RE:

Το email σας επιλέχθηκε για $ 570.000,00USD στο βραβείο κινητής τηλεφωνίας Chevrolet Auto 2018, Για να λάβετε το βραβείο, στείλτε το όνομα, τη διεύθυνση και τον αριθμό κινητού σας Απάντηση Αυτό το μήνυμα ηλεκτρονικού ταχυδρομείου: chev...@hotmail.com From: SUBDIR

Re: RFS: numexpr 2.6.4-2 (closes RC bug #894623)

Dear Antonio, On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 06:56:03PM +0200, Antonio Valentino wrote: > I prepared an updated version of the debian package for numexpr: version > 2.6.4-2 [1]. > I includes a fix for the RC bug #891023. Uploaded, thanks for your contribution. P.S.: in the future, please rather send

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Whoop whoop! Thanks everyone! [1] https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libvtk7-dev On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:55 PM Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Gert et al., > > Thanks again for re-uploading; I have just ACCEPTed it. > > > [I] replicated here what I did

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Gert et al., Thanks again for re-uploading; I have just ACCEPTed it. > [I] replicated here what I did, kind of to acknowledge the review and > the changes it required (a habit from scinetific paper reviews, nothing > more) Thanks! I was mostly making sure for next time; it is a g

Re: dh-r_20180403_source.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, 2018-04-03 17:05 GMT+02:00 Debian FTP Masters : > > Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed. > > binary:pkg-r-autopkgtest is NEW. > Thanks for the upload of dh-r, unfortunately it was rejected because a new binary package is generated. The new

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Am Montag, den 02.04.2018, 19:53 +0100 schrieb Chris Lamb: > Hi Gert, > > > > The comments were listed as being "for" version 7.1.1+dfsg1- > > > 1~exp1 — > > > did you upload with the same version number? That would explain > > > why I > > > thought they remained unaddressed. > > > > Yes, I did

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

be recorded as they are not only entire hidden from the rest of the Project, they cannot be seen by our downstream distributions nor anyone doing an entirely separate audit. :) Thanks for re-uploading. Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

t would explain why I > thought they remained unaddressed. Yes, I did upload with the same version. The policy is not clear about this, and since the first changelog entry must remain for the ITP, I thought that was the usual approach. > > If so, please re-upload and ping me and I will happily take

Processed: Re: Bug#894462: paraview: edges are blotted [regression]

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #894462 [paraview] paraview: edges are blotted [regression] Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 894462: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894462 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

RE:

I have a proposal for you kindly email me via my private email for more info::   mrsliuyanp...@gmail.com Mrs. Liu.

Re: Comments regarding vnlog_1.5-1_amd64.changes

Chris Lamb writes: > Just add that he is the author? I mean, just to give some kind of > credit... Alrighty. Done. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Comments regarding vnlog_1.5-1_amd64.changes

Dima, > Hi. Thanks for pushing this through NEW so quickly. I acknowledge Chris > Venter's copyright in the README. What would you suggest for a better > attribution? Just add that he is the author? I mean, just to give some kind of credit... Best wishes, -- ,''`. : :' :

Re: Comments regarding vnlog_1.5-1_amd64.changes

Chris Lamb writes: > Hi, would be nice to attribute credit to Chris Venter for > b64_encode.c, even if not necessary :) > > -- Chris Lamb Sun, 01 Apr 2018 10:09:43 + Hi. Thanks for pushing this through NEW so quickly. I acknowledge Chris

Processed: Re: paraview: errors when saving animations as AVI files [regression]

Processing control commands: > found -1 paraview/5.4.1+dfsg4-2 Bug #892293 [paraview] paraview: errors when saving animations as AVI files [regression] Marked as found in versions paraview/5.4.1+dfsg4-2. -- 892293: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892293 Debian Bug Tracking

Processed: Re: paraview: segfaults when performing query-based selections

Processing control commands: > found -1 paraview/5.4.1+dfsg4-2 Bug #837796 [paraview] paraview: segfaults when performing query-based selections Marked as found in versions paraview/5.4.1+dfsg4-2. -- 837796: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837796 Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed: Re: openstereogram FTBFS with openjdk-9

