Am 15.02.2023 um 08:21 schrieb DdB:
> $ awk --version
> GNU Awk 4.2.1, API: 2.0 (GNU MPFR 4.0.2, GNU MP 6.1.2)
> Copyright © 1989, 1991-2018 Free Software Foundation.
even mawk would. see:
$ mawk -W version
compiled limits:
max NF 32767
sprintf buffer 2040
$ echo "Adams, Fred,
Le 15 février 2023 gene heskett a écrit :
> gene@bpi54:~$ grep -i bpi54 /etc/hosts
> 192.168.71.12 bpi54.coyote.denbpi54
> gene@bpi54:~$ getent hosts bpi54
> fe80::4765:bca4:565d:3c6 bpi54
> gene@bpi54:~$ ping -c1 coyote (this machines alias in /etc/hosts)
> ping: coyote: Name or
Am 15.02.2023 um 07:25 schrieb Albretch Mueller:
> $ _L="Adams, Fred, and Ken Aizawa \"The Bounds of Cognition\""
> echo "// __ \$_L: |${_L}|"
> _AR=($(echo "${_L}" | awk -F'\"' '{for (i=1; i<=NF; i++) print $i}' ))
> _AR_L=${#_AR[@]}
> echo "// __ \$_AR_L: |${_AR_L}|"
> for(( _IX=0; _IX<${_AR_L};
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:11:02 +0100
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:36:12PM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I find the trend disturbing. If you have a lot of apps running, and
> > they're all these types of packages, you're going to be using
> > considerably more
Once again one of my silly problems ;-). I search and search for an
answer/the reason why this is happening.
$ _L="Adams, Fred, and Ken Aizawa \"The Bounds of Cognition\""
echo "// __ \$_L: |${_L}|"
_AR=($(echo "${_L}" | awk -F'\"' '{for (i=1; i<=NF; i++) print $i}' ))
_AR_L=${#_AR[@]}
echo "//
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:36:12PM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
[...]
> I find the trend disturbing. If you have a lot of apps running, and
> they're all these types of packages, you're going to be using
> considerably more memory [...]
I'm not a friend of flatpaks and similar
On 2/14/23 18:12, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 05:51:52PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Already done that a month or so ago, to satisfy my own curiosity, the answer
is yes host lookups did fail again without it.
And just to make sure, I just went to it, removed the lsattr i, from
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 23:55:03 +0100
Oliver Schoede wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 09:35:34 -0500
> wrote:
>
> >Am I correct in assuming that package formats like Flatpak, Snap and
> >Appimage, because they package up everything with the executable,
> >would consume more system memory?
[snip]
>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 05:51:52PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> Already done that a month or so ago, to satisfy my own curiosity, the answer
> is yes host lookups did fail again without it.
>
> And just to make sure, I just went to it, removed the lsattr i, from
> resolv.conf, commented that line
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 09:35:34 -0500
wrote:
>Am I correct in assuming that package formats like Flatpak, Snap and
>Appimage, because they package up everything with the executable, would
>consume more system memory? One of the reasons to use these formats is
>to avoid library version mismatches,
On 2/14/23 15:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 03:01:18PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:02:22PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Yes Greg, you keep telling me that. But I'm in the process of bringing
up a 3dprinter farm, each printer with a bpi5 to manage
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 03:01:18PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:02:22PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > Yes Greg, you keep telling me that. But I'm in the process of bringing
> > up a 3dprinter farm, each printer with a bpi5 to manage octoprint. Joing
> > the other 4 on
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 02:33:12PM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023, jeremy ardley wrote:
you can ping them as in
ping fe80::87d:c6ff:fea4:a6fc
ooh, I didn't know that worked.
Same as
ping fe80::87d:c6ff:fea4:a6fc%eth0
on my machines at least. No idea how it picks the
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 03:02:22PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Yes Greg, you keep telling me that. But I'm in the process of bringing
up a 3dprinter farm, each printer with a bpi5 to manage octoprint.
Joing the other 4 on this net running buster and linuxcnc.
Just last week I added another
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:42:59PM +, Brian wrote:
I was attracted by this idea and it gave me pause for
thought. Leaving aside printers that include a network
interface, the IPP-over-USB standard applies to a
non-network-capable printer.
The specs require IPP (put in firmware, I suppose)
On 2/14/23 10:49, David Wright wrote:
Wisely done: we don't need it twice … and logs can be lengthy.
I have seen the 169.254.xxx.yyy on my system, too.
It is a Debian Bullseye. To check if Debian works on this hardware I
have simply select the xfce4 option in the installer. Either the avahi
Am Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:48:11AM -0600 schrieb David Wright:
Hello David,
> On Mon 13 Feb 2023 at 11:39:31 (+0100), Christoph Brinkhaus wrote:
> > Am Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 09:29:16PM -0600 schrieb David Wright:
> > > On Fri 10 Feb 2023 at 06:40:42 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > On
to...@tuxteam.de writes:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 07:20:17PM +0100, Linux-Fan wrote:
[...]
> ~~~
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/vinetto", line 418, in
>print(" " + TNid + " " + TNtimestamp + " " + TNname)
> TypeError: can only concatenate str (not "bytes") to str
>
gene heskett composed on 2023-02-14 08:21 (UTC-0500):
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:07:58 (UTC-0500), gene heskett wrote:
>>> Are you saying that this printer has been sitting on the Staples display for
>>> 5 years when I bought it new about when it first showed up there
David Wright (12023-02-14):
> > lsusb -v > /tmp/1
> > sudo lsusb -v > /tmp/2
> > diff -u /tmp/1 /tmp/2
> Irrespective of the lines that interested Brian, how did your system
> manage to produce no output
I copy-pasted only the commands, not their output.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
On Tue 14 Feb 2023 at 13:32:37 (+0100), Nicolas George wrote:
> Brian (12023-02-14):
> > > FWIW, if you invoke lsusb with the -v option, you need
> > > some superpowers. So better "sudo lsusb -v".
