closes l438:Closes #136612 W: squirrelmail:

Bug#423171: possible-missing-colon-in-closes should not check ancient entires

2007-05-10 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Thursday 10 May 2007 17:28, Russ Allbery wrote: I suggest to only check the topmost changelog entry, as some other tests already do aswell if I remember correctly. None that I could find, and I couldn't see a way of doing that without some structural changes, although I could look again.

Bug#423171: possible-missing-colon-in-closes should not check ancient entires

2007-05-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thursday 10 May 2007 17:28, Russ Allbery wrote: However, it's not correct that only the top-most changelog entries are relevant. That's true in some cases, and indeed the .changes file might address that. But I wonder whether there will be many