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #893381 [src:openstereogram] openstereogram FTBFS with openjdk-9 Added tag(s) patch. -- 893381: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893381 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi all, > these are the comments I got last year The comments were listed as being "for" version 7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1 — did you upload with the same version number? That would explain why I thought they remained unaddressed. If so, please re-upload and ping me and I will happil

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Am 29.03.2018 18:00 schrieb "Chris Lamb" : > > > Forwarding notes, please include Luca in any reply. See, also: > > Thu 29 16:38 < mapreri> lamby: can I ask you to either *) forward me the > comments and I'll see what to do next *) accept and open a bunch of RC

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Wait, VTK7 is no longer in NEW [1]. Does anyone know what happened? Cheers, Nico [1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:28 PM Gert Wollny wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 06.03.2018, 21:37 + schrieb Nico Schlömer: > > Perhaps it's time to bring

Processed: Re: Bug#892861: libglm-dev: removal of default type initialization breaking packages

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 892861 - wontfix Bug #892861 [libglm-dev] libglm-dev: removal of default type initialization breaking packages Removed tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 892861:

Re: orocos-bfl_0.8.0-1_combined.changes REJECTED

Quoting Johannes Schauer (2018-03-27 10:30:37) > > * pkg-config file in wrong directory > > The pkg-config file is stored in: > > /usr/lib/pkgconfig/orocos-bfl.pc > > We assume you mean that it should go to /usr/lib//pkgconfig instead? > The liborocos-bfl-dev is Multi-Arch:same but the

Re: orocos-bfl_0.8.0-1_combined.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, Quoting Thorsten Alteholz (2018-03-04 16:00:10) > one of our trainees had a look at your package and found: > > * software last changed 9 years ago that is alright for several reasons: - the software is the de-facto standard in the ROS community for Kalman Filters and other

Processed: Re: Bug#886361 closed by Kartik Mistry <kar...@debian.org> (Bug#886361: fixed in apertium 3.4.2~r68466-4)

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #886361 {Done: Kartik Mistry <kar...@debian.org>} [src:apertium] apertium: frequent parallel FTBFS 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add

Re: GL2PS latest version

Confirmed, latest VTK now builds on Sid with system GL2PS. Thank you Anton! On 03/25/2018 12:35 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: Hi Kyle, uploaded with those two patches. API was extended by one funciton, so the API changes are compatible and no need to do a transition process. Regards Anton

Re: GL2PS latest version

Hi Kyle, uploaded with those two patches. API was extended by one funciton, so the API changes are compatible and no need to do a transition process. Regards Anton 2018-03-22 23:00 GMT+01:00 Kyle Edwards : > All, > > New versions of VTK use new features from upstream

Re: Ciao, hello.

Ciao caro come stai? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#893172: python-sagenb depends on cruft package python-flask-autoindex

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:flask-autoindex 0.6+0git20160725-02b454-5 Bug #893172 [python-sagenb] python-sagenb depends on cruft package python-flask-autoindex Bug reassigned from package 'python-sagenb' to 'src:flask-autoindex'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug

Processed: Re: Bug#892861: libglm-dev: removal of default type initialization breaking packages

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 892861 + wontfix Bug #892861 [libglm-dev] libglm-dev: removal of default type initialization breaking packages Added tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 892861:

Processed: Re: Bug#892910: libsundials-serial-dev: Fails to link when making shared object using these libs

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 please provide shared libraries for Fortran interfaces Bug #892910 [libsundials-serial-dev] libsundials-serial-dev: Fails to link when making shared object using these libs Changed Bug title to 'please provide shared libraries for Fortran interfaces'

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Please get back to me its urgent

Good Day Dearest, Hope this email find you in good condition, my name is Alice Walton, a citizen of United States of America. I have a profitable proposal for you which I intend to use for charity. I will be very happy to know you, as my instinct directed me to you at this point in time, so do

