DdB composed on 2023-02-16 07:44 (UTC+0100):
> I do use (NVMe-) SSD, and i did partition it.
> I did it to make sure, pages/partitions start on PHYSICAL boundaries,
> not the logical ones reported to satisfy Windooze.
What physical boundaries do SSDs have to report? All I know about that are
Am 16.02.2023 um 07:44 schrieb DdB:
> I do use (NVMe-) SSD, and i did partition it.
> I did it to make sure, pages/partitions start on PHYSICAL boundaries,
> not the logical ones reported to satisfy Windooze. Not every model
> reports correct hardware parameters to the OS.
>
> What i would
Am 15.02.2023 um 23:58 schrieb PMA:
> Dear Debian,
>
> I'm preparing to install Debian 11.5.0 on a new computer.
> Its drives are SSDs, not the HDDs I've been accustomed
> to and have always fastidiously *partitioned*.
>
> With my file groupings already well differentiated c/o
> directory-tree
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:23:52PM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
Here's why you would partition a drive. Reinstalling (which I end up
having to do every time Debian comes out with a new version) means
overwriting the storage.
I already acknowleged that people can do what they want
Hello,
16 févr. 2023, 02:12 de ghe2...@pm.me:
> I run needrestart when there's a little updating available, and it always
> says it can't update the CPU microcode. Add -v and it says:
>
>
> [main] needrestart v3.5
> ...
> [ucode] using NeedRestart::uCode::Intel
> [ucode] using
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:45:49 -0500
Michael Stone wrote:
>
> I don't personally think there's a point in partitioning any storage
> device on a user system these days beyond what's required to boot. If
> you want to do more, that's a personal preference. Being an SSD
> doesn't really change
On 2/15/23 14:58, PMA wrote:
Dear Debian,
I'm preparing to install Debian 11.5.0 on a new computer.
Please tell us about the computer, the environment it will be deployed
in (including Internet access or none), and the role of the computer.
Its drives are SSDs, not the HDDs I've been
On 15/02/2023 22:58, PMA wrote:
is there any further advantage
to be had in partitioning *these* drives?
Although some people still prefer to leave about 20% of a SSD as raw
unpartitioned space, so SSD can spare/level out sectors to that empty
space, this is IMO on longer necessary, as you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Debian: Bullseye, Box: SuperMicro, CPU: 2.4G 8 core Intel Xeon
I run needrestart when there's a little updating available, and it always says
it can't update the CPU microcode. Add -v and it says:
[main] needrestart v3.5
...
[ucode] using
On 16/2/23 07:45, Michael Stone wrote:
I don't personally think there's a point in partitioning any storage
device on a user system these days beyond what's required to boot. If
you want to do more, that's a personal preference. Being an SSD
doesn't really change things.
I agree with
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:49:51AM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 03:07:08PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 02:33:12PM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2023, jeremy ardley wrote:
> > you can ping them as in
> >
> > ping
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 05:58:47PM -0500, PMA wrote:
I'm preparing to install Debian 11.5.0 on a new computer.
Its drives are SSDs, not the HDDs I've been accustomed
to and have always fastidiously *partitioned*.
With my file groupings already well differentiated c/o
directory-tree layout, is
Dear Debian,
I'm preparing to install Debian 11.5.0 on a new computer.
Its drives are SSDs, not the HDDs I've been accustomed
to and have always fastidiously *partitioned*.
With my file groupings already well differentiated c/o
directory-tree layout, is there any further advantage
to be had in
On 2/15/23 17:05, Felix Miata wrote:
gene heskett composed on 2023-02-15 16:24 (UTC-0500):
I've got around 5 machines
Every one of them has had avahi removed by a root rm, and has some
variation of this in an /etc/resolv.conf that is a real file, before the
local network worked.
Do you
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 04:24:36PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
you basically just made this up
No Michael, just recalling our interaction history, the general tone
being to give me hell for using hosts files instead of running a dns.
