libmicrohttpd_1.0.0-2.1_armhf.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 12:21:57 + Source: libmicrohttpd Binary: libmicrohttpd-dev libmicrohttpd12t64 libmicrohttpd12t64-dbgsym Architecture: armhf Version: 1.0.0-2.1

Processing of libmicrohttpd_1.0.0-2.1_armhf.changes

libmicrohttpd_1.0.0-2.1_armhf.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libmicrohttpd-dev_1.0.0-2.1_armhf.deb libmicrohttpd12t64-dbgsym_1.0.0-2.1_armhf.deb libmicrohttpd12t64_1.0.0-2.1_armhf.deb libmicrohttpd_1.0.0-2.1_armhf.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian

libmicrohttpd_1.0.0-2.1_armel.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 12:21:57 + Source: libmicrohttpd Binary: libmicrohttpd-dev libmicrohttpd12t64 libmicrohttpd12t64-dbgsym Architecture: armel Version: 1.0.0-2.1

Processing of libmicrohttpd_1.0.0-2.1_armel.changes

libmicrohttpd_1.0.0-2.1_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libmicrohttpd-dev_1.0.0-2.1_armel.deb libmicrohttpd12t64-dbgsym_1.0.0-2.1_armel.deb libmicrohttpd12t64_1.0.0-2.1_armel.deb libmicrohttpd_1.0.0-2.1_armel.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021473 [src:nitpic] nitpic: reproducible-builds: buildid differs in /usr/bin/nitpic Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021473: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021473 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021472 [src:xzoom] xzoom: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in /usr/bin/xzoom Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021472: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021472 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021470 [src:xsok] xsok: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in /usr/games/xsok Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021470: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021470 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021461 [src:icon] icon: reproducible-builds: buildid differences in /usr/bin/icon* Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021461: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021461 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021466 [src:pacman] pacman: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in /usr/games/pacman Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021466: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021466 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021458 [src:o3dgc] o3dgc: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in libo3dgc_common_lib.a Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021458: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021458 Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021464 [src:stfl] stfl: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in binaries Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021464: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021464 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021457 [src:olpc-powerd] olpc-powerd: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in debugging symbols Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021457: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021457 Debian Bug Tracking

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021456 [src:bwbasic] bwbasic: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in /usr/bin/bwbasic Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021456: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021456 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021452 [src:libdv] libdv: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in libdv.so.4.0.3 Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021452: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021452 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1020876 [src:yaskkserv] yaskkserv: reproducible-builds: buildid differences in various binaries Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1020876: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020876 Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1020808 [src:powerdebug] powerdebug: reproducible-builds: Embedded build paths in /usr/sbin/powerdebug Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1020808: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020808 Debian Bug Tracking

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1020806 [src:perl-byacc] perl-byacc: reproducible-builds: differing buildid in in /usr/bin/pbyacc Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1020806: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020806 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#1020806:

Control: severity -1 wishlist Dear Maintainer, Because Debian builds packages from a fixed build path, neither the 'reprotest' utility in Salsa-CI, nor the Reproducible Builds team's package test infrastructure for Debian[1] currently check for equivalent binary package output from differing

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1024283 [src:ipsvd] ipsvd: reproducible-builds: buildid differences in various binaries Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1024283: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024283 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1024279 [src:tolua++] tolua++: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in tolua++5.1 Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1024279: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024279 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1023960 [src:libcgicc] libcgicc: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in /usr/bin/cgicc-config Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1023960: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023960 Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021509 [src:xxkb] xxkb: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in /usr/bin/xxkb Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021509: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021509 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1021498 [src:tcm] tcm: reproducible-builds: build path embedded in /usr/bin/tcm Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1021498: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021498 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1021498:

Control: severity -1 wishlist Dear Maintainer, Because Debian builds packages from a fixed build path, neither the 'reprotest' utility in Salsa-CI, nor the Reproducible Builds team's package test infrastructure for Debian[1] currently check for equivalent binary package output from differing

Processed:

Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #1033032 [src:buddy] buddy: reproducible-builds: Embedded build path and usrmerge paths in example Makefile Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 1033032: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033032 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1033032:

Control: severity -1 wishlist Dear Maintainer, Because Debian builds packages from a fixed build path, neither the 'reprotest' utility in Salsa-CI, nor the Reproducible Builds team's package test infrastructure for Debian[1] currently check for equivalent binary package output from differing

Re: Question regarding time_t transition

Le 12/03/2024 à 19:11, Rene Engelhard a écrit : Are we supposed to report bugs against packages ending up with "t64" and missing the "Provides: " for affected architectures like armhf ? That Provides: is there for archs where the transition *doesn't* make a difference. In Debian: Anything

Re: Question regarding time_t transition

Hi, Am 12.03.24 um 15:17 schrieb Raphaël Halimi: Are we supposed to report bugs against packages ending up with "t64" and missing the "Provides: " for affected architectures like armhf ? That Provides: is there for archs where the transition *doesn't* make a difference. In Debian:

Bug#1065767: libopendbx: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: mssql_basic.c:324:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dbpoll’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 09:26:38PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > mssql_basic.c: In function ‘mssql_odbx_result’: > mssql_basic.c:324:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dbpoll’ > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 324 | if( dbpoll( dbproc, ms, , ) == FAIL )

Question regarding time_t transition

Dear fellow developers, I was about to file two bug reports (one against libdb5.3 and one against perl-base) but instead of wasting everybody's time, I'd like to ask first, since I couldn't find the information anywhere. Are we supposed to report bugs against packages ending up with "t64"