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan China construction bank . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan China construction bank . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan China construction bank . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan China construction bank . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan China construction bank . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan China construction bank . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan China construction bank . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re:

Hi, Did you get my last email?? Regards, Patrick Chan China construction bank . -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

Hi Denis! On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 01:22:57PM +0100, Denis Briand wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 08:54:00AM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Btw. the layout of the repo seems a little bit unusual. > > It is only the content of the debian directory, but without the > > "debian" dir itself. > >

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

On 2018-03-11 13:22, Denis Briand wrote: > No, sorry, I prefere to have only the debian directory in the git repos. I'm fine with that! (Yet I prefer full-source and even half-broken pristine-tar!) > but we can create a debian/ dir and put all files in it. Yes. IMHO, this would make the used

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 08:54:00AM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Btw. the layout of the repo seems a little bit unusual. > It is only the content of the debian directory, but without the > "debian" dir itself. > Maybe we can change this to the more DEP-14-ish layout? >

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

On 2018-03-11 11:38, laurent Trinques wrote: > FYI Martin, the online documentation (Sphinx Inventory), is very old now ... > But Nuri work for explain quickly new features on new web site : > https://qelectrotech.org/test/lang-en/features.php > https://qelectrotech.org/test/lang-en/manual.php

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

Le dimanche 11 mars 2018, 08:54:00 CET W. Martin Borgert a écrit : > On 2018-03-11 07:44, Anton Gladky wrote: > > I have added the Denis to the Debian Science Team and > > created an empty repo for qelectrotech [1]. > > Thanks, Anton! > > I pushed the existing branches from >

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

Hi all, Is a Denis little typo, since 0.5 version is a Qt5 application. Regards, Laurent Le dimanche 11 mars 2018, 09:28:32 CET Anton Gladky a écrit : > Hi all, > > please pay attention that Qt4 can be removed soon. > So if upstream did not start to port the software to > Qt5 it would be good

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

On 2018-03-11 09:28, Anton Gladky wrote: > please pay attention that Qt4 can be removed soon. > So if upstream did not start to port the software to > Qt5 it would be good to do so. I believe, that the current version 0.5 in buster already uses Qt5. Thanks for the heads-up, though! --

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

Hi all, please pay attention that Qt4 can be removed soon. So if upstream did not start to port the software to Qt5 it would be good to do so. Regards Anton 2018-03-11 8:54 GMT+01:00 W. Martin Borgert : > On 2018-03-11 07:44, Anton Gladky wrote: >> I have added the Denis

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

On 2018-03-11 07:44, Anton Gladky wrote: > I have added the Denis to the Debian Science Team and > created an empty repo for qelectrotech [1]. Thanks, Anton! I pushed the existing branches from http://git.tuxfamily.org/qet/debian.git to https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/qelectrotech Denis,

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

Hi all, I have added the Denis to the Debian Science Team and created an empty repo for qelectrotech [1]. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/qelectrotech Best regards Anton 2018-03-11 0:53 GMT+01:00 W. Martin Borgert : > On 2018-03-10 20:57, Denis Briand wrote: >>

Re: please add qelectrotech in debian-science

On 2018-03-10 20:57, Denis Briand wrote: > I have just created my salsa account "narcan-guest" with this e-mail address. > It could be great if you can add me in the team, and create or migrate the git > repository. I can't add Denis (narcan-guest) to the team, because I'm only master, not owner,

Re: For Your Notice

-- Warm Greeting. Date:10.03.2018 With Great Excitement.We happily announced your awarded giveaway prize $1,850,000.00 USD in ongoing LGMobile 2018 Giveaway for “GoodThings Happen to Good People” project. You have been selected for this award. Your Award Claims Ref Number:298-H78/LG. Send

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9: configure fails to detect Java

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #875790 [src:scilab] FTBFS with Java 9: configure fails to detect Java Added tag(s) patch. -- 875790: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875790 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Processed: Re: FTBFS with Java 9: can't find jdk

