date:20100913

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:32:10 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:

 See the bug [1] I filed against upgrade-reports, where I tried to upgrade a
 default lenny GNOME desktop.
 
 As you can see from the sid upgrade log for apt-get [2], the
 system-config-printer-udev package is not automatically installed on upgrades
 and instead the old and useless hal-cups-utils package is kept.
 
Can we avoid conflicting with hal-cups-utils at all?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596669: copyright issues in virtualbox-ose-3.2.6-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile{, .kmk}

2010-09-13 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas

Package: virtualbox-ose
Version: 3.2.6-dfsg-2
Severity: serious

Hi Michael,

while reviewing virtualbox for migration for testing, i found the
following issue in the source-code, that probably needs to be fixed
before we release squeeze:


diff -Nru virtualbox-ose-3.2.6-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile
virtualbox-ose-3.2.8-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile
--- virtualbox-ose-3.2.6-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile
2010-06-25 14:25:42.0 +
+++ virtualbox-ose-3.2.8-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile
2010-08-05 11:43:06.0 +
@@ -4,8 +4,13 @@
 #
 # Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Oracle Corporation
 #
-# Oracle Corporation confidential
-# All rights reserved
+# This file is part of VirtualBox Open Source Edition (OSE), as
+# available from http://www.virtualbox.org. This file is free software;
+# you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU
+# General Public License (GPL) as published by the Free Software
+# Foundation, in version 2 as it comes in the COPYING file of the
+# VirtualBox OSE distribution. VirtualBox OSE is distributed in the
+# hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any kind.
 #
 
 CC = gcc
diff -Nru virtualbox-ose-3.2.6-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile.kmk
virtualbox-ose-3.2.8-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile.kmk
--- virtualbox-ose-3.2.6-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile.kmk
2010-06-25 14:25:42.0 +
+++ virtualbox-ose-3.2.8-dfsg/src/apps/svnsync-vbox/Makefile.kmk
2010-08-05 11:43:06.0 +
@@ -6,8 +6,13 @@
 #
 # Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Oracle Corporation
 #
-# Oracle Corporation confidential
-# All rights reserved
+# This file is part of VirtualBox Open Source Edition (OSE), as
+# available from http://www.virtualbox.org. This file is free software;
+# you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU
+# General Public License (GPL) as published by the Free Software
+# Foundation, in version 2 as it comes in the COPYING file of the
+# VirtualBox OSE distribution. VirtualBox OSE is distributed in the
+# hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any kind.
 #




-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages virtualbox-ose depends on:
ii  adduser 3.112add and remove users and groups
ii  libc6   2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcurl37.21.1-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libgcc1 1:4.4.4-9GCC support library
ii  libpng12-0  1.2.44-1 PNG library - runtime
ii  libpython2.62.6.6~rc2-1  Shared Python runtime library (ver
ii  libsdl1.2debian 1.2.14-6 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libssl0.9.8 0.9.8o-1 SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++6  4.4.4-9  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libvncserver0   0.9.7-2  API to write one's own vnc server
ii  libx11-62:1.3.3-3X11 client-side library
ii  libxcursor1 1:1.1.10-2   X cursor management library
ii  libxext62:1.1.2-1X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxml2 2.7.7.dfsg-4 GNOME XML library
ii  libxmu6 2:1.0.5-1X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6  1:1.0.7-1X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  python  2.6.5-13 interactive high-level object-orie
ii  python-central  0.6.16   register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python2.5   2.5.5-7  An interactive high-level object-o
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime

Versions of packages virtualbox-ose recommends:
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]7.7.1-4  A free implementation of the OpenG
ii  libqt4-opengl   4:4.6.3-1Qt 4 OpenGL module
ii  libqtcore4  4:4.6.3-1Qt 4 core module
ii  libqtgui4   4:4.6.3-1Qt 4 GUI module
ii  virtualbox-ose-dkms 3.2.8-dfsg-1 x86 virtualization solution - kern
ii  virtualbox-ose-qt   3.2.8-dfsg-1 x86 virtualization solution - Qt b

Versions of packages virtualbox-ose suggests:
ii  libasound2   1.0.23-1shared library for ALSA applicatio
ii  libpulse00.9.21-3+b1 PulseAudio client libraries
pn  vde2 none  (no description available)
pn  virtualbox-guest-additions   none  (no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:

Processed: Bug#596640: RM: fluxconf/0.9.9.2-3

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 596640 ftp.debian.org
Bug #596640 [release.debian.org] RM: fluxconf/0.9.9.2-3
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
 user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was f...@debian.org).
 usertag 596640 - rm
Bug#596640: RM: fluxconf/0.9.9.2-3
Usertags were: rm.
Usertags are now: .
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
596640: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596640
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128436865728377.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#596662: marked as done (unblock: iceweasel/3.5.12-2)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:07:27 +0200
with message-id 20100913090727.gg5...@patate.is-a-geek.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596662: unblock: iceweasel/3.5.12-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #596662,
regarding unblock: iceweasel/3.5.12-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596662: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package iceweasel

The original 3.5.12-1 package had the changes mentionned in
20100902145001.gb31...@glandium.org, 3.5.12-2 added 2 fixes for induced
FTBFSes on hppa and hurd. Both fixes only touch to build scripts, not
code. See the attached debdiff.

unblock iceweasel/3.5.12-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/changelog iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/changelog
--- iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/changelog	2010-09-08 09:04:44.0 +0200
+++ iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/changelog	2010-09-11 11:04:53.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+iceweasel (3.5.12-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * config/JarMaker.py: Use errno.ENOENT instead of 2 in JarMaker.py.
+bz#595459. Fixes FTBFS on Hurd.
+  * debian/rules, debian/xulrunner-dev.install.in: Build npapi_getinfo in
+build-xulrunner/dist/bin, and use an RPATH. Some plugins depend on
+libxpcom.so, and dlopen() from npapi_getinfo fails unless libxpcom.so
+can be loaded too. Fixes FTBFS on hppa as a side effect.
+
+ -- Mike Hommey gland...@debian.org  Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:42:37 +0200
+
 iceweasel (3.5.12-1) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * New upstream release.
diff -Nru iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/fixes/Use-errno.ENOENT-instead-of-2-in-JarMaker.py.patch iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/fixes/Use-errno.ENOENT-instead-of-2-in-JarMaker.py.patch
--- iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/fixes/Use-errno.ENOENT-instead-of-2-in-JarMaker.py.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/fixes/Use-errno.ENOENT-instead-of-2-in-JarMaker.py.patch	2010-09-11 11:04:40.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+From 3630e5168a6f5be3035210eb07e4fa9f6c52813b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org
+Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:31:09 +0200
+Subject: Use errno.ENOENT instead of 2 in JarMaker.py
+
+https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595459
+---
+ config/JarMaker.py |5 +++--
+ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/config/JarMaker.py b/config/JarMaker.py
+index 9bd5111..3029120 100644
+--- a/config/JarMaker.py
 b/config/JarMaker.py
+@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ See the documentation for jar.mn on MDC for further details on the format.
+ import sys
+ import os
+ import os.path
++import errno
+ import re
+ import logging
+ from time import localtime
+@@ -385,7 +386,7 @@ class JarMaker(object):
+   try:
+ os.remove(out)
+   except OSError, e:
+-if e.errno != 2:
++if e.errno != errno.ENOENT:
+   raise
+   return open(out, 'wb')
+ def ensureDirFor(self, name):
+@@ -405,7 +406,7 @@ class JarMaker(object):
+   try:
+ os.remove(out)
+   except OSError, e:
+-if e.errno != 2:
++if e.errno != errno.ENOENT:
+   raise
+   os.symlink(src, out)
+ 
+-- 
+1.7.2.rc1.13.gd67bc
+
diff -Nru iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/series iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/series
--- iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/series	2010-09-07 08:56:20.0 +0200
+++ iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/patches/series	2010-09-11 11:04:40.0 +0200
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 fixes/Use-syscall-for-mmap-and-munmap-and-disable-ncpus-in.patch
 fixes/Calculate-negotiate-auth-token-length-after-removing.patch
 fixes/Bug-504766.-qcms-Fix-unaligned-reads-in-qcms.-r-jrmu.patch
+fixes/Use-errno.ENOENT-instead-of-2-in-JarMaker.py.patch
 iceweasel-branding/Rename-Firefox-to-Iceweasel.patch
 iceweasel-branding/Set-MOZ_APP_NAME-to-iceweasel.patch
 iceweasel-branding/Our-name-should-be-Iceweasel-not-Firefox.patch
diff -Nru iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/rules iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/rules
--- iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/rules	2010-09-07 08:53:03.0 +0200
+++ iceweasel-3.5.12/debian/rules	2010-09-11 11:04:52.0 +0200
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@
 debian/dh/dh_xulrunner.1:

Bug#596670: unblock: perdition/1.19~rc3-1

2010-09-13 Thread Horms

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception


Please unblock package perdition

Perdition 1.19~rc4-1 includes several important fixes and I would like it
considered for inclusion in Squeeze.  As it coincides with an upstream
release (1.19-rc4) it also contains one or two (minor) changes that don't
strictly meet the criteria for the freeze. All such changes are minor.  And
are mainly changes that were committed upstream before the freeze hardened.
As both the upstream and Debian maintainer I would be most grateful if
these could be let through.

An annotated list of all the changes between 1.19~rc3-1 (= upstream 1.19-rc3)
and 1.19~rc4-1 (= upstream 1.19-rc4) is as follows. The upstream changelog
can be found at http://hg.vergenet.net/perdition/perdition/

changeset:   871:c232fe1163d0
tag: v1.19-rc4
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Mon Sep 13 16:12:52 2010 +0900
summary: Perdition 1.19-rc4

This simply updates configure.ac, debian/changelog
and perdition.spec.in.

changeset:   870:11a92ae20bcc
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Mon Sep 13 16:09:55 2010 +0900
summary: rpm: binary dependency on libvanessa_socket2 (= 0.0.12)

From a Debian point of view, this is a source-only change
although it relates to Debian bug #592459.

changeset:   869:055be8c2db1f
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Mon Sep 13 16:06:31 2010 +0900
summary: Debian: binary dependency on libvanessa-socket2 (= 0.0.12)

This relates to Debian bug #592459

changeset:   868:3981109ea6ba
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Mon Sep 13 16:01:09 2010 +0900
summary: Debian: There is a typo in the changelog for 1.19~rc3-2

This relates to Debian bug #592459

changeset:   867:86df56cded53
user:Christophe Ségui christophe.se...@math.univ-toulouse.fr
date:Thu Sep 09 21:34:24 2010 +0900
summary: Correct parsing of NIS map

This is a bug that I believe is worthy of fixing for Squeeze

changeset:   866:975801678a3d
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Fri Aug 20 17:13:22 2010 +0900
summary: perdition(8): Clean up introduction

This is a documentation change

changeset:   857:e17ec8401d34
tag: debian-1.19~rc3-2
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Tue Aug 17 16:18:08 2010 +0900
summary: Debian: Update standards version from 3.9.0 to 3.9.1

Self explanatory, I realise that strictly this isn't freeze
material, but it was committed upstream before the
freeze became harder.

changeset:   856:baeb40f36e7d
parent:  849:2493da66045b
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Tue Aug 17 15:45:13 2010 +0900
summary: Debian: BuildDepend on libvanessa-logger-dev (= 0.0.12)

This was included in 1.19~rc3-2.
There is some discussion of it in Debian bug #592459.
It is needed in order for 1.19-rc3 and rc4 to compile.

changeset:   855:263c96021ef9
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Tue Aug 03 09:56:05 2010 +0900
summary: Allocate enough space for fromv

This is a bug that I believe is worthy of fixing for Squeeze.
The bug is a segmentation fault on start bug for
certain configuration combinations.

changeset:   854:aeff92473a55
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Sat Jul 31 14:23:46 2010 +0900
summary: Fix build failure if pam libraries aren't installed

This doesn't effect Debian as BuildDependencies
ensure that pam is always installed at build time.

As such, I realise that strictly this isn't freeze
material, but it was committed upstream before the
freeze became harder.

changeset:   853:2178a5528029
user:Joachim Sehlstedt u...@newstyledata.net
date:Fri Jul 30 16:02:17 2010 +0900
summary: Load configuration file before setting logger options

This is a bug that I believe is worthy of fixing for Squeeze.
The problem is that for some configuration parameters
may be ignored.

changeset:   852:1718ccb586e9
user:Simon Horman ho...@verge.net.au
date:Fri Jul 30 12:08:30 2010 +0900
summary: Don't assign the result of SSLv23_method()

This removes a build warning.

As such, I realise that strictly this isn't freeze
material, but it was committed upstream before the
freeze became harder.

changeset:   851:d4ec17993901
user:Joachim Sehlstedt u...@newstyledata.net
date:Fri Jul 30 11:54:28 2010 +0900
summary: Document --managesieve_capability in man page

This is a documentation change.


unblock perdition/1.19~rc4-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (190, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Bug#596675: freeze exception: enemies-of-carlotta 1.2.6-4 into Squeeze

2010-09-13 Thread Dave Holland

Package: release.debian.org

Hi,

Yesterday I had bug #596623 reported (enemies-of-carlotta uses
deprecated md5 module). The result is that the deprecation warnings
will confuse MTAs and break mailing lists using e-o-c. So I've just
now changed the bug to serious, and uploaded 1.2.6-4 which uses the
hashlib module instead. Please can you allow this version into Squeeze
for release? Sorry I didn't notice the problem sooner.

This is the changelog entry from 1.2.6-3 which is currently in Squeeze:

enemies-of-carlotta (1.2.6-4) unstable; urgency=high

  * Switched from deprecated md5 to hashlib (closes: #596623)

 -- Dave Holland d...@debian.org  Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:33:49 +0100

thanks,
Dave



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913094657.gb31...@snag.biff.org.uk

virtualbox hopefully for the last time

2010-09-13 Thread Michael Meskes

Hi again,

as Zobel just pointed out, version 3.2.6 is not distributable because Oracle
forgot to change some copyrights. Therefore I think we are forced to use 3.2.8
which is fine copyright wise afaict. I'm planning just another upload (ideally
today) to fix some problems with 3.2.8, namely:

- Incorrect dependencies (#595715)
- Problems with kernel 2.6.36 (#594602)
- Some manpages were added
- Ftbfs with recent libdrm-dev (#594599)

I think the non-docs changes are important enough to warrant an exception.

Michael

-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913103449.ga6...@feivel.credativ.lan

Re: Bug#578458: still fails to build

2010-09-13 Thread Niko Tyni

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:41:26PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:

 I've prepared a new libcoro-perl release in our svn repo which
 - removes the cruft from debian/rules
 - bumps the build and runtime dependency on libanyevent-perl to 
   = 5.271-2
 
 Before I upload: Is this ok for the release team, and can -- provided
 libcoro-perl builds everywhere -- both package be unblocked?
 
 On a second thought: libcoro-perl 5.210-1 in testing should be fine
 with the newer libanyevent-perl and a round of binNMUs; and we can
 still test this and do the cleanup by uploading 5.230-4 to unstable.
 Hm.

