Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
We would like the Release Team's permission to carry out a GNUstep
transition, namely
libgnustep-base1.27 -> 1.28
Ok please send along the patches. Sorry again for all the trouble. Do
you know of some way I can check for libtool problems prior to making
new releases? I think this is the 3rd time something like this has happened
On 12/1/21 7:39 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 1 December 2021 at 21:41,
On 1 December 2021 at 21:41, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| Indeed, it will need a trip through NEW. So going via experimental would
| be appreciated. But, once it passed NEW, you can then immediatly follow
| up with the upload to unstable. I will take care of the binNMUs of the
| reverse
Hi Graham,
On 12/2/21 2:48 AM, Graham Inggs wrote:
I've already added hints marking r-bioc-biocparallel/1.28.2-2 urgent
and gffread/0.12.1-4 as a bad test, so please do let us know if there
are others.
Yes, I could spot some more.
Please set these to ignore, or Let me know if I should rather
Am Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 02:30:21AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> Actually, it started issuing a warning with regards to some white space/tab
> problem. Something else changed and it is already failing in testing.
The warning string comes from libgclib - so the change comes from there.
> But
Hi
On 2021-12-01 11:27:00 +0100, Harshula wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Who triggers the reverse dependency binNMUs?
>
> I've been following the process as described in:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
I have already scheduled the binNMUs. See
Hi Nliesh
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 23:00, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> But we should make a list of all such packages and ping for Graham/Sebastian
> to propagate the hints accordingly. Probably that's what Graham wanted to say
> in the first place.
I've already added hints marking
Hi,
Who triggers the reverse dependency binNMUs?
I've been following the process as described in:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
Thanks,
Harshula
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: po...@debian.org
[ Reason ]
#990148:
We are patching the upstream code to use Debian's version of
jquery, but it wasn't done properly. Instead of trying to load the
On 1 December 2021 11:01:12 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>But this is set[3]. If not Salsa-CI should fail.
You are testing it on a different version than in testing that's why it passes.
If you want to validate, trigger CI on the upload commit for 0.12.1-4
>Moreover, the issue
>is not
On 2021-12-01 09:15:01 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 1 December 2021 at 09:45, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> | On 2021-11-30 22:43:11 -0700, Patrick Alken wrote:
> | > All, I have uploaded a new GSL release (2.7.1) which I hope fixes the
> | > libtool version numbers
>
> Patrick,
>
> Big
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> About next steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me know if
> you prefer other things to happen first or instead.
To avoid this gets lost I've just uploaded http-parser 2.8.1-1+deb10u2.
Updated debiff attached, only editorial changes since the previous
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 14:16 +0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Wed 2021-12-01 09:43:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > It looks like you've hit a (fairly) common issue with trying to
> > upload
> > the same upstream version to multiple suites in a short time.
[...]
> I can't help but wonder
Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 06:28:06PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> On 2021-12-01 22:46:45 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > Because the version from testing 0.12.1-4 is failing which does not have
> > allow-stderr restriction.
> >
> > The new version 0.12.7 you uploaded has it. The new version
Hi Sebastian,
Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 05:13:24PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> On 2021-12-01 17:06:00 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > >
> > > There's at least one more regression; in gffread, caused by
> > > r-bioc-gviz [1]. Please check that each r-bioc* package is ready to
> > >
On 2021-12-01 22:46:45 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 1 December 2021 9:36:00 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >Hi Graham,
> >
> >Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:33:15PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> >> > One i386 autopkgtest failure for
On 1 December 2021 9:36:00 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi Graham,
>
>Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:33:15PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> > One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the
>> > entire migration. Rest stuff
On 2021-12-01 17:06:00 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:33:15PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> > On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > > One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the
> > > entire migration. Rest stuff
Hi Graham,
Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:33:15PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the entire
> > migration. Rest stuff looks okay.
>
> There's at least one more regression; in
On 1 December 2021 at 09:45, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| On 2021-11-30 22:43:11 -0700, Patrick Alken wrote:
| > All, I have uploaded a new GSL release (2.7.1) which I hope fixes the
| > libtool version numbers
Patrick,
Big big thank you! (And I missed this email yesterday)
| Thank you!
|
|
Hi,
Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:29:45PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the entire
> migration.
Its not "only" on i386 if I'm correctly but it randomly happens on different
architectures. I've now deactivated the according test
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1000511 - moreinfo
Bug #1000511 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
debian-edu-config/2.11.56+deb11u2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1000511:
On Wed 2021-12-01 09:43:18 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It looks like you've hit a (fairly) common issue with trying to upload
> the same upstream version to multiple suites in a short time.
thanks for keeping an eye on this, and giving a quick diagnosis, Adam.
> I assume both of your uploads
Hi Nilesh
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the entire
> migration. Rest stuff looks okay.
There's at least one more regression; in gffread, caused by
r-bioc-gviz [1]. Please check that each r-bioc* package is
On 24 November 2021 12:37:49 am IST, Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
>Control: tags -1 = confirmed
>
>On 2021-11-23 23:32:46, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 17:46:56 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
>> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > > Bioconductor 3.14 was released [1].
>> > >
>> >
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 09:43 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 13:23 +0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > On Mon 2021-11-29 20:46:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 16:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > >
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1000785 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package curl/7.74.0-1.3+deb11u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1000785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000785
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Adam,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 08:25:57PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> What's the potential impact of the change? Is "curl-config --configure"
> consumed by anything, other than human eyeballs?
curl-config is mainly meant for machine consumption. It kinda is a
On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 13:23 +0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Mon 2021-11-29 20:46:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 16:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > > Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
> > >
On Mon 2021-11-29 20:46:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 16:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it
>>
On Mon 2021-11-29 20:46:25 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2021-11-10 at 16:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Please consider an update to publicsuffix in debian bullseye.
>>
>> This package reflects the state of the network, and keeping it
>>
Hi Patrick
On 2021-11-30 22:43:11 -0700, Patrick Alken wrote:
> All, I have uploaded a new GSL release (2.7.1) which I hope fixes the
> libtool version numbers
Thank you!
Dirk, please go ahead with gsl 2.7.1 in unstable whenever you are ready.
Cheers
>
> On 11/21/21 3:27 PM, Dirk
32 matches
Mail list logo