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #875584 [src:jhdf] FTBFS with Java 9: can't find jdk Added tag(s) patch. -- 875584: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875584 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Am Dienstag, den 06.03.2018, 21:37 + schrieb Nico Schlömer: > Perhaps it's time to bring this up again. At six months in the queue, > VTK7 has been the leader in the NEW queue for a while now. It'd be > great if we could work on this again, particularly since VTK8 is > already out there. I

Re: vtk7_7.1.1+dfsg1-1~exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Perhaps it's time to bring this up again. At six months in the queue, VTK7 has been the leader in the NEW queue for a while now. It'd be great if we could work on this again, particularly since VTK8 is already out there. Cheers, Nico On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:56 AM Gert Wollny

Re: Greetings My Dear,

-- Dear Respectfully, Good Day, I'm well pleased to contact you today, I heard about business growth in your country, My name is Julia William, I want to respectfully seek for your directions to invest my fund US$5.6 Million United States Dollars in your country. I am in search of stable

Re: Comments regarding petsc_3.8.0+dfsg1-1exp1_amd64.changes

On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 16:07 +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi Drew, > > one of our trainess had a look at your package and found the > following > stuff. He is nice and doesn't want to reject the package but just > have > your comments :-). > > Thanks! > Thorsten > Thanks Thorsten. > >

Processed: Re: Bug#778304: [libarmadillo-dev] Add static headers

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 778304 + wontfix Bug #778304 [libarmadillo-dev] [libarmadillo-dev] Add static headers Added tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778304:

Processed: Re: Bug#852307: bcolz: test_leftover_ptr_with_statement_create_open fails on s390x, powerpc

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 bcolz: test_leftover_ptr_with_statement_create_open fails on big > endian Bug #852307 [bcolz] bcolz: test_leftover_ptr_with_statement_create_open fails on s390x, powerpc Changed Bug title to 'bcolz: test_leftover_ptr_with_statement_create_open fails on

Re: hdfview 2.11 locks SWMR files

On 02/19/2018 10:08 AM, Jan Kotanski wrote: > is it possible to provide the h5clear tool in the hdf5-tools package for > stretch, (e.g. backports). > Since hdfview brakes SWMR files it would be good to have a script which fix > them back. h5clear is not provided by hdf5-tools in

Re: hdfview 2.11 locks SWMR files

Dear HDF5-tools Maintainers, is it possible to provide the h5clear tool in the hdf5-tools package for stretch, (e.g. backports). Since hdfview brakes SWMR files it would be good to have a script which fix them back. Best regards, Jan On 02/16/18 19:16, h...@hdfgroup.org wrote: > Hi Jan, >

Re: hdfview 2.11 locks SWMR files

Hello Frederic, Thanks for your answer. Yes, indeed. Since even hdfview 3.0.0 has problems with SWMR files it is better to use other browser, e.g. silx. cheers, Jan On 02/16/18 10:28, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello Jan, > > just as a work around, you can use the silx package which is

Bug#887454: Debian Science Policy has moved [was Re: Bug#887454: Re-uploaded console-bridge]

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 08:18:30AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > If your way of doing it is really common practice, I would be glad to get > > some references for it. > > Very simple: > > > https://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html#idm45916846202048 Note that

Bug#887454: Re-uploaded console-bridge

Hi Jochen, I'm putting Debian Science list in CC. More information about this discussion is in bug #887454. On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 01:41:10AM +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > * Andreas Tille [2018-02-17 22:30]: > > A not uploaded state has the target distribution

Bug#887454: Re-uploaded console-bridge

* Andreas Tille [2018-02-17 22:30]: A not uploaded state has the target distribution "UNRELEASED". Once it is uploaded this is set to "unstable" and the commit log says something like: "Uploaded to unstable (or new)" I think that's pretty obvious vor everybody even

Bug#887454: Re-uploaded console-bridge

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 07:18:11PM +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > * Andreas Tille [2018-02-17 19:13]: > > I tend to disagree. A package that's rejected by ftpmaster will not > > reach the archive. I'm tagging only those commits that have an > > equivalent package inside

Bug#887454: Re-uploaded console-bridge

Hi Jochen, On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 06:12:09PM +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > > * Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> [2018-02-17 13:48]: > > I've re-uploaded console-bridge_0.4.0+dfsg-1 to new. > > I did so as well yesterday, that's why your upload was rejected. That'

Bug#887454: Re-uploaded console-bridge

* Andreas Tille [2018-02-17 19:13]: I tend to disagree. A package that's rejected by ftpmaster will not reach the archive. I'm tagging only those commits that have an equivalent package inside the package pool. But how would you know which state you uploaded to ftp-master?