I have not told you that you need to use bind instead of
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 05:05:42PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> gene heskett composed on 2023-02-15 16:24 (UTC-0500):
>
> > I've got around 5 machines
> > Every one of them has had avahi removed by a root rm, and has some
> > variation of this in an /etc/resolv.conf that is a real file,
gene heskett composed on 2023-02-15 16:24 (UTC-0500):
> I've got around 5 machines
> Every one of them has had avahi removed by a root rm, and has some
> variation of this in an /etc/resolv.conf that is a real file, before the
> local network worked.
Do you have TDE on none of these
On 2/15/23 13:08, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:30:57AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
True. But I'd also suggest that if you do not want to support
/etc/hosts files name resolution methods
/etc/hosts works and has worked fine on debian for decades
I've got around 5 machines
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:07:29PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:30:57AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > True. But I'd also suggest that if you do not want to support /etc/hosts
> > files name resolution methods
>
> /etc/hosts works and has worked fine on debian for
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:12:32AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Sorry, Gene's line was actually "search hosts, nameserver".
So, "ping coyote" should have triggered name resolution for "coyote.hosts"
and/or "coyote.nameserver".
It's just barely conceivable that *something* might have created a
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 09:30:57AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
True. But I'd also suggest that if you do not want to support
/etc/hosts files name resolution methods
/etc/hosts works and has worked fine on debian for decades
to. Your attitude that everybody with a two machine home network
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 03:21:08PM +0200, Alexander Procenko wrote:
> Hi
> https://forum.qt.io/topic/142922/qt-5-15-4-and-upper-nvidia-driver-340-108-segmentation-fault-of-all-qt-soft
>
> freeartist-devuan@home:~$ reportbug
> Please enter the name of the package in which you have found a problem,
> I'm not a friend of flatpaks and similar concepts, either. For me,
> it's not memory use, but the shifting of power from a distrubution
> model to single applications. I find that makes software less "free".
Indeed. These end up reproducing the black-box model "it just works".
If you like
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:04:14AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> The part I still don't understand is how adding "search files, nameserver"
> to /etc/resolv.conf and rebooting could change the behavior of any of
> Gene's commands.
Sorry, Gene's line was actually "search hosts, nameserver".
So,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 08:34:49AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:30:44AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > That said, I'm curious about this part oF Gene's result:
> >
> > > > gene@bpi54:~$ grep -i bpi54 /etc/hosts
> > > > 192.168.71.12 bpi54.coyote.den
On 2/15/23 09:20, Charles Curley wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:57:09 -0500
gene heskett wrote:
192.168.71.4sixty40.coyote.den sixty40
192.168.71.7vna.coyote.deb vna
I think you have a typo in the line for vna.
Correct, Charles, but that machine died 2
On 2/15/23 08:41, Michael Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:57:09AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
And this disclosed that I had not properly added coyote.coyote.den to
the /etc/hosts file on that machine. That mistake, fixed, now makes
the local net pingable. The rest of it, whats powered
Hi folks,
I do not know, if someone did notice this too:
I am using kmail (version 5.15.3 and running into this issue, that kmail is
crashing, when there is a mail with an attachement,
As long as I any other mail is active (clicked on and reading), nothing
happens, but as soon as I click
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:57:09 -0500
gene heskett wrote:
> 192.168.71.4 sixty40.coyote.den sixty40
> 192.168.71.7 vna.coyote.deb vna
I think you have a typo in the line for vna.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 03:46:21PM +0300, Reco wrote:
libnss-myhostname does that.
Why it chooses ipv6 link-local over ipv4 static IP is another question.
