]
I'll take a look at the cron output for it shortly to see if I have any
better ideas. [And clean up the few cases I see where we're not
propogating failures or have non-atomic file creation.]
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
One day I put instant coffee in my mi
On Mon, 01 Jan 2018, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jan 2018, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > udeb uninstallability watcher <debian-b...@lists.debian.org> (2018-01-01):
> > > Newly-broken packages in testing
> > > multipath-udeb amd64 a
to know that
the right versions are in unstable, but they're not showing up on the
graph.
I'll try to track this down today and see what is going on there.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
The terrorist's job is to terrorize the people, to interfere with
freedom in s
@@
+perltidy (20140328-2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Backport fix for CVE-2016-10374 which fixes insecure file deletion of
+perltidy.ERR and perltidy.LOG files (closes: #862667)
+
+ -- Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> Sun, 21 May 2017 12:41:30 -0700
+
perltidy (20140328-1) unstable; u
ed all blocking bugs on
> #827061 after cloning just one of them, and it turns out it did so on
> two occasions, my clone[2] and Adrian's one[3].
Hrm; that's not supposed to happen.
Let me check that out and see if I can fix it.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
Information wants to be free to kill again.
-- Red Robot http://www.dieselsweeties.com/archive.php?s=1372
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: important
On Sat, 30 Jul 2016, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:03:36 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:41:08 -0500 Don Armstrong wrote:
> [...]
> > > OK, this is going to take a bit of work; I thi
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [dropped #830267 from CC; it's not directly relevant to this branch of the
> discussion]
>
> On 2016-07-24 17:43, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> >>could you please inves
rtunately, I don't know when the BTS thought that 1.18.9 was
actually in testing and not in unstable. I'll try to check out snapshots
later this week to see if I can figure out when the transition actually
happened, or if there was something else going on in the archive to
explain it.
--
Don Armstrong
elopment release of lilypond
through the lifetime of a stable release.]
Are auto-removals from testing currently off? [Basically, I'd like to
avoid having lilypond removed from testing until we're closer to the
release if that's at all possible.]
--
Don Armstrong https://ww
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:38:13PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > If there's something specific that you'd like the CTTE to try to do
> > > beyond what I've just reported now, l
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> If there's something specific that you'd like the CTTE to try to do
> beyond what I've just reported now, let me know.
Let me know if you'd like the CTTE to do something beyond what I've
already done.
--
Don Armstrong
list
of the specific bug fixes and additional features be enough for an
initial yes/no, given the review process upstream?
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
There is no more concentrated form of evil
than apathy.
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2015, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I've been waiting for the release team for a while to make a decision
> > on #765639 for a year now. Could you help in getting a decision?
> >
> > I've actually been waiting fo
n this?
Specifically, this being (FWICT), bringing a new(er) version of openssl
into jessie and/or wheezy.
I personally don't have enough information to form an opinion yet, but
I recognize that some decision should be made.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
Rule 30: "
2015-02-05 07:17:08.0 -0800
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: misc
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debbugs developers debian-debb...@lists.debian.org
-Uploaders: Josip Rodin jro...@jagor.srce.hr, Colin Watson
cjwat...@debian.org
+Uploaders: Don Armstrong d...@debian.org
Standards-Version: 3.2.1
overrule delegates?
Only if the decision of the delegate falls under 6.1.1, 6.1.2, or 6.1.4
(and of course, that it was a decision delegated to the delegate by the
DPL). If it's not a technical matter, than only a GR can override a
delegate.
--
Don Armstrong http
() :
Apache::Constants::DECLINED();
}
# Lookup the file in the cache and scale the image if the cached
# image does not exist
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
I will not make any deals with you. I've resigned. I will not be
pushed, filed, stamped
self-triggering; will still need
+Breaks from dpkg to resolve this (closes: #768599)
+ * Add Pre-Depends on dpkg to allow for noawait just in case this gets
+backported to squeeze.
+
+ -- Don Armstrong d...@debian.org Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:26:37 -0800
+
fontconfig (2.11.0-6.1) unstable
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 d-i
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:56:23AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
This is a simple partial fix for the RC bug #768598, with a typoed bug
in the changelog for good measure:
diff -Nru fontconfig-2.11.0/debian/changelog
/share/doc/lilypond/Documentation. (Closes: #768272)
+ * Add missing Pre-Depends: ${misc:Depends} for dpkg-maintscript-helper.
+
+ -- Don Armstrong d...@debian.org Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:38:32 -0800
+
lilypond (2.18.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Revert previous patch (no parallel); the issue
work.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
First you take a drink,
then the drink takes a drink,
then the drink takes you.