Bug#887454: Re-uploaded console-bridge

Hi Andreas, * Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> [2018-02-17 13:48]: I've re-uploaded console-bridge_0.4.0+dfsg-1 to new. I did so as well yesterday, that's why your upload was rejected. (I wasn't aware of the bug, so sorry for not commenting about it.) Please note: I have r

Bug#887454: Re-uploaded console-bridge

Hi Jose, I've re-uploaded console-bridge_0.4.0+dfsg-1 to new. Please note: I have removed the changelog entry console-bridge (0.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 0.4.0 -- Jose Luis Rivero <jriv...@osrfoundation.org> Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:21:19 +

Re: hdfview 2.11 locks SWMR files

.@desy.de> Cc: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Sent: Friday, 16 February, 2018 16:49:46 Subject: Re: hdfview 2.11 locks SWMR files Hi Jan, HDFView 2.11 is based on HDF5-1.8 with 32-bit object identifiers. SWMR is a new feature in HDF5-1.10 (which has 64-bit object identifier

Re: hdfview 2.11 locks SWMR files

Hi Barbara, Ah ok. Thanks. Jan Oryginalna wiadomość Od: h...@hdfgroup.org Data: 16.02.2018 19:16 (GMT+01:00) Do: "Kotanski, Jan" <jan.kotan...@desy.de> DW: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Temat: Re: hdfview 2.11 locks SWMR files Hi J

Re: hdfview 2.11 locks SWMR files

files they loose their data. Best regards, Jan - Original Message - From: h...@hdfgroup.org To: "Jan Kotanski" <jan.kotan...@desy.de> Cc: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Sent: Friday, 16 February, 2018 16:49:46 Subject: Re: hdfview 2.11 locks SW

Re: hdfview 2.11 locks SWMR files

Hi Jan, HDFView 2.11 is based on HDF5-1.8 with 32-bit object identifiers. SWMR is a new feature in HDF5-1.10 (which has 64-bit object identifiers). HDFView 3.0 (Beta) supports HDF5-1.10. However, even if you use it and select "File->Open", it gets a lock on the file and it modifies it. We are

Re: dolfin_2017.2.0.post0-1exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 11:04 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 10:47 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 22:00 +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > > Hi Drew, > > > > > > one of our trainees had a look at your package and found: > > > * copyright file, while

Re: dolfin_2017.2.0.post0-1exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 10:47 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 22:00 +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi Drew, > > > > one of our trainees had a look at your package and found: > > * copyright file, while autogenerated and unreadable, incomplete. > > missing for example: > >

Re: dolfin_2017.2.0.post0-1exp1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 22:00 +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi Drew, > > one of our trainees had a look at your package and found: > * copyright file, while autogenerated and unreadable, incomplete. > missing for example: > test/unit/cpp/mesh/MeshColoring.cpp:// Copyright (C) 2016 Garth >

Re: node-shiny-server-client_1.0.0+gitf214eae+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, I added the missing copyright bits now. Could you please upload the package? https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/node-shiny-server-client Thanks, Philip -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Maintaining a package (JASP)

Hi Joris, > I am a member of the core team of JASP, we develop a GPL'd statistics > program that aims to replace SPSS while adding bayesian statics to the mix. > We would like to make this as widely available as possible and therefore > would like to contribute it to the debian repositories. > >

Processed: Re: Bug#889878 closed by Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel <pi...@debian.org> (Bug#889878: fixed in hkl 5.0.0.2449-1)

may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked as fixed in versions hkl/5.0.0.2449-1. -- 889878: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889878 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-ma