> > I do not believe that to be the case.
>
> experiment > belief
>
> lsusb -v > /tmp/1
> sudo
On Mon 13 Feb 2023 at 11:39:31 (+0100), Christoph Brinkhaus wrote:
> Am Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 09:29:16PM -0600 schrieb David Wright:
>
> please excuse the late reply. I have had a side discussion with Tomas
> in German about the issue I observed, too.
>
> > On Fri 10 Feb 2023 at 06:40:42 (+0100),
> Network printers from 2016 almost certainly (always in my
> experience) do ship with IPP-over-USB. For some reason USB-only
> devices generally do not provide it; it's very hit-and-miss.
IPP-over-USB basically requires the whole traditional networking stack,
so it's no surprise that it's
On 2/14/23 07:58, Brian wrote:
[...]
Brother HL-L2320D L2300D best budget laser printer review
https://www.youtube.com › watch
7:51
A quick demonstration and review of the Brother HL-L2320D laser printer.Buy it
on Amazon here: http://amzn.to/2haHDsdOr buy the similar ...
YouTube ·
On Tue 14 Feb 2023 at 14:02:05 +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Greg Wooledge (12023-02-14):
> > It's certainly more than "the error messages went away".
>
> Yes, but Reco was smarter than us, with the "> /dev/null".
OK, my belief, backed up by experience, is that sudo is
not needed to obtain the
On 2/14/23 07:21, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:07:58AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
On 2/14/23 06:29, Brian wrote:
Anyway, this USB-only printer from 2016 does not provide
an IPP-over-USB service. This is not unexpected.
Are you saying that this printer has been sitting on
Greg Wooledge (12023-02-14):
> It's certainly more than "the error messages went away".
Yes, but Reco was smarter than us, with the "> /dev/null".
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 03:37:58PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> lsusb -v >/dev/null
>
> sudo lsusb -v >/dev/null
>
>
> First one shows: "Couldn't open device, some information will be
> missing". Second one does not.
diff -u <(lsusb -v 2>&1) <(sudo lsusb -v 2>&1) | less
gives me 252 lines of diff
On Tue 14 Feb 2023 at 07:21:00 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:07:58AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > On 2/14/23 06:29, Brian wrote:
> > > Anyway, this USB-only printer from 2016 does not provide
> > > an IPP-over-USB service. This is not unexpected.
> > >
> > Are you
Hi.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 01:32:37PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> Brian (12023-02-14):
> > > FWIW, if you invoke lsusb with the -v option, you need
> > > some superpowers. So better "sudo lsusb -v".
> > I do not believe that to be the case.
>
> experiment > belief
Indeed.
lsusb -v
Brian (12023-02-14):
> > FWIW, if you invoke lsusb with the -v option, you need
> > some superpowers. So better "sudo lsusb -v".
> I do not believe that to be the case.
experiment > belief
lsusb -v > /tmp/1
sudo lsusb -v > /tmp/2
diff -u /tmp/1 /tmp/2
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:07:58AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 2/14/23 06:29, Brian wrote:
> > Anyway, this USB-only printer from 2016 does not provide
> > an IPP-over-USB service. This is not unexpected.
> >
> Are you saying that this printer has been sitting on the Staples display for
> 5
Nicolas George writes:
> Nicolas George (12020-02-19):
>> 8<8<8<8< xi2watch.c >8>8>8>8
>
> Hi.
>
> I am replying to my own mail of three years ago where I explained how to
> configure X11 to set different layouts on different keyboards and handle
>
On 2/14/23 06:29, Brian wrote:
On Tue 14 Feb 2023 at 06:23:34 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 04:04:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
On 2/13/23 14:10, Brian wrote:
lsusb -v | grep -A 3 bInterfaceClass.*7
FWIW, if you invoke lsusb with the -v option, you need
some
Hola Roberto, muchas gracias por tu respuesta.
El dom, 12 feb 2023 a la(s) 04:27, Roberto J. Blandino Cisneros
(rojobland...@gmail.com) escribió:
>
> No, he tenido experiencia con ese.
> Sin embargo depende de lo que deseas realizar, si es realizar una
> sincronización entre dos equipos
On Tue 14 Feb 2023 at 06:23:34 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 04:04:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > On 2/13/23 14:10, Brian wrote:
> > > lsusb -v | grep -A 3 bInterfaceClass.*7
>
> FWIW, if you invoke lsusb with the -v option, you need
> some superpowers. So better
--- Original Message ---
Le lundi 13 février 2023 à 09:51, ptilou a écrit :
>
> Bonjour,
>
Bonjour,
> Je ne suis pas venu m’engueler avec qui que ce soit , je demande comment
> utiliser gcc pour compiler davinci resolve, on me parle de virus ?
>
Ben en fait je crois que le
--- Original Message ---
Le dimanche 12 février 2023 à 15:41, ajh-valmer a écrit :
>
>
> On Sunday 12 February 2023 12:46:30 ptilou wrote:
>
> > Je me demande pourquoi tu dis ca avec cette signature,
> > deja que ceu qui sont dans les petit papier me disent avoir
> > 2 tiers d
Bonjour,
Le 2023-02-13 17:39, Romain P. a écrit :
La commande " dpkg -l | awk '/libc-bin/ {print $2,$3}'" renvoie
"libc-bin 2.28-10+deb10u2".
Les 3 commandes contenant "apt" renvoient
"GLIBC_2.34" et "GLIBC_2.35" "not found".
Le système a donc toujours une libc (bonne nouvelle) mais la
39 matches
Mail list logo