-- F. Scott Fitzgerald
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
reverse
dependency of guile 1.8 in jessie was lilypond.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
You have many years to live--do things you will be proud to remember
when you are old.
-- Shinka proverb. (John Brunner _Stand On Zanzibar_ p413)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
Yeah, it's not working. I've got it on my TODO list, but haven't had a
chance to work on it yet. I will probably have a chance next weekend
to spend some time on it.
So I think I've fixed this now; had to finally set up a testing
framework for bugscan
, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Freitag, 7. Februar 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
I've now rolled this out, but bugscan's crontab hasn't run yet. I'll
keep an eye on it to make sure it works.
https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ doens't look like it's working :/
Could you please have a look again
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using
bugcfg instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I
just fixed this in @81492, but I haven't rolled it out to the BTS yet.
I've now rolled this out, but bugscan's
-ignore.
Yeah. I think this is a bug I introduced when I switched to using bugcfg
instead of the hardcoded values which were being used before. I just
fixed this in @81492, but I haven't rolled it out to the BTS yet.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
I cannot find rest
prefer.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
For those who understand, no explanation is necessary.
For those who do not, none is possible.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Niels Thykier wrote:
In this regard; I am guilty of filing some those bugs without tagging
them. Honestly, adding the tags get a bit in the way right now. If a
package FTBFS on 4 architectures, I have to dig up 3-4 different
of syslinux that isn't being distributed in wheezy, but I think that
might need to be discussed and a technical solution fleshed out
elsewhere, and probably isn't ripe for a CTTE decision.]
Don Armstrong
0: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699742#30
1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
Assuming that the patch for #699742[0] fixes this issue with DI RC
releases being installed, is there still an outstanding issue for the
CTTE?
Earlier in this thread, there had been a couple of reports
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 19:43:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 23.12.2012 21:31, Don Armstrong wrote:
In making a fix to the RC bug #684817, I also fixed a problem
issue, as seen by Michael and myself.
Is it the intention of the Release Managers not to accept a newer
version of syslinux into wheezy? [That is, if the CTTE were to decide
to require some fix to d-i, we'd also have to override the RMs?]
Don Armstrong
--
I now know how retro SCOs OSes are. Riotous
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 19:43:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 23.12.2012 21:31, Don Armstrong wrote:
In making a fix to the RC bug #684817, I also fixed a problem in
disabling optimization when noopt is present
;
could RC bugs for Wheezy have gone missing for similar reasons?
No, because they still show up in
http://bugs.debian.org/bugscan/britney/testing-nr and
http://bugs.debian.org/bugscan/other/testing.html for example.
Don Armstrong
--
Sometimes I wish I could take back all my mistakes
attached for proposed upload to unstable.
Don Armstrong
--
My spelling ability, or rather the lack thereof, is one of the wonders
of the modern world.
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
diff -u lilypond-2.14.2/debian/control lilypond-2.14.2/debian/control
--- lilypond
: #658139. This also fixes
#619564, #627027, and #551734 which were related to evince.mime and
evince-gtk.mime. #581441 was fixed in shared-mime-info/1.0.
unblock evince/3.4.0-3.1
Thanks.
Don Armstrong
--
There is no such thing as social gambling. Either you are there to
cut the other
',
'1333548859.3223.24.ca...@mordor.loewenhoehle.ip', 'request_subject', ...)
called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 912
eval {...} called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 910
Ugh. This is fixed now.
Don Armstrong
--
I leave the show floor, but not before a pack of caffeinated Jolt gum
is thrust
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Neil McGovern wrote:
Awesomeness of Squeeze
Obviously, because it's a Debian release, it's awesome! Or at the very
least, awe-inspiring. What more is needed?
Good job everyone, and keep it up!
Don Armstrong
--
Herodotus says, Very few things happen at the right time
in squeeze?
It's simple enough; the only change in -2 is to remove the Provides:
nscd, and add some verbiage as to what to do if you actually need it.
I don't have a strong opinion either way, but given that two people
have now mentioned it, it's probably worth it.
Don Armstrong
--
A Democracy lead
-mail anyone else but the package
maintainer, the bug, and possibly debian-release if the package
maintainer doesn't respond.
Don Armstrong
--
Our days are precious, but we gladly see them going
If in their place we find a thing more precious growing
A rare, exotic plant, our gardener's heart
machines with LDAP to have run into the same problems with nscd, which
is why I packaged it.]
But anyway, thanks to Mehdi Dogguy it's been unblocked, so it'll
transition soon. I'll whip up a backport once that happens.