+1 to the second thought, except that I don't see any need for binNMUs.

Uploading libcoro-perl 5.230-4 to sid doesn't change anything wrt. squeeze
(squeeze and sid already have different versions) and therefore isn't
really in the release team domain. However, it's the easiest way to
confirm that the fix works and to clean away the unnecessary backend
selection code. I think you should go ahead.

If 5.230-4 builds everywhere, I think this bug (#578458) should be closed
outright. I should really have reassigned it instead of cloning.

From the release point of view, I think just unblocking libanyevent-perl
5.271-2 for squeeze should be enough. The libcoro-perl version in squeeze
(5.210) should indeed be fine, and if there's a need to get 5.230 in that
should be a separate discussion.

Apologies, the confusion was probably because of my earlier comment about
cleaning the backend selection code for squeeze. That's not necessary
because the code never got in squeeze in the first place.
-- 
Niko Tyni   nt...@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913104649.ga3...@madeleine.local.invalid

Bug#596677: unblock: libconfig-model-tkui-perl/1.310-1

2010-09-13 Thread Dominique Dumont

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock


Please unblock package libconfig-model-tkui-perl. This new release fixes
a usability bug where some buttons were not enabled when needed.

The meat of the change is quite small:

Index: lib/Config/Model/Tk/HashEditor.pm
===
--- lib/Config/Model/Tk/HashEditor.pm   (revision 61498)
+++ lib/Config/Model/Tk/HashEditor.pm   (revision 62496)
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
 
 # bind both entries to update correctly the state of all buttons
 my $bound_sub = sub { 
-   $cw-update_state(entry = $item , tklist = $tklist-curselection) 
+   $cw-update_state(entry = $item , tklist = $tklist-curselection || 
0) 
 };
 $entry - bind( 'KeyPress'   , $bound_sub );
 $tklist- bind( 'ListboxSelect', $bound_sub );



unblock libconfig-model-tkui-perl/1.310-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.utf8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100913111355.21627.42197.report...@komarr.gre.hp.com

Bug#596677: Complete diff

2010-09-13 Thread Dominique Dumont

Oops. I intented to add the complete diff between the last version but hit the 
wrong key.

Here's the complete diff between libconfig-model-tkui-perl 1.309 and 1.310 
taken from debian-perl group's svn. Most changes affect the version number of 
the Perl modules.

All the best

Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog	(revision 61498)
+++ debian/changelog	(revision 62496)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libconfig-model-tkui-perl (1.310-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * New upstream release (small bug fix)
+
+ -- Dominique Dumont dominique.dum...@hp.com  Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:07:26 +0200
+
 libconfig-model-tkui-perl (1.309-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release
Index: META.yml
===
--- META.yml	(revision 61498)
+++ META.yml	(revision 62496)
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 configure_requires:
   Module::Build: 0.3601
 dynamic_config: 0
-generated_by: 'Dist::Zilla version 4.101900, CPAN::Meta::Converter version 2.101670'
+generated_by: 'Dist::Zilla version 4.102340, CPAN::Meta::Converter version 2.102400'
 license: lgpl
 meta-spec:
   url: http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec-v1.4.html
@@ -23,4 +23,4 @@
   Tk: 0
   Tk::DirSelect: 0
   Tk::Tree: 0
-version: 1.309
+version: 1.310
Index: lib/Config/Model/TkUI.pm
===
--- lib/Config/Model/TkUI.pm	(revision 61498)
+++ lib/Config/Model/TkUI.pm	(revision 62496)
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 
 package Config::Model::TkUI ;
 BEGIN {
-  $Config::Model::TkUI::VERSION = '1.309';
+  $Config::Model::TkUI::VERSION = '1.310';
 }
 
 use strict;
Index: lib/Config/Model/Tk/HashViewer.pm
===
--- lib/Config/Model/Tk/HashViewer.pm	(revision 61498)
+++ lib/Config/Model/Tk/HashViewer.pm	(revision 62496)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #
 package Config::Model::Tk::HashViewer ;
 BEGIN {
-  $Config::Model::Tk::HashViewer::VERSION = '1.309';
+  $Config::Model::Tk::HashViewer::VERSION = '1.310';
 }
 
 use strict;
Index: lib/Config/Model/Tk/NodeViewer.pm
===
--- lib/Config/Model/Tk/NodeViewer.pm	(revision 61498)
+++ lib/Config/Model/Tk/NodeViewer.pm	(revision 62496)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #
 package Config::Model::Tk::NodeViewer ;
 BEGIN {
-  $Config::Model::Tk::NodeViewer::VERSION = '1.309';
+  $Config::Model::Tk::NodeViewer::VERSION = '1.310';
 }
 
 use strict;
Index: lib/Config/Model/Tk/AnyViewer.pm
===
--- lib/Config/Model/Tk/AnyViewer.pm	(revision 61498)
+++ lib/Config/Model/Tk/AnyViewer.pm	(revision 62496)
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 
 package Config::Model::Tk::AnyViewer ;
 BEGIN {
-  $Config::Model::Tk::AnyViewer::VERSION = '1.309';
+  $Config::Model::Tk::AnyViewer::VERSION = '1.310';
 }
 
 use strict;
Index: lib/Config/Model/Tk/LeafViewer.pm
===
--- lib/Config/Model/Tk/LeafViewer.pm	(revision 61498)
+++ lib/Config/Model/Tk/LeafViewer.pm	(revision 62496)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #
 package Config::Model::Tk::LeafViewer ;
 BEGIN {
-  $Config::Model::Tk::LeafViewer::VERSION = '1.309';
+  $Config::Model::Tk::LeafViewer::VERSION = '1.310';
 }
 
 use strict;
Index: lib/Config/Model/Tk/HashEditor.pm
===
--- lib/Config/Model/Tk/HashEditor.pm	(revision 61498)
+++ lib/Config/Model/Tk/HashEditor.pm	(revision 62496)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #
 package Config::Model::Tk::HashEditor ;
 BEGIN {
-  $Config::Model::Tk::HashEditor::VERSION = '1.309';
+  $Config::Model::Tk::HashEditor::VERSION = '1.310';
 }
 
 use strict;
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
 
 # bind both entries to update correctly the state of all buttons
 my $bound_sub = sub { 
-	$cw-update_state(entry = $item , tklist = $tklist-curselection) 
+	$cw-update_state(entry = $item , tklist = $tklist-curselection || 0) 
 };
 $entry - bind( 'KeyPress'   , $bound_sub );
 $tklist- bind( 'ListboxSelect', $bound_sub );
Index: lib/Config/Model/Tk/CheckListViewer.pm
===
--- lib/Config/Model/Tk/CheckListViewer.pm	(revision 61498)
+++ lib/Config/Model/Tk/CheckListViewer.pm	(revision 62496)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #
 package Config::Model::Tk::CheckListViewer ;
 BEGIN {
-  $Config::Model::Tk::CheckListViewer::VERSION = '1.309';
+  $Config::Model::Tk::CheckListViewer::VERSION = '1.310';
 }
 
 use strict;
Index: lib/Config/Model/Tk/NodeEditor.pm
===
--- lib/Config/Model/Tk/NodeEditor.pm	(revision 61498)
+++ lib/Config/Model/Tk/NodeEditor.pm	(revision 62496)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #
 package Config::Model::Tk::NodeEditor ;
 BEGIN {
-  $Config::Model::Tk::NodeEditor::VERSION = '1.309';
+  $Config::Model::Tk::NodeEditor::VERSION = '1.310';
 }
 
 use strict;
Index:

Re: Bugfixes for icinga-core

2010-09-13 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas

Hi, 

On Sun Sep 05, 2010 at 10:21:41 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
 Hi, 
 
 I know I'm late.. But we discovered some bugs in icinga 1.0.2 which would be
 nice to get fixed for squeeze. So we backported the fixes and I attached them
 to this mail. It would be nice if I could do a bugfix upload for icinga. 
 
 0001-fix-image-urls-555.patch: This patch fixes some image urls which were
 borken in 1.0.2. This patch is more or less cosmetic, but it prevents several
 404 in the apache log. 
 
 0002-fix-copy-paste-error-569.patch: If the configuration file lists
 temp_path before check_result_path the former gets overwritten. This patch
 fixes that behaviour (https://dev.icinga.org/issues/569)
 
 0003-modify-execv-to-execvp-accepting-4096-cmd-args-for-b.patch,
 0004-execvp-searches-in-PATH-too-like-popen-and-returns-i.patch:
 1.0.2 included a new heuristic to detect if a check could be executed without
 a shell to speed up things. Unfortunatly that heuristic had some critical
 bugs. One of the is that a command can only have 20-1 arguments which often
 is not enough. The second of the patches fixes PATH lookups for check
 commands. 
 
 0005-fix-wrong-is_volatile-conditions-causing-wrong-servi.patch:
 The volatile check was wrong and caused wrong service alerts 
 
 0006-fix-multiurl-action-status-icon-macro-processing-fix.patch:
 fixes a bug in macro processing and an invalid pointer in extinfo.cgi.

Please go ahead and upload.

Cheers,
Martin
-- 
 Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org  | Debian System Administrator
 Debian  GNU/Linux Developer   |   Debian Listmaster
 Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc   -   KeyID: 5D64 F870
 GPG Fingerprint:  5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7  302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913115821.ga4...@ftbfs.de

Re: unblock request: cacti 0.8.7g-1

On Tue, September 7, 2010 19:58, sean finney wrote:
 cacti 0.8.7g-1 has been in unstable for ~20 days with no ill effects
 reported.  this is largely an upstream maintenance release incorporating
 various bug/security fixes present in the previous releases.
[...]
 from both a user and stable/security support perspective it would be
 nice to have this version in the next stable release as opposed to the
 0.8.7e release (0.8.7f was a foobar'd release, in case you're wondering
 about the skipped version).

Unblocked by Luk as part of the security fixes unblock set.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/df4c7e8f25c9c5848c35c2177b3e116c.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org

Re: Freeze exception for sssd?

On Thu, August 12, 2010 22:26, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
 When the freeze was announced, I was working on an updated sssd
 package with code to automatically detect the configuration settings
 during installation, to have this included in Squeeze.  The freeze
 caught us a bit by surprise, but this new autodetection code is now
 working, and it would be very good to have it included in Squeeze.

Unblocked by Luk as part of the security fixes unblock set.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/2c5cb515276815950d7199a7cd15e417.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org

Bug#596686: unblock: gtk2-engines-qtcurve/1.5.2-1.1 (currently in delayed/2)

2010-09-13 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal


Hi!

Could you please unblock gtk2-engised-qtcurve, as it fixed rc bug #590521?

The change is trivial:


diff -Nru gtk2-engines-qtcurve-1.5.2/debian/rules 
gtk2-engines-qtcurve-1.5.2/debian/rules
--- gtk2-engines-qtcurve-1.5.2/debian/rules 2010-07-22 08:41:07.0 
+0200
+++ gtk2-engines-qtcurve-1.5.2/debian/rules 2010-09-13 13:45:40.0 
+0200
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
dh $@ --parallel
 
 override_dh_auto_configure:
-   dh_auto_configure -- -DQTC_MODIFY_MOZILLA=true
+   dh_auto_configure -- -DQTC_MODIFY_MOZILLA=false
 
 get-orig-source:
uscan --verbose --force-download --no-symlink



Best regards,
  Alexander

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to de...@euro)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100913121541.19319.769.report...@melusine.alphascorpii.net

Bug#596574: unblock: ruby1.9.1/1.9.2.0-1 libgems-ruby/1.3.7-2

On Sun, September 12, 2010 18:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 The rubygems1.9.1 package used to be built from the libgems-ruby source
 package. But Ruby 1.9.2 broke it, so we decided to switch to using Ruby
 1.9.2's rubygems for 1.9.X.
 That requires dropping the 1.9 package from libgems-ruby, and making
 changes to the ruby1.9.1 package to add the rubygems files to the
 ruby1.9.1 package. (full discussion in #588125)
 Additionally, a common complaint from rubygems users was addressed, by
 allowing a workaround to do gem update --system. (Done in both
 packages).

Why was this uploaded with an urgency of high?

One of the changes in debian/rules isn't mentioned in the changelog:

-include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
+include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk

 Then, ruby1.9.1 1.9.2.0-1.

Already unblocked by Luk as part of the security fixes unblock set, but
aged to 20 days.

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/251e4d70436a3b70df1028df63b626c5.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org

Re: Pre-approval of python-liblas/1.2.1-2 upload

On Sun, September 12, 2010 16:06, David Paleino wrote:
 On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:26:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

 On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 10:56 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
  I prepared an upload for python-liblas, version 1.2.1-2, targetted at
  Squeeze. This upload fixes an RC bug (#595603), and another one which
 is
  minor (#595608, but the fix is really easy, and they're really
 almost the
  same bug).

 Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been accepted.

 Accepted.

and unblocked.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/8d0b6ded29ccebf4dbf33154943b46f0.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org

Bug#596688: unblock: gweled/0.8.repack-4.1 (currently in DELAYED/2)

2010-09-13 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal


Hi!

Could you please unblock gweled/0.8.repack-4.1?  It fixes RC bug #595590
(which is actually the same as #591597, incorrectly marked as fixed) and
the fix is trivial:


diff -Nru gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules
--- gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules  2010-08-04 09:29:10.0 +0200
+++ gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules  2010-09-13 14:04:32.0 +0200
@@ -15,4 +15,4 @@
 
 override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install
-   rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/gweled/var/games
+   rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/gweled/var/games/*



Best regards,
  Alexander


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to de...@euro)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100913122318.20733.48735.report...@melusine.alphascorpii.net

Processed: submitter 596688, retitle 596688 to unblock: gweled/0.8.repack-5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 submitter 596688 ond...@sury.org
Bug #596688 [release.debian.org] unblock: gweled/0.8.repack-4.1 (currently in 
DELAYED/2)
Changed Bug submitter to 'ond...@sury.org' from 'Alexander Reichle-Schmehl 
toli...@debian.org'
 retitle 596688 unblock: gweled/0.8.repack-5
Bug #596688 [release.debian.org] unblock: gweled/0.8.repack-4.1 (currently in 
DELAYED/2)
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: gweled/0.8.repack-5' from 'unblock: 
gweled/0.8.repack-4.1 (currently in DELAYED/2)'

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
596688: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596688
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128438236331133.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#596574: unblock: ruby1.9.1/1.9.2.0-1 libgems-ruby/1.3.7-2

2010-09-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum

On 13/09/10 at 13:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Sun, September 12, 2010 18:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
  The rubygems1.9.1 package used to be built from the libgems-ruby source
  package. But Ruby 1.9.2 broke it, so we decided to switch to using Ruby
  1.9.2's rubygems for 1.9.X.
  That requires dropping the 1.9 package from libgems-ruby, and making
  changes to the ruby1.9.1 package to add the rubygems files to the
  ruby1.9.1 package. (full discussion in #588125)
  Additionally, a common complaint from rubygems users was addressed, by
  allowing a workaround to do gem update --system. (Done in both
  packages).
 
 Why was this uploaded with an urgency of high?

