Bug#1064031: rustc-web 1.70.0+dfsg1-7~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

2024-02-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 15:00 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > So it looks like I'll need a new upload to fix two bookworm > architecture > build failures (armhf and ppc64el), and also to fix #1064562. Should > I > file a new release.d.o bug, or continue using this one? Given that both issues are

CRAN Package Matrix update and a possible transition or not

2024-02-27 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
A couple of days ago, the (effective) Maintainer and rather active developer of the Matrix package Mikael Jagan (CC'ed) posted on the r-package-devel list (the primary list for R package development) that the upcoming change of Matrix 1.7-0, planned for March 11, will be _very midly disruptive_

Bug#1064031: rustc-web 1.70.0+dfsg1-7~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

2024-02-27 Thread Andres Salomon
So it looks like I'll need a new upload to fix two bookworm architecture build failures (armhf and ppc64el), and also to fix #1064562. Should I file a new release.d.o bug, or continue using this one? (I'm ignoring armel and mipsel build failures, since firefox-esr hasn't built on either