Don Armstrong
--
LEADERSHIP -- A form of self-preservation exhibited by people
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Moreover, it doesn't seem to fix any RC bug.
unscd was made to resolve the problems seen in nscd where nscd is
near useless in a system with any amount of load (see #574990 et
al.)
So, I'd rather keep
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 15:52:21 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
The fix is to unblock lilypond. The only reason it didn't make it
in for the freeze were the failures of fontforge brought about by
a new version.
Unblocking lilypond is not going
many people are going to be typesetting their
music on a mainframe? Would removing the old lilypond/s390 binaries
be a feasible solution?
If that's what we have to do at the end, that's fine. But I'd much
rather fix the fontforge issue. We don't really need to rush to decide
this yet.
Don
fontforge dying). Do you have any plans for
how to fix these RC bugs for squeeze? Are the fixes feasible to backport, for
instance?
The fix is to unblock lilypond. The only reason it didn't make it in
for the freeze were the failures of fontforge brought about by a new
version.
Don Armstrong
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 19/11/2010 03:26, Don Armstrong wrote:
I've been using it in production for months, and it's been in unstable
for a while already; if worst comes to worst and there is a serious
problem with it in testing, it can easily be removed. [But unless
, and works
significantly better than nscd does.
unscd (0.47-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial packaging for Debian (Closes: #513305)
-- Don Armstrong d...@debian.org Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:21:13 -0700
Description: Micro Name Service Caching Daemon
A daemon which handles passwd, group and host
would only see mails from bugs which
happened to fit that criteria at the instant that the message to the
bug was sent; you'd still need to examine the bug listings for the
packages anyway.
Don Armstrong
--
Mozart tells us what it's like to be human, Beethoven tells us what
it's like
of course
be refered back to the ctte.]
Don Armstrong
--
Information wants to be free to kill again.
-- Red Robot http://www.dieselsweeties.com/archive.php?s=1372
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
and the resultant archive bloat?x
Don Armstrong
0: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/10/msg00226.html (cc'ed
to -release, but further discussion should not happen there because
release isn't a discussion list.)
1:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/perl-maintainers/2009-October/000799
is based on. If you're uploading
an unstable version, the experimental uploads should not show up in
the changelog unless the unstable version is based upon a version
which is in experimental.
Don Armstrong
--
Information wants to be free to kill again.
-- Red Robot http
. If there's something more that needs to be
changed, let me (or someone else know.)
James: the links will be fixed by the next time the pages are
generated; thanks for reporting the problem.
Don Armstrong
--
Our days are precious, but we gladly see them going
If in their place we find a thing more
a good idea, but there would still need to be logic
to detect which mirrors had actually managed to get up to date... and
that bit is probably a bit complicated.
Don Armstrong
--
It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 06:23:07PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
See the attached patch which fixes #510665 (a normal bug) and along
the way #496003 (documentation); I'd like to get these into lenny, but
before uploading to unstable, pre-approval
) double checking that they fix his problem.]
The interdiff is attached.
Don Armstrong
--
Your village called.
They want their idiot back.
-- xkcd http://xkcd.com/c23.html
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
diff -u spamass-milter-0.3.1/spamass-milter.cpp spamass-milter
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Philipp Kern wrote:
am Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:24:02AM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
Looks like debbugs (or britney?) is broken, bug#211765 doesn't get
properly ignored. Can I get a force in addition to the unblock
britney...
Could it be a problem that this very bug is not properly versionned?
That shouldn't be a problem.
Don Armstrong
--
CNN/Reuters: News reports have filtered out early this morning that US
forces have swooped on an Iraqi Primary School and detained 6th Grade
teacher Mohammed Al-Hazar
.
*** end proposal ***
Does that meet the needs of the RMs et al? Are there any objections?
Don Armstrong
1: It's quite likely that we talked about the way it should work, and
I totally forgot about what we decided that it should do after
promising that I'd change it. My brain is at its base
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
Don Armstrong wrote:
*** proposal ***
For the purposes of determining buginess, setting a distribution tag
limits the bugginess of a package in distribtions to the intersection
of the distributions and the version-based bugginness of a package
not like doing this manually in a single
shot is hard.
Don Armstrong
--
Only one creature could have duplicated the expressions on their
faces, and that would be a pigeon who has heard not only that Lord
Nelson has got down off his column but has also been seen buying a
12-bore repeater and a box
The original bug which caused all of these blocking bugs has been
fixed; rebuilds probably need to be requested for all of these
packages.
Don Armstrong
--
This can't be happening to me. I've got tenure.
-- James Hynes _Publish and Perish_
http://www.donarmstrong.com http
61 matches
Mail list logo