Because I have little doubt that the package is of better quality than
the one currently in testing, and I'd like to maximize testing of the
package by having it migrate ASAP.

 One of the changes in debian/rules isn't mentioned in the changelog:
 
 -include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
 +include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk

Should I upload a fix?
 
  Then, ruby1.9.1 1.9.2.0-1.
 
 Already unblocked by Luk as part of the security fixes unblock set, but
 aged to 20 days.

I don't understand the reason for that. I think that we agree that this
version is better than the previous one. Why do you prefer to reduce the
opportunity for testing by not letting it migrate now?

- Lucas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913131218.ga25...@xanadu.blop.info

Re: bugs in the unofficial RC bug tracker @ turmzimmer

2010-09-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum

On 15/08/10 at 17:00 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
 On 08/15/2010 04:46 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
  Hi,
 
 Hi
 
  I investigated some differences between 
  http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php
  and what UDD sees, and found out that the unofficial RC bug tracker
  seems to be missing quite a lot of bugs.
  
  The main problem seems to be that it doesn't know about the 'src:'
  syntax (examples: #577321, #577364).
  
  It also seems wrong about other bugs, though it's harder to understand
  what it does wrong in those cases.
 
 I guess some of them can be explained by the seemingly missing support
 for multiple source versions in unstable (aka it seems to take the first
 one it encounters).
 
  If someone is interested in rewriting the unofficial RC bug tracker
  using UDD, I could provide some help with the SQL part.
 
 aba: what do you think?
 
 Maybe it's also time to make it an official service?

Hi,

I worked on a UDD-based RC bugs list. It doesn't have all the
functionality of the turmzimmer tracker, but at least it shouldn't miss
any bugs.

http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugs.cgi

Feedback welcomed.

- Lucas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913133250.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info

Re: Unblock request for opendnssec 1.1.3-1

2010-09-13 Thread Ondřej Surý

Hi Julien,

I know maybe it's too much to ask, but the upstream have found a grave bug
in opendnssec 1.1.2 and released 1.1.3 today, which fixes just that
one critical bug. (I didn't want to open another bug in Debian BTS
just for formal reasons, but I can do that.)

The bug description is:
OpenDNSSEC 1.1.3 - 2010-09-10

Bugfixes:
* Bugreport #183: Partial zone could get signed if zone transfer failed
  when using zone_fetcher

The full description of the bug can be found here:
http://trac.opendnssec.org/ticket/183

The trimmed down patch is attached and the output of diff stat looks like this:

 zone_fetcher.c |   54 --
 zone_fetcher.h |4 ++--
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

It just moves initialization of xfrd structure lower into data
structures, because it cannot be reused and does much more strict data
checking.

Ondrej

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 13:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
 On Mon, Sep  6, 2010 at 11:22:31 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:

 On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:48, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
  On Mon, Sep  6, 2010 at 09:24:25 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
 
  On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 15:42, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
   tools/ods-control.in looks like it should exit with an error if it
   doesn't like its command line arguments.
 
  I have prepared patch for this issue and I will upload it as 1.1.2-2
  if you say it's ok.
 
  ack

 Thanks. Uploaded.

 Unblocked.

 Cheers,
 Julien

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMiMHMAAoJEDEBgAUJBeQMdP0QAMxaqcz2j1fxSCcp1Yk9wdK5
 qNlGXBGp9SzTFMaIu6Xn0ClvWgoArLDS+zzpZGeroCL1Er20cIRfhq7F3dw3Mc0B
 b27jynVjE9rfjmIU6Thj+e7uZU4eBj//Zi1DFLDx/obMHE47u6+YIm2++4Qsf6+f
 Lz+mZijuFOXEtv7EXh8/FIv/vU2i3INfGW+d0AtXre5ybH7aYGD6i1kBxghzJOq1
 jlWcoSeFou+xuHqBhWSIfetYXx08JkuP+i4YtRhgFB9I+lb8zqAJg8Z9uisM9vdx
 9y2coDYbTnrNhYplED6/Dky0dW3VT3CqEi27JmhLefcEsL8Tzsx/UZe2ZpKPoS7W
 4P6fj8UrPoNznUIiTGstzXBPiGzBaJtwynxbbvRPvaWjmMUpB9CDRO1KhIJMz8p9
 zGi9MWI59ogZQp4DV82GfPNaUKG1bwrOS9ujOVwZR6RdVqEYoaq/wsdlJMF0lHcs
 zXePFrtyUa4HXkX8OKbu5kZrey5ysH8nr7iKo4mscrKwXGWW0eiTx43MX/6FoL2d
 WGC/QlShNEJ56zcet3ww8dzKrUPMOb1hmVyGlcUxewCI6BsEDCL9rhD8Cx8xakFR
 kNJ0ZBG2nU/fg2DP1F0Qt+JtkFsK1tboLC1pcmSyuvcKJVR/wLsPa+nhJLVCMu8s
 yG2MLre/los5CIJPnzIF
 =T0AN
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-





-- 
Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org
diff -urNapw opendnssec-1.1.2/signer/tools/zone_fetcher.c opendnssec-1.1.3/signer/tools/zone_fetcher.c
--- opendnssec-1.1.2/signer/tools/zone_fetcher.c	2010-08-25 10:47:46.0 +0200
+++ opendnssec-1.1.3/signer/tools/zone_fetcher.c	2010-09-13 15:09:50.918928154 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /*
- * $Id: zone_fetcher.c 3653 2010-08-05 14:04:51Z matthijs $
+ * $Id: zone_fetcher.c 3912 2010-09-10 12:35:26Z rb $
  *
  * Copyright (c) 2009 NLnet Labs. All rights reserved.
  *
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 #include getopt.h
 #include signal.h
 #include syslog.h
+#include unistd.h
 
 #include libxml/tree.h
 #include libxml/parser.h
@@ -168,7 +169,6 @@ free_config(config_type* cfg)
 free_zonelist(cfg-zonelist);
 free_serverlist(cfg-serverlist);
 free_serverlist(cfg-notifylist);
-ldns_resolver_free(cfg-xfrd);
 free((void*) cfg);
 }
 }
@@ -846,6 +846,7 @@ odd_xfer(zonelist_type* zone, uint32_t s
 char dest_file[MAXPATHLEN];
 char engine_sign_cmd[MAXPATHLEN + 1024]; 
 int soa_seen = 0;
+ldns_resolver* xfrd = NULL;
 
 /* soa serial query */
 if (!zone || !zone-dname) {
@@ -862,11 +863,21 @@ odd_xfer(zonelist_type* zone, uint32_t s
 Aborting AXFR);
 return -1;
 }
-status = ldns_resolver_send_pkt(apkt, config-xfrd, qpkt);
+
+/* Initialise LDNS resolver for AXFR */
+xfrd = init_xfrd(config);
+
+if (!xfrd) {
+	log_msg(LOG_ERR, Failed to initialise AXFR structure);
+	return -1;
+}
+
+status = ldns_resolver_send_pkt(apkt, xfrd, qpkt);
 if (status != LDNS_STATUS_OK) {
 log_msg(LOG_ERR, zone fetcher failed to send SOA query: %s,
 ldns_get_errorstr_by_id(status));
 ldns_pkt_free(qpkt);
+	ldns_resolver_free(xfrd);
 return -1;
 }
 if (ldns_pkt_ancount(apkt) == 1) {
@@ -881,15 +892,17 @@ odd_xfer(zonelist_type* zone, uint32_t s
 Aborting AXFR);
 /* retry? */
 ldns_pkt_free(apkt);
+	ldns_resolver_free(xfrd);
 return -1;
 }
 
 if (DNS_SERIAL_GT(new_serial, serial)) {
-status = ldns_axfr_start(config-xfrd, zone-dname, LDNS_RR_CLASS_IN);
+status = ldns_axfr_start(xfrd, zone-dname, LDNS_RR_CLASS_IN);
 ldns_pkt_free(qpkt);
 if (status != LDNS_STATUS_OK) {
 log_msg(LOG_ERR, zone fetcher failed to start axfr: %s,
 ldns_get_errorstr_by_id(status));
+	ldns_resolver_free(xfrd);
 return -1;
 }
 
@@ -905,17 +918,19 @@ odd_xfer(zonelist_type* zone, uint32_t s
 if (!fd) {

Pre-approval for upcoming FFmpeg upload

2010-09-13 Thread Reinhard Tartler


With your permission, I'd like to upload the following debdiff to fix a
rather embarrassing bug:


diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 59a7196..ee4457a 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+ffmpeg (4:0.5.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ Dominic Evans ]
+  * add libxfixes-dev to build-depends to unbreak x11grab input,
+Closes: #596342, LP: #631103
+  
+  [ Reinhard Tartler ]
+  * fix x11grab example in e.g. the manpage so that they actually work
+
+ -- Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de  Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:29:49 +0200
+
 ffmpeg (4:0.5.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Loïc Minier ]
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 260932e..86a0e38 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7),
libvorbis-dev,
libx11-dev,
libxext-dev,
+   libxfixes-dev,
libvdpau-dev,
libxvmc-dev,
quilt,
diff --git a/debian/patches/fix-x11grab-example.patch 
b/debian/patches/fix-x11grab-example.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..b6fde93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/fix-x11grab-example.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+From: siretart siret...@9553f0bf-9b14-0410-a0b8-cfaf0461ba5b
+Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:25:51 + (+)
+Subject: fix x11grab example in e.g. the manpage so that they actually work
+X-Git-Url: 
http://git.ffmpeg.org/?p=ffmpeg;a=commitdiff_plain;h=ead47de1d89067e24bc3f520b6d762ecf64db002
+
+fix x11grab example in e.g. the manpage so that they actually work
+
+git-svn-id: file:///var/local/repositories/ffmpeg/tr...@25113 
9553f0bf-9b14-0410-a0b8-cfaf0461ba5b
+---
+
+diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
+index 71bed9b..d9c5c14 100644
+--- a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
 b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
+@@ -817,14 +817,14 @@ standard mixer.
+ FFmpeg can grab the X11 display.
+ 
+ @example
+-ffmpeg -f x11grab -s cif -i :0.0 /tmp/out.mpg
++ffmpeg -f x11grab -s cif -r 25 -i :0.0 /tmp/out.mpg
+ @end example
+ 
+ 0.0 is display.screen number of your X11 server, same as
+ the DISPLAY environment variable.
+ 
+ @example
+-ffmpeg -f x11grab -s cif -i :0.0+10,20 /tmp/out.mpg
++ffmpeg -f x11grab -s cif -r 25 -i :0.0+10,20 /tmp/out.mpg
+ @end example
+ 
+ 0.0 is display.screen number of your X11 server, same as the DISPLAY 
environment
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index 104c330..4c91710 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ fix-dv-seeking.patch
 fix-constant-quant-encoding.patch
 increase-VOFW-on-x86.patch
 use-normal-check_func-test-for-math-functions.patch
+fix-x11grab-example.patch
 900_doxyfile
 901-fix-misc-typos.patch
 # fpic-ftbfs-fix.patch


-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/87fwxddaxm@faui44a.informatik.uni-erlangen.de

Re: another two freez exceptions for texlive-base and texlice-extra

2010-09-13 Thread Norbert Preining

Hi Julien, hi all,

On Sa, 11 Sep 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
  texlive-extra 2009-10
  
* add the forgotten epoch for musixtex dependency (Closes: #587746)
  
  This chnage is trivail, it only adds the forgotten epco to musixtex
  dependency, which was not included in the upload before. It is not
  aserious issue, since there are no other musixtex packages around
  anyway.
  
 If there's likely to be other changes before release I'd rather defer
 this.  Otherwise go ahead.

Currently I have nothing in the queue, but if you want I can still wait
a bit.

  texlive-base 2009-11
  
 * texlive-base conflict with texlive-base-bin-doc to get it removed
   (Closes: #589205)
 * avoid unneeded 10texlive-base.cnfpre-edit files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d,
   thanks Jörg-Volker Peetz (Closes: #584950)
  
  The first item is harmless, more important is the second.
  
 I don't understand the rationale for the first item.  If the old package
 is not doing any actual harm then conflicting with it isn't necessary.

Yes that is true, but it duplicates information in a way that one might
believe there is telxive-base-bin and the binaries. The very same docs
are shipped now in different packages, so yes, in principle it should
not harm, but we did it for cleaning up the upgrade 2007-2009.

If you prefer I can revert it.

  The code in the texlive-base.postinst in the *current* version in testing
  now unconditionally edits texlive-base.cnf in place creating a backup
  file
  /etc/texmf/fmt.d/texlive-base.cnfpre-edit
  even if no changes were necessary (i.e., when you have not upgraded all
  the way from etch).
  
  The change in this package no protects this in place editing with
  a check whether the actual target line really occurs.
  
 Sounds ok.

Thanks.

So I wait for your suggestion regarding the above two points (wait with
texlive-extra, revert the conflict) and will upload.

Thanks a lot and all the best

Norbert


Norbert Preiningprein...@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live  Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094

BOOKWhat to do if you find yourself stuck in a crack in the ground
underneath a giant boulder you can't move, with no hope of
rescue. Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to
you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so
far, which given your current circumstances seems more likely,
consider how lucky you are that it won't be troubling you much
longer.
 --- Comforting advice for Ford and Arthur in this current
 --- situation, Fit the Eighth.
 --- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913131803.gc32...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at

Bug#596574: unblock: ruby1.9.1/1.9.2.0-1 libgems-ruby/1.3.7-2

On Mon, September 13, 2010 14:12, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
 On 13/09/10 at 13:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Sun, September 12, 2010 18:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
  The rubygems1.9.1 package used to be built from the libgems-ruby
 source
  package. But Ruby 1.9.2 broke it, so we decided to switch to using
 Ruby
  1.9.2's rubygems for 1.9.X.
  That requires dropping the 1.9 package from libgems-ruby, and making
  changes to the ruby1.9.1 package to add the rubygems files to the
  ruby1.9.1 package. (full discussion in #588125)
  Additionally, a common complaint from rubygems users was addressed, by
  allowing a workaround to do gem update --system. (Done in both
  packages).

 Why was this uploaded with an urgency of high?

 Because I have little doubt that the package is of better quality than
 the one currently in testing, and I'd like to maximize testing of the
 package by having it migrate ASAP.

Testing in unstable is also useful; mentioning that in the changelog would
have been helpful, at least imho.

 One of the changes in debian/rules isn't mentioned in the changelog:

 -include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
 +include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk

 Should I upload a fix?

If there's a good reason the change was made, that's fine. I wasn't able
to find an explanation in the changelog, so I queried it.

  Then, ruby1.9.1 1.9.2.0-1.

 Already unblocked by Luk as part of the security fixes unblock set,
 but
 aged to 20 days.

 I don't understand the reason for that. I think that we agree that this
 version is better than the previous one. Why do you prefer to reduce the
 opportunity for testing by not letting it migrate now?

I assume that was plural you. :)

From 4c8dbe97.60...@debian.org:

/=
|  unblock ruby1.9.1/1.9.2.0-1
|
| unblocked and aged to 20 days due to massive changes
\=

From a quick look at the diff, much of the changes appear to be
auto-generated stuff in enc/trans/ and ext/ripper; are either/both of
those used in the packages?

