Bug#1004877: marked as done (transition: gupnp-av)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 13:23:09 -0500 with message-id and subject line Re: transition: gupnp-av has caused the Debian Bug report #1004877, regarding transition: gupnp-av to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Re: Bug#1005105: transition: gavl

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1005105 [release.debian.org] transition: gavl Added tag(s) confirmed. > tags 1005107 confirmed Bug #1005107 [release.debian.org] transition: gmerlin-avdecoder Added tag(s) confirmed. > tags 1005106 confirmed Bug #1005106 [release.debian.org]

Bug#1005105: transition: gavl

Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: tags 1005107 confirmed Control: tags 1005106 confirmed On 2022-02-07 11:30:53 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > The latest upstream

Processed: tagging 1003548

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1003548 + confirmed Bug #1003548 [release.debian.org] transition: libwebp Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1003548:

Bug#1002286: marked as done (transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 15:16:57 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1002286: Acknowledgement (transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries) has caused the Debian Bug report #1002286, regarding transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1003548: transition: libwebp

On 2022-02-11 16:39:01 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-02-11 07:27:42 -0800, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > > # remove the moreinfo tag > > tags 1003548 - moreinfo > > thanks > > > > Sebastian, may we move forward with ibwebp? > > The perl 5.34 transition is currently ongoing. As libwebp

Bug#1005343: marked as done (nmu: asterisk-flite_3.0-4)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 14:51:34 +0100 with message-id <164467389424.2636895.15585753177184644...@auryn.jones.dk> and subject line Re: Bug#1005343: nmu: asterisk-flite_3.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1005343, regarding nmu: asterisk-flite_3.0-4 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1003004: marked as done (transition: capnproto)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 13:29:17 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1003004: transition: capnproto has caused the Debian Bug report #1003004, regarding transition: capnproto to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1001830: marked as done (transition: libtorrent-rasterbar)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 13:30:11 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1001830: transition: libtorrent-rasterbar has caused the Debian Bug report #1001830, regarding transition: libtorrent-rasterbar to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1004841: marked as done (transition: libpdb-redo)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 13:24:00 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1004841: transition: libpdb-redo has caused the Debian Bug report #1004841, regarding transition: libpdb-redo to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#1004727: marked as done (transition: libcifpp)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 13:23:26 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1004727: transition: libcifpp has caused the Debian Bug report #1004727, regarding transition: libcifpp to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#1004717: marked as done (transition: libkiwix and libzim)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 13:22:27 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1004717: transition: libkiwix and libzim has caused the Debian Bug report #1004717, regarding transition: libkiwix and libzim to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Re: Bug#1005343: nmu: asterisk-flite_3.0-4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1005343 [release.debian.org] nmu: asterisk-flite_3.0-4 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1005343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005343 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1005343: nmu: asterisk-flite_3.0-4

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2022-02-11 18:44:28 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu asterisk-flite_3.0-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against >

Bug#1003526: Update to close CVE-2022-0536

Hi, here is a new debdiff to close also CVE-2022-0536 Cheers, Yadddiff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 5bfcaa7..5e881cd 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +node-follow-redirects (1.13.1-1+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Team upload +

Bug#1005374: buster-pu: package apache-log4j1.2/1.2.17-8+deb10u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org Hello, I would like to fix CVE-2021-4104, CVE-2022-23302, CVE-2022-23305 and CVE-2022-23307 in apache-log4j1.2. These issues are less severe because

Bug#1005372: bullseye-pu: package apache-log4j1.2/1.2.17-10

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org Hello, I would like to fix CVE-2021-4104, CVE-2022-23302, CVE-2022-23305 and CVE-2022-23307 in apache-log4j1.2. These issues are less severe because