Justin Pryzby wrote:
First, why is it necessary to set the hostname
otherwise some stupid maintainerscripts of packages do fail, e.g. ssmtp
in etch.
Second, why isn't it clear why the hostname shouldn't be changed back?
it is clear, and it is also set back as you quoted:
if [
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:11:20AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Justin Pryzby wrote:
First, why is it necessary to set the hostname
otherwise some stupid maintainerscripts of packages do fail, e.g. ssmtp
in etch.
I couldn't confirm this problem. I copied ssmtp/stable deb to
I'm really confused by this. First, why is it necessary to set the
hostname (within the chroot, I guess with the unfortunate but
[perhaps?] unavoidable consequence that it affects outside the chroot
too).
Second, why isn't it clear why the hostname shouldn't be changed back?
Otherwise everyone's
3 matches
Mail list logo