Re: Rheolef moved to Git : problem to download/edit the debian files

Hi Pierre, >> You need to register an account on salsa.debian.org and ask for >> membership of Debian Science team. You also need to create your >> personal Gitlab token. > > Ok, I'am asking for membership of Debian Science team > together with an account on salsa.debian.org > Who is managing

Re: Rheolef moved to Git : problem to download/edit the debian files

Hi Andreas, > You need to register an account on salsa.debian.org and ask for > membership of Debian Science team. You also need to create your > personal Gitlab token. Ok, I'am asking for membership of Debian Science team together with an account on salsa.debian.org Who is managing this ?

Re: Rheolef moved to Git : problem to download/edit the debian files

Hi Pierre, On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 10:34:50AM +0100, Pierre Saramito wrote: > Many thanks for your rewrite and modernization > of the Debian files for the Rheolef package in rheolef-6.7-5. You are welcome. > For build time tests to run correctly, > I have now to patch these files, > but I

Re: console-bridge_0.4.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Thanks Thorsten for catching the error. In fact the gtest sources should not be there so I added support for repacking them correctly excluding the gtest sources. https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/console-bridge/commit/eef5cae8c302f16a422abb16e7e3b431c3a488f7 @Andreas, I think that I need

Re: My name is Jessica U. Meir,From Maine, United States. An ARMY officer. Please can we be friends?

-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: muszę usłyszeć od Ciebie

Mój przyjaciel Proszę przyjąć moje szczere przeprosiny, jeśli mój mail nie spełnia Twoje osobiste etyki. To jest moja trzecia wiadomość wysyłam do Ciebie, i starali się skontaktować się z wami po naszej ostatniej dyskusji, ale nie mógł dotrzeć, proszę zezwolić mi na doradztwo banku do drutu

Processed: Re: severity of 889189 is normal

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 889189 normal Bug #889189 [inventor-doc] inventor-doc is empty Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 889189:

Processed: Re: severity of 889189 is normal

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 889189 grave Bug #889189 [inventor-doc] inventor-doc is empty Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 889189:

Re: RFS: pytables 3.4.2-3 (closes RC bug #888177)

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:01:17AM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 3.4.2-3 of the pytables [1,2]. > The new version includes a fix for the RC bug #888177, and also #876841, > #664441 and #877277. Uploaded, thanks for your contribution. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀

Re: 3Depict : upload request, bug #876620

that option myself. > > > > I've pushed the history-rewritten changes, so the tag upstream/0.0.20 > > should now generate a byte-identical tarball. I've also re-tested this > > under cowbuilder. > > Thanks for your effort. Unfortunately something is still wrong, because there

Processed: Re: Bug#888912: sagemath test failures with mpfr 4.0.0 and several architectures

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 888459 888911 Bug #888912 [src:sagemath] sagemath test failures with mpfr 4.0.0 and several architectures 888912 was not blocked by any bugs. 888912 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 888912: 888459 and 888911 -- 888912:

RE: Business Proposal

Hello Dear, How are you today? I have an urgent business transaction to discuss with you, kindly contact me via my Google mail: mrsjanezh...@gmail.com for more details. Mrs Lin.? ? [http://getsetforthegames.com/] Be part

Processed: Re: Bug#888661: "configure: error: glm/glm.hpp not found. install glm" although libglm-dev is installed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 888661 src:glm Bug #888661 {Done: r...@rene-engelhard.de (Rene Engelhard)} [src:libreoffice] FTBFS: glm/glm.hpp: present but cannot be compiled Bug reassigned from package 'src:libreoffice' to 'src:glm'. No longer marked as found in

Processed: Re: paraview: segfaults when performing query-based selections

Processing control commands: > found -1 paraview/5.4.1+dfsg3-1 Bug #837796 [paraview] paraview: segfaults when performing query-based selections Marked as found in versions paraview/5.4.1+dfsg3-1. -- 837796: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837796 Debian Bug Tracking System

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >