Re: Package "usr-is-merged" is reported as missing in Debian Live ISO 12.5 (debian-live-12.5.0-amd64-lxqt.iso) during installation with live-installer/enable=false

root 2048 Feb 10 11:07 usrmerge > > Which package should I report to the bug tracking system ? > > Let me know if I can help. > > Thanks. > > -- > [0] > https://live-team.pages.debian.net/live-manual/html/live-manual/customizing-installer.en.

Re: Bug#1069964: debian-installer: Debian LXQt ISO loads all unnecessary proprietary firmware even with firmware=never parameter

rchitectures, BIOS vs. UEFI, etc.) is a huge mess already, it might happen but I'm not holding my breath here. > It would be a good idea to warn the user if the entered parameter / > value does not exist, to avoid unwanted results like installing > non-free firmware. There's no absolute list to chec

Re: Bug#1037550: installation-reports: Command /usr/sbin/bootloader-config failed to finish in 600 seconds.

rther reference, using reply-all is best). Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#1037550: installation-reports: Command /usr/sbin/bootloader-config failed to finish in 600 seconds.

ler images. The one you linked to is about the latter. Cc-ing debian-live@ as a heads-up. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#1023472: Workaround implemented for live images

Hi, Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-24): > I'm fine with a late tasksel upload with the proposed change (including > the typo fix, sddm-theme-debian-elarun vs. sddm-theme), before RC 4. > > I'd need a *very swift* confirmation the aforementioned results are OK > on the lxqt front thoug

Upcoming D-I Bookworm RC 4 and pseudo-RC 5

Hi all, Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-21): > Dates that have been announced[1] so far: > - 2023-05-24: full freeze [x] ← You are here! > - 2023-05-28: last moment to file unblock requests > - 2023-06-03: bookworm totally frozen >(per “last week prior to the release”)

Re: Bug#1023472: Workaround implemented for live images

rtant packages going away.) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Upcoming D-I Bookworm RC 3 and RC 4

Hi all, Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-06): > I think it'd make sense to have at least 2 releases: > - 1 around mid-May; > - 1 around end of May. > > The first one would bundle a bunch of the fixes or improvements being > worked on these days, making sure everything works as in

Re: Bug#1023472: Workaround implemented for live images

age, it lives only in Salsa [2]. OK. I just wanted to make sure to raise that topic, I'm fine with whatever the live team ends up (not) doing. No stone unturned, etc. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team m

Re: Bug#1023472: Workaround implemented for live images

xample: debian-cd.) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Upcoming D-I Bookworm RC 3 and RC 4

page. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#1035360: bookworm RC2 installation leaves luks encrypted system in unbootable state

[ Reordering slightly ] Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-02): > Paul Seelig (2023-05-02): > > Attached installation logs should be sufficiently verbose about what > > actually happened underneath. > > Either it was forgotten or dropped by the BTS; please use reply-all, >

Re: Starting the weekly live images for Bookworm building again

While I have been behind most of non-free-firmware related work[1], I don't plan on touching anything on the debian-live side. I'm happy to try and answer any n-f-f related questions though. 1. https://debamax.com/blog/2023/02/27/debian-versus-non-free-firmware/ Cheers, -- Cyril Bruleboi

Re: Starting the weekly live images for Bookworm building again

Luna Jernberg (2023-03-15): > And now they have not built for 2 days any specific reason? casulana broke; please refrain from hijacking threads and cross-posting to so many lists. debian-cd would have done just fine… Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debam

Re: Q: different behavior about d-i between normal install image and live image

nded behavior? cc += debian-live@ Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: DebianInstaller Help Request

e the relevant configuration file(s) for this aspect of the >installer's operations may be located in the live distro iso. > > Thank you. You'll want to check with debian-live@ (in copy). Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>

Bug#944697: security.debian.org: please bring back MD5Sum, at least for buster/updates

/updates seem fine (MD5Sum is present there). I don't have an opinion regarding bulleyes/updates (MD5Sum is missing there) at this point, but given at least some apt bindings don't support missing MD5Sum, it would seem premature to remove it from there as well? Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois

Bug#944696: python-apt: relies on MD5 internally to download packages

get some attention as well; hence filing at serious severity. Feel free to adjust as required. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/

Re: Scheduling 9.9

I'm afraid, and so is chief CD > tester Andy. > > > - April 27 > > But this works. All dates should be OK for d-i preparations on my side. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Scheduling 9.7

Hi, Jonathan Wiltshire (2019-01-18): > Please indicate your availablility out of: > > - (Feb 2 unlikely, FOSDEM) > - Feb 9 > - Feb 16 I should be able to make anything work regarding d-i preparations/checks before the point release, thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (

Re: Scheduling 9.6

er 27th > - November 3rd > - November 10th All of these look good to me. The first one is a bit close (esp. with my backlog, as you pointed out a few days ago), but that should be doable. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I re

Re: Scheduling 9.5

nd then Debconf on the 28th. So that leaves us with: > > - July 7th > - July 14th > > Are people available for either or both of those dates? Will try hard to be available for the timing of your choosing. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com

Re: Scheduling final Jessie point release, 8.11

n > - (30th Jun I already know is impossible, for the sake of completeness) > - 7th July Anything June/July-ish should be good for me. debian-boot@, if there's anything needing a fix in jessie, please follow up to the list and myself. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)&l

Re: Scheduling 9.5

ave missed pu requests for d-i components though, but hopefully debian-boot@ will correct me if I'm wrong on this. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Scheduling 9.4

equally OKish for me. AFAICT: - There's a busybox I need to look at. - The kernel ABI bump is already in git, and we'll need a source upload accordingly. debian-boot@ people, feel free to mention other things that should be in the next stretch point release (ideally cc-ing me). Cheers, -- Cy

Re: Bug#879215: stretch-pu: package live-config/5.20170112

Hi Adam, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2017-10-29): > On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 17:02 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > > We've been having issues with KDE live images, and since this popped > > up on #debian-cd again, a few days ago, I've looked into

Bug#879215: stretch-pu: package live-config/5.20170112

a fix from unstable to stable. The source debdiff is attached, and here's the changelog entry: | live-config (5.20170112+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium | | [ Cyril Brulebois ] | * Cherry-pick the change below to improve KDE live images. | | [ Алексей Шилин ] | * Add components/0085-sddm

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

Hi, Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-06-25): > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of > these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July > 22/23 July I should be equally busy on all weeks leading to these

Re: 8.8 planning

Hi, Julien Cristau (2017-03-14): > It's time to start thinking about our next stable point release. Here > are some dates, please let us know which ones would work. > > * April 8-9 Not ideal for me. > * April 15-16 > * April 22-23 > * April 29-30 > * May 6-7 All those

Re: 8.6 planning

Hi, Adam D. Barratt (2016-08-29): > We seem to have converged on these two. The 10th is doable, but means > freezing over the coming weekend and I'm not sure how much time I'll > have between now and then, so I'm tempted to opt for the 17th and get > the announcement

Re: 8.6 planning

Adam D. Barratt (2016-08-07): > It's time for another Jessie point release; as wheezy's EOL, we don't > have to worry about trying to fit two in at the same time. Some possible > dates: > > August 20th/21st - doesn't work for me > > August 27th/28th - public holiday

Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning

Julien Cristau (2016-05-14): > with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to > avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around > the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the > same Saturday again. > >

Re: Bug#816682: live-installer: Inaccessible utility

Samuel Thibault (2016-03-08): > There was also a bug in at-spi2-atk, I have uploaded a fixed package. > > So, to summarize the needed steps to get d-i accessible from debian live: > > - at-spi2-atk fix (debian/patches/p2p), done. > - adding a udeb for libgail-common &

Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning

Hi, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2015-08-18): We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some potential September dates: 5/6th - okay for me 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon 19th/20th - looks okay 26th/27th - looks okay

Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2015-05-20): Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Provided the p-u freeze happens on time so that I can perform d-i tests ahead of

Re: About modifying live-images

Daniel, Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net (2015-04-28): Steve, I'm rather unhappy about seeing local modifications done on top of live-images here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-cd/pettersson-live.git/tree/available/run-30live-build Yes, it's always

Bug#779313: Sid installer broken - wrong branch in apt sources.list

jnqnfe jnq...@gmail.com (2015-02-28): On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 22:26 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Right, so to get an installer that will work correctly as a Sid installer, you have to build a copy as such. This is what I assumed would be the case when I filed the bug. Why don't you

