forgot the link
[3] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer#Granting_Permissions
cheers
Il 31/03/24 21:05, Antonio Valentino ha scritto:
Dear Thomas,
Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto:
On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Dear Thomas and Ondřej,
a couple of packages that
Dear Thomas,
Il 30/03/24 22:25, Thomas Goirand ha scritto:
On 3/29/24 15:13, Antonio Valentino wrote:
Dear Thomas and Ondřej,
a couple of packages that I maintain are impacted by an RC bug in
python-pint (#1067318).
I think that an update to the to the latest pint version 0.23 should
be
On Sunday, 31 March 2024 15:31:36 CEST c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
>
> Don't write and explain such things in emails. Save your time and
> resources. Write it into the wiki just one time and then you can link
> to it. You wrote it. I won't copy and paste your stuff. Ladies and
> Gentlemen please do
Hello.
Am 31.03.24 um 15:31 schrieb c.bu...@posteo.jp:
Otherwise just delete the whole wiki. That would be an increase in
the quality of Debians documentation. In its current state it is
embarrassing and it harms the project called Debian.
Do you really think, deleting for example this pages
Dear Soren,
my primary intention is always to improve Debian. That also involves a
better image to the public and potential new users and contributors.
On 2024-03-29 13:42 Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Much of Debian’s documentation is not written for people
> who are new to the topic, but for people
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 02:16:39PM +0200, tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
> The bug is about the --pristine-tar option of bgp...
>> It turns out that doing pristine-tar by hand often gives different
>> results, as I discovered:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065445
Yes,
The bug is about the --pristine-tar option of bgp...
Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer
On Mar 31, 2024 1:58 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 10:21:06PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> [...]
> > [0]: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging#Creating_a_new_package
> > [1]:
Julian,
Arrow is a complicated and large package. We use it at work (where there is a
fair amount of Python, also to Conda etc) and do have issues with more
complex builds especially because it is 'data infrastructure' and can come in
from different parts. I would recommend against packaging at
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 10:21:06PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> [...]
> > [0]: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging#Creating_a_new_package
> > [1]: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging#New_upstream_release
> I would not do this way, but use gbp import-orig instead. I'm not sure why
Hi Diane,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 08:59:39PM -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 20:22 +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Lovely to hear from you, and oh wow, that's amazing, thank you!
> >
> > I can't speak for anyone else, but I suggest that pushing your
> > updates
Hey,
I would like to join debian-python team for helping in maintaining some
python packages. I've got experience in maintaining packages in ruby and
JS teams. For now, I would like to update pmbootstrap package for fixing
#1065637.
My salsa login: vivekkj
I've read python-team policy, and I'm
11 matches
Mail list logo