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20edc27bdb2a6304f700a6467aeaa9b3.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org

Re: another two freez exceptions for texlive-base and texlice-extra

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:18:03 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:

 Hi Julien, hi all,
 
 On Sa, 11 Sep 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
   texlive-extra 2009-10
   
 * add the forgotten epoch for musixtex dependency (Closes: #587746)
   
   This chnage is trivail, it only adds the forgotten epco to musixtex
   dependency, which was not included in the upload before. It is not
   aserious issue, since there are no other musixtex packages around
   anyway.
   
  If there's likely to be other changes before release I'd rather defer
  this.  Otherwise go ahead.
 
 Currently I have nothing in the queue, but if you want I can still wait
 a bit.
 
Whichever you prefer, I don't mind.

   texlive-base 2009-11
   
  * texlive-base conflict with texlive-base-bin-doc to get it removed
(Closes: #589205)
  * avoid unneeded 10texlive-base.cnfpre-edit files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d,
thanks Jörg-Volker Peetz (Closes: #584950)
   
   The first item is harmless, more important is the second.
   
  I don't understand the rationale for the first item.  If the old package
  is not doing any actual harm then conflicting with it isn't necessary.
 
 Yes that is true, but it duplicates information in a way that one might
 believe there is telxive-base-bin and the binaries. The very same docs
 are shipped now in different packages, so yes, in principle it should
 not harm, but we did it for cleaning up the upgrade 2007-2009.
 
 If you prefer I can revert it.
 
Conflicts create problems for upgrades so if this is not strictly
necessary then yes, please revert it.

   The code in the texlive-base.postinst in the *current* version in testing
   now unconditionally edits texlive-base.cnf in place creating a backup
   file
   /etc/texmf/fmt.d/texlive-base.cnfpre-edit
   even if no changes were necessary (i.e., when you have not upgraded all
   the way from etch).
   
   The change in this package no protects this in place editing with
   a check whether the actual target line really occurs.
   
  Sounds ok.
 
 Thanks.
 
 So I wait for your suggestion regarding the above two points (wait with
 texlive-extra, revert the conflict) and will upload.
 
Thanks for your work.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#596130: unblock: doom-wad-shareware/1.9.fixed-1

2010-09-13 Thread Jon Dowland

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 06:15:01PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 17:02:43 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
 
  On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 09:15:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
   On Wed, Sep  8, 2010 at 21:01:58 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
   
Please unblock package doom-wad-shareware.

   You're getting rid of the md5sums control file?
  
  Thanks for spotting. That is not intentional.  Would you
  prefer it fixed for squeeze?
  
 If it's not too much trouble :)

I've uploaded a fixed package version 1.9.fixed-2.


Thanks,

-- 
Jon Dowland


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913135447.ga15...@deckard.alcopop.org

Bug#596574: unblock: ruby1.9.1/1.9.2.0-1 libgems-ruby/1.3.7-2

2010-09-13 Thread Michael Gilbert

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Lucas Nussbaum  wrote:
 On 13/09/10 at 13:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Sun, September 12, 2010 18:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
  The rubygems1.9.1 package used to be built from the libgems-ruby source
  package. But Ruby 1.9.2 broke it, so we decided to switch to using Ruby
  1.9.2's rubygems for 1.9.X.
  That requires dropping the 1.9 package from libgems-ruby, and making
  changes to the ruby1.9.1 package to add the rubygems files to the
  ruby1.9.1 package. (full discussion in #588125)
  Additionally, a common complaint from rubygems users was addressed, by
  allowing a workaround to do gem update --system. (Done in both
  packages).

 Why was this uploaded with an urgency of high?

 Because I have little doubt that the package is of better quality than
 the one currently in testing, and I'd like to maximize testing of the
 package by having it migrate ASAP.

 One of the changes in debian/rules isn't mentioned in the changelog:

 -include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
 +include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk

 Should I upload a fix?

  Then, ruby1.9.1 1.9.2.0-1.

 Already unblocked by Luk as part of the security fixes unblock set, but
 aged to 20 days.

 I don't understand the reason for that. I think that we agree that this
 version is better than the previous one. Why do you prefer to reduce the
 opportunity for testing by not letting it migrate now?

The 20 days provides more time to find show stopping issues in
unstable since the changes are so large.  This seems fine since the
security issue itself is minor.

Best wishes,
Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik7ymfp-fewhkzyq38hoyenggt8o8=1q3dz6...@mail.gmail.com

Unblock webkitkde (kpart-webkit / libkwebkit1) or other action?

2010-09-13 Thread Adrian von Bidder

Heyho!

(Ping - sent last Thursday, no answer so far.)

Sune NMUd webkitkde (which I maintain) and got a freeze exception.  Not 
being aware of this I uploaded a new upstream snapshot (fixing at least one 
quite annoying bug), incorporating his NMU change and correcting 
README.Debian to match the change Sune did in his NMU.

libkwebkit1 ABI didn't change as far as I can see; kget is currently the 
only package depending on this (except kpart-webkit itself, of course.)

I'd be happy about input from the release team about how to proceed:
 - I re-upload Sune's NMU version to t-p-u
 - let the new version go into squeeze
 - remove webkitkde from squeeze (requires a kdenetwork upload without 
dependency on libkwebkit, so less than ideal unless such an upload is 
planned anyway.)

(Looking at popcon and at the low number of bug reports despite there being 
a few annoying bugs, removing webkitkde from squeeze wouldn't be the end of 
the world - having it in squeeze would still be nice, though.)

+++
webkitkde (0.9.6svn1170614-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream version.
- History fixes.
  * Merge NMU and adjust README.Debian to match the new reality
  * Convert symbol file to C++
  * Update to Policy 3.9.1

 -- Adrian von Bidder c...@debian.org  Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:17:45 +0200
+++

cheers
-- vbi



-- 
In Blythe, California, a city ordinance declares that a person must own
at least two cows before he can wear cowboy boots in public.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Unblock webkitkde (kpart-webkit / libkwebkit1) or other action?

2010-09-13 Thread Michael Gilbert

On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:23:58 +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
 Heyho!
 
 (Ping - sent last Thursday, no answer so far.)
 
 Sune NMUd webkitkde (which I maintain) and got a freeze exception.  Not 
 being aware of this I uploaded a new upstream snapshot (fixing at least one 
 quite annoying bug), incorporating his NMU change and correcting 
 README.Debian to match the change Sune did in his NMU.
 
 libkwebkit1 ABI didn't change as far as I can see; kget is currently the 
 only package depending on this (except kpart-webkit itself, of course.)
 
 I'd be happy about input from the release team about how to proceed:
  - I re-upload Sune's NMU version to t-p-u
  - let the new version go into squeeze
  - remove webkitkde from squeeze (requires a kdenetwork upload without 
 dependency on libkwebkit, so less than ideal unless such an upload is 
 planned anyway.)
 
 (Looking at popcon and at the low number of bug reports despite there being 
 a few annoying bugs, removing webkitkde from squeeze wouldn't be the end of 
 the world - having it in squeeze would still be nice, though.)

Is another webkit code copy really necessary?  Who has volunteered to
support backports of security fixes to this?

Unless there are some must have reverse dependencies, I think this
package should be removed from testing.

Best wishes,
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100913102756.634ff681.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com

Re: Permission to fix bug #576127 in ncurses

2010-09-13 Thread Sven Joachim

On 2010-09-11 20:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

 On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 20:20:25 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:

 I would like to get a freeze exception for ncurses to fix bug #576127[0]
 for squeeze.  While this bug only affects a minority of our users, those
 will be hit rather hard, and this bug is a regression from Lenny.  The
 commits in our git repository can be found at [1] and [2].
 
 Another bug I would like to fix is #595484[3].  This is not as
 important, but the patch is a one-liner (exactly three characters long).
 The commit would be [4].
 
 Please go ahead, let us know when the package is accepted.

Craig uploaded it, and it has already been built on all release
architectures.

Cheers,
   Sven


pgpuUkjnlBA9a.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: tagging 596280

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 596280 + moreinfo
Bug #596280 [release.debian.org] unblock: kolabd/2.2.4-20100624-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
596280: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596280
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128438870217840.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: tagging 596094

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 596094 + moreinfo
Bug #596094 [release.debian.org] unblock: epiphany-browser/2.30.5-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
596094: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596094
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128438873718237.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Re: Unblock webkitkde (kpart-webkit / libkwebkit1) or other action?

2010-09-13 Thread Sune Vuorela

On 2010-09-13, Michael Gilbert michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:23:58 +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
 Heyho!
 
 (Ping - sent last Thursday, no answer so far.)
 
 Sune NMUd webkitkde (which I maintain) and got a freeze exception.  Not 
 being aware of this I uploaded a new upstream snapshot (fixing at least one 
 quite annoying bug), incorporating his NMU change and correcting 
 README.Debian to match the change Sune did in his NMU.
 
 libkwebkit1 ABI didn't change as far as I can see; kget is currently the 
 only package depending on this (except kpart-webkit itself, of course.)
 
 I'd be happy about input from the release team about how to proceed:
  - I re-upload Sune's NMU version to t-p-u
  - let the new version go into squeeze
  - remove webkitkde from squeeze (requires a kdenetwork upload without 
 dependency on libkwebkit, so less than ideal unless such an upload is 
 planned anyway.)
 
 (Looking at popcon and at the low number of bug reports despite there being 
 a few annoying bugs, removing webkitkde from squeeze wouldn't be the end of 
 the world - having it in squeeze would still be nice, though.)

 Is another webkit code copy really necessary?  Who has volunteered to
 support backports of security fixes to this?

It is a kpart (kde platform component) built on top of libkdewebkit,
which just wraps qtwebkit.

So, it is not another webkit code copy. just something that uses the
library.

That said, I don't have any particular opinion on webkitkde, except for
the fact that the current version in squeeze should not be released as
it is. (hence my NMU and such)

/Sune


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrni8se4k.rvp.nos...@sshway.ssh.pusling.com

Re: Permission to fix bug #576127 in ncurses

2010-09-13 Thread Sven Joachim

On 2010-09-13 16:32 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:

 On 2010-09-11 20:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

 On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 20:20:25 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:

 I would like to get a freeze exception for ncurses to fix bug #576127[0]
 for squeeze.  While this bug only affects a minority of our users, those
 will be hit rather hard, and this bug is a regression from Lenny.  The
 commits in our git repository can be found at [1] and [2].
 
 Another bug I would like to fix is #595484[3].  This is not as
 important, but the patch is a one-liner (exactly three characters long).
 The commit would be [4].
 
 Please go ahead, let us know when the package is accepted.

 Craig uploaded it, and it has already been built on all release
 architectures.

I just noticed that the source package contains two spurious
*.debhelper.log files, which is probably due to

- Craig having worked on i386 at some point, but uploading on amd64
- dh_clean only removing log files for packages in the architecture list
  (cf. debhelper 4.1.52 changelog entry)
- lintian being silent about the files that should not be there

Otherwise it is identical to our new 'sid' branch in git[1], please
unblock.

Cheers,
   Sven


1. http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/ncurses.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/sid


pgpW9mJpyNKhU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#596706: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.7.7-6

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Essentially two patches from upstream, fixing wrapping/unwrapping of
EnterVT throughout the tree.

xorg-server (2:1.7.7-6) unstable; urgency=low

  * Unwrap/rewrap EnterVT/LeaveVT completely.  Because some EnterVT code needs
to remove itself from the call chain, we need to fix all of the wrappers
to correctly unwrap/rewrap during the call chain.  Followup to the fix in
the previous upload, pointed out and tested by Sven Joachim, thanks!
(closes: #596012, #595973, #595776)

 -- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org  Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:06:02 +0200

xorg-server (2:1.7.7-5) unstable; urgency=low

  [ Julien Cristau ]
  * Clean up RandR12 bits on screen close.  Avoids infinite recursion on
EnterVT in the second server generation (closes: #595386).

  [ Cyril Brulebois ]
  * Upload to unstable.

 -- Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org  Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:57:55 +0200

There'll probably be a few more fixes before release, and we need to
sort out the xserver-xorg-video-intel situation, but for now, please:

unblock xorg-server/2:1.7.7-6

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Please unblock arno-iptables-firewall 1.9.2.k-4

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 20:44:01 -0400, Michael Hanke wrote:

 I'd be glad if you could allow the version to transition into squeeze.
 
Unblocked.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Bugfixes for icinga-core

On Sun, Sep  5, 2010 at 10:21:41 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:

 0003-modify-execv-to-execvp-accepting-4096-cmd-args-for-b.patch,
 0004-execvp-searches-in-PATH-too-like-popen-and-returns-i.patch:
 1.0.2 included a new heuristic to detect if a check could be executed without
 a shell to speed up things. Unfortunatly that heuristic had some critical
 bugs. One of the is that a command can only have 20-1 arguments which often
 is not enough. The second of the patches fixes PATH lookups for check
 commands. 
 
Wouldn't it be easier/safer to just fork a shell every time, if the
heuristic is unreliable?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#596130: unblock: doom-wad-shareware/1.9.fixed-1

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 14:54:47 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:

 I've uploaded a fixed package version 1.9.fixed-2.

Unblocked.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596130: marked as done (unblock: doom-wad-shareware/1.9.fixed-1)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:15:07 +0200
with message-id 20100913161507.gn5...@patate.is-a-geek.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596130: unblock: doom-wad-shareware/1.9.fixed-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596130,
regarding unblock: doom-wad-shareware/1.9.fixed-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596130: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596130
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hello,

Please unblock package doom-wad-shareware.

This is possibly the simplest possible Debian package: it
installs precicely one upstream file, plus the changelog
and copyright files.  Amazingly, it turns out it has been
installing the wrong upstream file for the last ten years.

The original maintainer resigned in December last year. I've
taken over maintenance and packaged the correct file.  Due
to the trivial nature of the package, the fact that the
testing version installs the wrong file, and to prevent the
former maintainer being bugged about the package for the
duration of the next release, I am requesting this unblock.

unblock doom-wad-shareware/1.9.fixed-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 14:54:47 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:

 I've uploaded a fixed package version 1.9.fixed-2.

Unblocked.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---

Re: Bug#578458: still fails to build

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 13:46:49 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:

 From the release point of view, I think just unblocking libanyevent-perl
 5.271-2 for squeeze should be enough. The libcoro-perl version in squeeze
 (5.210) should indeed be fine, and if there's a need to get 5.230 in that
 should be a separate discussion.
 
libanyevent-perl unblocked, thanks for your work.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: initramfs-tools 0.98.3

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:51:23 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:

 On Freitag, 10. September 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
  After some dicussion in #debian-release, this unblock should
  be synced with a newer debian-edu-artwork, please wait for that.
  (aka fix of #593707)
 
 will try to work on the weekend, wont mind if its done by someone else ;)
 
-edu, anyone?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596379: marked as done (unblock: kgb-bot/1.05-1)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:25:49 +0200
with message-id 20100913162549.gq5...@patate.is-a-geek.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596379: unblock: kgb-bot/1.05-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596379,
regarding unblock: kgb-bot/1.05-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596379: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596379
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package kgb-bot/1.05-1

At first glance this looks like a new upstream release, but we are 
upstream, so it is all under control. The upstream diff is attached.