perhaps because ipv6 is preferred and there is no public ip6. it doesn't
really matter because normal users won't notice or care whether
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:57:09AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
And this disclosed that I had not properly added coyote.coyote.den to
the /etc/hosts file on that machine. That mistake, fixed, now makes
the local net pingable. The rest of it, whats powered up, was/is all
pingable. It just wasn't
Hi
https://forum.qt.io/topic/142922/qt-5-15-4-and-upper-nvidia-driver-340-108-segmentation-fault-of-all-qt-soft
freeartist-devuan@home:~$ reportbug
Please enter the name of the package in which you have found a problem, or
type
'other' to report a more general problem. If you don't know what
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:30:44AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
That said, I'm curious about this part oF Gene's result:
> gene@bpi54:~$ grep -i bpi54 /etc/hosts
> 192.168.71.12 bpi54.coyote.denbpi54
> gene@bpi54:~$ getent hosts bpi54
> fe80::4765:bca4:565d:3c6 bpi54
On 2/15/23 07:31, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 08:30:08AM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote:
Le 15 février 2023 gene heskett a écrit :
gene@bpi54:~$ grep -i bpi54 /etc/hosts
192.168.71.12 bpi54.coyote.denbpi54
gene@bpi54:~$ getent hosts bpi54
Hi.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:30:44AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> That said, I'm curious about this part oF Gene's result:
>
> > > gene@bpi54:~$ grep -i bpi54 /etc/hosts
> > > 192.168.71.12 bpi54.coyote.denbpi54
> > > gene@bpi54:~$ getent hosts bpi54
> > >
On 2/15/23 02:30, Michel Verdier wrote:
Le 15 février 2023 gene heskett a écrit :
gene@bpi54:~$ grep -i bpi54 /etc/hosts
192.168.71.12 bpi54.coyote.denbpi54
gene@bpi54:~$ getent hosts bpi54
fe80::4765:bca4:565d:3c6 bpi54
gene@bpi54:~$ ping -c1 coyote (this machines alias in
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 12:09:28PM +, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> On 2/15/23, DdB wrote:
> > $ echo "Adams, Fred, and Ken Aizawa \"The Bounds of Cognition\"" | awk
> > -F'\"' '{for (i=1; i<=NF; i++) print $i;}'
> > Adams, Fred, and Ken Aizawa
> > The Bounds of Cognition
>
> yes and this also
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 08:30:08AM +0100, Michel Verdier wrote:
> Le 15 février 2023 gene heskett a écrit :
>
> > gene@bpi54:~$ grep -i bpi54 /etc/hosts
> > 192.168.71.12 bpi54.coyote.denbpi54
> > gene@bpi54:~$ getent hosts bpi54
> > fe80::4765:bca4:565d:3c6 bpi54
> >
On 2/15/23, DdB wrote:
> $ echo "Adams, Fred, and Ken Aizawa \"The Bounds of Cognition\"" | awk
> -F'\"' '{for (i=1; i<=NF; i++) print $i;}'
> Adams, Fred, and Ken Aizawa
> The Bounds of Cognition
yes and this also works:
_L="Adams, Fred, and Ken Aizawa \"The Bounds of Cognition\""
echo
Hey!
Won't go to foss-north 2023 myself this year, got other things to do
that also costs money so sadly can't afford it this year
On 1/16/23, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Luna Jernberg]
>> Hello Debian friends!
>>
>> The Community day for foss-north 2023: https://foss-north.se/2023/ has
>>
Hey!
Won't go to foss-north 2023 myself this year, got other things to do
that also costs money so sadly can't afford it this year
On 1/16/23, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Luna Jernberg]
>> Hello Debian friends!
>>
>> The Community day for foss-north 2023: https://foss-north.se/2023/ has
>>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 03:07:08PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 02:33:12PM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Feb 2023, jeremy ardley wrote:
> > > you can ping them as in
> > >
> > > ping fe80::87d:c6ff:fea4:a6fc
> > >
> >
> > ooh, I didn't know that worked.
> >
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 18:22, DdB
wrote:
> Am 15.02.2023 um 07:25 schrieb Albretch Mueller:
> > $ _L="Adams, Fred, and Ken Aizawa \"The Bounds of Cognition\""
> > echo "// __ \$_L: |${_L}|"
> > _AR=($(echo "${_L}" | awk -F'\"' '{for (i=1; i<=NF; i++) print $i}' ))
> > _AR_L=${#_AR[@]}
> > echo
to...@tuxteam.de (12023-02-15):
> I'm not a friend of flatpaks and similar concepts, either. For me,
> it's not memory use, but the shifting of power from a distrubution
> model to single applications. I find that makes software less "free".
>
> In a distro, applications have to get along with
44 matches
Mail list logo