Re: 7.7 planning

Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2014-09-20): We're (over)due another wheezy point release; this time, 7.7. I propose we go for one of: 11/12 October 18/19 October 25/26 October As far as rebuilding/testing d-i is concerned, any of those should be just fine. Reminds me I have

Re: Upcoming oldstable point release (6.0.8)

Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-09-22): The next point release for squeeze (6.0.8) is scheduled for Saturday October 19th. Oldstable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend. As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze. I don't think I have

Re: Upcoming stable point release (7.2)

Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-09-22): The next point release for wheezy (7.2) is scheduled for Saturday October 12th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend. So there's a new linux kernel for that one:

Re: Wheezy point release planning

Hi, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (12/05/2013): Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of 15/16 June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point release. Would that work for everyone? I hope to have the d-i side in shape by then. (Adding -boot@ for

Re: Preparation for d-i beta 1

Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (25/06/2012): - 1st d-i upload less than 12 hours from now. - udeb freeze. Done. - 2nd upload when the kernel is ready, hopefully some time next week. I have to review a few packages we might want to get into testing soon, that should happen during

Preparation for d-i beta 1

Hi folks, as you may know, nobody else stepped up, so I'm volunteering again to try and get a new debian-installer release out, codenamed « beta 1 ». I have looked at the packages mentioned on the udeb testing summary page[1] and I have “urgented” many of them, so that they reach testing sooner

Re: README in debian-live-6.0.4-amd64-rescue.iso has wrong arch

Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu (20/06/2012): (Please keep me in the cc line since I'm not on the debian-boot mailing list) Done. Hi, This is a minor nit, but I noticed today that the README files in /live/image/README.txt and /live/image/README.html found in

Re: gmane follow this list?

Daryl Styrk darylst...@gmail.com (13/08/2009): subject says it all.. I didn't find it. Pick a Message-ID, type http://mid.gmane.org/$mid in your favorite browser. There you go. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: FTWCA storing config/ in VCS

/*. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: FTWCA storing config/ in VCS

Cyril Brulebois cyril.bruleb...@kerlabs.com (23/01/2009): Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org (16/01/2009): I've improved this, the way config.cfg is handled is: * if config.cfg is executed, its output is taken as extra arguments. * if config.cfg is not executable, but it's readable

Re: FTWCA storing config/ in VCS

Cyril Brulebois cyril.bruleb...@kerlabs.com (23/01/2009): As Juergen says, escaping in various ways didn't help, but I guess at least the following bit should be reverted (though it doesn't address the problem Juergen initially mentioned): | -Local_arguments ${EXTRA_ARGUMENTS

[PATCH] Fix typo: taskel vs. tasksel.

Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois cyril.bruleb...@kerlabs.com --- functions/defaults.sh |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/functions/defaults.sh b/functions/defaults.sh index ae5c879..beeeb33 100755 --- a/functions/defaults.sh +++ b/functions/defaults.sh

[PATCH] Documentation: get rid of MIRROR_BOOTSTRAP_SECURITY.

Both --mirror-bootstrap-security and MIRROR_BOOTSTRAP_SECURITY are long gone, see: c6fa0ca0421a5353348ed8a16c56e3481ae12129. Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois cyril.bruleb...@kerlabs.com --- debian/cron.daily|4 ++-- debian/default |1 - manpages

[PATCH] Fix --apt-pdiffs disabled being ignored.

Unlike APT_OPTIONS, APT_PDIFFS is public, so should be called LH_APT_PDIFFS when parsing options, so that config/common is generated properly (especially when the opposite of the default is specified). Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois cyril.bruleb...@kerlabs.com --- helpers/lh_config |2 +- 1

Re: [PATCH] Document LH_BOOTSTRAP_FLAVOUR as empty by default.

-done-the-wrong-way), things should go smoother anyway. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: NFS export

Olivier wrote (2008/10/06): #From Cyril Brulebois post sed -i -e '2 iexport CONFIG_AUFS_EXPORT=y' debian/conf.mk sed -i -e 's/ -I/ -DCONFIG_AUFS_EXPORT -I/' debian/conf.mk Hm? It's been fixed since some time already, see #490079, fixed in 0+20080719-1, dated 19 Jul 2008. /var/chroot/ *(ro

Re: Help testing syslinux

descriptions of the HW, don't be afraid to ask. Just thinking the main point here are the BIOS versions. Also, sorry for the lag, but you know the reasons. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.