1.05-1 fixes two bugs:
#593631 -- can't access /usr/bin/polygen (moved to /usr/games)
#593633 -- dies when polygen is removed after daemon startup

Changelog:

  * kgb-bot: use File::Which to find polygen binary; split out the
polygen-finding function; add libfile-which-perl to Suggests;
closes: #593631 -- can't access /usr/bin/polygen
  * kgb-bot: check existence of polygen binary just before using it;
closes: #593633 -- dies when polygen is removed after daemon startup
  * any problems in finding/running polygen binary are logged only when debug
is enabled as a counter-measure against remotely-assisted log abuse

Thanks in advance,
dam
diff --git a/Changes b/Changes
index d30fa6b..b254e97 100644
--- a/Changes
+++ b/Changes
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+
+1.05:
+  * kgb-bot: use File::Which to find polygen binary; split out the
+polygen-finding function; closes: #593631
+  * kgb-bot: check existence of polygen binary before using it;
+closes: #593633
+  * add gregor to copyright holders
+  * move polygen detection entirely at runtime
+  * any problems in finding polygen binary are logged only when debug is
+enabled as a counter-measure against remotely-assisted log abuse
+
+1.04:
+  * use Digest::SHA from core instead of ::SHA1
+  * remove references to Svn::* from Build.PL
+Closes: #582739 (by working around #589812)
+
 1.03:
   * Synchronized versions of kgb-bot and KGB
 
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 90d18a3..810efc8 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+kgb-bot (1.05-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ gregor herrmann, Damyan Ivanov ]
+  * kgb-bot: use File::Which to find polygen binary; split out the
+polygen-finding function; add libfile-which-perl to Suggests;
+closes: #593631 -- can't access /usr/bin/polygen
+  * kgb-bot: check existence of polygen binary just before using it;
+closes: #593633 -- dies when polygen is removed after daemon startup
+  * any problems in finding/running polygen binary are logged only when debug
+is enabled as a counter-measure against remotely-assisted log abuse
+
+ -- Damyan Ivanov d...@debian.org  Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:49:25 +0300
+
 kgb-bot (1.04-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * use Digest::SHA from core instead of ::SHA1
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 073e777..53bb807 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, adduser, perl (= 5.10),
  libproc-pid-file-perl,
  libyaml-perl,
  kgb-client
-Suggests: polygen, libipc-run-perl
+Suggests: polygen, libipc-run-perl, libfile-which-perl
 Description: IRC collaboration bot
  KGB is an IRC bot, helping people work together by notifying an IRC channel
  when a commit occures.
diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright
index 8ab2b89..b902410 100644
--- a/debian/copyright
+++ b/debian/copyright
@@ -3,10 +3,12 @@ Upstream source is available frop http://alioth.debian.org/projects/kgb
 Upstream authors:
  Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org
  Damyan Ivanov d...@debian.org
+ gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org
 
 Copyright:
 # Copyright © 2008 Martín Ferrari
 # Copyright © 2008,2009,2010 Damyan Ivanov
+# Copyright © 2010 gregor herrmann
 
 License:
 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
diff --git a/lib/App/KGB.pm b/lib/App/KGB.pm
index 2d3294d..be9c5b8 100644
--- a/lib/App/KGB.pm
+++ b/lib/App/KGB.pm
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ App::KGB - collabourative IRC helper
 
 =cut
 
-our $VERSION = '1.04';
+our $VERSION = '1.05';
 
 =head1 DESCRIPTION
 
diff --git a/script/kgb-bot b/script/kgb-bot
index 4fede8a..92b3aa2 100755
--- a/script/kgb-bot
+++ b/script/kgb-bot
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ use utf8;
 # KGB - an IRC bot helping collaboration
 # Copyright © 2008 Martín Ferrari
 # Copyright © 2008,2009,2010 Damyan Ivanov
+#

Re: Permission to fix bug #576127 in ncurses

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 16:32:44 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:

 Craig uploaded it, and it has already been built on all release
 architectures.
 
Unblocked.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Pre-clearance for aide bug fix of #596230

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 20:36:15 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:

 What would the release team prefer to get these fixes into squeeze:
 
 - upload aide 0.15.1 to unstable, let it migrate to squeeze
 - update aide 0.15 with the patches that virtually make it aide 0.15.1?
 - Add the rule patches or not?
 
 Please indicate what you would prefer.
 
0.15.1 should be ok.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Freeze exception request for opencv

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:26:31 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I'd like to ask for a freeze exception for opencv 2.1.0-2.
 
 opencv had a problem of FTBFS on hppa[0], but deleted hppa 
 from unstable[1].
 
 Please unblock this package.
 
 [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590977
 [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596190
 
opencv has reverse dependencies with hppa binary packages.  That needs
to get fixed one way or another.

In unstable, that's:

Source: freej (0.10git20100110-1)
Source: frei0r
Source: kipi-plugins
Source: libdecodeqr
Source: mrpt
Source: player

Not to mention it's fairly late to be introducing a new upstream version
in testing, not fixing any RC bug.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#592900: Updating system-config-printer

2010-09-13 Thread Michael Biebl

On 06.09.2010 22:54, David Kalnischkies wrote:

 A question which i have in mind since i read that the mentioned
 packages are not compatible as they are in different namespaces:
 Is this breaks just here to remove the package from the system?
 If so, thats not the idea behind breaks…
 If they are co-installable they should be co-installable,
 end-of-support is not an other word for breaking away packages
 as it breaks third-party archives as well as self-builds.
 Let autoremove and co handle these instead…

I tested a lenny→squeeze upgrade of a default GNOME desktop installation.
aptitude is much more aggressive in removing unused packages, e.g. during the
upgrade dead packages like dhcdbd are not removed by apt, whereas they are with
aptitude.
I ran apt-get autoremove after the dist-upgrade, but it did not remove any 
packages!

Michael


[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596654
-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: ed2k-hash, unblock and have sparc try a rebuild

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 20:45:04 -0400, Ariel wrote:

 
 ed2k-hash should enter testing, the only reason it's not in testing
 already is that sparc ran out of space on a build.
 
 So sparc should try a rebuild, then the entire package should move
 to testing (especially since the bug that is fixed is pretty
 severe).
 
Given back.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596706: marked as done (unblock: xorg-server/2:1.7.7-6)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:05:58 +0200
with message-id 20100913170558.gb4...@ftbfs.de
and subject line Re: Bug#596706: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.7.7-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #596706,
regarding unblock: xorg-server/2:1.7.7-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596706: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596706
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Essentially two patches from upstream, fixing wrapping/unwrapping of
EnterVT throughout the tree.

xorg-server (2:1.7.7-6) unstable; urgency=low

  * Unwrap/rewrap EnterVT/LeaveVT completely.  Because some EnterVT code needs
to remove itself from the call chain, we need to fix all of the wrappers
to correctly unwrap/rewrap during the call chain.  Followup to the fix in
the previous upload, pointed out and tested by Sven Joachim, thanks!
(closes: #596012, #595973, #595776)

 -- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org  Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:06:02 +0200

xorg-server (2:1.7.7-5) unstable; urgency=low

  [ Julien Cristau ]
  * Clean up RandR12 bits on screen close.  Avoids infinite recursion on
EnterVT in the second server generation (closes: #595386).

  [ Cyril Brulebois ]
  * Upload to unstable.

 -- Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org  Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:57:55 +0200

There'll probably be a few more fixes before release, and we need to
sort out the xserver-xorg-video-intel situation, but for now, please:

unblock xorg-server/2:1.7.7-6

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi, 

On Mon Sep 13, 2010 at 17:56:26 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 unblock xorg-server/2:1.7.7-6

done


-- 
 Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org  | Debian System Administrator
 Debian  GNU/Linux Developer   |   Debian Listmaster
 Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc   -   KeyID: 5D64 F870
 GPG Fingerprint:  5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7  302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870


---End Message---

Re: Bug #566650: Please unblock dtc 0.32.2-1

2010-09-13 Thread Thomas Goirand

Philipp Kern wrote:
 Seems most of the PHP disaster is actually due to non-communication on
 the public -release list?

Hi,

If you wish to discuss this topic, you are welcome to do so, but not in
this thread please (and feel free to add me as Cc:, I'd be happy to read
as well, as I read -release only through gmane when I feel I need to).

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8e57d9.5050...@debian.org

Bug#596717: unblock: software-center/2.0.7debian5

2010-09-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package software-center

This update fixes a release critical bug (not working)
caused by API changes in Xapian. You may want to push
this to testing ASAP, as the current version in testing
is completely unusable and the changes are small; that
is, s/m\[xapian.MSET_DOCUMENT\]/m.document/g is done
on the code.

unblock software-center/2.0.7debian5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (350, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.


pgp158Oaq4vtH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#592900: Updating system-config-printer

2010-09-13 Thread David Kalnischkies

2010/9/13 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org:
 On 06.09.2010 22:54, David Kalnischkies wrote:

 A question which i have in mind since i read that the mentioned
 packages are not compatible as they are in different namespaces:
 Is this breaks just here to remove the package from the system?
 If so, thats not the idea behind breaks…
 If they are co-installable they should be co-installable,
 end-of-support is not an other word for breaking away packages
 as it breaks third-party archives as well as self-builds.
 Let autoremove and co handle these instead…

 I tested a lenny→squeeze upgrade of a default GNOME desktop installation.
 aptitude is much more aggressive in removing unused packages, e.g. during the
 upgrade dead packages like dhcdbd are not removed by apt, whereas they are 
 with
 aptitude.

aptitude nukes autoremove packages directly in the upgrade run.
apt-get can do this too, but it is disabled by default and deferred to an
autoremove run… (as far as i know you can't disable it in aptitude).


 I ran apt-get autoremove after the dist-upgrade, but it did not remove any 
 packages!

You are bitten by the silly bug #594689 fixed in 0.8.1 and above
which is not yet in testing. We are busy waiting currently a bit for
the incoming bug-rate to stabilize and last translations updates
to come in before bothering the release team again…
(beside that i was a bit short on time thanks to a few exams).


Best regards

David Kalnischkies


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim92oh_n8tqxkc8g8njptvjvhv1xjvhp6eqg...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#596364: unblock: cracklib2/2.8.16-3

2010-09-13 Thread Jan Dittberner

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:24:59PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
 On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:31:27PM +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote:
  I checked all Breaks, Provides and Conflicts statements in debian/control. 
  They
  all refer to version prior to Lenny. The binary package python-crack was a
  transitional package in Lenny the other were even older. I think it is best 
  to
  remove all the unnecessary Provides, Conflicts and Breaks.
 
 I think you need to retain the conflicts against python-crack then, because it
 should still get deinstalled on upgrades to squeeze.

I re-added the Conflicts: python-crack (an updated debdiff is attached to this
mail). I tested the upgrade from Lenny with the installed transitional package
to this version and it removed python-crack properly.

Please tell me whether you would unblock an upload with this change.


Regards
Jan Dittberner

-- 
Jan Dittberner - Debian Developer
GPG-key: 4096R/558FB8DD 2009-05-10
 B2FF 1D95 CE8F 7A22 DF4C  F09B A73E 0055 558F B8DD
http://ddportfolio.debian.net/ - http://people.debian.org/~jandd/
diff -Nru cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/changelog cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/changelog
--- cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/changelog	2010-09-10 18:44:28.0 +0200
+++ cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/changelog	2010-09-13 19:00:08.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+cracklib2 (2.8.16-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/control: remove Conflicts, Provides and Breaks refering to versions
+and packages before Lenny, keep python-cracklib's Conflicts with
+python-crack to force deinstallation of transitional package
+
+ -- Jan Dittberner ja...@debian.org  Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:00:03 +0200
+
 cracklib2 (2.8.16-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/control: update to Standards-Version to 3.9.1
diff -Nru cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/control cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/control
--- cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/control	2010-09-10 18:44:28.0 +0200
+++ cracklib2-2.8.16/debian/control	2010-09-13 19:00:08.0 +0200
@@ -16,10 +16,6 @@
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
 Recommends: cracklib-runtime
-Conflicts: cracklib2.6
-Breaks: cracklib2 ( 2.8.12-1)
-Provides: cracklib2
-Replaces: cracklib2.6, cracklib2 ( 2.8.12-1)
 Description: pro-active password checker library
  Shared library for cracklib2 which contains a C function which may be
  used in a passwd like program. The idea is simple: try to prevent
@@ -33,10 +29,6 @@
 Architecture: any
 Depends: libcrack2 (=${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}
 Recommends: cracklib-runtime
-Provides: cracklib-dev, cracklib2-dev
-Conflicts: cracklib-dev
-Breaks: cracklib2-dev ( 2.8.12-1)
-Replaces: cracklib-dev, cracklib2-dev ( 2.8.12-1)
 Description: pro-active password checker library - development files
  Header files, static libraries, documentation, and symbolic links
  developers using cracklib2 will need.
@@ -64,7 +56,6 @@
  (=${binary:Version})
 Provides: ${python:Provides}
 Conflicts: python-crack
-Replaces: python-crack
 XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions}
 Description: Python bindings for password checker library cracklib2
  This package provides Python bindings for cracklib. It contains a


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596720: unblock: python-debianbts/1.9

2010-09-13 Thread Sandro Tosi

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package python-debianbts

python-debianbts recevied a lot of attention lately, in
particular durin DebConf and it would be nice to have it in
Squeeze: it contains several fixed related to utf-8 crashed,
along with documentation improvement and a wide t est suite.

I'm not the maintainer (X-Debbugs-CC'ed) but since I happen to
use that package, and after agreement from the mai nt himself,
I'm asking for an unblock.

unblock python-debianbts/1.9

Regards,
Sandro

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.34-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100913172131.22449.31739.report...@zion.matrix.int

Re: Bugfixes for icinga-core

2010-09-13 Thread Alexander Wirt

Julien Cristau schrieb am Monday, den 13. September 2010:

Hi, 

  0003-modify-execv-to-execvp-accepting-4096-cmd-args-for-b.patch,
  0004-execvp-searches-in-PATH-too-like-popen-and-returns-i.patch:
  1.0.2 included a new heuristic to detect if a check could be executed 
  without
  a shell to speed up things. Unfortunatly that heuristic had some critical
  bugs. One of the is that a command can only have 20-1 arguments which often
  is not enough. The second of the patches fixes PATH lookups for check
  commands. 
  
 Wouldn't it be easier/safer to just fork a shell every time, if the
 heuristic is unreliable?
AFAIR (I don't have the code by hand) we removed the feature (I was never
happy with it) in the last version. But so far, just a bugfix for 1.0.3 to
make the changes no to big.  

Alex


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913174059.gb8...@nelson.snow-crash.org

Bug#596722: unblock: fbreader/0.10.7dfsg-4

2010-09-13 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Please unblock new fbreader in unstable. It fixes recently reported RC
bug #596575.

Full diff attached.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
diff -u fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/changelog fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/changelog
--- fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/changelog
+++ fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+fbreader (0.10.7dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * debian/control:
+- Use source:Version for dependencies on arch-independent packages.
+  Thanks to Julien Cristau for the report. Fixes FTBFS on BinNMUs.
+  (Closes: #596575)
+- Updated my mail address.
+- Removed DM-Upload-Allowed, not needed anymore.
+
+ -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org  Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:23:29 +0300
+
 fbreader (0.10.7dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/control:
diff -u fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/control fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/control
--- fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/control
+++ fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/control
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
 Source: fbreader
 Section: text
 Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Eugene V. Lyubimkin jackyf.de...@gmail.com
-DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
+Maintainer: Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org
 Standards-Version: 3.8.3
 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), libgtk2.0-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, libqt4-dev,
   libexpat1-dev, libbz2-dev, libz-dev, libhildon-1-dev, libosso-dev,
@@ -39,7 +38,7 @@
 Package: libzlcore0.10
 Section: libs
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, libzlcore-data (= ${binary:Version})
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, libzlcore-data (= ${source:Version})
 Conflicts: fbreader-gtk, fbreader-qt, fbreader-qt4
 Description: ZLibrary cross-platform development library (shared library)
  This is the core of ZLibrary, the library that the fbreader e-book reader
@@ -65,7 +64,7 @@
 Section: libs
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, libzlcore0.10 (= ${binary:Version}),
-  libzltext-data (= ${binary:Version})
+  libzltext-data (= ${source:Version})
 Description: ZLibrary text model/viewer part (shared library)
  This package provides text model/viewer part of ZLibrary. See also 
  libzlcore0.10 package.

Re: Accepted orc 0.4.7-1 (source all amd64)

Hi Sebastian,

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:17:08 +, Sebastian Dröge wrote:

  orc (0.4.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
  .
* New upstream release:
  + debian/rules:
- Update shlibs version for API additions.

That's not exactly helpful in the middle of a freeze, since it means
reverse-deps get stuck with a dependency that's not satisfied in
testing.  The changes aren't small either, so I'm not looking forward to
reviewing this.  So what's your plan for orc in squeeze?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596722: marked as done (unblock: fbreader/0.10.7dfsg-4)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:15:45 +0100
with message-id 
1284401746.23417.217.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#596722: unblock: fbreader/0.10.7dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #596722,
regarding unblock: fbreader/0.10.7dfsg-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596722
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Please unblock new fbreader in unstable. It fixes recently reported RC
bug #596575.

Full diff attached.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
diff -u fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/changelog fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/changelog
--- fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/changelog
+++ fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+fbreader (0.10.7dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * debian/control:
+- Use source:Version for dependencies on arch-independent packages.
+  Thanks to Julien Cristau for the report. Fixes FTBFS on BinNMUs.
+  (Closes: #596575)
+- Updated my mail address.
+- Removed DM-Upload-Allowed, not needed anymore.
+
+ -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org  Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:23:29 +0300
+
 fbreader (0.10.7dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/control:
diff -u fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/control fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/control
--- fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/control
+++ fbreader-0.10.7dfsg/debian/control
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
 Source: fbreader
 Section: text
 Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Eugene V. Lyubimkin jackyf.de...@gmail.com
-DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
+Maintainer: Eugene V. Lyubimkin jac...@debian.org
 Standards-Version: 3.8.3
 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), libgtk2.0-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, libqt4-dev,
   libexpat1-dev, libbz2-dev, libz-dev, libhildon-1-dev, libosso-dev,
@@ -39,7 +38,7 @@
 Package: libzlcore0.10
 Section: libs
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, libzlcore-data (= ${binary:Version})
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, libzlcore-data (= ${source:Version})
 Conflicts: fbreader-gtk, fbreader-qt, fbreader-qt4
 Description: ZLibrary cross-platform development library (shared library)
  This is the core of ZLibrary, the library that the fbreader e-book reader
@@ -65,7 +64,7 @@
 Section: libs
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, libzlcore0.10 (= ${binary:Version}),
-  libzltext-data (= ${binary:Version})
+  libzltext-data (= ${source:Version})
 Description: ZLibrary text model/viewer part (shared library)
  This package provides text model/viewer part of ZLibrary. See also 
  libzlcore0.10 package.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 20:43 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
 Please unblock new fbreader in unstable. It fixes recently reported RC
 bug #596575.

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam

---End Message---

Re: virtualbox hopefully for the last time

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 12:34 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
 as Zobel just pointed out, version 3.2.6 is not distributable because Oracle
 forgot to change some copyrights. Therefore I think we are forced to use 3.2.8
 which is fine copyright wise afaict. I'm planning just another upload (ideally
 today) to fix some problems with 3.2.8, namely:
 
 - Incorrect dependencies (#595715)
 - Problems with kernel 2.6.36 (#594602)
 - Some manpages were added
 - Ftbfs with recent libdrm-dev (#594599)

Zobel unblocked 3.2.8-dfsg-2, which appears to be the upload you
mentioned above.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284402205.23417.259.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Re: Request for packaging calendarserver in squeeze

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 23:59:31 +0530, Rahul Amaram wrote:

 I am the new maintainer for the calendarserver and
 python-twisted-calendarserver. I have been working with the previous
 maintainer (Guido) closely in getting the latest version of calendarserver
 packaged.
 
I unblocked this on the basis that it was in lenny, doesn't have
(AFAIK?) a straightforward alternative, and can be removed pre-release
if bugs are reported and not fixed.  Which means I won't hesitate to do
that.  You've been warned ;)

Enjoy.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Accepted orc 0.4.7-1 (source all amd64)

2010-09-13 Thread Sebastian Dröge

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 19:50 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 Hi Sebastian,
 
 On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:17:08 +, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
 
   orc (0.4.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
   .
 * New upstream release:
   + debian/rules:
 - Update shlibs version for API additions.
 
 That's not exactly helpful in the middle of a freeze, since it means
 reverse-deps get stuck with a dependency that's not satisfied in
 testing.  The changes aren't small either, so I'm not looking forward to
 reviewing this.  So what's your plan for orc in squeeze?

Hrm, this should've go to experimental instead of unstable. I'll upload
a 1:0.4.6-1 later, which will be the same as previous 0.4.6-1. Sorry


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Request for packaging calendarserver in squeeze

2010-09-13 Thread Patrick Matthäi

Am 13.09.2010 20:44, schrieb Julien Cristau:
 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 23:59:31 +0530, Rahul Amaram wrote:
 
 I am the new maintainer for the calendarserver and
 python-twisted-calendarserver. I have been working with the previous
 maintainer (Guido) closely in getting the latest version of calendarserver
 packaged.

 I unblocked this on the basis that it was in lenny, doesn't have
 (AFAIK?) a straightforward alternative, and can be removed pre-release
 if bugs are reported and not fixed.  Which means I won't hesitate to do
 that.  You've been warned ;)

Sorry for the list spam, but a big thank you @ the release team at all
and also for this decision (as I am myself a calendarserver user). :)

-- 
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
 Patrick Matthäi
 GNU/Linux Debian Developer

E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@linux-dev.org

Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#596733: unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20100808-1 (as -2)

2010-09-13 Thread Aaron M. Ucko

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Greetings!

ncbi-tools6 recently had its first upstream release in a year, issued
a few days before your latest announcement. (As the version number
indicates, the sources themselves are somewhat older; however, the
public release thereof didn't occur until August 27.) Here's the
changelog block:

ncbi-tools6 (6.1.20100808-1) experimental; urgency=low

* New upstream release; the upgrade to BLAST 2.2.24 (from 2.2.21) should
address a formatdb regression. (LP: #586219.)
* Uploading to experimental because squeeze is frozen.
* debian/rules
- Clean up compilation settings; in particular, use dpkg-buildflags rather
than relying on dpkg-buildpackage to have set CFLAGS appropriately.
- (clean): restore expected empty directories if necessary,
for compatibility with VCSes (notably git) that don't track them.
- (install-indep-stamp): adapt to new ncbilogo.ico contents.
- (VIB): add asndisc, as upstream takes care to publish binaries thereof.
* debian/ncbi-tools6.install: likewise add asndisc.
* (debian/).gitignore: Ignore content generated during build.
* debian/lib{ncbi6,vibrant6a}.symbols: update for latest release.
* make/makenet.unx: don't link asndisc against extraneous libraries.
* doc/man/*.1: update for latest release.
* doc/man/asndisc.1: throw together a man page for asndisc.
* doc/man/cleanasn.1: fix SEE ALSO formatting.
* debian/control:
- bump dpkg-dev build-dep to = 1.15.7 for dpkg-buildflags.
- Standards-Version: 3.9.1 (already compliant).
- note switch to git-mediated Debian-Med team maintenance.

-- Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:43:17 -0400

In particular, please note that this upload fixes a nasty regression
reported in Launchpad:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ncbi-tools6/+bug/586219

There's no corresponding Debian bug report at present, but I can
formally issue one if you'd like. ;-)

At any rate, I uploaded my packages of the new release to experimental
out of respect for the freeze, but would greatly appreciate it if you
could please authorize a reupload to unstable with the intent of
making it into squeeze. I concede that the diff

http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-med/ncbi-tools6.git;a=commitdiff;hp=3a98718;h=c4b77b0

is on the large side; however, the impact on reverse dependencies
should be negligible, as most of the changed interfaces are only used
internally. (Also, leaving out changes to spacing and fully generated
files helps a fair bit; the result is still larger than I care to
attach :-/, but I've posted a copy at

http://people.debian.org/~ucko/ncbi-tools6_6.1.20100808-1.full-diff

that you're welcome to review as you see fit.)

Per reportbug, I'm including the relevant unblock directive for your
convenience:

unblock ncbi-tools6/6.1.20100808-2

Thanks in advance for considering this request; please let me know if
you have any questions or concerns.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20100913183621.28829.67353.report...@tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net

Please unblock flashbake 0.26.2-4

2010-09-13 Thread Abhishek Dasgupta

Hi,

Previously, without a minimum python version, the system would try to
compile for 2.4 as well leading to an error message. It has been in
unstable for 13 days. Only changes are to debian/watch and
debian/control.

flashbake (0.26.2-4) unstable; urgency=low

   * Fix debian/watch.
   * Specify minimum Python version as 2.5 (Closes: #594192)

Regards,
Abhishek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikwwgrpo72efltxcumt3dt9akaihmk_hwd-b...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#596670: unblock: perdition/1.19~rc3-1

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 18:17 +0900, Horms wrote:
 Perdition 1.19~rc4-1 includes several important fixes and I would like it
 considered for inclusion in Squeeze.  As it coincides with an upstream
 release (1.19-rc4) it also contains one or two (minor) changes that don't
 strictly meet the criteria for the freeze.

Does the versioning imply that 1.19 is likely to be released soon?  If
so, are you likely to be requesting a further exception for that?

 changeset:   867:86df56cded53
 user:Christophe Ségui christophe.se...@math.univ-toulouse.fr
 date:Thu Sep 09 21:34:24 2010 +0900
 summary: Correct parsing of NIS map
 
   This is a bug that I believe is worthy of fixing for Squeeze

This appears to be #596102 (the attribution above matches the bug's
submitter), although that isn't mentioned in the changelog.

Regards,

Adam



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284404303.23417.440.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Re: Accepted orc 0.4.7-1 (source all amd64)

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 20:42 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
 On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 19:50 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
  Hi Sebastian,
  
  On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:17:08 +, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
  
orc (0.4.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
  * New upstream release:
+ debian/rules:
  - Update shlibs version for API additions.
  
  That's not exactly helpful in the middle of a freeze, since it means
  reverse-deps get stuck with a dependency that's not satisfied in
  testing.  The changes aren't small either, so I'm not looking forward to
  reviewing this.  So what's your plan for orc in squeeze?
 
 Hrm, this should've go to experimental instead of unstable. I'll upload
 a 1:0.4.6-1 later, which will be the same as previous 0.4.6-1. Sorry

That should be 1:0.4.6-2 or similar; package filenames don't include
epochs so the packages for 0.4.6-1 (which is still in testing) and
1:0.4.6-1 would have the same filenames.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284404677.23417.475.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

soci package back in squeeze?

2010-09-13 Thread Julian Taylor

Hi,
I have a question about the package soci which was removed from debian
two weeks ago due to orphanage. See bug #520746
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soci.html
http://soci.sourceforge.net/

Unfortunately I was a bit too late to adopt it.
Given that it was in squeeze up to a short while ago and it is still in
lenny, is there the possibility to get it back into squeeze if I adopt
it?
There was only one bug reported against it which I can fix (#583846)
But I would need sponsoring.

Upstream is still active and is currently working on a new release which
I intend to package in any case (obviously not for squeeze)

All patches currently in the debian package have bee incorporated into
upstream and I am willing to backport all bugfixes which have
accumulated since the last release of the library.

Best Regards,
Julian Taylor


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: unblock request for vzctl

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 22:22:09 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:

 vzctl (3.0.24-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 
--- vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.preinst
+++ vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.preinst
@@ -19,12 +19,22 @@
 install)
 ;;
 upgrade)
+# Upgrade path, vz cron file no longer needed as vzeventd exist
+   # instead.
+   # From lenny
+if [ -e /etc/cron.d/vz ] ; then
+   rm -f /etc/cron.d/vz
+   fi
+   # From etch
+   if [ -e /etc/vz/cron/vz ] ; then
+   rm -f /etc/vz/cron/vz
+   fi
 # Upgrade path for (etch version) cron files.
 if [ -e /etc/cron.d/vpsnetclean ] ; then
-   mv /etc/cron.d/vpsnetclean /etc/cron.d/vpsnetclean,disabled
+   rm -f /etc/cron.d/vpsnetclean
fi
 if [ -e /etc/cron.d/vpsreboot ] ; then
-   mv /etc/cron.d/vpsreboot /etc/cron.d/vpsreboot,disabled
+   rm -f /etc/cron.d/vpsreboot
fi
 ;;
 

Removing possibly modified configuration files is a severe policy
violation.

diff -u vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
--- vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
+++ vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
@@ -52,6 +41,25 @@
rm $NAMECFG
fi
done
+fi
+   # This is not an upgrade, check if we should start it as well.
+   if [ -d /proc/vz ] ; then
+   if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ] ; then
+   invoke-rc.d vz start || true
+   else
+   /etc/init.d/vz start || true
+   fi
+   else
+   echo The kernel do not support openvz, do not start vz.
+   fi
+   if [ -e /sys/module/vzevent/parameters/reboot_event ] ; then
+   if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ] ; then
+   invoke-rc.d vzeventd start || true
+   else
+   /etc/init.d/vzeventd start || true
+   fi
+   else
+   echo The kernel do not support vzevent, do not start vzeventd.
fi
 ;;
 

Why are you ignoring errors from the init script?

It looks like you've done the autotools run with older versions
(automake 1.10 instead of 1.11)?  That makes the diff quite a bit larger
than it would otherwise be.

Why does src/vzctl-actions.c now ignore malloc() failure?

The upstart fix doesn't seem necessary, although probably harmless..

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Please unblock flashbake 0.26.2-4

On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:11 +0530, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote:
 Previously, without a minimum python version, the system would try to
 compile for 2.4 as well leading to an error message. It has been in
 unstable for 13 days. Only changes are to debian/watch and
 debian/control.
 
 flashbake (0.26.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
* Fix debian/watch.
* Specify minimum Python version as 2.5 (Closes: #594192)

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284405961.23417.581.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Bug#596658: unblock: libapache-mod-musicindex/1.3.5-1

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 07:08 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
 The current libapache-mod-musicindex has a memory access bug
 (pointer accessed outside scope), causing it to return an invalid
 Content-Disposition for playlist downloads. This is primarily
 inconvenient to users (whose default handler application will not be
 respected, as the browser is required by the standard to ask what to
 do if it cannot decipher the Content-Disposition.

`cvers` TINYINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL, /* XXX this should be useless since we 
trash the whole cache on version bums... */

I think there might be a typo at the end of that comment ;-)

Looking at the bug report for this issue, the maintainer doesn't seem to
think that this even qualifies for normal severity, which doesn't
really sound like freeze exception material (I realise this a leaf
package).

Regards,

Adam



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1284406653.23417.650.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Re: virtualbox hopefully for the last time

2010-09-13 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas

Hi, 

On Mon Sep 13, 2010 at 19:23:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 12:34 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
  as Zobel just pointed out, version 3.2.6 is not distributable because Oracle
  forgot to change some copyrights. Therefore I think we are forced to use 
  3.2.8
  which is fine copyright wise afaict. I'm planning just another upload 
  (ideally
  today) to fix some problems with 3.2.8, namely:
  
  - Incorrect dependencies (#595715)
  - Problems with kernel 2.6.36 (#594602)
  - Some manpages were added
  - Ftbfs with recent libdrm-dev (#594599)
 
 Zobel unblocked 3.2.8-dfsg-2, which appears to be the upload you
 mentioned above.

yes, i did unblock it, but i bumped the urgency from high to medium via 
age-days.

Cheers,
Martin
-- 
 Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org  | Debian System Administrator
 Debian  GNU/Linux Developer   |   Debian Listmaster
 Public key http://zobel.ftbfs.de/5d64f870.asc   -   KeyID: 5D64 F870
 GPG Fingerprint:  5DB3 1301 375A A50F 07E7  302F 493E FB8E 5D64 F870


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913194405.gd4...@ftbfs.de

Bug#596744: RM: debgtd/1.3.1-1

2010-09-13 Thread Jon Dowland

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Hi - please remove debgtd from testing.

As the maintainer, I do not feel that the package as it
currently stands is particularly useful, or suitable for a
stable release.

Many thanks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913195101.ga11...@tchicaya.lan

Re: Bug#578458: still fails to build

2010-09-13 Thread gregor herrmann

On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:46:49 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:

  I've prepared a new libcoro-perl release in our svn repo which
  - removes the cruft from debian/rules
  - bumps the build and runtime dependency on libanyevent-perl to 
= 5.271-2
  
  On a second thought: libcoro-perl 5.210-1 in testing should be fine
  with the newer libanyevent-perl and a round of binNMUs; and we can
  still test this and do the cleanup by uploading 5.230-4 to unstable.
  Hm.
 
 +1 to the second thought, except that I don't see any need for binNMUs.

Oh, right, if this is only a problem at build time we don't need it.
 
 Uploading libcoro-perl 5.230-4 to sid doesn't change anything wrt. squeeze
 (squeeze and sid already have different versions) and therefore isn't
 really in the release team domain. However, it's the easiest way to
 confirm that the fix works and to clean away the unnecessary backend
 selection code. I think you should go ahead.

Done now, thanks for again helping to think this through.
 
 If 5.230-4 builds everywhere, I think this bug (#578458) should be closed
 outright. I should really have reassigned it instead of cloning.

I haven't closed it in the upload and will monitor the buildd page.
 
 From the release point of view, I think just unblocking libanyevent-perl
 5.271-2 for squeeze should be enough. 

Thanks, Julien!

 The libcoro-perl version in squeeze
 (5.210) should indeed be fine, and if there's a need to get 5.230 in that
 should be a separate discussion.

Ack.
 
 Apologies, the confusion was probably because of my earlier comment about
 cleaning the backend selection code for squeeze. That's not necessary
 because the code never got in squeeze in the first place.

No worries, I manage to confuse myself on my own often enough :)

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin,  developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-NP: Eric Clapton: Willie And The Hand Jive


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596744: marked as done (RM: debgtd/1.3.1-1)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:15:24 +0100
with message-id 
1284408924.25401.15.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
and subject line Re: Bug#596744: RM: debgtd/1.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #596744,
regarding RM: debgtd/1.3.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596744: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596744
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Hi - please remove debgtd from testing.

As the maintainer, I do not feel that the package as it
currently stands is particularly useful, or suitable for a
stable release.

Many thanks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 20:51 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
 Hi - please remove debgtd from testing.
 
 As the maintainer, I do not feel that the package as it
 currently stands is particularly useful, or suitable for a
 stable release.

Removal hint added.

Regards,

Adam

---End Message---

Re: soci package back in squeeze?

2010-09-13 Thread Neil Williams

On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:23:18 +0200
Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Unfortunately I was a bit too late to adopt it.

umm, like a year.

 Given that it was in squeeze up to a short while ago and it is still
 in lenny,

(Having it in lenny hasn't anything to do with whether it should be in
squeeze.)

 is there the possibility to get it back into squeeze if I
 adopt it?

Is there any realistic prospect of this actually happening? soci was
orphaned for eighteen months before being removed! 

 Upstream is still active and is currently working on a new release
 which I intend to package in any case (obviously not for squeeze)

Upstream has been pretending to do stuff for 2 years. There is little
prospect of a new upstream release before Squeeze is released IMHO. The
proposed upload is yet another not-yet-released-made-up-version
+random-git-noise mess. That's no better than the
not-yet-released-made-up-version-random-cvs-noise version which was
removed.

3.0.0 has been unreleased now for nearly three years.

Packaging soci for Wheezy would appear to be a pipe dream. If you've
got time to do anything with soci, join upstream and get the release
out. If not, find something more useful to do please. Debian doesn't
need soci IMHO.

 All patches currently in the debian package have bee incorporated into
 upstream and I am willing to backport all bugfixes which have
 accumulated since the last release of the library.

What possible justification is there for putting the package back into
Squeeze when nothing has actually changed since it was removed?

-- 


Neil Williams
=
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/



pgpRcJ4xREQE4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: unblock request for vzctl

2010-09-13 Thread Ola Lundqvist

Hi Julien

Thanks for checking the package.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:24:01PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 22:22:09 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
 
  vzctl (3.0.24-5) unstable; urgency=medium
  
 --- vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.preinst
 +++ vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.preinst
 @@ -19,12 +19,22 @@
  install)
  ;;
  upgrade)
 +# Upgrade path, vz cron file no longer needed as vzeventd exist
 +   # instead.
 +   # From lenny
 +if [ -e /etc/cron.d/vz ] ; then
 +   rm -f /etc/cron.d/vz
 +   fi
 +   # From etch
 +   if [ -e /etc/vz/cron/vz ] ; then
 +   rm -f /etc/vz/cron/vz
 +   fi
  # Upgrade path for (etch version) cron files.
  if [ -e /etc/cron.d/vpsnetclean ] ; then
 -   mv /etc/cron.d/vpsnetclean /etc/cron.d/vpsnetclean,disabled
 +   rm -f /etc/cron.d/vpsnetclean
 fi
  if [ -e /etc/cron.d/vpsreboot ] ; then
 -   mv /etc/cron.d/vpsreboot /etc/cron.d/vpsreboot,disabled
 +   rm -f /etc/cron.d/vpsreboot
 fi
  ;;
  
 
 Removing possibly modified configuration files is a severe policy
 violation.

Yes you are right. I thought the package should be cleaned up as this
functionality really do not have any meaning anymore.
But you are right, I overlooked how this should be performed. Will disable
them instead and remove in purge.

Uploaded fixed version now.

vzctl (3.0.24-6) unstable; urgency=low

  * Configuration files are not allowed to be removed on upgrade. Solved.

 -- Ola Lundqvist o...@debian.org  Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:57:44 +0200

 diff -u vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
 --- vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
 +++ vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
 @@ -52,6 +41,25 @@
 rm $NAMECFG
 fi
 done
 +fi
 +   # This is not an upgrade, check if we should start it as well.
 +   if [ -d /proc/vz ] ; then
 +   if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ] ; then
 +   invoke-rc.d vz start || true
 +   else
 +   /etc/init.d/vz start || true
 +   fi
 +   else
 +   echo The kernel do not support openvz, do not start vz.
 +   fi
 +   if [ -e /sys/module/vzevent/parameters/reboot_event ] ; then
 +   if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ] ; then
 +   invoke-rc.d vzeventd start || true
 +   else
 +   /etc/init.d/vzeventd start || true
 +   fi
 +   else
 +   echo The kernel do not support vzevent, do not start vzeventd.
 fi
  ;;
  
 
 Why are you ignoring errors from the init script?

Good question. It is a practice of mine to make sure that upgrade
do not fail just because of some issue during the startup. Especially
important as this one checks for kernel modules which may be provided
by custom kernels. Do you have a problem with that?

 It looks like you've done the autotools run with older versions
 (automake 1.10 instead of 1.11)?  That makes the diff quite a bit larger
 than it would otherwise be.

Yes. I run stable here, except for some few backported tools. So, yes
it is larger than necessary.

 Why does src/vzctl-actions.c now ignore malloc() failure?

It was part of 'Revert Check for memory granted by get_dist_name'.
See
http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=9588ecbb8c8e3b628a1187e88d664662b83c97d5
There were issues with the change in 3.0.24.

 The upstart fix doesn't seem necessary, although probably harmless..

I'm not sure what upstart fix you are referring to.

If you are referring to the change in vzeventd, then yes it should be harmless.
Not strictly necessary but could be useful
for people. I thought it would be useful to add as this was the first
time this script was introduced anyway.

If you are referring to the solution for #411902, I solved that one as
vzeventd should be started on install. I made sure vz was also
started at the same time.

Or did you refer to something else?

Best regards,

// Ola

 Cheers,
 Julien



-- 
 --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology 
/  o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\
|  o...@debian.org   654 65 KARLSTAD|
|  http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
 ---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913201051.ga18...@inguza.net

Bug#596749: RM: symfony/1.0.21-2

2010-09-13 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Please remove symfony from testing. It contains security sensitive
code copies and should not enter a stable release if it's orphaned.
Popcon is also very low. We can leave it in unstable for now, though.

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de_de.iso-8859...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100913200717.3235.95629.report...@localhost.localdomain

Re: unblock request for vzctl

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:10:51 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:

  diff -u vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst 
  vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
  --- vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
  +++ vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
  @@ -52,6 +41,25 @@
  rm $NAMECFG
  fi
  done
  +fi
  +   # This is not an upgrade, check if we should start it as well.
  +   if [ -d /proc/vz ] ; then
  +   if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ] ; then
  +   invoke-rc.d vz start || true
  +   else
  +   /etc/init.d/vz start || true
  +   fi
  +   else
  +   echo The kernel do not support openvz, do not start vz.
  +   fi
  +   if [ -e /sys/module/vzevent/parameters/reboot_event ] ; then
  +   if [ -x /usr/sbin/invoke-rc.d ] ; then
  +   invoke-rc.d vzeventd start || true
  +   else
  +   /etc/init.d/vzeventd start || true
  +   fi
  +   else
  +   echo The kernel do not support vzevent, do not start vzeventd.
  fi
   ;;
   
  
  Why are you ignoring errors from the init script?
 
 Good question. It is a practice of mine to make sure that upgrade
 do not fail just because of some issue during the startup. Especially
 important as this one checks for kernel modules which may be provided
 by custom kernels. Do you have a problem with that?
 
Well, kind of, yeah.  If a service can't start for whatever reason then
I don't think it should be ignored and swept under the carpet.

  It looks like you've done the autotools run with older versions
  (automake 1.10 instead of 1.11)?  That makes the diff quite a bit larger
  than it would otherwise be.
 
 Yes. I run stable here, except for some few backported tools. So, yes
 it is larger than necessary.
 
  Why does src/vzctl-actions.c now ignore malloc() failure?
 
 It was part of 'Revert Check for memory granted by get_dist_name'.
 See
 http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=9588ecbb8c8e3b628a1187e88d664662b83c97d5
 There were issues with the change in 3.0.24.
 
  The upstart fix doesn't seem necessary, although probably harmless..
 
 I'm not sure what upstart fix you are referring to.
 
 If you are referring to the change in vzeventd, then yes it should be 
 harmless.
 Not strictly necessary but could be useful
 for people. I thought it would be useful to add as this was the first
 time this script was introduced anyway.
 
 If you are referring to the solution for #411902, I solved that one as
 vzeventd should be started on install. I made sure vz was also
 started at the same time.
 
 Or did you refer to something else?
 
I'm referring to the first and second hunks in
etc/dists/scripts/debian-add_ip.sh.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#596749: marked as done (RM: symfony/1.0.21-2)

Your message dated Mon, 13 Sep 2010 23:37:35 +0200
with message-id 20100913213735.gg3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#596749: RM: symfony/1.0.21-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #596749,
regarding RM: symfony/1.0.21-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Please remove symfony from testing. It contains security sensitive
code copies and should not enter a stable release if it's orphaned.
Popcon is also very low. We can leave it in unstable for now, though.

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de_de.iso-8859...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:07:17 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:

 Please remove symfony from testing. It contains security sensitive
 code copies and should not enter a stable release if it's orphaned.
 Popcon is also very low. We can leave it in unstable for now, though.
 
Removal hint added, thanks Moritz.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---

Re: soci package back in squeeze?

2010-09-13 Thread Julian Taylor

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 21:21 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
 On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:23:18 +0200
 Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
  Unfortunately I was a bit too late to adopt it.
 
 umm, like a year.

I'm sorry, I only recently decided to get more active in development of
debian.
Adopting a package seemed to me to be a good way to get my feet wet.
I choose soci because I consider it very useful and would like to keep
it in debian in some way.

 
  Given that it was in squeeze up to a short while ago and it is still
  in lenny,
 
 (Having it in lenny hasn't anything to do with whether it should be in
 squeeze.)
 
  is there the possibility to get it back into squeeze if I
  adopt it?
 
 Is there any realistic prospect of this actually happening? soci was
 orphaned for eighteen months before being removed! 

I would adopt it.
I just need a decision if it could be reincluded in squeeze.
If yes I'll take over the existing package and do whatever maintenance
is required.
If not I'll wait for the next upstream release and package it for
wheezy.

 
  Upstream is still active and is currently working on a new release
  which I intend to package in any case (obviously not for squeeze)
 
 Upstream has been pretending to do stuff for 2 years. There is little
 prospect of a new upstream release before Squeeze is released IMHO. The
 proposed upload is yet another not-yet-released-made-up-version
 +random-git-noise mess. That's no better than the
 not-yet-released-made-up-version-random-cvs-noise version which was
 removed.
 
 3.0.0 has been unreleased now for nearly three years.
 
 Packaging soci for Wheezy would appear to be a pipe dream. If you've
 got time to do anything with soci, join upstream and get the release
 out. If not, find something more useful to do please. Debian doesn't
 need soci IMHO.

I am working with upstream on the new release (basically a bugfix
release + new build system)
But it is unlikely that it will be released in time for squeeze.

 
  All patches currently in the debian package have bee incorporated into
  upstream and I am willing to backport all bugfixes which have
  accumulated since the last release of the library.
 
 What possible justification is there for putting the package back into
 Squeeze when nothing has actually changed since it was removed?
 

It was orphaned, now there is somebody who would adopt it.
This fixes the only reason why it was removed.
There were no serious bugs reported against it and the library works.
It lacks a bit of documentation in certain areas, but I've seen worse.

I consider this a possible justification.
If it is enough is up to the release managers.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#595602: unblock: subdownloader/2.0.13-1

2010-09-13 Thread Marco Rodrigues

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:

 On Sun, Sep  5, 2010 at 12:00:21 +0100, Marco Rodrigues wrote:

  Please unblock package subdownloader. The current stable version
  doesn't currently connect to API ( RC Bug ). This new 2.0.13 version

 Is that bug filed in the BTS?


No. It was reported in Launchpad / Ubuntu initially. Do I need to fill it ?




 only has a new method of connecting to http with better performance
  and locales updates.
 
  Relevant changes in Changelog:
 
  - Update translations from Launchpad.

 Why do some translated strings disappear from the greek translation?


Looks like they were removed from the translator at Launchpad for some
reason. I've just exported them from LP.

https://translations.launchpad.net/subdownloader/trunk/+pots/subdownloader/el/+translate?start=0batch=10show=untranslatedfield.alternative_language=field.alternative_language-empty-marker=1old_show=untranslated

They were removed and reviewed as empty. Is this a block or I need to upload
a new version with that strings (which I don't know what they mean, because
I don't know Greek) included?

Thanks.

-- 
Marco Rodrigues

http://www.marblehole.com

Re: Freeze exception request for opencv

2010-09-13 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 06:40:09PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:26:31 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
 
  Hi,
  
  I'd like to ask for a freeze exception for opencv 2.1.0-2.
  
  opencv had a problem of FTBFS on hppa[0], but deleted hppa 
  from unstable[1].
  
  Please unblock this package.
  
  [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590977
  [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596190
  
 opencv has reverse dependencies with hppa binary packages.  That needs
 to get fixed one way or another.
 
 In unstable, that's:
 
 Source: freej (0.10git20100110-1)
 Source: frei0r
 Source: kipi-plugins
 Source: libdecodeqr
 Source: mrpt
 Source: player

Thanks, I will apply for the deletion of these packages from hppa.

 
 Not to mention it's fairly late to be introducing a new upstream version
 in testing, not fixing any RC bug.
 

Yes, I know. But
OpenCV 2.1 is basically a stabilized OpenCV 2.0.
Many bug is revised from version 2.0 to 2.1.
I want to put opencv 2.1 in squeeze.

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Bug#596670: unblock: perdition/1.19~rc3-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 596670 unblock: perdition/1.19~rc4-1
Bug #596670 [release.debian.org] unblock: perdition/1.19~rc3-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: perdition/1.19~rc4-1' from 'unblock: 
perdition/1.19~rc3-1'

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
596670: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596670
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12844299905315.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Re: libesmtp6 in unstable

2010-09-13 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse

On 09/10/2010 12:46 PM, Sebastian Harl wrote:
 Hi Jeremy,
 
 I noticed that libesmtp 1.0.6 introduces a new major SONAME version in
 unstable (libesmtp6 compared to libesmtp5 in Squeeze). Are there any
 plans to get that into Squeeze? I haven't found any discussions about
 that on -release and since that's a new upstream version, this is quite
 unlikely to happen (not to say: mostly impossible) anyway since Squeeze
 is frozen. That makes the upload kinda unfortunate, though, as it
 basically makes it impossible to get any reverse deps into Squeeze
 through unstable, but I might just have missed something.
 
 TIA,
 Sebastian
 

With the ABI change and the upstream release coming so close to the
Squeeze freeze being announced I have no expectation of 1.0.6-1 making
it into Squeeze for release. I had already made the 1.0.4-5 upload in
late July to address existing CVE issues that remained so the version in
Squeeze now is free of known security issues at this time.

Regards,
Jeremy



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Pre-approval for upcoming FFmpeg upload

2010-09-13 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 13-09-2010 10:34, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
 With your permission, I'd like to upload the following debdiff to fix a
 rather embarrassing bug:

Please, upload and let us know once it got accepted.

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyO/lsACgkQCjAO0JDlykYrUQCdG8gKtvqLnDpMZKvMSa69VFgj
bwYAoIvLtUm8MNcbz9NSv+Khnid9l/RA
=EV9e
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8efe5d.8050...@funlabs.org

Bug#596717: marked as done (unblock: software-center/2.0.7debian5)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:42:13 -0300
with message-id 4c8efd25.2070...@funlabs.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596717: unblock: software-center/2.0.7debian5
has caused the Debian Bug report #596717,
regarding unblock: software-center/2.0.7debian5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596717: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596717
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package software-center

This update fixes a release critical bug (not working)
caused by API changes in Xapian. You may want to push
this to testing ASAP, as the current version in testing
is completely unusable and the changes are small; that
is, s/m\[xapian.MSET_DOCUMENT\]/m.document/g is done
on the code.

unblock software-center/2.0.7debian5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (350, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Julian Andres Klode  - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member

See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/.


pgpBljYMHmMlJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 13-09-2010 14:13, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: freeze-exception
 
 Please unblock package software-center
 
 This update fixes a release critical bug (not working)
 caused by API changes in Xapian. You may want to push
 this to testing ASAP, as the current version in testing
 is completely unusable and the changes are small; that
 is, s/m\[xapian.MSET_DOCUMENT\]/m.document/g is done
 on the code.
 
 unblock software-center/2.0.7debian5

Unblocked. I didn't change the age-days, so it should hit
testing by the end of the week. :)

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyO/SMACgkQCjAO0JDlykYhyQCfRZlSi4Zd5Y2wcNv45+iFpbqT
+fAAoIrhLt/a4yhZVZipvDRPLEZhkfax
=E8px
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---

Bug#596720: marked as done (unblock: python-debianbts/1.9)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:40:06 -0300
with message-id 4c8efca6.5010...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596720: unblock: python-debianbts/1.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #596720,
regarding unblock: python-debianbts/1.9
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596720: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596720
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package python-debianbts

python-debianbts recevied a lot of attention lately, in
particular durin DebConf and it would be nice to have it in
Squeeze: it contains several fixed related to utf-8 crashed,
along with documentation improvement and a wide t est suite.

I'm not the maintainer (X-Debbugs-CC'ed) but since I happen to
use that package, and after agreement from the mai nt himself,
I'm asking for an unblock.

unblock python-debianbts/1.9

Regards,
Sandro

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.34-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 13-09-2010 14:21, Sandro Tosi wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: unblock
 
 Please unblock package python-debianbts
 
 python-debianbts recevied a lot of attention lately, in
 particular durin DebConf and it would be nice to have it in
 Squeeze: it contains several fixed related to utf-8 crashed,
 along with documentation improvement and a wide t est suite.
 
 I'm not the maintainer (X-Debbugs-CC'ed) but since I happen to
 use that package, and after agreement from the mai nt himself,
 I'm asking for an unblock.
 
 unblock python-debianbts/1.9

Unblocked.

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyO/KQACgkQCjAO0JDlykaMdwCeLYL+Mb2q8h96Rz/jHSHkjeFq
4J4An1ZY6H2g+2eQ+Xv1DvYVhvkp8449
=fQD/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---

Re: unblock request for vzctl

2010-09-13 Thread Ola Lundqvist

Hi Julien

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:47:26PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:10:51 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:

...

   Why are you ignoring errors from the init script?
  
  Good question. It is a practice of mine to make sure that upgrade
  do not fail just because of some issue during the startup. Especially
  important as this one checks for kernel modules which may be provided
  by custom kernels. Do you have a problem with that?
  
 Well, kind of, yeah.  If a service can't start for whatever reason then
 I don't think it should be ignored and swept under the carpet.

Ok. As we have the if statement first on whether it should be started
or not it should be safe enough. I have also reviewed so that problems like
already started is safely ignored already.
I have removed the || true part of the code now.
Uploaded in 3.0.24-7.

...

   The upstart fix doesn't seem necessary, although probably harmless..
  
  I'm not sure what upstart fix you are referring to.
  
  If you are referring to the change in vzeventd, then yes it should be 
  harmless.
  Not strictly necessary but could be useful
  for people. I thought it would be useful to add as this was the first
  time this script was introduced anyway.
  
  If you are referring to the solution for #411902, I solved that one as
  vzeventd should be started on install. I made sure vz was also
  started at the same time.
  
  Or did you refer to something else?
  
 I'm referring to the first and second hunks in
 etc/dists/scripts/debian-add_ip.sh.

It is this solution:
'debian-add_ip.sh: fixlet for Ubuntu networking'
http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=0ea082ad2e72b6bad15c0e64d8bf2b4e1ee7f11a

Ubuntu is not Debian, I know. But this problem is to solve so that
you can run Ubuntu in a container on a debian machine.

Please tell if you have a problem with that one. I can revert it.
It is not critical, but I think it is rather important.

Best regards,

// Ola

 Cheers,
 Julien



-- 
 --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology 
/  o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37\
|  o...@debian.org   654 65 KARLSTAD|
|  http://inguza.com/Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
 ---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100914045155.ga29...@inguza.net

Bug#596688: marked as done (unblock: gweled/0.8.repack-5)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:58:19 -0300
with message-id 4c8f00eb.6000...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596688: unblock: gweled/0.8.repack-4.1 (currently in 
DELAYED/2)
has caused the Debian Bug report #596688,
regarding unblock: gweled/0.8.repack-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596688: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596688
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal


Hi!

Could you please unblock gweled/0.8.repack-4.1?  It fixes RC bug #595590
(which is actually the same as #591597, incorrectly marked as fixed) and
the fix is trivial:


diff -Nru gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules
--- gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules  2010-08-04 09:29:10.0 +0200
+++ gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules  2010-09-13 14:04:32.0 +0200
@@ -15,4 +15,4 @@
 
 override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install
-   rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/gweled/var/games
+   rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/gweled/var/games/*



Best regards,
  Alexander


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.6
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-xen-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: lang=de...@euro, lc_ctype=de...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to de...@euro)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 13-09-2010 09:23, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 
 Hi!
 
 Could you please unblock gweled/0.8.repack-4.1?  It fixes RC bug #595590
 (which is actually the same as #591597, incorrectly marked as fixed) and
 the fix is trivial:
 
 
 diff -Nru gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules
 --- gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules2010-08-04 09:29:10.0 +0200
 +++ gweled-0.8.repack/debian/rules2010-09-13 14:04:32.0 +0200
 @@ -15,4 +15,4 @@
  
  override_dh_auto_install:
   dh_auto_install
 - rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/gweled/var/games
 + rm -rf $(CURDIR)/debian/gweled/var/games/*

Unblocked. *BUT*, I don't like the idea of maintainers _just_
retitling the bug without adding the information that the new
version overrides the NMU and *adds* new stuff to the diff.

We would really appreciate such details to be explicit
mentioned to avoid WTFs while reviewing unblocks.

Kind regards
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyPAOoACgkQCjAO0JDlyka2kgCdF4kUSRLozNcTtFSG/kMzVMFS
AiIAnRWhv4Y+gTpR37m84rAHwr68CDLJ
=wNk8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---

Re: Please unblock mahara-1.2.6-2 (currently in NEW)

2010-09-13 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 13-09-2010 02:01, Francois Marier wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Mahara 1.2.6 was released upstream to fix two RC bugs:
 
 - removal of a non-free swf video player (#591200)
 - upgrades from 1.0.x (the version in lenny) didn't work (not in the BTS)
 
 The reason why it's currently in NEW is that I created a new contrib package
 with the swf files in it. They come with source code, but they require tools
 that aren't in Debian to be built from source.
 
 (I did most of these fixes in mahara-1.2.6-1, but I forgot about one swf so I
 had to upload mahara-1.2.6-2 shortly after.)
 
 Let me know if this request isn't useful as long as the packages as in NEW
 and I'll resubmit once they've been accepted by ftpmasters.

Can you provide some diff in advance (before ftpmaster acceptance)?

It sounds OK to get it unblocked, but a diff would be better. :-)

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyPA8UACgkQCjAO0JDlykbxngCZAaSG1IvS00KCPDFnuwfomWWg
qpwAoKMd229X7O1+lIEVHeLHPXzNaDdI
=eGT8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c8f03c6.1020...@funlabs.org

Bug#596675: marked as done (freeze exception: enemies-of-carlotta 1.2.6-4 into Squeeze)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:06:02 -0300
with message-id 4c8f02ba.2030...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#596675: freeze exception: enemies-of-carlotta 1.2.6-4 
into Squeeze
has caused the Debian Bug report #596675,
regarding freeze exception: enemies-of-carlotta 1.2.6-4 into Squeeze
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
596675: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596675
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org

Hi,

Yesterday I had bug #596623 reported (enemies-of-carlotta uses
deprecated md5 module). The result is that the deprecation warnings
will confuse MTAs and break mailing lists using e-o-c. So I've just
now changed the bug to serious, and uploaded 1.2.6-4 which uses the
hashlib module instead. Please can you allow this version into Squeeze
for release? Sorry I didn't notice the problem sooner.

This is the changelog entry from 1.2.6-3 which is currently in Squeeze:

enemies-of-carlotta (1.2.6-4) unstable; urgency=high

  * Switched from deprecated md5 to hashlib (closes: #596623)

 -- Dave Holland d...@debian.org  Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:33:49 +0100

thanks,
Dave


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 13-09-2010 06:46, Dave Holland wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 
 Hi,
 
 Yesterday I had bug #596623 reported (enemies-of-carlotta uses
 deprecated md5 module). The result is that the deprecation warnings
 will confuse MTAs and break mailing lists using e-o-c. So I've just
 now changed the bug to serious, and uploaded 1.2.6-4 which uses the
 hashlib module instead. Please can you allow this version into Squeeze
 for release? Sorry I didn't notice the problem sooner.
 
 This is the changelog entry from 1.2.6-3 which is currently in Squeeze:
 
 enemies-of-carlotta (1.2.6-4) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Switched from deprecated md5 to hashlib (closes: #596623)
 
  -- Dave Holland d...@debian.org  Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:33:49 +0100

Unblocked.

Kind regards,
- -- 
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyPArkACgkQCjAO0JDlykaOMgCfdkzBwsKOiGJ654KZtDHD05SF
LP0An32K6lckidINQMvTLUqPH579xNsx
=kTzM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---

Bug#596677: marked as done (unblock: libconfig-model-tkui-perl/1.310-1)